Malcy Whit

As another man who once worked with me declares himself saddened by my beliefs on gender and sex, I thought it might be useful to compile a list for handy reference. Which of the following do you imagine makes actors and directors who aren’t involved with the HBO reboot of Harry Potter so miserable? Is it my belief that women and girls should have their own public changing rooms and bathrooms? That women should retain female-only rape crisis centres? That men don’t belong in women’s sport? That female prisoners shouldn’t be incarcerated with violent men and male sex offenders? That women should remain a protected class in law, because they have sex-specific needs and issues? That language should reflect reality rather than ideological jargon, especially in a medical context? That women shouldn’t be harassed, persecuted or fired for refusing to pretend humans can change sex? That women should not be threatened with violence and rape when they assert their rights? That freedom of speech and belief are essential to a pluralistic democratic society? That troubled minors, especially those who are gay, autistic and trauma-experienced, should be given mental health support instead of irreversible surgeries and drug treatments on non-existent evidence of benefit? That gay people shouldn’t be pressured to include the opposite sex in their dating pools, nor should they be smeared as ‘genital fetishists’ when they don’t? That cross-dressing heterosexual male fetishists aren’t actually oppressed, but having the time of their lives piggybacking off gender identity ideology? That said ideology, and the privileged, blinkered fools pushing it because they suffer zero consequences themselves, have done more damage to the political left’s credibility than Trump and Farage could have achieved in a century? Let me have your thoughts.

🚨 CLIMATE SCIENTIST REVEALS THE TRUTH! - “This was NEVER EVER science!There was NEVER a global warming trend!!! It was data manipulated to tell a story. The ice age never came….First wrong prediction….🃏

"So you want the UK to join the EU?" "Yes" "So you want to give up the Pound and accept the Euro" "No" "So you want to join the Schengen area and allow completely open borders" "No" "So you want to be part of the EU Migration Pact, another 100k illegal migrants to the UK a year" "No" "So you want to re-introduce the testing of cosmetics onto animals, required by EU law" "No" "So you want to re-introduce live exports of animals for fattening or slaughter" "No" "So you want to give control of UK fishing waters and quotas back to the EU" "No" "So you want to reverse the protections of UK marine birds like puffins, who were endangered due to EU overfishing of the main food source" "No" "So you want to give up the better trade relationship the UK now has with the USA, Japan, India, Australia, New Zealand, Mexico, Singapore, and countless other countries" "No" "Well it sounds like you don't want to join the EU then"

Between 2007 and 2012, scientists carried out extensive ice drilling in Greenland, aiming to uncover Earth's climate history from the last 125,000 years. Their findings put today's climate alarmism into perspective. "Back then, Greenland was around 8°C warmer than today. Sea levels were 4-8m higher." "Yet the planet didn't collapse and Greenland didn't melt. There were no tipping points and no mass extinctions." "The planet was far warmer and life flourished." Credit: @Electroversenet

About time people realised we’ve all been played, gaslit and downright lied to. There’s plenty of evidence like this around, you just need to look further than the headline.

Obviously, we weren’t clear last time: Britain rejects Digital ID. Scrap the plans. - Click here: cgo.ac/sc9sxI88h

@afneil @Goosey30111568 Infantile fantasists

@EricLDaugh 🚨WOW!!! Watch as this British show host unleashed hell for 2 minutes on her own government! It's beautiful, elect her as PM... STAT!!!

I can't stand #London anymore — the city I loved for 60 years. I cannot fail to love England 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 but nowadays I'm ashamed of it. #TwoTierKeir Starmer has brought shame to this sceptred isle. He is like a noncey uncle who brings shame upon a good honest family. #POTUS47 is right.

