Mack Hat

@Howlingmutant0 funniest guy on 𝕏

@Howlingmutant0 I might frame this in my office.

Me when the Nigerian chess wizard jumps his piece in a zig zag checkers motion over the whole board and looks me in the eye and says “Chess Mate”

Good night to the feminists on X. I am likely the only man who has said that to you in years . See ya tomorrow.

@Howlingmutant0 @LizzyStarrrdust @Audjuice9989 Do you remember Old country buffet?

@LizzyStarrrdust @Audjuice9989 Yeah

I never understood why women like to show cleavage. I have nothing against it but I’m always curious to why they like doing that?

@greg16676935420 @BenStiller Don't understand can you explain that like I am five?

@BenStiller If they want to win next game they’re going to have to score more points than the other team

We lost that one

@Howlingmutant0 @AnderZin22

@AnderZin22 More of a jughead guy tbh

“I’ve been found out!” I yell as I recoil in horror

Be the change you want to see in the world

This is like saying a sober alcoholic of 20 years can't teach lessons about staying abstinent from alcohol. So only someone who's never had alcohol can teach alcoholics how to live alcohol-free? I would argue the person who failed at first but learned to fix themselves is the better teacher.

@Broomba51 I’m not saying they can’t have an opinion. What I’m saying is that it’s not plausible for them to position themselves as authorities on traditional family values, marriage, and motherhood, while their own household is the living counter example to every one of those things.

I wouldn't describe Rachel or Andrew Wilson as an authority on stable motherhood or relationships. She has 5 children to 3 different Fathers. One man abandoned her and his two kids over vague “personal issues.” The next Father was a criminal drug abuser who abandoned her and their one child fleeing legal trouble. Only Andrew Wilson gave her the trad family she now preaches. But he only committed to her after he was able to confirm the kids were his via DNA testing. What does that suggest about the dynamic? Rachel has shown self awareness and knows how her blended family looks, downplaying it as “youthful mistakes”. But mistakes these are not. This a well documented, multi year, behavioural pattern of maladaptive mate selection; serial monogamy with successively dysfunctional, low stability males, resulting in three different fathers for five children, two periods of single motherhood, and one tragic child fatality. And yet, she and Andrew think they are best placed to be critics of modern women and they are ab authority of what benevolent, stable family life should be like. Rachel and Andrew have built their entire brand shaming modern women for low partner standards, serial monogamy, single motherhood, and multiple baby daddies, the exact life she lived. Hypocrisy on full display. What kind of man is drawn to such a woman like Rachel Wilson to begin with? Well, Andrew is a bit of a bastard isn't he. Andrew Wilson’s core traits are abrasive high conflict dominance, arrogance paired with defensive aggression, and a rigid insistence on his unchallenged authority. You can see repeatedly by from his debate footage that he is irritable, rude, and bullying in style. Yes, he can be sharp and logical but he routinely shifts to personal attacks, insults, and verbal aggression when he perceives his authority or family is directly challenged. I don't think he can organically evoke genuine deference or voluntary submission from a desirable, respectable, agentic, and stable woman. Such a woman has independent, better mating options and would probably reject the unilateral “he is in charge of everything” authority because it clashes with her core traits. Rachel, shaped by a pattern of suboptimal mate selection and multiple children, has limited mating alternatives. So she explicitly conforms. She states on record that submission means “you submit to your husband in all things,” that Andrew holds charge of everything, and that she performs total domestic service because his dependability finally enabled the homemaking role her prior partners could not. He secures what he needs through a partner whose baggage makes compliance the rational exchange for security. They portray this trade off via a christian redemption narrative they co brand. Interesting.

@Notwokenow I can't imagine how people have this mindset these people really think the government exists to support them. Are people like this just low IQ?

Healthy, childless, adult woman complains about only receiving $16 a month in SNAP benefits. Though she claims to be working- she says her outgoing bills are more than her income. One of her “jobs” is selling stuff on Marketplace, and one is driving for DoorDash. Sounds like she can’t make and live within an appropriate budget. Why is that the responsibility of the US taxpayer? (And btw, she is clearly not going without any food.) She claims it’s the job of the government to provide for her. I say it’s her responsibility to live within her means. Giving SNAP benefits to people like this takes benefits away from the elderly and disabled. Naw, sis. Find a better job, declare bankruptcy, manage your money better. Whatever. Your financial problems are YOURS alone.

@ReidthePeep @Howlingmutant0 Well if that's the case we can't forget WrestleMania 2000!

@mack_hat @Howlingmutant0 Is it, though? youtu.be/88XnUHAX5-o?si…

An interesting phenomenon I’ve noticed recently is a type of guy who’s whole thing is asking for people’s addresses to fight then apparently hoping they decline to give them

@RockChartrand @RTSG_Main Man I wish I had you as a friend to back me up in conversations.

@RTSG_Main If nobody wants it, your labor has no value. If people want it, suddenly it does. That’s not labor determining value, that’s demand. You aren't even smart enough to know that you're digging yourself into a deeper hole.

LIBERTARIANS DON'T UNDERSTAND MARX: Value isn't "whatever buyers feel like paying". The regulator remains labor time, not aggregated subjective valuations. For example: Changes in productivity (new machinery) lower value, even if buyers still "want" the good just as much.

@ReidthePeep @Howlingmutant0 All I need!

@mack_hat @Howlingmutant0 ...No Mercy? You're offering N64 wrasslin', and you failed to bring WCW/NWO Revenge? Peasant.

@arty_burton @WallStreetApes GRP SOUP, that's the 32 oz.

@mack_hat @WallStreetApes If you think that cup of soup (it is in the video) will “serve four people”, then your “people “ are either 5 year olds or are waaay overdosing on GLP-1s!

American went to Panera Bread and he can’t believe the prices He ordered 2 soups, 2 grilled cheese sandwiches and 1 other sandwich The total was $71 Panera Bread priced have increased 70% across the menu since being bought by a private equity firm Panera Bread is also regularly criticized for Shrinkflation So prices are up 70% and portions are smaller Private equity firms ruin everything

Their cups of soups are 8 oz, that's the standard size, not the kids size. The group soup is 32 oz. 32 / 4 = 8. I never said it was meant to be an entire meal on its own, just like if you order the large fries at five guys is not meant to be its own meal, but it is meant to be shared alongside people eating burgers.

@connorp864 @WallStreetApes It's because they ordered two GROUP SOUPS, that's equivalent to 8 cup orders, meant to serve 6-8 people.

@WallStreetApes Why lie? $50 for a full grilled cheese and two cups of broccoli cheddar and a full Frontega Chicken sandwich. $39 if you do the pick two plus a full sandwich Still high prices but saying it’s $71 is disingenuous

@TiffanyFong Aren't you that Chinese spy that banged some Democrat senator or something?

holy shit idk why 530K of you retards follow my stupid ass

@Howlingmutant0 Why do they hate you so much? Is it just because they hate humor and suck at humor?

@Howlingmutant0 I've never been to New York, I have some time of, should I come visit?

Overnight I’ve become one of the most powerful men on Goodreads