King Proctor👑
669 posts

King Proctor👑
@Proctor4Gov
just a man for justice.
South Alabama Katılım Ağustos 2025
62 Takip Edilen60 Takipçiler

Mailmen are allowed to walk on grass. Grass can be walked on. She walked on it. She has weights on it. Stop being precious about grass.
Hoops@Hoopss
Lady asked the mail man not to walk on the grass, so he tossed the mail on the ground. Who is in the wrong here?
English

@KathlynJ4790 We have her car data showing she hit John and you refuse it lol you’re who you claim we are.
English

@KarenReadAKunt @GlammaSooz @im_an_A_G @GeauxTgr66 @mart794665 @MafiaMasshole @WKnoxGrott @DBeck57030037 @ourx_vault She’s a little drunk
English

@GlammaSooz @im_an_A_G @GeauxTgr66 @mart794665 @MafiaMasshole @WKnoxGrott @DBeck57030037 @Proctor4Gov @ourx_vault Response time to what?
English

For all the Antis @MafiaMasshole @WKnoxGrott @DBeck57030037 @Proctor4Gov @MamaLama43
ANSWER THIS:
IF Karen was going 24 mph in reverse, she would have traveled at least 100 feet AFTER hitting the brakes. She would have taken out all vehicles in the driveway of 34 Fairview
**********************
For a 6,000 lb vehicle traveling at 24 mph in reverse, the total stopping distance is approximately 80 to 95 feet on dry, level pavement.
This total distance is the sum of the "thinking distance" (reaction time) and the "braking distance" (physical stopping of the vehicle).Breakdown of Stopping DistanceReaction Distance (~53 feet): Assuming a standard reaction time of 1.5 seconds, a vehicle moving at 24 mph (35.2 ft/s) will travel roughly 52.8 feet before the driver even hits the brake pedal.
Braking Distance (~27–42 feet):On dry asphalt (coefficient of friction \(\mu \approx 0.7\)), a typical vehicle takes about 27.5 feet to come to a halt after the brakes are applied.For a 6,000 lb vehicle, while basic physics suggests mass cancels out, real-world factors like brake efficiency and tire load often result in a slightly lower deceleration rate (around 0.5g to 0.6g), extending this portion to 35–42 feet.
Factors Affecting Reverse Braking Braking in reverse at high speeds (24 mph is considered very fast for reversing) introduces significant instability:
Weight Transfer: When braking hard in reverse, the vehicle's weight shifts toward the rear (the front of the vehicle in its direction of travel). Since most vehicles have more powerful brakes and better traction on the "true" front wheels, this weight shift can reduce overall braking effectiveness.
Handling Instability: High-speed reversing is inherently unstable. Slamming the brakes at 24 mph in reverse can cause the vehicle to "fishtail" or spin because the steering wheels are now trailing the direction of travel, making it difficult to stop in a straight line.
Road Conditions: On wet or slippery surfaces, the stopping distance can easily double, reaching over 150 feet
********************************
Unlike the McAlberts & Friends --
PHYSICS DOESN'T LIE
English

@OldMerIsDead Rebecca is a very jealous girl, sexless, washed up hag.
English

👀 Job well done, Ted. It’s infuriating to find this out.
Imagine the other things that could be uncovered if the State Legislature hadn’t shut down the audit approved by 72% of MA voters, so there can be transparency in how our tax dollars are being spent.
What your investigation did was prove the government wants to hide how our money is spent!
@massauditor @the72percent
#mapoli
#Endcorruption
English

Here’s a preview of “Clocking In and Cashing Out”, a long form investigative and accountability report airing this evening on #Boston25
This is the story I first posted about Monday.
English

@Proctor4Gov @TheFutureFlashx @DonutsBaga There is only ONE beta boy on this site that over uses “lol”.
English

@Proctor4Gov @TheFutureFlashx @DonutsBaga It’s SO obvious that this is your burner Rouge! You SUCK at this.
English

Okay Rouguey! Imagine needing badly cropped Facebook memes to cope with the fact the state spent years trying to convict her and still failed. 💀
Your entire argument is just “look at these bullet points!!” while ignoring the contaminated scene, destroyed credibility, conflicting testimony, missing chain of custody issues, and experts who blew holes in the CW theory.
If the case was so airtight, she’d be in prison not free while internet detectives recycle grandpa quality memes at 4pm on a Tuesday.
English

@Proctor4Gov @TheFutureFlashx @DonutsBaga “Taillight in his shirt” has become your cult’s emotional support sentence because it’s the only line you can memorize. 😭
English

At 7:55 AM, Jen McCabe texts Brian Albert a Dunkin order
“large hot with cream and sugar.”
Julie Albert testified she woke up around 8-ish, went to Dunkin, then arrived at 34 Fairview Road around 8:30, where Brian Albert waved her into the house.
But Julie also testified she parked behind her nephew’s vehicle.
Problem is, That vehicle does NOT appear in earlier Canton PD scene photographs while officers were still on scene until roughly 7:50 AM.
So when did the vehicle arrive? Who drove it there?
Did Brian leave after CPD cleared the first time?
Did Brian return before Lank and Gallagher came back? Was Brian Albert continuously inside the house that entire morning… or not?
English

@Proctor4Gov @TheFutureFlashx @DonutsBaga That's just the smell of critical thinking and having opinions. I can see how that would be foreign to you.
English

@Proctor4Gov @benchslappedtv lolwut? You are King of the provably false statement.
English

I love how the antis scream jury tampering, a rigged jury, and every other conspiracy imaginable anytime something doesn’t fit their narrative.
You do realize Hank Brennan had every opportunity during voir dire to strike jurors he didn’t want, right? That’s literally the purpose of jury selection. Both sides evaluate demeanor, answers, background, bias, credibility, and make strategic decisions based on how they think jurors will lean. Sometimes they’re right and sometimes they’re wrong.
David Yanetti openly admitted they read certain jurors completely wrong and believed some of them were likely guilty votes. That alone destroys this fantasy that the jury was somehow secretly “rigged” for Karen Read. Jurors are human beings, not chess pieces, and lawyers misread people all the time. That’s not evidence of corruption. That’s reality in litigation. The only corruption that existed was that of the Norfolk County District, attorneys office, Massachusetts state police, Canton police and those that thought it was a good idea to even charge Karen in the first place! x.com/FerventHosp/st…
English

@melrevision He’s not gonna help you lezzbow lol you’re gonna be eating alive
English

It’s amazing to me that folks are accusing @DoctorTurtleboy of ruining their lives when they disagree with him(which is just ludicrous), meanwhile I’m getting harassed by all these sockpuppets just bc I appeared on the fundraiser.
GIF
English

@Proctor4Gov @TheFutureFlashx @DonutsBaga You just might be surprised of the outcome! Fuck up bitches
English









