Mike Cordeiro

@mc_khristina You gotta start somewhere…

So let me get this straight, I go to the grocery store and buy … a pound of sliced turkey in a plastic bag, a loaf of bread in a plastic bag, a gallon of milk in a plastic jug, a pack of napkins in plastic wrap, a store-made salad in a plastic tub, a plastic bottle of mustard and ketchup, but they won't give me a plastic bag to carry it home because the plastic bag is bad for the environment? 🙄😂

@WerderEdNFL You gotta start somewhere….

This is what happens in Colorado. Insane.

@dpbrugler I’m not sure I’m going to be able to print it anymore it’s gotten so huge!

Almost there. Most extensive, detailed draft guide we've done. Can't wait to share it!

@orbvase @KL71ind @esf69 @WiseOneAwakens You are all idiots. The moon has no atmosphere and minimal gravity. That’s why they can get off its surface with minimal thrust. And they don’t return to earth in the lunar lander, it returns to the command module in the moons orbit and they return in that.

@KL71ind @esf69 @WiseOneAwakens The “moon landings” 57 years ago are very obviously dubious at best.

For all you highly moronic moon conspiracy theorists... The moon landings happened. Here are four bulletproof reasons why the hoax theory collapses under its own weight. 1. We brought back 842 pounds of moon rocks and geologists worldwide have been slicing them open for 55 years Apollo 11–17 crews hauled back samples that scream "lunar origin" in every isotope, crystal structure, and chemical signature. These rocks have zero water content (Earth rocks almost always have some), solar wind particles embedded from billions of years of unfiltered space exposure, and microscopic glass beads formed by ancient meteorite impacts— stuff impossible to replicate with 1960s tech. Independent labs in the Soviet Union, Europe, Japan, and China analyzed them and confirmed: same age (3.7–4.5 billion years), same exotic minerals like armalcolite, same lack of oxidation. If NASA faked it, they'd have needed a secret lunar rock factory decades ahead of its time. Conspiracy theorists never explain how we pulled that off while simultaneously "faking" the tech to get there. These samples are still studied today in museums and universities— you can touch (protected) pieces yourself. 2. Laser reflectors are still on the Moon, and anyone with the right equipment can ping them right now Apollo 11, 14, and 15 crews placed corner-cube retroreflectors on the lunar surface. These are passive mirrors (no batteries, no moving parts) that bounce laser beams straight back to Earth. Observatories like McDonald in Texas, Apache Point in New Mexico, and facilities in France, Italy, and Australia have been firing lasers at them daily since 1969 and measuring the round-trip time to millimeter precision. The data proves the distance to the Moon (about 384,400 km) and how it's slowly receding (3.8 cm/year). China’s Chang’e missions and India’s Chandrayaan have imaged the exact landing sites, including the hardware and tracks. If it was faked, the hoaxers would have needed to secretly land mirrors on the Moon— or convince every laser-ranging scientist on Earth to lie for half a century. Spoiler: they didn’t. 3. Modern orbiters from multiple countries have photographed the landing sites in high resolution—footprints and all NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) has snapped razor-sharp images of every Apollo site since 2009. You can see the descent stages, rover tracks, astronaut footprints, and even the exact paths they walked. Japan’s SELENE, India’s Chandrayaan-2, and China’s Chang’e-2 and Chang’e-3 orbiters independently confirmed the same shadows, hardware, and disturbance patterns. These aren’t blurry NASA photos from 1969, they’re crisp, multi-spectral images taken decades later by rival space agencies. The geometry matches perfectly: the flag is still there (Apollo 11’s fell over during liftoff), the rover is parked where they left it, and the blast craters under the landers are exactly as predicted. A studio set on Earth couldn’t survive that level of global scrutiny from space. 4. The conspiracy would have been bigger, dumber, and leakier than the actual mission Over 400,000 people worked on Apollo. That’s engineers, technicians, contractors, secretaries, and janitors across dozens of companies and universities. Not one deathbed confession, not one leaked memo, not one whistleblower with hard proof in 55+ years? That’s statistically insane. The Soviets were tracking every second of the missions in real time with their own radar and radio telescopes— they hated America’s guts and would have screamed "fake" at the first glitch if they could. Instead, they congratulated the U.S. and kept quiet. Faking it would have required inventing better special effects, vacuum chambers, and propulsion tech than what actually existed while hiding it from the very people who built the real rockets. Occam’s razor doesn’t just cut here; it eviscerates the hoax. The footage, the rocks, the reflectors, the photos, the tracking data— they all line up perfectly because the landings were real. The moon is still up there, waiting for the next crew. The evidence isn’t "believable", it’s undeniable. If you’re still on the fence, go look at an LRO image of Tranquility Base or bounce a laser off those reflectors yourself. Remember: conspiracy theory is the sophistication of the ignorant.

@Sportst17732434 @TheRealACF @DLLS_Cowboys I don’t agree the quality is close to same. The consensus this year is there are no blue chip prospects outside maybe Love (and he is a RB). If Arizona values 3 that much that’s fine. It’s their pick so they set the value. But I’m gonna let them pick if that’s the case.

@mcordeiro73 @TheRealACF @DLLS_Cowboys The quality is close to same everyone thinks the next draft is better this year prospects are often higher than last year Value charts typically go up for the seller not down It’s close enough that it’s probably a starting point here

What would you be willing to give up for the #DallasCowboys to go get David Bailey at #3 in the NFL Draft?

@infantrydort @WerderEdNFL Is this even a narrative?

America, please don’t listen to the new narrative that we wasted so much equipment to save one life. There’s a reason recruiting is through the roof. And it’s because we don’t leave your sons and daughters behind enemy lines because it’s financially convenient.

