LoveNig

1.9K posts

LoveNig banner
LoveNig

LoveNig

@lovenig2012

Rationality is so scarce that most people on the Internet tend to reinforce their pre-existing perceptions and biases.

Hongkong Katılım Kasım 2012
240 Takip Edilen42 Takipçiler
小牛
小牛@Xiaoniu6161·
特朗普儿媳妇 ins上发的照片☺️ 看看国宴餐具和无糖可乐罐装。
小牛 tweet media小牛 tweet media
中文
281
110
2.8K
1.5M
LoveNig
LoveNig@lovenig2012·
@Mont_Jiang His parents are from Zhejiang, just like TSMC's founder, Morris Chang, who also hails from Zhejiang. The province with the highest average IQ in China.
English
0
0
7
557
LoveNig
LoveNig@lovenig2012·
@kejimao And in India's nationalist narrative,CN is the enemy, an enemy even worse than Britain and PK. How could a scholar from the enemy possibly give India good advice?The more you advise,the more they feel you're insulting them.They'll use more radical rhetoric to defend India's honor
English
0
0
0
13
LoveNig
LoveNig@lovenig2012·
@kejimao What Indians fantasize about is that Americans need India to counter China, and that India can also rely on American capital and technology to fight back against China. So they'll reject your arguments,it's like talking to a wall.
English
1
0
0
52
Keji Mao (毛克疾)
India is already facing serious pressure on its balance of payment: Oil prices have risen recently, remittances from overseas Indians have fallen, and foreign capital has been fleeing the country. On top of that, as an emerging economy, capital is the scarcest resource it needs for its development anyway. So why are Indian companies still committing to huge investments in the United States? It seems the US really treats India as its “blood bag”—a source to suck blood from and keep itself alive. Through a series of geopolitical maneuvers that were not aimed at India but weakened India greatly anyway, Washington made it much easier to do three things: 1) sell high-priced oil and natural gas to India; 2) sell expensive weapons systems to India; and 3) squeeze out large investment commitments from Indian tycoons. in.usembassy.gov/record-20-5-bi…
English
52
329
859
64.2K
LoveNig
LoveNig@lovenig2012·
@kejimao Lack of shame, hatred, and self-reflection that are part of East Asian culture.Vietnam has been influenced by Chinese culture for two thousand years, so its elites are more likely to reflect on themselves and listen to constructive criticism.
English
0
0
1
36
LoveNig
LoveNig@lovenig2012·
@kejimao Your criticism essentially insults India's culture of honor-Izzat. So essentially, when they argue with you, they're defending their own honor. Party politics and votes only make this situation worse.A country at India's level of development should be self-reflective and critical
English
3
0
3
229
Keji Mao (毛克疾)
Many years ago, I gave two presentations on how China builds its industrial and technological ecosystem—one for an Indian audience and one for a Vietnamese audience. Although the content was largely the same and went into many details that were rarely mentioned in other settings, the feedback from the Vietnamese and Indian participants was strikingly different. When I discussed the gaps between Vietnam and China, my Vietnamese friends listened very attentively to my analysis of Vietnam’s weaknesses. They even proactively acknowledged Vietnam’s deficiencies and asked me to analyze more specific issues in greater detail. However, when I compared China and India, many Indian friends became quite argumentative. They tried to compete with or challenge the Chinese perspective on almost every point, to the point where I could barely develop my analysis. As a result, they might have won the debate, but missed a valuable opportunity to have a meaningful exchange. So, I came to know which country would be the real winner for "China+1" many years beforehand.
Keji Mao (毛克疾) tweet mediaKeji Mao (毛克疾) tweet media
English
164
441
1.9K
164.4K
LoveNig
LoveNig@lovenig2012·
@kejimao And what prevails in India is more of an arrogance that goes against its level of development. Perhaps in Indian culture, reflection and introspection are considered behaviors of the weak,the strong are always glorious, right, and great.
English
0
0
1
33
LoveNig
LoveNig@lovenig2012·
@ChristoMalloo Russia is also planning to bring in a large number of Indian workers, which will only make Indians look even worse in the eyes of Russians. It's pretty much the same as the anti-Indian sentiment sweeping the West right now.
English
0
0
0
173
Chris
Chris@ChristoMalloo·
While Russians write flattering things in English to appease Indians, you need to look at what they write in Russian to understand their true mindset. Just look at the comments on Russian YouTube channels for proof. Try searching for terms like Индия (India) or индийцы (Indians).
Chris tweet media
The Diplomat@Diplomat_APAC

