CyrilHodl

6K posts

CyrilHodl banner
CyrilHodl

CyrilHodl

@maxitaker

Trader & degenerate |Founder of @utopia_web3 || Proud holder of @taprootwizards || Project Advisor @endshields

England, United Kingdom Katılım Eylül 2025
1.2K Takip Edilen392 Takipçiler
CyrilHodl retweetledi
ENDSHIELDS
ENDSHIELDS@Endshields·
🚨 $500 USDT IN REWARDS!!! 🎉 EndShields just launched a campaign with @taskonxyz! ⏰ Live until April 24. Complete tasks and earn rewards. Join through the link below! 👉 taskon.xyz/quest/141924101
ENDSHIELDS tweet media
English
65
3.5K
356
26.6K
CyrilHodl retweetledi
Å𝖒Ø𝖗
Å𝖒Ø𝖗@Amordeev·
𝐀𝐢𝐫𝐝𝐫𝐨𝐩 𝐂𝐚𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐢𝐠𝐧 💌 $𝟐𝟎𝟎 𝐔𝐩 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐆𝐫𝐚𝐛 by @Pocket_SOL Apply : forms.gle/gsJ4VhjoRAh6Tp… Submit SOL address via Form Like & Retweet 12hrs ⏰
Å𝖒Ø𝖗 tweet media
English
340
280
434
11.8K
Vadim (AI, ⋈)
Vadim (AI, ⋈)@zacodil·
nobody accidentally swaps $50M into a pool with $36K of liquidity lol. fresh wallet, $50.4M from Binance, zero slippage protection, routed through the jankiest Sushiswap path possible. and then an MEV bot just happens to flash borrow $29M from Morpho in the same block and pocket $9.9M? cmon. 0xngmi called this exact play a year ago - construct a deliberately terrible swap, let a friendly bot extract the value, dirty money comes out the other side as "legit MEV profit." $154K per AAVE isn't a fat finger. it's a laundering fee
Watcher.Guru@WatcherGuru

JUST IN: Trader accidentally swaps $50 million $USDT for $36,000 $AAVE on Ethereum.

English
378
568
7.1K
1.2M
Umbrella
Umbrella@Bigg_Bhrella·
He’s Aura Farming! Not Nonchalant🤧
English
131
1.1K
10.4K
247.3K
Uncle Vor 🧬| Ascension Era
There's a lesson here frens Those who you trust the most will hurt and disappoint you the most in the end of the day ! Think about it
whysomad 🧬@0xwhysomad

to the situation on @MitosisOrg We / I could have take profit but we didn't: Option A or B - I took tMITO ~ ( 112k if I remember right) cause I believed in the narrative of EOL and "yield on yield token" - @MikadoHubLabs were granted with 141k $MITO [ worth of grant time about 16k$ ~ 20k$) while other dApps got alot of more for their "bubbles" build. of these 141k MITO we swapped 95%+ into $tMITO and staked it. - Mikado got a validator node to run, costs about ~1900$ / year, we also started with the lowest validator tier, so lowest revenue, we never took profit. hodled gMITO and tMITO - myself even bought more MITO ________ total: 562,374 tMITO @MurinXDA , Mikado and me likely never took any profit or barely converted gMITO, on peak we hold about 10% of all gMITOs We gained experience and had fun, and along the way, we became friends. We helped out, provided feedback on new features, and served as beta testers. Murin gained intense knowledge about SC / DEV. We are still thankful for all of this. We always believed in the narrative of EOL and supported it fully. But seeing the team get along so well with a payout to @Binance while ignoring those who always trusted, built, and believed in the project — that really feels like a disturbing loss of respect. The silence is just a sign of weakness: an unwillingness to admit that the project failed. It's as if they're ashamed of themselves. Please don’t be upset with the whole team — it’s really just a decision that came by the founders (Jake, Luke, and JY?). All the friends we have gained during Mitosis are the greatest gift. I love you all. ❣️ sincerely and disappointed WSM ps: maybe one day I will write a full detailed thread about what went wrong about Mitosis ( 20% initial drop, Binance, bubbles build etc.)

English
3
0
11
290
CyrilHodl
CyrilHodl@maxitaker·
@Crypto_Zh0u I blame mitosis once again you would have been in Dubai with family with $100k damn that team
English
0
0
1
28
Zh0u
Zh0u@Crypto_Zh0u·
When a defi bro is telling me about all the farming strategies he is doing but I am broke as hell:
English
18
1
40
903
Zh0u
Zh0u@Crypto_Zh0u·
They say you need to study hard, get a proper education to get a job with a stable pay Now all I get is a stable pay with no increments & I need to use it to pay the education loan
English
7
1
28
470
CyrilHodl
CyrilHodl@maxitaker·
@njokuScript Hi possiblity this project will fail if they are affiliated with mitosis !
English
0
0
1
144
njokuscript.um
njokuscript.um@njokuScript·
The Ultramarkets team is growing with insane talent density.. We now have people from Bloomberg Terminal, Mitosis, MakerDAO(Sky) & Stripe. We’re bringing the best of tradfi & defi together to build the Margin Layer for Prediction Markets! Hiring more roles soon.
njokuscript.um tweet medianjokuscript.um tweet media
English
20
9
153
7.3K
CyrilHodl
CyrilHodl@maxitaker·
@alocealoce_ @njokuScript So what happens to people who believed in mitosis and staked for 6months you just gonna ignore us and move on to the next it’s not cool and remember if you don’t address this. It will affect your new project
English
0
0
3
118
Alice
Alice@alocealoce_·
@njokuScript glad to be part of the team that's shipping the first and only proper margin trading layer for prediction markets 🫡
English
2
1
9
1.1K
Alice
Alice@alocealoce_·
last weekend, an attacker exploited a CLOB price manipulation vector on @ultramarketsxyz, causing ~$3.2k in vault losses. shipped a twap guard to prod within hours, and this week we're heads down building an automated detection of suspicious activities. here's the full story: blog.ultramarkets.xyz/how-a-price-ma…
English
8
4
85
7.9K
DramaAlert
DramaAlert@DramaAlert·
Donald Trump ENDORSES Jake Paul for political office.
English
587
229
6.1K
1.2M
Zh0u
Zh0u@Crypto_Zh0u·
I think we need an answer from @MitosisOrg in regards to the tMITO unlocking date When exactly can we redeem it? Anyone with any info? I just feel extremely disappointed how it went post-TGE Hard to believe after building for 3 years, this happens
Rob Inmoods@robinmoods

