Masrawy

@J80936488 @3lfares @kat_pysh42493 @Alonso_GD Zionist braincells incapable of creating a free account, or even bothering to simply Google or read the words of an ex Israeli foreign minister in his own book.

@masrellobello @3lfares @kat_pysh42493 @Alonso_GD You can’t bother sending me a source I can actually read lmao, I’m still waiting

It was never yours, thieves.

@J80936488 @3lfares @kat_pysh42493 @Alonso_GD Lol bro lost and still arguing. Can’t even bother clicking on the Israeli sources.

@masrellobello @3lfares @kat_pysh42493 @Alonso_GD Don’t give me some half assed source next time that doesn’t even proof your point

@DShamen @3lfares Yet genetic and archeological studies that have been done on the subject show strong genetic continuity of Egyptians. No evidence of arab mass migration or genocide of Egyptians. You can’t prove otherwise, unless the evidence is your arsehole.

@masrellobello @3lfares Not the original Egyptians, twat.

@J80936488 @3lfares @kat_pysh42493 @Alonso_GD Again, embarrassing Jon. The sources are listed at the bottom of the page, you are free to check them out yourself. You want to be spoon fed?

@masrellobello @3lfares @kat_pysh42493 @Alonso_GD You can’t even give me a source that I have full access too lmao. Also the blurb only ambiguously said Sadat addressed “most” of Israel’s concerns, which doesn’t help your case lol

@J80936488 @3lfares @kat_pysh42493 @Alonso_GD Not knowing the most basic fact about the October war and still arguing is embarrassing. journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00…

@masrellobello @3lfares @kat_pysh42493 @Alonso_GD And yet no sources provided

@J80936488 @3lfares @kat_pysh42493 @Alonso_GD You’re clearly highly informed about the topic ;)

@masrellobello @3lfares @kat_pysh42493 @Alonso_GD

@J80936488 @3lfares @kat_pysh42493 @Alonso_GD You should learn some history. Sadat tried diplomacy many times before the October war. The war was designed specifically to disrupt the status quo and end the political stalemate that Israel enjoyed after the war of attrition was over.

@masrellobello @3lfares @kat_pysh42493 @Alonso_GD Israel wasn’t forced to give it back, it created a process where they got peace with Egypt in exchange, something Egypt was not willing to entertain before

@DShamen @3lfares What is the definition of arab, idiot?

@3lfares Egypt was never Arab either. Give it back.

@ElezorCa @3lfares We love that cockiness of pre-1973, keep it up

@3lfares we won it war, looser

@maxamillion040 @3lfares A war that israel started? You must be happy the US saved your asses

@3lfares egypt lost it in a war. lol

@J80936488 @3lfares @kat_pysh42493 @Alonso_GD The agranat commission was setup because israel won the war🤣

@3lfares @kat_pysh42493 @Alonso_GD Tell yourself whatever you want. At the end of the day, it was still a tactical Israeli victory which led to Egypt recognizing Israel and getting blacklisted by the Arab world for a while

@kat_pysh42493 @3lfares @Alonso_GD Do you have evidence for this 30km claim idiot?

@3lfares @Alonso_GD Egypts army was decimated Israel was 30km from Cairo.

@fQueenLadygaga @mog_russEN Obsessed cunt

@mog_russEN They were covering it maybe because of unappropriate content, in least they don't try to force you to do it like Muslims

🚨⚡️ UNUSUAL Jewish children on a flight from New York to Tel Aviv covered their screens due to Sabbath rules prohibiting the use of electronic devices.

@Cutman4567 @Alonso_GD The onus is on who to show evidence when a 2 month old baby is killed zio pig?

@Alonso_GD When you say no evidence was found, you cross referenced these claims against the Hamas confessionals, I mean martyr notices, in which, in dozens of instances, the claim that no military target was present was invalidated by Hamas providing the name, rank and serial # of the🎯

On 19 Oct 23, Israel bombed the Church of St. Porphyrius, where 100s of Christians were seeking refuge, killing 18 people including Yara, Juliet, and George. The IDF posted about the attack but quickly deleted it. No evidence of a “military site” has been presented or found

This is factually untrue and false and a lie as I explain, with evidence and receipts, here:

@egypt4egyptians @wenzema124 What is the will of the people now?

