Matthew Eernisse

22.1K posts

Matthew Eernisse banner
Matthew Eernisse

Matthew Eernisse

@mde

Literal rock star developer. JavaScript, music, Japanese, and serial commas. 日本語でもOKです。

San Francisco, California USA Katılım Şubat 2007
210 Takip Edilen2.3K Takipçiler
Matthew Eernisse
Matthew Eernisse@mde·
I have no idea where this "data" is coming from, but this is 100% not what I see happening in the actual market. This guy is living in a fantasy world.
Anthony Pompliano 🌪@APompliano

I have changed my mind on how AI will impact jobs in America. Previously, I believed AI would replace many entry level roles typically filled by young employees. The technology would then work its way up the organization and eventually reduce the total number of jobs in a company. The data is saying something different, so when I get new information I am willing to change my mind. The number of software engineers being hired has been increasing. The number of open software engineer roles is growing. The number of new college grads who get hired has increased 5.6% over the last 12 months. The unemployment level for people aged 20-24 years old who have a college degree has fallen from nearly 9% to almost 5% as well. The Wall Street Journal recently wrote “AI created 640,000 jobs between 2023 and 2025 in the U.S., according to an analysis by LinkedIn of job posting data, including new white-collar positions such as Head of AI and AI engineer.” And I am starting to see companies throughout our portfolio aggressively hiring to keep up with the demand for their products and services. If AI can make employees more productive, which is widely accepted as fact, then companies are going to want as many productive units of labor as possible. This is a key reason why I am changing my mind. AI appears to be a magical technology that will make companies more productive and more profitable. The net result will be more corporations, more startups, and more jobs. All three are big, positive wins for the American economy.

English
0
0
0
97
Matthew Eernisse
Matthew Eernisse@mde·
@JonahDispatch I don't get being annoyed by it. If you do, it's because you're a fucking weasel. Don't be a fucking weasel. Don't enable these fuckers. You're part of the problem.
English
0
0
0
381
Jonah Goldberg
Jonah Goldberg@JonahDispatch·
I get being annoyed when Elizabeth Warren (who I find insufferable) or other Democrats play gotcha by asking “Do you believe Donald Trump lost in 2020?” You know what would have spared Republicans the embarrassment and annoyance of these questions? If Trump hasn’t lied about winning and hadn’t tried to steal the election.
English
558
312
3.6K
562.1K
PGCPS
PGCPS@pgcps·
NEWS — We're celebrating #EarthDay at Northview Elementary with @MDNR, @MDE, and @MSDE! Third graders planted 20 trees for climate learning and stewardship. #PGCPSProud
PGCPS tweet mediaPGCPS tweet mediaPGCPS tweet mediaPGCPS tweet media
English
1
1
3
734
Anthony Scaramucci
Anthony Scaramucci@Scaramucci·
We get our ass kicked every 80 years. And here's why. 👇🏼 After 80 years the generational memory is gone. Everyone who lived through the last crisis is dead. Revolution in 1776. 80 years later — the Civil War. 600,000 dead. We couldn't resolve the stain in the Constitution any other way. 80 years after that — the Great Depression leading into World War II. We're 80 years out again. The last World War II veterans are 100 years old. The institutional memory is gone. And instead of remembering why we came together — we're tearing each other apart. This is the pattern. Every single time. We get beaten badly enough that we look around and say — okay, this is screwed up. How do we fix it? So here's what fixing it looks like: -25 to 50 year plans. -Bipartisan commitment. -Fix K-12 education. -Rebuild the infrastructure. -Jobs training. -Curb the deficit spending. Not a four year political cycle. A generational commitment. We've rebuilt ourselves every 80 years. Time to do it again. @Newsweek
English
223
691
3.2K
177.9K
Matthew Eernisse retweetledi
Mitchell Hashimoto
Mitchell Hashimoto@mitchellh·
Now I understand the full picture. The cleanest fix is... But actually, the real fix simpler... Actually wait. The best fix: Now the real fix. Actually, let me reconsider. OK Key finding: Wait I need a hardware device I can physically punch to stop the agentic session.
English
180
159
4K
114K
Matthew Eernisse
Matthew Eernisse@mde·
@levie The jobs argument is not wrong. The vast majority of current manual work is not like this new type of job. The new, AI-powered workflows will require a ton of intelligence and creativity. This is not driving a truck. A significant majority of people will lose their jobs.
English
0
0
1
154
Aaron Levie
Aaron Levie@levie·
I think everyone is substantially underestimating the total demand for software and automation in areas that don’t feel like “software”. Not talking about software that’s another app on your phone. Software that just automates things for companies all day long. Most companies have not been able to bring automation to most areas of work because it’s been too complex or costly to do so. Outside of tech or maybe large banks, companies don’t have an unlimited supply of engineers. They have to ration resources very selectively, which means most things don’t get funded. Further, there are many projects that never got done simply because the technology wasn’t there to solve the problem. Basically anything even remotely touching unstructured data was impossible to automate before AI, or connecting data flows between systems that deal with significant variability, for instance. This is where all the new software and automation will be applied. It will be in CPG and retail connecting marketing stacks. Pharma research is about to explode because we can automate far more tests and simulations. Bankers and investors are going to run 10X the amount of analyses on every scenario. Healthcare providers will bring automation to the every step of the process. Now that agents bring down the cost of doing this work, and because many parts of it are now possible, companies will light these projects up. This is why there demand will continue for anyone technical enough to execute this work, and why the jobs arguments will be wrong.
English
71
67
593
121K
Matthew Eernisse
Matthew Eernisse@mde·
Yeah, not just that. It's a big PR thing, saving face. It was a horrible thing to see those hostages paraded around on TV constantly in the 70s, and that failed mission was the final fatal blow to Carter's presidency.
Craig Fuller 🛩🚛🚂⚓️@FreightAlley