One study found that 40 percent of all pro-Russia posts on Twitter globally came from Indian users. Why all the love? buff.ly/AajIR1U

English
84
316
2.7K
117.8K
LoveNig
LoveNig@lovenig2012·
@okaythenfuture Plus, the extreme corruption in FIFA and AFC has also affected the fairness and justice of the games. Football might become less and less popular in the future as people have more gaming options to choose from.
English
0
0
2
1.2K
OK Then
OK Then@okaythenfuture·
Its not just China alone, FIFA is having an extremely hard time closing the deal with Southeast Asian countries + India as well, FIFA honestly could have scheduled the games a bit later into the American evening, but it chose to privilege European viewers so it'll have to live with the L.
OK Then tweet media
English
22
68
1.7K
172.3K
OK Then
OK Then@okaythenfuture·
FIFA went to China demanding $300 million, CCTV told FIFA you scheduled nearly all the games from 12 AM to 6 AM East Asian time, why on earth would we pay that much? FIFA then came back around begging for $150 million. CCTV told them $60 million or bounce, GTFO. Excellent negotiation skills in practice. And also a sign on how excessive eurocentrism will lead you to having constant Ls in the modern era.
Polymarket Sports@PolymarketSport

🚨REPORT: FIFA has settled on a broadcasting deal with China for $60M just 27 days out from the tournament FIFA originally wanted $300M for the deal

English
276
3.7K
27.6K
2.9M
LoveNig
LoveNig@lovenig2012·
@HARJGTHEONEDBA @Its_ereko If you merged with India, Canada could become a superpower, India was already a superpower in 2020. Good luck to you.A superpower with a population of 1.5 billion,no one in the world can compete with you.
English
1
0
1
61
HARJGTHEONE DBA
HARJGTHEONE DBA@HARJGTHEONEDBA·
The population of Canada is going to explode with Rise of H, - could easily add 100 million people quickly. So Canada will not be marginal and if USA would listen to me it should do a deal with Canada to merge with USA. Trump is too busy bombing Iran to help is Jewish friends rather than merge Canada.
English
1
0
0
127
New Direction AFRICA
New Direction AFRICA@Its_ereko·
China became a superpower because of: 1. The 1949 revolution that ended foreign domination 2. Land reform that broke the old landlord class 3. Industrialization driven by Chinese planning, not foreign aid 4. Massive investment in education and healthcare in the 1950s-70s 5. Strategic opening on China's own terms post-1978 The US never "invested" in China to make it strong. American companies came to China to make themselves richer, not China powerful. Cheap labor. Weak environmental rules. Tax breaks. That was the deal. China took those crumbs and built its own banks, its own supply chains, its own technology. Huawei. BYD. TSMC. High-speed rail. Beidou satellites. None of that came from US charity. Meanwhile, look at countries that actually relied on US "investment" as the main strategy. The Philippines. Mexico. Egypt. Where are their superpower statuses? The revolution created the foundation. Chinese discipline built the rest. The US was just an accidental landlord collecting rent until the tenant bought the building.
Adémọ́lá.@OgbeniDemola

No, China did not become a superpower because of ‘US investment’ China became a superpower because of the Chinese revolution in the 1950s.

