Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Manny Singh
1K posts

Manny Singh
@mannysinghhhh
YouTuber | 5M subscribers | 5,000,000,000 Views Last Year Currently Building LongForm
Grinding Katılım Ağustos 2019
970 Takip Edilen1.2K Takipçiler

@yogurt_eth @orangie I do this for a living, if you ever need help dm me
English

does anyone on here care about growing as a creator / your brand / content?
think people aren’t as aware as how many opportunities that can bring in crypto
having a audience is the best leverage possible and I’ve been debating making more content only X about how I’ve built my empire using only content
Potion to $1m MRR, to getting acquired
One of cryptos biggest YouTube channels
1 million+ people referred to trading platforms
Brand deals etc.
Any interest ?
English

@ItsCheeseCFB @fightbasicz Buddy Jones can’t even sell a tenth of what Connor could. What are you talking about 😭
English

@fightbasicz Not paying Jon Jones just looks insane now lol
English

UFC 329 is officially in the books.
Conor McGregor walked away with $30 million, which comes out to around $435,000 per second. During those 69 seconds inside the Octagon, he landed zero significant strikes.
Of course, Conor’s impact on the organization is undeniable, and the UFC clearly knew his value and made sure it paid off.
Max Holloway also had some easy money — $3 million without cutting weight or taking a single punch. Not a bad night at the office.
And then there was Paddy Pimblett, who put on a solid performance and finished BSD in just over a minute.


English

@noahmorris @nexlevio Can you explain the gentle intro thing? I’ve had the belief it’s quite the opposite
English

I used claude & @nexlevio MCP to analyse retention across all videos across all my channels historically here's some interesting stats it found.
1. Retention benchmark

English

Copy these prompts to make your next thumbnails look HYPER REALISTIC #thumbnails #thumbnaildesign #youtube

English

Huge milestone tonight, I fell in love with making YouTube videos when I was just 11 years old, I dreamed of one day becoming a YouTuber and over a 7 year period I made hundreds of videos with no luck
So I decided I wasn’t good enough on camera or charismatic enough for anyone to care and I gave up on that dream
For the 10 years that followed I got to semi-live out my original dream by working for other YouTubers and I had a lot of fun learning a lot along the way
But I found myself aged 27 no closer to my original goal and that’s when I decided I need to go for this now or I’ll regret it for the rest of my life
Tonight, just 9 videos later… this happened, it feels like 15+ years of ups and downs, every time I tried and failed, every time I convinced myself I wasn’t good enough are all starting to become worth it
Everyone that knows me personally will know I’m one of the most YouTube obsessed people you’ll ever meet and finally it feels like we might actually make it

English

Airrack is one of the most talented, and consistent creators on YouTube, averaging over 5m+ views a video.
So we analysed his last 10 videos.
Here's what a 15M subscriber creator is doing right — and where even he is leaving views on the table.
First, the consistency story.
8 out of 10 videos clustered within a 6-point scoring range.
That's not luck. That's a creator who has reverse-engineered a repeatable formula and executes it with almost zero variance.
Most creators have a 20-30 point gap between their best and worst videos. Airrack's gap is 13. His floor is elite. His ceiling is the problem.
The formula he's running:
9 out of 10 titles start with "I."
First-person framing creates instant POV buy-in — the viewer isn't watching someone do something, they're experiencing it with them.
It's the difference between a story and a spectacle.
The structure behind the titles is just as deliberate:
[I] + [transgressive/secret action] + [recognisable target]
"I Hunted Down Real Scammers"
"I Secretly Lived In MrBeast's Theme Park"
"I Paid the Military to Get Revenge on Bullies"
Every title implies a hidden camera, a ticking clock, and a payoff.
The viewer knows what kind of video this is before they click.
His secret weapon: justice framing.
His top 4 performing videos all involve moral tension. Scammers. Cheaters. Bullies. Karma.
Justice videos create something most formats can't manufacture artificially — a natural escalation loop.
The viewer stays because they need to see the payoff. The moral contract of the premise demands resolution.
"Try Not To Laugh" has no moral contract.
No escalation. No reason to stay past any individual clip.
That format scored at the bottom of his catalogue. Not a coincidence.
"Secretly" is losing steam.
4 out of 10 titles use the word "secretly."
It was clearly a high-performing hook device — curiosity-driven, implies ticking clock, front-loads tension.
But the three "Secretly Lived/Hid" videos scored 54, 61, 62 in descending order of recency.
The format is getting mined out. Even a collab with Ryan Trahan — a massive name — couldn't rescue a tired structure.
This is a creator at the point where his best-performing format is approaching saturation.
The next evolution of his channel probably doesn't include the word "secretly."
Duration is doing more damage than he probably realises.
His best scores cluster between 18–28 minutes. Every video over 30 minutes scored at the bottom of his catalogue.
The 42-minute grocery store video is the most revealing data point.
It's an inherently strong premise — "How Many Days Can I Secretly Live In a Grocery Store?" is a compelling concept.
It scored below his average anyway. At that length, pacing valleys accumulate and mid-video retention bleeds.
His data is telling him something: sub-28 minutes is his sweet spot.
So what's stopping him from becoming as big as Mr Beast?
It's payoff density.
MrBeast builds videos with roughly 3–4 escalation beats per 10 minutes.
A new challenge layer, a twist, a raising of stakes, a moment that makes you say "I can't believe that just happened."
Airrack builds to one big reveal and leans on it.
Airrack does more with less budget than almost anyone making videos at his scale.
The narrative tension in his "secretly" format costs nothing to produce. But the frequency of payoff moments in his middle third is where he bleeds viewers — and where MrBeast pulls away.
More "wow" moments per minute. That's the gap. Nothing to do with money.
Where Airrack actually beats MrBeast:
Relatability. His format makes viewers feel like co-conspirators, not spectators. MrBeast's scale creates spectacle. Airrack's scale creates intimacy.
"I secretly hid in Beast Games" puts you inside the story.
MrBeast's videos put you in the crowd watching it. Both work. They're different emotional contracts.
What any creator can take from this:
→ First-person framing isn't a trend, it's a structure. "I did X" is a promise. Viewers know the format, the POV, and the payoff type before they click. That certainty reduces friction.
→ Moral tension is the cheapest escalation device available. You don't need a $500K budget if your premise has a built-in justice loop. Justice demands resolution. Resolution demands watch time.
→ Know your duration sweet spot and protect it. Every creator has a length where their pacing is optimal. Airrack's is 18-28 minutes. Going beyond it costs him — every time.
→ Payoff density matters more than payoff size. One big moment at the end loses to five medium moments spread across the video. Map your next video's payoff moments before you film. Where are the gaps?
→ Your best format has a shelf life. "Secretly" worked until it didn't. The strongest creators recognise the diminishing returns signal before their audience does and evolve the format before it dies.
The summary:
Airrack is arguably the most structurally consistent large creator we've analysed. He almost never makes a bad video. But consistency has a ceiling — and his is visible in the data.
The creators who go from 15M to 50M aren't the most consistent. They're the most consistent and the ones who find a way to raise their ceiling.
His floor is the lesson. His ceiling is the warning.