@wenzema124 Here is the will of people or are those not people in your books?

A terrorist, the whole muslim brotherhood is a terrorist organization who killed thousands of Egyptians. USA supported this regime, was about to flip on Egypt after the 2013 revolution. Egyptians did the right thing in 2011 & did it again in 2013 after removing this guy.

@MizoLFC @RoyalKimmich Yeah ofc we’ve seen his midfield dominance in Denmark

@RoyalKimmich "midfield battle" you mean dominance? masterclass? midfielder 101?

Can't believe I'm about to watch Emam Ashour in a midfield battle with Pedri and Rodri I'm crying this is a fever dream

@slimy7785 @blob206 @muntazireimam84 Where are you from cunt? Do what you’re preaching

@blob206 @muntazireimam84 Seen videos of the younger generation not knowing how to pray, perplexed how u speak Arabic but are furthest from Islam. We don’t want u crying when Israeli tanks are at your homes, keep it silent

Are Egyptians still charging exaggerated amounts, or was it only for Gazans?

@YoniMichanie @mehdirhasan Can you write without using chatgpt zio boy?

You’re collapsing complex historical categories into a slogan and then calling it analysis. No serious historian treats “who fired the first shot” as the sole definition of aggression or self-defense. That’s not how international relations works, and it’s not how the 1956 or 1967 wars are studied. Take 1967. By the time Israel struck, Gamal Abdel Nasser had already: - Massed troops in Sinai - Expelled the United Nations Emergency Force - Closed the Straits of Tiran to Israeli shipping Under international law and historical convention, closing the Straits was widely treated as an act of war. So reducing the question to “who attacked first” is a textbook oversimplification. Yes, Menachem Begin later described the war as a “choice”—but that quote is constantly stripped of context. His broader point was that Israel chose to strike before being attacked in order to avoid what it perceived as an imminent, coordinated assault. That’s the definition of a preemptive—or if you prefer, preventive—war. Those are debated categories, but they are not the same as unprovoked aggression. Same issue with 1956. Ignoring years of Egyptian-backed fedayeen attacks and the blockade of Israeli shipping, and then saying “Israel attacked first,” again reduces a multi-year escalation to a single moment. That’s not serious history—that’s cherry-picking. And the claim that saying Israel was “attacked first in every war” is a “lie” depends entirely on how you define “attack.” If you define it narrowly as “who fired the first conventional shot,” you can make that argument. If you include blockades, proxy warfare, troop mobilization, and expulsion of peacekeepers—as historians generally do—the picture is very different. So this isn’t about people needing to “Google 1967.” It’s about understanding that wars don’t start at the first airstrike—they start with a chain of escalatory actions. If you want to argue that Israel made strategic choices—and it did—that’s a legitimate debate. But pretending those choices happened in a vacuum, and reducing everything to “who shot first,” is not a serious reading of history. But then again, you’re not a very serious person.

Calling “Google 1967” like it’s a mic-drop only works if you actually grapple with what happened. Egypt didn’t just posture—it closed the Straits of Tiran (a recognized act of war), expelled UN peacekeepers without resistance, and massed 80,000 troops on Israel’s border while coordinating with neighboring states. That’s not some abstract “tension,” that’s a textbook casus belli under international law. Pretending Israel just woke up and chose aggression ignores the sequence that made conflict all but inevitable. And let’s not gloss over the UN’s role—you know full well those forces withdrew immediately when asked, removing the last buffer precisely when escalation was peaking. Everyone involved understood what that meant. So framing 1967 as if Israel had no legitimate claim to self-defense isn’t just oversimplified—it’s willfully selective. If you’re going to tell people to “Google,” at least don’t skip the parts that destroy your narrative.