It shouldn’t have taken an Iranian attack on the world’s largest gas export facility in Qatar for us to realise the benefits of being able to produce our own oil and gas. As the world gets more dangerous, we must ditch fantasy Net Zero thinking and prioritise our own energy resilience. All of this has shown up our luxury belief that we in Britain are better off keeping our own oil and gas in the ground while making ourselves more reliant on Qatari LNG imports. First, let’s get the worst of the climate change lobby’s arguments out of the way. Destroying our own oil and gas production does not mean we will need any less oil and gas. Even the captured Climate Change Committee acknowledges that we’ll need oil and gas for decades to come. If we are going to need it, then of course we should get as much as possible from Britain. That is just common sense. Instead of maximising our own production, we’ve been sleepwalking into disaster and allowed the powerful green lobby to demonise an industry that is vital for our national resilience. Yesterday, Rachel Reeves missed an opportunity at the Spring Statement to reverse the damage that has been wrought on the North Sea. The Energy Secretary, Ed Miliband, is a dangerous fantasist who has been hellbent on sacrificing our oil and gas production on the altar of Net Zero. He’d banned new oil and gas licences and charging effective marginal tax rates of over 100% on some companies. And for what? So we can increase our imports of higher-emission LNG from the other side of the world by 40% while British production is in freefall. The green lobby argue that there is no point drilling more in the North Sea, because ‘all of our gas is sold on international markets’. This is nonsense. Every single molecule of gas we extract from the North Sea goes into our pipes, making up half of our supply. We are losing 1,000 jobs a month, squandering £50 billion of investment and becoming less secure. Not a single exploration well was drilled in British waters last year – for the first time since 1964. Labour trumpet that the basin is just in natural decline. But Norway, which shares the exact same basin, tells a different story – last year they drilled 49 exploration wells and made 21 new discoveries. Admittedly, my own party have not been perfect. Policies like the windfall tax or mandating the electrification of oil rigs have not helped. When I was Energy Secretary, I signed off Rosebank, legislated to protect oil and gas licences and fought against windfall taxes – all in the face of great opposition. The Conservatives are clear that the oil and gas industry is a national asset and we must do all we can to maximise economic recovery of our own resources. So what should Rachel Reeves have done yesterday? First, end the ban on new licences, end the windfall tax, and scrap the Net Zero duties which are hammering our oil and gas sector. Fast-track permissions for Rosebank and Jackdaw. Downstream, our heavy industry and refineries are in crisis. We lost a third of our refineries last year alone. We have to stop imposing crippling, escalating Carbon Taxes that are killing British industry. We need to double down on nuclear which has the most secure energy supply chain, streamline regulations and reverse Labour’s decision to cancel my plan for another large nuclear plant at Wylfa. We must be clear-eyed about the fact that Ed Miliband is making us dangerously exposed to China’s dominance of critical mineral and renewable supply chains. We need to repeal the Climate Change Act that forces us to subordinate the priorities of energy security and affordability to decarbonisation. And if we want lower reliance on oil and gas, growth, and better living standards, then we must make electricity cheap. Our Cheap Power Plan to cut electricity bills by 20% for households and businesses would be a start. As the world gets more dangerous, we need to prioritise our energy and industrial resilience.

Al Gore predicts the North Pole will be "ice free" in the summer "within 5 to 7 years" 2009 (17 years ago)

NEW: Andy Burnham has been BLOCKED from running in the Gorton and Denton by-election. LOL.

@JebraFaushay Always take noise cancelling headphones on your flight. Problem solved.

Nothing on an airplane has driven me to the brink of insanity before, but this would surely do it.

For those who say: TRUMP isthe problem. Trump isn't the one giving away our territory. Trump isn't allowing the UK to be invaded by the 3rd world. Trump isn't spending all of our taxes accommodating them once they've arrived. Trump doesn't tell us that terrorists are "Welsh choir boys." Trump didn't cover up the Pakistani Rape Gangs. Trump doesn't ban Jewish football teams because hes afraid of Muslim extremists. Trump isn't allowing the worlds biggest Chinese spy centre to be built in the heart of our capital city. Trump doesn't want to lock us up for our thoughts. Trump doesn't think we're "far right" for worrying about our wives and daughters. Trump is more on our side than our own PM Keir Starmer, who working against us. - @EvacTony

Antarctic sea ice extent is currently higher than it was in 1988. That was the year James Hansen warned US Congress about "runaway global warming". Today, Antarctic sea ice is greater than it was almost four decades ago. Twenty years ago, Al Gore released a film predicting polar collapse and was awarded the Nobel Prize for it. Since then though, Antarctic sea ice extent is up 14%. While over the past three years alone it has risen 31%. In 2026, Antarctic ice is on the march, with extent rapidly expanding. And sea ice volume (or thickness) is back above its long-term average dating back to 1979. This is not the collapse we were promised.

🚨INSANE: Keir Starmer's Chagos Surrender Deal is the most idiotic, unnecessary, and treacherous decision in British history. He should be booted out of office, arrested, and charged with TREASON! We need a general election.

