Liam Satchell

Satchell, @RoopeKaaronen & @RLatzman paper on an ecological approach to personality (ft. my fav topics on mental health, social perception, non-human animals, etc). If you want to know what I’m about it’s here. So glad it’s out. Thanks so much team! onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sp…

Are you doing research on impression formation, face perception, personality judgment, or related topics? Then you might be interested in joining our collaborative study! Follow the link for more information: tilburgss.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_4N…

Liam Satchell has discussed about the BSPID Big Project! Find more information - bspid.uk/bspid-big-proj… #bspid15

We’ve had a wonderful time here in Belfast for our 15th annual conference. Thank you to everyone who came along and to all of our wonderful presenters. We hope you had as great a time as we did! 🍀

Are you a UK based self-funded post grad researcher? (PhD, MRes etc) If so, I'd like to send you a copy of my book. I have *five* to give away. Please share and drop a note below or DM me. I'll announce next Friday (from the pub) 🐕 📖 🍺 more info - immersiveresearch.co.uk/bookshop

How does playing football in a live tournament or online (FIFA) affect our first impressions? New (Smith, Satchell, Randell & Lancaster) paper at Interpersona. Likeability improved after playing against anyone in any context and some performance effects osf.io/preprints/psya…

I got interviewed for our uni podcast about my work As always, got to talking about effective measurement and open science practices - and how these things help us understand applied issues. Got talking about education, prisons, and even dog massage! lnkd.in/eKHniwaC

@mzloteanu @psicostat Oooh nice one! I’ve used distribution-free assumption overlaps in my paper before, but I haven’t seen this method. Looks cool! Always keen to see more. Thanks for flagging!

@psicostat @lpsatchell maybe of interest

Struggling to meet parametric tests' assumptions?📈 Here a useful and rigorous solution: the ζ-Overlapping test, a non parametric approach that calculates the overlap between distributions. 📌Our preprint is now out!! doi.org/10.31219/osf.i… #statistics #psychometrics

We’re at the Service Children’s Progression Alliance 2024 Conference on Inspiring Impact. So much important work today - and how we support those doing the work to gather credible and rigorous evidence of what works to support families. Say hi if you’re here!

We sold out! @_UoW presents Dissecting Dracula - our spooky Humanities and Social Sciences faculty team discussion about the book Dracula! Ft. @UOWPsychology colleague @JStubbersfield We’re talking psychopathy and morbid curiosity!

Great to be at the Armed Forces Covenant conference today. We’re talking about the work we’re currently doing and new developments with @scipalliance to enhance: 📝research rigour, 📊data analysis, ➡️impact for the service families sector. Learning a lot from today!

Academia is a spectrum

*New* paper out today in World Psychiatry! "Where do neurodevelopmental conditions fit in transdiagnostic psychiatric frameworks? Incorporating a new neurodevelopmental spectrum" 🧵👇 (1) @QM_SBBS @QMULSciEng onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wp…

New report: the $100 Billion Evidence Gap. The Governments of the UK, US, Australia and Canada spend trillions a year on public services, but precious little on checking whether any of it works – and virtually nothing outside healthcare. 🧵...

#ColourBlindAwarenessDay My upcoming book offers detailed & practical guidance for identifying & accommodating Colour Blind children. #1InEveryClassroom @colourblindorg @pennywpennyw Find out more here: bit.ly/3B25RQs

Excited to be a panel member for our ‘Dissecting Dracula’ event on 30 Oct at @TRwinchester I’ll be talking psychology of charm and manipulation alongside @_UoW colleagues with sociological, philosophical, historic, and literary analyses! theatreroyalwinchester.co.uk/whats-on/disse…

Great job Jamie for presenting your PhD research at BASS! Looking forward to sharing more of your PhD work on naturally occurring individual differences in rapport experiences for interviewers and witnesses!

Cool data story in here. Something Simpson’s paradox-y when you start looking at London vs other (see thread)

@GGCanto @lluaces Given that the bulk of our analysis was on free text responses in two independent samples, a desk reject for a non-issue is baffling 😂. Using scales brings something weird and misplaced in people.

@lluaces @lpsatchell I've read my fair share of papers in psychometrics, and there are only 2 kinds of papers in psychometrics: 1 "I am an applied analytical philosopher" 2 "I write my paper as it my audience is a board of nepo CEO"

We had a paper rejected because a scale we used doesn't have any reverse scored items... therefore editor was concerned abt response acquiescence - people tending to agree with statements in general - in a paper with null or negative findings in two samples...🙃 what is going on

@JonathanDowlin Haha that’s brilliant for other reasons. The fascinating thing I can’t get over is that even if it was a real issue - it wasn’t happening in our paper! If anything our findings are evidence against the concern they had 😂. Had so many weird desk rejects lately.

@lpsatchell I wanted to make a joke but that's just insane! pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29694314/