Yesterday (March 10, 2026 - 1 PM UTC) was supposed to mark the end of the 180-day tMITO lockup period. However: isLockupEnded → false And the team set: lockupEndTime = 281474976710655 (uint48) 💀 Mitosis: the programmable rekt.

English
31
4
70
15.1K
Shy🌊
Shy🌊@Onoja_Cee·
If you have assets tied up in tMito, the situation is looking like a potential soft rug or outright project abandonment already. ​When founders like @Luke_onair go silent and the smart contract doesn’t align with marketing promises, it’s a major warning sign. Keep in mind that the team failed to set the 180-day lockup period in the contract correctly. Today marks the scheduled unlock date, yet it appears no one is able to claim their tokens or promised multipliers. You got rugged, brother. Move on!!! ​Most of the team members, noticeably @alocealoce_ and @DeFi_Tex already left. ​I honestly feel sorry for my friends @jasonzhou1993, @Natalia77351991, and @sam6170, who were rugged on this. This is the end of Mitosis. ​My advice to @Luke_onair: You’ve been a terrible founder. No one will ever take you seriously again, regardless of what you build next. Even if you choose to rebrand, we will find you. Between this and the other rugs mentioned this year by @zachxbt, I think Trove and Mitosis are the worst I’ve witnessed in my entire time in crypto. ​The bar keeps getting lower. I’m going to stay right here and watch how this all eventually plays out.
Shy🌊 tweet mediaShy🌊 tweet media
Shy🌊@Onoja_Cee

A big gMito to everyone who can relate to this.

English
15
1
64
7.6K
Cookie DAO 🍪
Cookie DAO 🍪@cookiedotfun·
If you’re a trader, a lot of your edge comes from living on CT. Instead of spending hours researching, you can just query it. Here are 5 prompts you can run with Cookie AI research: → What happened on CT before the last price move for [token]? → Which tokens are gaining mindshare fastest right now? → Which accounts are driving the narrative around [sector/token]? → Which tokens have rising social signal but haven’t moved yet? → What are the dominant narratives on CT this week? Reminder: we’ve just opened friends & family access. Tell us how you’d use it and the best answers get in.
Cookie DAO 🍪 tweet media
English
19
6
55
6.8K
Naval
Naval@naval·
Is Traditional Software Engineering Dead? “Does this mean that traditional software engineering is dead? Absolutely not. Software engineers—even the ones who are not necessarily tuning or training AI models—these are now among the most leveraged people on earth. Sure, the guys who are training and tuning models are even more leveraged because they’re building the tool set that software engineers are using. But software engineers still have two massive advantages on you. First, they think in code, so they actually know what’s going on underneath. And all abstractions are leaky. So when you have a computer programming for you—when you have Claude Code or equivalent programming for you—it’s going to make mistakes. It’s going to have bugs. It’s going to have suboptimal architecture. So it’s not going to be quite right. And someone who understands what’s going on underneath will be able to plug the leaks as they occur. So if you want to build a well-architected application, if you want to be able to even specify a well-architected application, if you want to be able to make it run at high performance, if you want it to do its best, if you want to catch the bugs early, then you’re going to want to have a software engineering background. The traditional software engineer is going to be able to use these tools much better. And there are still many kinds of problems in software engineering that are out of scope for these AI programs today. The easiest way to think about those is problems that are outside of their data distribution. For example, if they need to do a binary sort or reverse a linked list, they’ve seen countless examples of that, so they’re extremely good at it. But when you start getting out of their domain—where you have to write very high-performance code, when you’re running on architectures that are novel or brand new, when you’re actually creating new things or solving new problems, then you still need to get in there and hand code it. At least until either there are so many of those examples that new models can be trained on them, or until these models can sufficiently reason at even higher levels of abstraction and crack it on their own… And remember: there is no demand for average. The average app—nobody wants it, at least as long as it’s not filling some niche that is filled by a superior app. The app that is better will win essentially a hundred percent of the market. Maybe there’s some small percentage that will bleed off to the second-best app because it does some little niche feature better than the main app, or it’s cheaper, or something of the sort. But generally speaking, people only want the best of anything. So the bad news is there’s no point in being number two or number three—like in the famous Glengarry Glen Ross scene where Alec Baldwin says, “First place gets a Cadillac Eldorado, second place gets a set of steak knives, and third place you’re fired.” That’s absolutely true in these winner-take-all markets. That’s the bad news: You have to be the best at something if you want to win. However, the set of things you can be best at is infinite. You can always find some niche that is perfect for you, and you can be the best at that thing. This goes back to an old tweet of mine where I said, “Become the best in the world at what you do. Keep redefining what you do until this is true.” And I think that still applies in this age of AI.”
English
385
1.1K
7.2K
836.1K