Sabitlenmiş Tweet
⭐ LEGO Blacktron Radar Command Truck: on the moon of Luyten b, they are watching the skies urgently. Unidentified spacecrafts have been observed: rebrickable.com/mocs/MOC-20336…
English
Lu Blacktron
4.3K posts
Lu Blacktron
@lu_blacktron
⭐ AFOL MOC design: My own creations & LEGO fun. Fictional world building. Universes collide in parallel world story of Blacktron Corporation / Space Nation! 🫡
Tau Ceti Star System Katılım Aralık 2023
305 Takip Edilen163 Takipçiler
@haider1 yes its total crap. imagine we embody our best Ai model in our best robot body (combining the two systems is nowhere near prime time but ignore that) if say to your new 'employee': go find a certain item from another room, it can't. why? because the system has zero intelligence.
English
Anthropic co-founder Jack Clark:
We're building a technology something 10 times bigger than the Industrial Revolution, compressed into 10 times less time
The Industrial Revolution changed jobs over generations
"but this is different: millions of copies, smarter and faster than any human"
English
@ScratchyDerose it costs more than human workers to royally screw up whatever job its tasked with too 🤭
English
“AI CAN COST MORE THAN HUMAN WORKERS NOW”
Y’all are just NOW realizing that? lol
Vivek Sen@Vivek4real_
BREAKING: MICROSOFT JUST ANNOUNCED TO BAN ITS OWN ENGINEERS FROM USING AI DUE TO THE COST OF USING IT. VP OF NVIDIA SAID, “THE COST OF AI FOR MY TEAM WAS MORE THAN HUMANS” “AI CAN COST MORE THAN HUMAN WORKERS NOW”
English
@elonmusk Not good news. Starlink is a military network controlled by Epstein Coalition. Now they can send their industriallly mass-produced drones to hit endless hallucinatory target lists collated by American "AI" (likely your Grok helps too) to hit schools & hospitals in new areas 👎👎
English
@apples_jimmy The idea must be its cheaply gained publicity. They're hoping lots of curious folks sign up to see what the fuss is about. Absolute charletons theatrically pretending their pattern matching babblers might be alive. The church should simply kick them out. Its a total disgrace 😔
English
What was the idea here ?
Talk about mass unemployment and hope the pope was going to view you as “ the good guys “ ?
Courtney Mares@catholicourtney
Anthropic’s Chris Olah at the Vatican press conference to present Pope Leo XIV’s encyclical on AI: “There is a real possibility that AI will displace human labor at very large scale. If that happens, supporting those displaced will be a moral imperative of historic proportions.” Pope Leo wrote in the encyclical, “The pursuit of greater profits cannot justify choices that systematically sacrifice jobs, because the human person is an end, not a means, and the economic order must remain subordinate to human dignity and the common good.”
English
@_EarnieBanks Fair point. Art is nearly undefined. Can be almost anything imo 🤷 Pre-AI example: Collage. cut magazine clippings ✂️ glue into a painting you did. in one view, could say finished work is all yours, OR could say you 'stole' the magazine clippings. is either opinion 'correct'? 🤷
English
@lu_blacktron And that isn’t even fair. Bc art is a very, especially human thing. Yes you can mix real art w AI assisting you. But the part that is AI isn’t art. And your entire piece is not really a reflection of you. It’s a modification you made to an average of data from other ppls emotions
English
It is impossible to be an AI artist. These are two mutually exclusive, never overlapping things.
By implying they are artists, they are frauds for using AI and are simply hiding that they are frauds. For obvious reasons.
Eternal Blue 🌧️@4E_A3E
If ai so good then why do ai artists keep pretending they don’t use it
English
@_EarnieBanks for this example me & my friends never took nintendo games that seriously 😆 it was all great fun & game genie came out we all played with that too. I used to type in my own random codes to see what happens 😂 usually glitch, crash, or does nothing. if having fun, no harm done
English
@lu_blacktron For the OG Nintendo, kids were able to buy a cheat cartridge called Game Genie. It made the game so easy anyone can beat it without much effort. Even though the human still played, do you respect them as a player. Do you label them the same as ppl actually good w/o cheating?
English
@aionfork @mcmilleeee @noisyb0y1 cool thing is you can work with CERN data completely offline. Its all local, you never need ping their servers or anything 😄 so no risk they'll start messing with you or taunting you if you play with it 😂
English
@lu_blacktron @mcmilleeee @noisyb0y1 It’s difficult to balance these avant-garde simulations. They don’t have a strong basis for equilibrium, so you can’t usually leverage it. There are a lot of ways in which equilibrium could break down. It happens in econophysics
So that’s typically necessary for the aesthetics.
English
AN OXFORD STUDENT IS RUNNING A PARTICLE SIMULATION WITH REAL PEOPLE'S NAMES AND CLAIMS CERN IS TAUNTING HIM THROUGH THE CODE
Thousands of particles on a black screen - each one labeled with a real person's name - moving according to the laws of physics in real time and he is completely convinced this is not a simulation but a personal message from CERN directed at him specifically.
Particle simulation with collision detection, velocity vectors and brownian motion - technically flawless code that tracks every particle individually and renders trajectories at 60 fps.