@Sportst17732434 @TheRealACF @DLLS_Cowboys It’s not just same position. Nobody is going to give the Raiders what say Washington gave for RGIII (and that wasn’t even #1 overall). The quality of the prospect also matters.

@mcordeiro73 @TheRealACF @DLLS_Cowboys Hauls* like Texans cardinals one was not a qb It was an edge defender so it’s very comparable to this one

@Sportst17732434 @TheRealACF @DLLS_Cowboys David Bailey (or Bain or Styles or Reese) are not Will Anderson, so you can’t expect the same compensation.

@mcordeiro73 @TheRealACF @DLLS_Cowboys Again you look at the last few hails for 12-3 and yeah it’s going to be costly I think it’s a no for both teams Makes it more difficult with Dallas not having a second to maybe negotiate it a bit

@Sportst17732434 @TheRealACF @DLLS_Cowboys Depends on the trade chart you look at. This one actually still favors Arizona even with the 65 kickback. It all depends on the level of prospect. In this draft you aren’t getting a haul just cause it’s 3. If that’s what you want I’d politely pass. drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Valu…

@mcordeiro73 @TheRealACF @DLLS_Cowboys Texans and cardinals did it in 23 for a non qb Texans traded 12, 33, next years first and third 12,20, 92 for 3 by draft trade chart still favors cowboys no way they get 65 back as well

@origiskool @PHNX_Cardinals @McShay13 That Jimmy Johnson chart is out dated. This chart shows 12 + 20 for 3 + 65 would be good value for Arizona. Not saying it is or isn’t. Just pointing out that it depends on the cart. drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Valu…

@PHNX_Cardinals @McShay13 Cards shouldn't accept anything less than 12, 20, and 92 for the 3rd pick. Draft value chart has that as a slight edge to Dallas.

The Arizona Cardinals have had draft trade talks with the Dallas Cowboys centered around David Bailey, per @McShay13.

@DLLS_Cowboys @Mr4thAndLong 12 & 20 if they kick back 65. drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Valu…

@TheRealACF @DLLS_Cowboys QB tax. Wouldn’t cost that here. Should be 12 & 20 for 3 & 65.

@DLLS_Cowboys Might wanna check out the 2021 trade between the 49ers, at pick 12 and the Dolphins at pick 3! The Niners ended up giving up pick 12 in 2021, a 2022 1st round pick, 2023 1st round pick and a 2022 3rd round pick! All to move up to pick 3! Is that one player worth all that?

@silqueduck @ShaykhSulaiman

@ShaykhSulaiman Haha!! Trump knew that by doing so Wood get lefty Islamists/illegals like yourself into a tizzy. Magicians know that distraction is the cornerstone of all they do.

TWO STATEMENTS BY TRUMP 7 MINUTES APART: Trump at 9:00: "Regime change was not our goal. We don't want that" Trump at 9:07: "Regime change is what we want. It is needed" These statements were made 7 minutes apart in the same speech

@KCKU_ @James31Warner @JEREMYDB_75 @J1SYx @barstoolsports Seriously. Why you so angry?

@James31Warner @JEREMYDB_75 @J1SYx @barstoolsports Chill

Jose Canseco your watch has ended. There is a new HR blooper

@Rage_Baiter69 @RapSheet lol. You’re an idiot. The team that hired him. The falcons. Don’t get the picks. The bears would cause they lost him. Moron

@RapSheet They hired the black man because of the picks, let that sink in

The #Bears have been lobbying for draft pick compensation following the hire of Ian Cunningham as #Falcons GM. Today, the NFL responded stating there will be no picks coming: “The matter is now closed following the club’s appeal. The NFL informed the Bears today they will not receive compensatory picks. The policy is designed to provide picks for the Primary Football Executive position. The League determined Mr. Cunningham did not fill that role with the Falcons as it is defined in League rules.”

@SamMonsonNFL Have you seen the rule book?

Why are they hiring lawyers, judges and aerospace engineers to be NFL officials? There are a LOT of capable people for whom $350k would be an AWESOME full-time salary. Why has the NFL targeted a small subset of people for whom that's not true?

@NewEra_Mogul @Mr4thAndLong All part of being a fan. All in good fun. We shit on your QB, you shit on our QB. We both shit on Washington’s and New York’s QB. I’m just happy we don’t have a RB playing QB. 😂

@mcordeiro73 @Mr4thAndLong I’m sure it is because your favorite football team is struggling to show you a good time

Bad Job Bu Your Social Team. Cmon Cuzzie Gotta Admit That, Right?

@TRatsack @itmeolliev @itismarkharris Not like the article literally called out men for doing it too and linked to a YouTube video of Brian Harman’s infinite wiggles…

@itmeolliev @itismarkharris Yup. They have never written about men’s golf playing slow…outkick.com/sports/phil-mi…

Alright, two things here. 1. Bailey Shoemaker would beat me senseless on the golf course. 2. This is the most uncomfortable, unacceptable thing my eyes have ever seen.

@NewEra_Mogul @Mr4thAndLong That isn’t a season. That’s just a good time.

@Mr4thAndLong Depends on the agenda of the person consuming the content but since it’s “shit on Jalen Hurts season” we get it and that would make it a good job, right?

@incogles @JihadiAsuka @slowcarscharles @ADMegs_10 It’s true. He just didn’t notice whites do the same cause the color of your skin isnt enough to establish behavior. Some non-whites will even wear shorts when it’s less than 70!

@JihadiAsuka @slowcarscharles @ADMegs_10 It's not.

What was the temperature of this game??