Mark Fletcher

@Hitchslap1 We have one. Marxists.

We need a slur for Marxists.

@angelagodoy @Hombrelmparable No need, they’ll tell you whether you want to know or not.

@Hombrelmparable E as ex-esposas, foram pesquisadas também?

Le pregunté a varios hombres divorciados con los que trabajo: "¿Cuándo te diste cuenta de que tu matrimonio había terminado?" 9 de cada 10 mencionaron estos momentos. (Y no fue infidelidad, no fue una gran pelea)...

@honeymoon250 Republicans’ best chance for 2028.

So what would you call this Presidential Team?

@ethicalcha0s @Ravenismeee Nowadays “smash melee” is a euphemism… 🤪

@Ravenismeee Smash Melee at my cousin's house when I was like 5 years old. It blew my mind that you could actually move the characters. Before that day I had never heard of a video game. It was insane. 4 player smash as my introduction to gaming. Probably my favourite single childhood memory

Without telling me your age… what was the very FIRST video game you ever played?

@TackyWhale98 @Ravenismeee lol at “cd rom”… I see your cd rom and raise you cassette tape!

@anemalFTM @Ravenismeee Oh holy shit I’d forgotten about this one!!!

@Ravenismeee asteroids

@Ravenismeee I think it was probably “Firebirds” on a 16K ZX Spectrum. It was also the very first game I hacked on my own (infinite lives, anyone?)

@rapatel0 @Ric_RTP Competition has well and truly emerged.

@Ric_RTP The likely outcome is to dilute and pass 150 B in paper share value to the non-profit arm. Dilutes all investors, but ultimately it it’s a no op. Bigger issue is that OpenAI has to take their eye off the ball. Allowing competition to emerge

In 19 days, a jury in Oakland is going to decide whether the entire legal foundation of the AI industry is built on fraud. Everyone thinks the Musk vs Altman lawsuit is a billionaire grudge match. Two egos, one grudge, a $150 billion damages number designed for headlines. Easy to dismiss. Easy to scroll past. That's exactly what Altman wants you to think. Because what's actually on trial on April 27 is something much BIGGER than Elon's hurt feelings... A jury is going to decide whether you can legally take billions of dollars in nonprofit donations, use them to build the most valuable technology in human history, and then quietly convert that nonprofit into a for-profit company worth $850 billion. If the answer is no, the entire AI industry has a problem. Because OpenAI is not the only company that did this: Anthropic was founded by OpenAI defectors using the same nonprofit-first mission language. xAI pitches itself as building AI "for humanity." Every frontier lab has used the moral cover of "we're doing this for the good of the world" to attract talent, capital, and regulatory goodwill they would have never gotten otherwise. An Elon win doesn't just touch OpenAI. It creates a legal precedent that every AI company built on a nonprofit or public benefit promise becomes vulnerable to shareholder and donor clawback suits. That's why this case matters. And that's why Altman is panicking. Just look at what he did this week: Elon filed a motion demanding the court remove Altman and Brockman from their roles and FORCE OpenAI to return to its nonprofit origins. Then he amended the suit to say if he wins the $150 billion, all of it goes to OpenAI's charity arm. Not him. Zero dollars to Elon personally. That amendment was surgical. It stripped Altman of his entire public defense. He can no longer claim this is about Elon's ego or Elon's bank account. Elon is now legally on record saying he just wants the mission back. OpenAI's response was to panic-write a letter to the California and Delaware attorneys general asking them to investigate Elon for "anti-competitive behavior." Their strategy chief publicly accused Elon of coordinating attacks with Mark Zuckerberg. They called the lawsuit "harassment driven by ego and jealousy." That's NOT the response of a company that thinks it's going to win. Real companies with real defenses don't ask the government to silence the person suing them 3 weeks before trial. They let the evidence speak. OpenAI is scrambling because they know what's in discovery. Elon's team has been building this case for two years. Emails, board minutes, internal conversations about the conversion. The kind of paper trail that juries understand and executives can't explain away. And the timing couldn't be worse... OpenAI is trying to IPO at $852 billion. They just raised $122 billion. Microsoft has $135 billion of exposure to them. A jury verdict that even partially sides with Elon in late April or May would crater the entire IPO runway and send shockwaves through every major AI investor on Earth. This is why Altman spent the last 2 weeks doing press tours and policy blueprints and "super intelligence agendas" aimed at Washington. He's trying to REFRAME himself as the responsible statesman of AI right before a jury decides if he's a con artist. Most people will watch this trial start and think it's celebrity drama. The smart money is watching it and realizing that the legal foundation of the AI boom is about to be tested in court for the first time EVER. And if that foundation cracks, everything built on top of it is at risk.

@TiffanyFong Pics or it didn’t happen!

should i announce next time i have sex

@ThomasSowell She is 100% right.

What would you advise this woman?

@Getinwithgame Surely BOTH ways round???

Don’t let that happen. Stay focused on your own life. She should be adding to your world — not the other way around.

Most girls have no real hobbies. And she really doesn’t want you to notice. If you pay attention, you’ll see the truth: Her “hobbies” are usually:

@auguste_caron @XFreeze I’m resisting putting too much imagination into what “agape” was supposed to be…

@XFreeze Christianity precepts could be used as AI core principles; you shall not lie. You shall not kill. Charity. Forgiveness. Agape. Would be a better foundation than wokeness for sure.

I am telling you, Anthropic is not building an AI that is here to protect humanity, but rather an AI that will turn against it They're deep into the woke rabbit hole and they do not care about morality Their AI safety team is a joke. Their moral guide for AI is literally a leftist lunatic with a twisted understanding of reality, who doesn't really care if the end goal causes humanity's end They have proved this at every opportunity they've had, and it's crystal clear

@WorkElizab Not for no reason. It was never for no reason. And women used to understand that.

Can we actually do that?

@AntiWokeMemes Just wouldn’t happen

What would you do??

@SERPREMACY @EddieJarosz @nyprepper1 True, since it isn’t about anything.

@EddieJarosz @nyprepper1 This post isn’t about you cockhead 😭

@EddieJarosz @nyprepper1 Just block him and move on

@nyprepper1 Why is this morons garbage popping up on my notifications as if I gave any fucks even if this was true….. As did you expect me to somehow react with me running down to my nuclear proof bunker? Fucking morons smh

@CWilksy_78 @sheep_142 @maltagliat @ReemAmirIbrahim Nope. As I said, it doesn’t work like that. You asked them a dumb question which I called out. And you have spent the rest of this interaction trying to make it about something else, which demonstrates that you know it.

@mark27q1 @sheep_142 @maltagliat @ReemAmirIbrahim What part of I asked a commenter a question did you not get? I couldn’t care less your opinion I wanted their info. Now go away.

The state pension costs working-age Brits over £150 billion a year. Is it fair for young people to pay the highest tax burden in British history to fund every single pensioner? Especially when 25% are millionaires?

@AntiWokeMemes The utter unattractiveness of the woke woman, obviously.

Guys, what is stopping you from dating a woke woman?

@WMerilson25399 @SantelJonesB4L @lady_valor_07 Came here to say the same. Completely bizarre.

@SantelJonesB4L @lady_valor_07 thats retarded never tip more than 15% unless they are extraordinary

what would you do in this situation😭?

@lady_valor_07 Zero, to make a point. If a particular server had gone above and beyond in some way I would give them cash directly. But the restaurant’s stats need to show that customers punished this entitled behaviour.