CERN operates a 17km collider that accelerates protons to 99.9999991% the speed of light and generates a petabyte of data every single day - and apparently found the time to encode Oxford student names into a simulation.
The code is real. The physics is correct. The conclusions are a separate conversation.
CyrilXBT@cyrilXBT
English
@aionfork @mcmilleeee @noisyb0y1 econophysics sounds neat but is outside of my areas of specialty 😄 bulk of data you'd need won't come from CERN... far outside their domain also. CERN gives you data like: when x MeV of protons hit a block of lead, it results in y MeV deposited.
English
@josiezayner Its a realm of esoteric abstract knowledge with very thin real world application. If all Erdos problems were solved today it would not be a massive leap forward in technology. The wins would be modest: small improvements to network optimisations, cryptography & materials science
English
We get it. Every AI model has solved Erdos problems. But like maybe the 1,217 Erdos problems aren't as complicated as people thought and/or no one has just really ever tried to solve many of them?
Polymarket@Polymarket
JUST IN: Google DeepMind says its AI solved 9 open Erdős problems — considered among the hardest unsolved questions in mathematics.
English
@aionfork @mcmilleeee @noisyb0y1 You can add magnetic fields and electrical fields but if you want more exotic stuff you'd need do some heavylifting to interlace GEANT4 data with data from other scientific simulators. Theory stuff like tachyons can't be simulated this way as all data comes from real experiments.
English
English
@aionfork @mcmilleeee @noisyb0y1 I use GEANT4 as my toolkit's core dependency. Standard for particle physics. Data is from CERN. Its a Monte Carlo Model: a comprehensive, high-fidelity particle transport simulation. No weird stuff like taunting, and folk's names aren't in it. Just particle science, thats it 😄
English
@lu_blacktron @mcmilleeee @noisyb0y1 > “I happen to work on code for scientific toolkit using CERN data, simulating particles in the same fidelity (Monte Carlo)”
Wtf does that mean? Like what fidelity?
English
@aionfork @mcmilleeee @noisyb0y1 CERN isn't secretive. Without coding you can install the base tools my work sits on top of & play with it yourself. Its all open source & a big community of folks work with it. Look up GEANT4 to get started. Without a huge amount of effort you can inspect & see for yourself 🤗
English
English
@mcmilleeee @noisyb0y1 thats my hobby. in general i do not share much personal info on x
English
@lu_blacktron @noisyb0y1 Your profile doesn’t really support this claim all I see is someone who builds a shit ton of Legos
English
@thoughts17181 My view is its more like: 2 + x = y
You say you're certain y = 4.
Yet it can't be proven. We don't know what x equals.
I don't like beliefs but prefer rationality. This is agnosticism, not atheism.
A no is as irrational as a yes.
I don't know & I am content with that 🤗
English
If I say '2+2=4' and you say 'No' I'm naturally going to ask why. Likewise, if you reject belief in God, it's fair for people to ask what reasons led you to that conclusion
Atheists like playing the safe card 😂😂
Yẹmí@KR3Wmatic
Evolution is not atheism. Cosmology is not atheism. Abiogenesis is not atheism. Atheism is the one-word answer, “No,” to the question “Do you believe in any gods?” Nothing else.
English
@KokopiCanopy @NightSkyToday certainly its gonna be like fractional millimetres per year, not a worry 😄
English
@NightSkyToday At what depth does this rift start, and how fast is it actually spreading?
English
🚨JUST IN: Scientists say, Earth is splitting open beneath the Pacific Ocean.
English
@UAPJames I can't believe they finally dusted off old Project Blue Beam & putting it in play finally. All as a desperate try to distract everyone from the Epstein Files. This reeks of desperation lol 😆
English
@mathandcobb ...or wait i misunderstood you! 😂 I'm not a mathematician but a programmer looking at this new proof & thinking of potential applications. Yet its only relevant when theres such huge number of points (more than observable universe) so practical application is niche indeed! 😄
English
Take for example the new bounds for the unit distance problem. The new constructions beat older estimates only at 10^2000000 points or so. This has no practical application of any sort and the only interest in this proof is for the human understanding of the proof itself.
English
The Riemann Hypothesis, the Goldbach conjecture, the Twin Prime conjecture... They have all been extensively verified numerically. So for all practical purposes, these are "true" statements. If needed for an actual practical use, they could easily be verified even farther.
The mathematical truth of these statements would only be "useful" to mathematicians that seek the truth and those who seek to understand *why* these statements are true.
If an AI agent proved these statements but there were no mathematicians to understand and digest the proofs, what would be the point of such a proof?
Even in the most optimistic of cases, where a super human mathematician agent exists that could prove or disprove (or declare undecideable) every statement, either there are human mathematicians that are there to understand the proof to explain it to other humans... Or there is simply no point for such a super human agent to exist in the first place.
English
@mathandcobb Wasn't aware the point gain is so minor! I wonder if even a tiny gain may help in certain niche fields such as material design. A minor compaction of a lattice could lead to an energy breakthrough perhaps? 🤷 yet without humans to understand & apply a proof its a useless trivia
English