Sabitlenmiş Tweet

Kimi K3 just revealed why Jensen has been rooting for open source to win the entire AI race (Save this).
If only two or three labs, say OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google end up controlling frontier AI, they become enormously powerful buyers of compute.
That sounds good for Nvidia at first but it is actually dangerous.
A handful of mega scale buyers have the leverage and the balance sheets to eventually vertically integrate.
They can build custom chips, negotiate down Nvidia's margins, or in the extreme case become largely self sufficient on their own silicon.
Concentrated buyers become powerful enough to squeeze the supplier but An open source ecosystem prevents that concentration from ever forming.
When labs like Moonshot release frontier quality open weight models like Kimi K3, it does two things simultaneously.
It caps how much pricing power the closed labs can command, since enterprises now have a free, credible alternative to run instead of paying premium API prices.
And it multiplies the number of independent players competing at the model layer, which means no single lab or small cluster of labs ever accumulates enough scale or leverage to challenge Nvidia's position the way a concentrated oligopoly eventually could.
This is why more competition at the model layer is good for Nvidia specifically because of how it reshapes buyer power.
A fragmented market of many labs, many open forks, and many independent developers means demand for compute stays spread across thousands of buyers instead of consolidating into a few giants with the scale to eventually walk away from Nvidia's ecosystem.
Every one of those fragmented buyers still needs the same GPUs, whether they're running Kimi K3, a fine-tuned derivative of it, or their own separately trained model.
None of them individually have the size to negotiate the kind of custom silicon relationship that a company spending hundreds of billions of dollars a year could pursue.
So Jensen backing open source and simultaneously backstopping neocloud financing are the same strategic move from two different angles.
Both are designed to keep AI compute demand distributed across a large, competitive base of buyers who all rent from Nvidia-powered infrastructure, rather than letting the market consolidate into a small number of mega-buyers powerful enough to eventually threaten Nvidia's position as the industry's dominant supplier.
Bullish on open source and on Neoclouds, make sure to follow @MelvinInvests for more AI infrastructure insights.
English