English
261
1.3K
4.8K
237.4K
LoveNig
LoveNig@lovenig2012·
@HARJGTHEONEDBA @Its_ereko Anyway, it has nothing to do with Canada being a marginal country. Whether China or the US declines, you'll still be a marginal country. Why worry about stuff that has nothing to do with you? Just enjoy your life.
English
1
0
2
107
HARJGTHEONE DBA
HARJGTHEONE DBA@HARJGTHEONEDBA·
@lovenig2012 @Its_ereko China has more AI patents than any country. The problem for China is it’s still early in the AI race and what is coming down the road will make their patents useless. China will fall with the rise of Truth of H. It will have to submit to Truth of H.
English
1
0
0
240
枫糖小猫
枫糖小猫@Konekoutena·
大前研一在著作低智商社会里写到日本人是集体智慧最低的国家,日本人往往缺乏质疑和批判的能力,不会独立思考,只会随着媒体宣传而跟风行动。电视上大多也播放那些劣质的搞笑节目,除了娱乐以外毫无价值。日本人惰于思考,习惯于考虑手头的小事,而对三米之外的事漠不关心。这就导致日本可能有卓越的个体,但形成集体就会表现得极为愚蠢。而到了现代,人口和资源已经不再是国家经济发展最核心的竞争力,决定一个国家发展的是国民的思考能力。那些拥有集体智慧的国家,会在新一轮竞争中脱颖而出,而日本因为缺乏集体智慧,而且智能状况还在持续恶化,因而前景堪忧。本书写到,现代政治选举就是集体智慧的集大成体现,而日本人在政治方面表现得非常愚蠢。写这本书时,日本还没有进入民主党时代。那时他已经看到了日本的隐患。而现在高市早苗的上台,就是这种集体愚蠢最集中的表现。这么多年日本非但没有改善,而且越来越愚蠢了
中文
35
158
629
25.4K
LoveNig
LoveNig@lovenig2012·
@teortaxesTex What Singapore really lacks is a startup environment and culture. People tend to go to well-known companies for stability, so there's no entrepreneurial ecosystem and not enough talent.
English
0
0
3
291
Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞)
It's really funny that this doesn't happen, while actual Mainland Chinese use Singapore as a proxy hub and offshore compute cluster. One can say "but capital" – Singapore has more than enough capital to spawn one Moonshot or StepFun. Enough talent too. And yet.
Max Lv@m0d8ye

假设一家新加坡的大模型公司基于 Deepseek v4 的架构和 know-how,并在拥有足够算力的基础上训练出了 5T 规模的 open weight model。并且这家公司里碰巧全是华人。那么会发生什么呢?

English
10
6
119
11.6K
LoveNig
LoveNig@lovenig2012·
@8teAPi Indians succeeding in the US hasn't led to Indians overthrowing the Indian government.
English
0
0
0
125
LoveNig
LoveNig@lovenig2012·
@Noahpinion @kejimao A high manufacturing GDP share and global competitiveness are two different things.
English
0
0
7
204
Keji Mao (毛克疾)
While technological drift represents Japan's forward-looking failure, the collapse of its manufacturing base reveals the hollowing out of its historical foundation. For decades, Japan's economic identity was inseparable from its industrial prowess—steel, ships, automobiles, and electronics that conquered global markets and symbolized national resurgence. However, in consumer electronics and telecommunications, the fall has been precipitous and humiliating. The corporate titans of the feature-phone era—Panasonic, Sony, Sharp—once commanded global markets with an authority that seemed unassailable. In the smartphone age, they have been reduced to bit players, their brands acquired by foreign competitors or relegated to niche markets where nostalgia, not innovation, sustains demand. The transformation of these former champions into cautionary tales of technological myopia has been one of the most dramatic corporate narratives of the past two decades.
Keji Mao (毛克疾)@kejimao

In the past few weeks, I've been reviewing Japan's technological and industrial development. I feel that the most striking feature of Japan's relative decline is its accelerating detachment from the global technological mainstream. In the defining frontier domains of the 21st century—green energy, artificial intelligence, digital transformation, unmanned aerial systems, and humanoid robotics—Japan has not merely fallen behind; it has failed to establish any meaningful presence at all. The world once expected Japan to leverage its strengths in precision manufacturing, advanced materials, and industrial robotics to achieve seamless upgrading into these new domains. That expectation has been dashed. Instead of smooth transitions, Japan has produced strategic lags—gaps between its capabilities and the demands of the next industrial revolution that grow wider with each passing year. The country that gave the world the Walkman and the bullet train now struggles to produce a globally competitive smartphone operating system or a dominant AI model. This is not a cyclical lag; it is civilizational drift.