During World War II, Hitler was convinced that Americans lacked the will to fight and that any who did would be quickly overwhelmed. When early reports arrived from the battles in North Africa, German observers noted that Americans fought differently from the Europeans. Rather than charging aggressively and risking heavy infantry casualties, U.S. forces relied on overwhelming firepower—staying at a distance and expending vast quantities of artillery with little hesitation. Thanks to unmatched industrial production and logistics, fresh supplies were always available. This approach allowed relatively smaller American units to wear down much larger and well-entrenched enemy forces. In contrast, German and other European doctrines often emphasized aggressive maneuver and were sometimes more willing to accept high casualties to achieve objectives or preserve key equipment. This material-heavy American style surprised many Germans, including Hitler, who had long dismissed U.S. soldiers as soft and lacking in fighting spirit. He believed soldiers were cheap and expendable; he discovered too late that Americans fought to conserve lives by expending machines and ammunition instead. It was one of many reasons for Germany’s defeat—perhaps the hardest for some foreigners to fully understand. Americans place a high value on the lives of our soldiers. Equipment and shells could always be replaced.

English
0
0
1
78
Matthew Eernisse
Matthew Eernisse@mde·
@donpark I have spent a lot of my career doing janitorial engineering work. It's bad enough when it's people. The mess from the so-called 10X engineers, etc. Agents are going to be so much worse.
English
1
0
1
18
Don Park
Don Park@donpark·
@mde And they'd never lift the lid to see th mess inside so they'll keep going until they can't anymore then call in an engineer to finish it bc it's almost done. It feels great to be needed but not for sewage diving.
English
1
0
0
21
andy
andy@1a1n1d1y·
presented without comment
andy tweet media
English
300
102
2.5K
464.4K
Faisal Aldosari
Faisal Aldosari@Fai5alAld0sar1·
@quxiaoyin Yeah and then when someone hacks into their database in 10 minutes they’re real grateful for AI.
English
1
0
0
104
Xiaoyin Qu
Xiaoyin Qu@quxiaoyin·
I realize non-programmers, if smart, can vibe code much faster than senior programmers on average. They just trust AI with everything and see great results.
English
175
17
282
26.5K