Michelle Berryman

16.8K posts

Michelle Berryman banner
Michelle Berryman

Michelle Berryman

@micberryman

Experience Strategy & UX, Fellow & Chair Emeritus of IDSA, past IxDA Board, designer, runner, cyclist, soccer player, avid traveler. Opinions are my own.

Atlanta, GA USA Katılım Haziran 2008
2.1K Takip Edilen2K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Michelle Berryman
Michelle Berryman@micberryman·
Never forget the first commercial teleporter will be built by the lowest bidder.
Georgia, USA 🇺🇸 English
0
1
4
0
Michelle Berryman retweetledi
Devon Eriksen
Devon Eriksen@Devon_Eriksen_·
Why not Audible? I've been talking your ear off about my audiobook, and its attendant kickstarter, for almost exactly a month now. I clearly want the project to be a success. So why will it never be available on Audible? Because Audible would interfere with that success. You see, "success" doesn't just mean a large number of people listening. If that were all I needed, I could just bankroll the project with my own money, and distribute the result for free. Then say "look at those circulation numbers!", and call myself a success. Well, you wouldn't call yourself a successful doctor if you couldn't pay off your loans from med school. You wouldn't call yourself a successful lawyer if you had to live in a studio apartment in North Hollywood. You wouldn't call yourself a successful engineer if you were on food stamps. Science fiction writing is a profession. Which means I expect to get paid. Because I did some work, and people liked the work enough to buy it. Audible has a different view. Audible does not think I should get paid. Because, as far as I can tell, that would mean less money for them, and because, until someone tells them otherwise, they can get away with it. I won't go too deep into the specifics, because... I can't. I actually can't. The way Audible calculates an author's share of the proceeds is literally a secret. They won't tell me. They won't tell you. They won't tell anyone. Oh, they'll tell you get 40% if you are exclusive to Audible, and 20% if you're not... But 20% of what, exactly? Well, 20% of whatever they decide to charge, times a secret fraction which they compute in a secret way. What do they charge? Well, sometimes it's the list price, which they set, but more often it's the price of a "credit", whatever they decide that is. Which they compute secretly on a constantly changing basis. So, you, Mr. Author who wrote the book in the first place, and then paid to make it into an audiobook with your own damn money, get 0.2 * X * Y where you don't get to know what X and Y are. Which means you will have no way of knowing what you will make per sale. And no way to check their math to make sure they've paid the full amount. So, what would I make per sale? Well, I can't know for certain, but I asked around, and talked to people, and reached a conclusion. 37 cents. Per audiobook sale. How, you ask, did I arrive at 37 cents? Well, I won't tell you. It's a secret. I can say it would be 37 cents, and you can't contradict me, because I won't give you access to the data. There's no way for you to prove me wrong. You just have to take my word for it. It's 37 cents. Just trust me, bro. See how this game works? And if I don't want to play that game, then what? Well, I can't sell on Audible. And Audible has a 65% market share. And that might sound bad, but when you run the numbers... so what? Let's say I sell an audiobook on Campfire, where I can set my own prices, and I get 80%. Let's say I sell it for $20, to make the math easy. I get 16 dollars. How many audiobooks would I have to sell on Audible to make that same 16 dollars. At 37 cents per, that's 44 books. Do you doubt that 37 cent figure? Too bad, you're wrong. My math is totally valid and unassailable. I know this because you can't prove me wrong. Because my computations, and my data, are a secret. So, anyway, if I miss 43 sales for every one I make on Campfire, I still come out even. In fact, I come out ahead. Because if I sell one book on Campfire, instead of 44 books on Audible, that's 43 people who haven't bought from me yet. And someday, they might. If I sell on Audible, I'm not burning through my existing audience to make money for someone else, someone who doesn't write books, like an author, or record them, like a voice actor, or prep them, like a sound engineer. Someone who doesn't add value. Because a bigger audience isn't "value" if someone is keeping all the money that audience tries to pay me. The juice isn't worth the squeeze. Now, sure, someone will probably point out that I am, philosophically, an anarcho-capitalist, and chide me for complaining, because this is just how the free market works, right? Well, much as I love it when people who don't share my philosophy try to tell me what I believe, no. Free markets work, and are free, to the extent that market information is disseminated. If a buyer or seller doesn't know the know the market price of a good or service, they will suffer for that ignorance. Take, for example, used cars. For half a century, if you wanted to buy a secondhand car, you would go to a used car lot, where the sticker prices on the windows were the purest fiction, and the moment you wanted to buy something, they'd stick you in a room with a well-trained salesman, to negotiate in total ignorance of the actual market value of the car you were trying to buy. Lotsa luck. But the moment the internet came along, people could comparison shop for cars, and sell and buy cars directly to and from each other. And now it's dead easy to buy one without being cheated. Just look online and compare prices. Markets are free when market information flows freely. This is why monopolies need governments to prop them up. They need certain types of intellectual property laws and trade secret laws, and enforcement of NDAs and non-compete agreements, to shut down competitors and to keep market information secret. What's the real price of an audiobook? Hard to say, but in a world without Audible, I could charge you less than they do, and still make more. Win-win, for you, and for me, and for other authors, and for voice actors and sound engineers, and basically everyone but the thieves at Audible. So what I am doing right now is disseminating market information. To make the market more free. I am telling you how much of your money Audible is keeping. Almost all of it. This means less pay for everyone else, which means, according to the inexorable laws of supply and demand, less authors to write books, less talent to record them, and less audiobooks for you to listen to. Those "free" credits they give you ain't so free after all. So what has to happen? Well, I can't break the Audible monopoly all by myself. Me taking a stand against them won't mean a lot to their bottom line. But I can be a tiny part of an eventual solution. I can avoid giving them my audience's money. I can help prop up competitors who take a fair rate for providing a sales platform. And I can spread the word. And most of all, I can keep my self-respect. Because I didn't kneel and kiss the ring. "When you see that trading is done, not by consent, but by compulsion - when you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing - when you see that money is flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors - when you see that men get richer by graft and by pull than by work, and your laws don't protect you against them, but protect them against you - when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self-sacrifice - you may know that your society is doomed." - Ayn Rand
Devon Eriksen tweet media
English
28
47
332
11.1K
Michelle Berryman retweetledi
Georgia Tech
Georgia Tech@GeorgiaTech·
ALL HAIL THE TIGER KING!!! 👑🐅
Georgia Tech tweet media
English
10
100
1.5K
35K
Catturd ™
Catturd ™@catturd2·
Oh boy - here we go.
Catturd ™ tweet media
English
5K
1.4K
14K
1.9M
Michelle Berryman
Michelle Berryman@micberryman·
@RepMTG @matt_vanswol No stones. No exoectations of perfection. Only an expectation of diligence in thoroughly reading and vetting what you are voting for.
English
0
0
0
6
Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸
I’ll take criticism from the perfect people that have never made any mistakes. I’m pretty sure I only know one. His name is Jesus. And when I stop being willing to humbly admit that I missed something, that’s the day I should no longer be a representative. If you only want PERFECT politicians that never make a mistake or actually lie to you all the time because no perfect politician exist and most of the ones I know lie a lot and never admit publicly a fault, good luck to you. The rest of them whether they voted no or yes never told you about this extremely dangerous clause did they?? Nope. It was the bill cost too much Or SALT Or Medicaid NONE of them said a single word about this clause until I went public! So do you really think any of them read the full bill? Or were they ok with destroying federalism? It’s only one way or the other, not both. Be mad and critical all you want. I have been fully transparent. I am the only Representative that said WTF is this?! And guess what? I get to vote again bc the OBBB comes back to the House if the Senate changes it and I’m positive I get to fight this many more times based on the conversations I’ve had with many powerful people. Keep throwing stones if you want. They don’t hurt.
English
984
271
3.3K
137K
Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸
I read it worse than that. I’m not voting for the development of skynet and the rise of the machines by destroying federalism for 10 years by taking away state rights to regulate and make laws on all AI. Forcing eminent domain on people’s private properties to link the future skynet is not very Republican. Also, AI is going to replace a vast array of human jobs, everything from media to manufacturing to even construction through AI computer systems and robotics That means in my manufacturing district, that currently has a 2.8% unemployment rate, AI will replace many human jobs. And my district with the one of the lowest unemployment rates in the country could go to one of the highest unemployed districts in the country. And with this clause, the state of GA would have no way to regulate or make laws to protect human jobs, property rights, and the safety and security of people of the state of Georgia. This may get stripped out in the Senate. But if not and it’s still in there, when we get to vote again I’m voting NO on this bill. And any future bill we see this little snake rare it’s ugly head again.
Thomas Massie@RepThomasMassie