English
12
22
136
15.9K
LoveNig
LoveNig@lovenig2012·
@kejimao Actually, Europe has this trend too, but not as bad as in Japan.Europe's excessive regulation, bureaucracy, and high taxes have stifled large-scale adoption of innovation.
English
0
0
0
245
Keji Mao (毛克疾)
In the past few weeks, I've been reviewing Japan's technological and industrial development. I feel that the most striking feature of Japan's relative decline is its accelerating detachment from the global technological mainstream. In the defining frontier domains of the 21st century—green energy, artificial intelligence, digital transformation, unmanned aerial systems, and humanoid robotics—Japan has not merely fallen behind; it has failed to establish any meaningful presence at all. The world once expected Japan to leverage its strengths in precision manufacturing, advanced materials, and industrial robotics to achieve seamless upgrading into these new domains. That expectation has been dashed. Instead of smooth transitions, Japan has produced strategic lags—gaps between its capabilities and the demands of the next industrial revolution that grow wider with each passing year. The country that gave the world the Walkman and the bullet train now struggles to produce a globally competitive smartphone operating system or a dominant AI model. This is not a cyclical lag; it is civilizational drift.
English
35
54
332
77K
HARJGTHEONE DBA
HARJGTHEONE DBA@HARJGTHEONEDBA·
You live in a dream world. China was known to copy everything in the west and that is what they did - cheaper, thus they stole ideas, copied and built and that is how they rose. Meanwhile they trained their population with the money that they received and controlled them so they listened by keeping communism and strong socialism.
English
31
0
13
3.5K
LoveNig
LoveNig@lovenig2012·
@datasuki_intj 他们基本上不会也不能阅读第一手的中英文消息。日本的二传手媒体基本上报道的都是中国的负面消息,这种认知不奇怪,根据民意调查,日本是世界上对华负面印象最高的国家。
中文
0
0
18
2.6K
LoveNig
LoveNig@lovenig2012·
@leiyilu @asianmomriot @Telegraph 就是在英国的一傻逼港灿,什么东西不懂但是看了些反华的东西就当真理出来卖弄,可惜大脑容量有限。这种场合玩弄小动作属于典型的皇帝用金锄头耕地的屌丝缺乏想象力的表现
中文
1
0
1
86
Louis Lei
Louis Lei@leiyilu·
@asianmomriot @Telegraph 你显然无法理解,在中国文化中绝对强权的人物不屑于撒谎,撒谎是弱势的表现。😌
中文
4
1
11
1K
The Telegraph
The Telegraph@Telegraph·
🔴 Xi Jinping seemingly taunted Donald Trump on an exclusive tour of Zhongnanhai gardens, something he pointed out Putin had done before him. “The Russian president has visited Zhongnanhai several times during previous visits to China,” said Xi. Read the latest from Trump's visit to China here 👇 telegraph.co.uk/world-news/202…
English
88
153
962
407.9K
LoveNig
LoveNig@lovenig2012·
@Alt_Azn Same reason white people these days like to tan their skin to a wheat-brown color - to prove they're richer and have more leisure time. More about proving their social status than about racial discrimination.
English
0
0
0
186
AltAzn
AltAzn@Alt_Azn·
Light skin was a beauty standard in East Asia long before they ever met Europeans. Having a tan meant you were a peasant who did outdoor labor. I love how leftists and critical race theorist retcon this into worshipping of White people.
English
140
525
8.9K
214.6K