English

@AccMoebius Looks like fern is building a moat with in real life interviews, so will be hard but rooting for you brotha.
English

@LeroyterBraak Any tips on how to find content in adjacent niches? Any too you use directly
English


Your new YouTube channel is probably not getting views for one of these three reasons:
1. The algorithm hasn’t found your audience yet
When you’re new or small, YouTube tests your videos on lots of people to figure out who might like them.
If people don’t click, impressions stop.
If people click and watch, YouTube continues to recommend the video to similar audience clusters.
This means low views early on don’t automatically mean your content is bad.
It often just means your title and thumbnail didn’t attract clicks from the people who were shown the video.
Focus on improving packaging (titles and thumbnails), and test at least three thumbnail concepts per video to increase your odds.
2. Prioritizing quantity over quality
Many beginners upload frequently, but their videos are average and/or rushed.
The issue here is pretty simple:
Poor first impressions = viewers don’t return
Lower retention and satisfaction = weaker signals for the algorithm to keep testing your videos.
If growing faster is more important to you than getting reps in, focus on finding your sweet spot between quality and quantity.
If you can't give something that is already on YouTube, why would a viewer watch you over a channel they already consume?
3. You forget about the existence of TAM.
If you make very specific videos about very niche topics, you might want to think about how you position your video.
Let's say you make videos about collecting stamps. You could make a title like:
''1951 DDL Stamp - Authentic!''
This, my good friend, is far from optimised for broader YouTube viewership.
If you truly care about getting more people involved in your videos and hobby, you need to optimise for the viewers that simply ''don't know.''
Example:
'' I Found the Rarest Stamp From 1951..''
Pair that with a thumbnail with a hand and the stamp in it, and a thumb text like ''Worth $4500+!''
All of a sudden, many more people can click on it and be mesmerized by stamps who weren't before.
I'll talk a lot more about this in my weekly free newsletter soon, link below!
English

The next 2 upcoming big launches are Monad & MegaETH.
Former is launching next month, latter is probably launching before EOY.
You have a big opportunity to get involved in MegaETH before TGE with their upcoming Sonar launch.
After Plasma, this will most certainly be oversubscribed instantly as I expect a reasonable valuation.
Leaked details from an official site show priority to users based on their social media (either talk about MegaETH or are a real person), GitHub (favouring developers), additional wallets (either own Fluffles or are active on-chain), etc. MegaETH community will most likely be favoured with this being included.
They've taken an approach to be community-first for a while. Echo launch, Fluffles and now finally Sonar. Excited for this and think you should participate!
(Disclosure: I am an investor in Monad but have no exposure to MegaETH)

English

@JPainter_ @SamJonesArt No bro, I think it looks great. The intro was fire, but from past experience, viewers on YouTube hate the use of AI.
English

@armaaniyt @SamJonesArt I’d have loved to have just not used it at all for that opening shot either but in the end I decided I’d rather use it just once and get my vision exactly as I imagined it rather than it not hitting right, in future though when I can avoid it I will
English

YouTube AdSense is a trap, everyone knows that already
The alternative AdSense is External Monetization
It is how MrBeast and thousands of other creators are making millions without relying on YouTube
Like, RT and reply with "HOW" and I'll send you a step-by-step guide on how you can use external monetization to make money on YouTube

English




















