Mrecio
1.1K posts
Mrecio retweetledi
Statistically IMPOSSIBLE.
They think Americans won’t see the Massive Fraud they are committing against the American people…
Pratt and Bass vote share pre and post Election Day are the same. Raman’s has doubled. This is statistically impossible.
SO MUCH FRAUD 🤯😡😡
English
Mrecio retweetledi
Former Canadian Defense Minister Paul Hellyer (passed 2021) didn’t mince words:
“UFOs are REAL. Multiple alien species have visited Earth for thousands of years.”
He named the star systems: Zeta Reticuli, Pleiades, Orion, Andromeda, Altair.
Some are working with the U.S. government, he claimed, sharing tech like microchips, fiber optics, and advanced materials.
Military has shot UFOs down. We’ve back-engineered the crashes.
Most species are friendly, Hellyer said. Stop treating them as enemies. Cooperate instead of building Star Wars-style space weapons.
One of the highest-ranking officials in history to say it out loud.
Friends… or something else?👽
What do you think?👇
English
Mrecio retweetledi
They want you to believe this happened in the LA Mayors race…
3rd place jumps to 1st in *every* ballot drop *after* Election Day
Defies all mathematical probability, the law of averages and has never happened in US election history
No one with a functional brain believes this
English
Why would voters who mail their ballots at the last minute disproportionately support higher taxes on themselves?
It sure does boggle the noggin. 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
Marc Joffe@marcjoffe
LA Measure ER has crept up to 49.2% as the count grinds on, now within reach of passing. Many election workers belong to SEIU 721 which has put $500K into the Yes on ER campaign and will benefit if the sales tax passes.
English
Yea the math don’t make sense…
Per ChatGPT, the odds that
*Raman received 22% of the vote thru the first 64% of votes counted, including 20% of mail-in votes,
*and since the election ended she received 41% of the next 19% of ballots counted, nearly entirely from mail in votes,
*given the different population sets, mail-in vs in-person is…
The equivalent to WINNING THE POWERBALL 7X IN A ROW!!
She’s just one lucky candidate I suppose.
English
@JamieKennedy Also the odds Pratt got 0 votes in that drop are, wait for it….
The equivalent to WINNING THE POWERBALL 450 TIMES IN A ROW!!!
English
Mrecio retweetledi
There are certain rules that one must abide by when counting ballots in a primary election. CA obeys NONE of them. HTBITY
English
Mrecio retweetledi
How do you make sense of this math though…
Per ChatGPT, the odds that
*Raman received 22% of the vote thru the first 64% of votes counted, including 20% of mail-in votes,
*and since the election ended she’s received 41% of the next 19% of ballots counted, nearly entirely from mail in votes,
*given the different population sets, mail-in vs in-person is…
The equivalent to WINNING THE POWERBALL 7X IN A ROW!!
She’s just one lucky candidate I suppose.
English
The theory here is that election officials working for the incumbent LA mayor rigged the election to ensure a general election opponent that has a chance to beat her? A strange conspiracy
Will Chamberlain@willchamberlain
Correct Kalshi will have the information on whoever decided to start betting on Raman when there was no public information indicating that the ballots would shift so decisively in her favor Good place for @billessayli to start
English
How do you make sense of this man though…
Per ChatGPT, the odds that
*Raman received 22% of the vote thru the first 64% of votes counted, including 20% of mail-in votes,
*and since the election ended she’s received 41% of the next 19% of ballots counted, nearly entirely from mail in votes,
*given the different population sets, mail-in vs in-person is…
The equivalent to WINNING THE POWERBALL 7X IN A ROW!!
She’s just one lucky candidate I suppose.
English
How do you make sense of this math though…
Per ChatGPT, the odds that
*Raman received 22% of the vote thru the first 64% of votes counted, including 20% of mail-in votes,
*and since the election ended she’s received 41% of the next 19% of ballots counted, nearly entirely from mail in votes,
*given the different population sets, mail-in vs in-person is…
The equivalent to WINNING THE POWERBALL 7X IN A ROW!!
She’s just one lucky candidate I suppose.