When Asked About Girls’ Safety, Andy Burnham Looked Away Make no mistake about what you witnessed last week. Andy Burnham, Mayor of Greater Manchester and Labour’s would-be Prime Minister, was asked a simple question. Would he put the safety of girls before the fear of upsetting people. He did not answer it. What followed was his full ten-minute monologue. This was not leadership under pressure. It was evasion under scrutiny. A stage-managed performance in a familiar setting, chaired sympathetically, designed to avoid the one thing that mattered. A clear answer. So look instead at what @AndyBurnhamGM actually did. His defence rests on commissioning the “largest, longest-running inquiry.” What he does not say is that from the outset; - it had no power to compel evidence - Its terms of reference were set by institutions facing allegations - Even the review team depended on Oldham Council and Greater Manchester Police to decide which documents they were allowed to see. He then dismisses credible concerns about Oldham as “rumours.” Yet his own Assurance Review later confirmed that children in Oldham had been groomed and gang raped. Every case his experts examined confirmed this. Even then, the full extent of that abuse was obscured. To this day, we do not know how many little White girls in Oldham were dragged off the streets and gang raped by Pakistani men. Despite knowing both the truth of those concerns and the limits of his own review, Burnham still refused to call for a national inquiry that could have exposed who failed these children and why. Instead, he and his Labour Party allies hid behind a finding of “no evidence of a cover-up,” while having explicitly ruled out investigating whether a cover-up had taken place. Only years later, after relentless campaigning and global attention forced the issue back into the open, did Burnham finally support national action. And when confronted with this record, he does not answer it. He accuses his critics of spreading hate. A full article will follow. If you still need convincing, you will then understand why this would-be Prime Minister refuses to face scrutiny in the open. He knows exactly what would happen if he were challenged directly on what he was part of. So let there be no ambiguity. The allegation facing Andy Burnham is his role in the cover-up of the industrial-scale gang rape of the nation’s children. Name the time and place Andy Burnham. Face me. Face the millions who want to know who is telling the truth. ________ I’m Raja Miah. For seven years, I led a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. Before that, I spent over a decade safeguarding children and protecting communities from extremists. My work is free because the truth must circulate. But truth without numbers is easy to crush. The government does not fear facts. It fears scale. Starmer and the Labour Party fear thousands reading, sharing, and backing the same work because numbers mean witnesses, pressure, and consequences. That’s why I am blacklisted by the legacy media. That's why this matters. 🔴 Subscribe to the newsletter. It’s free. Every subscriber is a number they can’t erase. Every reader widens the circle they can’t control. 👉 Subscribe here: redwallandtherabble.co.uk If you can afford it, please support for 75p a week (£3/month or £30/year). Not for perks. Not for access. But because numbers with backing become power. A few supporters can be ignored. Thousands cannot. This is how this campaign survive. This is how we see this through. This is how voices like ours stops being managed and starts being feared. 🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution? 👉 BuyMeACoffee.com/recusantnine 👉 paypal.me/RecusantNine No sponsors. No parties. No institutions to lean on. Just numbers. Growing fast enough that covering this up becomes impossible. We don’t need everyone. We need you. – Raja Miah MBE

@AVL8ton Perhaps he just doesn't fancy living under Sharia Law and would like his bins to be collected 🤔

Quote: 'Did you know when I was 16, the government made an agreement with me, that if I paid National Insurance every week, they would give me a pension when I was 60 I kept my end of the deal and am still paying in!! On the 5th and 6th of June, the UK Government may be made to give back the right to retire at 60 to all those women who worked and paid their National Insurance. Currently their pension payout is delayed until 66 or 67 depending on date of birth. We all know that the pension age for women born in the sixties has been raised. Did you know a campaign called ‘Back to 60 Movement’ has won the right to a Judicial Review and is taking the DWP to the High Court? On the 5th and 6th June they will attempt to get women justice over non consultation in raising the pensionable age to 66 and above. Michael Mansfield QC will lead the case and the argument for the movement. However, there does not appear to be any media coverage regarding this significant event. That is why we’re raising the awareness now. Let's hope for justice rightly deserved. There appears to be a media blackout on this issue, which suggests that the government have put a block on the media reporting it. So let’s use social media for what it’s good at - share the hell out of this. Come on ladies - this is worth a great deal to you!' PLEASE, PLEASE COPY AND PASTE

NEW: Another West Midlands Police COVER-UP! Police claimed match day was 'peaceful'. ANOTHER LIE! Israeli players were stalked by masked-up groups of "Asian youths" in the days and hours before the match. It just gets worse. Chief Constable Craig Guildford HAS TO GO!