Lukasumoto

And here we go,... again...and again...👇

Even @binance is talking about the @IagonOfficial & @FireblocksHQ integration

@phil_uplc @ChenoskiPR Literally there at the bottom Phil. Let us know if you need access, we will happily give you a decent rate for the subscription, as long as Fireblocks approves

Large organizations don’t adopt systems because they sound exciting. They adopt them when trust is built into the way they operate. This is where real infrastructure begins: not in promises, but in control, visibility, and governance. Iagon is building for that standard.

Statur: First Look at Reputation in Action We’re opening the curtain on Statur — a reputation model for the Cardano ecosystem designed to make positive participation more visible, measurable, and rewarding. ⭐️ Public profiles. ⭐️ Node operator insights. ⭐️ Delegation context. ⭐️ Reputation that can grow with real activity. We’re building. We’re delivering. More to come.

Two layers, one stack. Fireblocks RAW signing + @IagonOfficial's Cardano nodes and Insights API now give approved customers an operational path for ADA and CNTs.

Friendly reminder that babel fees have already been implemented for 1+ years on @FluidTokens Aquarium. And yes, they are open source, anybody can use them and they are audited. The only fair alternative to Aquarium are off-chain Babel fees implementable with nested transactions. Please stop giving treasury money for already available solutions!

Below $ 1 each 3% $ 1 - $ 1.99 each 3.3 % $ 2 - $ 2.99 each 3.4 % $ 3 - $ 3.99 each 3.6 % $ 4 - $ 4.99 each 3.7 % $ 5 - $ 5.99 each 3.8% Above $ 6 4.00% These numbers for royalties are approved by Würth. Per printed part.

It is a stop-gap solution to show ARR, which can justify native integration. This is Fireblocks and Iagon. You can see their work: github.com/fireblocks/Iag… And here: github.com/fireblocks/car… Since this is working solution has been showcased recently, and still fine-tuning ongoing: enterprises have yet to be targeted. This allows for potentially MMs, exchanges and others to use this solution and show the ARR that Cardano can create. We don't know your discussion with Bridge but we doubt they know about this solution because we haven't presented it to enterprises yet.

For those who doubted @IagonOfficial and the teams resolve, i’d say your eating a bit of crow right now……..ketchup?

Sigh. I just need testnet CNT tokens and NFTs. I’m thrown in for a loop of sites not working, libraries too big, limited projects via Blockfrost, etc. Building something in Cardano is hard man.

I just realized the hypocrisy here "coordinated onboarding of accounts/members purely to capture governance outcomes" So it's okay to call out people from @BLOC_HQ but not dReps who are directly associated with IOG or Midnight (same owner btw) If you going to ban people because people are voting in multiples with UNIQUE IDs - maybe we should be banning a certain group from governance voting? Just to be clear I'm against coordinated voting. But don't be calling out one group and not the other - that can be defined as discrimination

Good lord. Trying to mint an NFT in @nmkr_io studio pre-prod so I can have some to test in the thing I'm building and I can't even do it. Uploading simple images takes forever then ends with an error. It took me a couple of hours to even make an account because of continuous error messages. I know some of these projects are limited man shows, but man, from a customer just trying to get on with my workflow, this is really bad UX.

Voted NO on Maintenance Initiative Voted YES on The first node in the browser Voted ABSTAIN on Pebble & Ecosystem maintenance

Thank you for confirming it. Pogun will have a token. IOG is an equity holder. But treasury get's NONE of this upside only RISK. But that disclosure should have been in the proposal from day one. If Treasury capital is helping derisk a venture that has private equity ownership, future token issuance and future fundraising upside, then Treasury should not be left holding only the risk while others retain the upside.

The most entertaining outcome is the most likely = Charles and IOG rage quitting and Cardano finally succeeding after that .

So let me get this straight: Party A (IOG & closely related parties) - has over 1 million followers (Charles) - has attacked $IAG holders, me and Iagon on video and posted to his followers "I don't give a shit about your token holders. I don't give a shit about your bag holders"(Charles) - has thrown racial slurs at me. "inbred monkey" "3rd world scammer" (Phil & Lucas) - has attacked Iagon and it's holders, "iagon is a scam" "rinsing retail" (Phil) - "Your competitor is AWS and AWS mogs you and your mother" Phil Party B (me) - asked questions as a DREP - has over 4k followers - asking more questions about over 150 million $ADA being asked to remove from public funds You know how absurd your statement sounds? Party A has done ALL the personal attacks, yet somehow people still like twisting the facts

🚨 We are planning to launch liquid staking later today. It is the biggest upgrade to the $STRIKE token in over one year.

#Crypto 📉 FUN FACT $IAG: On November 7, 2022, Iagon's $IAG (@IagonOfficial) hit ATL at $0.000704 USD. Now at $0.0253, up +3494% like a crypto phoenix rising from the ashes! 🚀 #CryptoFact