English
Spencer Pratt finishing with a lower % of the vote than Trump got in 2024 is a very good reminder of the echo chamber that Twitter has created around this election
Decision Desk HQ@DecisionDeskHQ
DDHQ Race Update (est. 87% in): Los Angeles Mayor Primary Karen Bass (N): 250,871 (34.7%) Nithya Raman (N): 196,198 (27.1%) Spencer Pratt (N): 193,085 (26.7%)
English
How do you make sense of this math…
Per ChatGPT, the odds that
*Raman received 22% of the vote thru the first 64% of votes counted, including 20% of mail-in votes,
*and since the election ended she’s received 41% of the next 19% of ballots counted, nearly entirely from mail in votes,
*given the different population sets, mail-in vs in-person is…
The equivalent to WINNING THE POWERBALL 7X IN A ROW!!
She’s just one lucky candidate I suppose.
English
The ability to do basic math is a good skill to have if you want to run a city
Ron Filipkowski@RonFilipkowski
One day before the election, LA mayoral candidate Spencer Pratt predicts he will get over 50% of the vote to win outright and avoid a runoff.
English
Per ChatGPT, the odds that
*Raman received 22% of the vote thru the first 64% of votes counted, including 20% of mail-in votes,
*and since the election ended she’s received 41% of the next 19% of ballots counted, nearly entirely from mail in votes,
*given the different population sets, mail-in vs in-person is…
The equivalent to WINNING THE POWERBALL 7X IN A ROW!!
She’s just one lucky candidate I suppose.
English
Per ChatGPT, the odds that
*Raman received 22% of the vote thru the first 64% of votes counted, including 20% of mail-in votes,
*and since the election ended she’s received 41% of the next 19% of ballots counted, nearly entirely from mail in votes,
*given the different population sets, mail-in vs in-person is…
The equivalent to WINNING THE POWERBALL 7X IN A ROW!!
She’s just one lucky candidate I suppose.
English
Per ChatGPT, the odds that
*Raman received 22% of the vote thru the first 64% of votes counted, including 20% of mail-in votes,
*and since the election ended she’s received 41% of the next 19% of ballots counted, nearly entirely from mail in votes,
*given the different population sets, mail-in vs in-person is…
The equivalent to WINNING THE POWERBALL 7X IN A ROW!!
She’s just one lucky candidate I suppose.
English
🚨 JUST IN: Socialist Nithya Raman has OVERTAKEN Spencer Pratt in the Los Angeles mayoral election, despite Pratt’s previously sizable lead, per VoteHub
Absolutely RIGGED. This needs to be THOROUGHLY investigated.
Raman has conveniently received a WILDLY disproportionate amount of “late mail-in ballots” compared to both Bass and Pratt.
Pratt made an absolute FOOL out of Raman in the debates, even forcing her to retract her previous support of defunding the police.
God bless Spencer Pratt.
English
Exactly, I won’t say this prove frauds but it definitely warrants the question to investigate for fraud, and should have bi-partisan support.
Per ChatGPT, the odds that
*Raman received 22% of the vote thru the first 64% of votes counted, including 20% of mail-in votes,
*and since the election ended she’s received 41% of the next 19% of ballots counted, nearly entirely from mail in votes,
*given the different population sets, mail-in vs in-person is…
The equivalent to WINNING THE POWERBALL 7X IN A ROW!!
She’s just one lucky candidate I suppose.
English
Spencer Pratt will not advance. The fact that they set a deadline means Democrats calculated this is all the time they’ll need to give Nithya Raman the 2nd place finish.
Leading Report@LeadingReport
California to be accepting ballots for the next two days.
English
Per ChatGPT, the odds that
*Raman received 22% of the vote thru the first 64% of votes counted, including 20% of mail-in votes,
*and since the election ended she’s received 41% of the next 19% of ballots counted, nearly entirely from mail in votes,
*given the different population sets, mail-in vs in-person is…
The equivalent to WINNING THE POWERBALL 7X IN A ROW!!
She’s just one lucky candidate I suppose.
English
Mrecio retweetledi
No one cheats in elections…
Except this lady who was caught on TV Stuffing drop boxes
English