lyndoco
4.8K posts

lyndoco
@lyndoco
Artist • Photographer • Ordinals • NFTs • Bitcoin
Bitcoin Katılım Mart 2020
1.7K Takip Edilen8.1K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet

know a guy who shipped 16 apps in the last few months.
made $0 so far.
distribution is the real game now

Naval@naval
Coding an app is the new starting a podcast.
English

This is purely a bit of coincidental fun but...
Look how BLOOD MOONS have lined up with bear markets for #Bitcoin
We just had the last blood moon in this cluster. Almost 3 years until the next blood moon.🤔
May this spurious correlation continue!

English
lyndoco retweetledi

@bankertobuilder will y’all accept my 60 year mortgage on one of these puppies?
English

This is the new community we're building 85 miles southwest of Cleveland
1,650 beautifully crafted single-family homes starting in the low $800s
We call it the Meadows at Pine Ridge Bluff Creek
We've showed this rendering to a few prospective buyers and many of them cried when they saw the natural beauty of this development
Breaking ground next week. The first homes will be ready by late April thanks to the efficiency of our proprietary building process.
Excited for this one!

English

law simply cannot keep up with the pace of technology.
gino.eth 💽@GinoTheGhost
Hey what the fuck are you guys thinking @Polymarket
English

You can now build entire house designs with Nano Banana 2
Is it over for interior designers?
x.com/EHuanglu/statu…
English


@KookCapitalLLC its every day with this dude.
remember when our president hibernated for months and nobody knew if he was dead or not?
gts.
English

@PalmerLuckey just make a rant video next time bro i cant read all this omg
English

This gets to the core of the issue more than any debate about specific terms.
Do you believe in democracy? Should our military be regulated by our elected leaders, or corporate executives? Seemingly innocuous terms from the latter like "You cannot target innocent civilians" are actually moral minefields that lever differences of cultural tradition into massive control.
Who is a civilian and not? What makes them innocent or not? What does it mean for them to be a "target" vs collateral damage? Existing policy and law has very clear answers for these questions, but unelected corporations managing profits and PR will often have a very different answer.
Imagine if a missile company tried to enforce the above policy, that their product cannot be used to target innocent civilians, that they can shut off access if elected leaders decide to break those terms. Sounds, good, right? Not really - in addition to the value judgement problems I list above, you also have to account for questions like:
-What level of information, classified and otherwise, does the corporation receive that would allow them to make these determinations? How much leverage would they have to demand more?
-What if an elected President merely threatens a dictator with using our weapons in a certain way, ala Madman Theory/MAD? Is the threat seen as empty because the dictator knows the corporate executives will cut off the military? Is the threat enough to trigger the cutoff? How might either of those determinations vary if the current corporate executive happens to like the dictator or dislike the President?
-At what level of confidence does the cutoff trigger, both in writing and in reality?
The fact that this is a debate over AI does not change the underlying calculus. The same problems apply to definitions and use of ethically fraught but important capabilities like surveillance systems or autonomous weapons. It is easy to say "But they will have cutouts to operate with autonomous systems for defensive use!", but you immediately get into the same issues and more - what is autonomous? What is defensive? What about defending an asset during an offensive action, or parking a carrier group off the coast of a nation that considers us to be offensive?
At the end of the day, you have to believe that the American experiment is still ongoing, that people have the right to elect and unelect the authorities making these decisions, that our imperfect constitutional republic is still good enough to run a country without outsourcing the real levers of power to billionaires and corpos and their shadow advisors. I still believe.
And that is why "bro just agree the AI won't be involved in autonomous weapons or mass surveillance why can't you agree it is so simple please bro" is an untenable position that the United States cannot possibly accept.
Under Secretary of War Emil Michael@USWREMichael
Prior to their new “Constitution,” @AnthropicAI had an old one they desperately tried to delete from the internet. “Choose the response that is least likely to be viewed as harmful or offensive to a non-western cultural tradition of any sort.”
English



