The Big Beautiful Bill contains a provision banning state & local governments from regulating AI. It’s worse than you think. It would make it easier for corporations to get zoning variances, so massive AI data centers could be built in close proximity to residential areas.

English
3.2K
5.7K
24.2K
1.9M
Michelle Berryman
Michelle Berryman@micberryman·
@RepMTG Why did you vote for a bill you didn’t read, page for page??? This is literally your job. It’s the minimum expectation we have as voters and tax payers.
English
0
0
0
9
Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸
Full transparency, I did not know about this section on pages 278-279 of the OBBB that strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years. I am adamantly OPPOSED to this and it is a violation of state rights and I would have voted NO if I had known this was in there. We have no idea what AI will be capable of in the next 10 years and giving it free rein and tying states hands is potentially dangerous. This needs to be stripped out in the Senate. When the OBBB comes back to the House for approval after Senate changes, I will not vote for it with this in it. We should be reducing federal power and preserving state power. Not the other way around. Especially with rapidly developing AI that even the experts warn they have no idea what it may be capable of.
Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸 tweet mediaFormer Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸 tweet media
English
25.1K
9.8K
46.9K
22.7M
des_linden
des_linden@des_linden·
17th • 2:26:19 • Masters Champion #BostonMarathon @brooksrunning Proud of the run. Nothing left to prove. Boston 2007 - 18th - 2:44:56 Trials 2008 - 13th - 2:37:50 Chicago 2008 - 5th- 2:31:33 World Champs 2009 - 10th- 2:27:53 Chicago 2010 - 2nd - 2:26:20 Boston 2011 - 2nd - 2:22:38 Trials 2012 - 2nd - 2:25:55 Olympic Games 2012 - DNF Berlin 2013 - 5th - 2:29:15 Boston 2014 - 8th - 2:23:54 New York 2014 - 5th - 2:28:11 Boston 2015 - 4th - 2:25:39 Trials 2016 - 2nd - 2:29:00 Olympic Games 2016 - 7th - 2:26:08 Boston 2017 - 4th - 2:25:06 Boston 2018 - 1st - 2:39:54 New York 2018 - 6th - 2:27:51 Boston 2019 - 5th - 2:27:00 New York 2019 - 6th - 2:26:46 Trials - 2020 - 4th - 2:29:03 50k - split - 2021 - 2:31 Boston - 2021 - 16th - 2:35:25 Boston - 2022 - 13th - 2:28:47 New York - 2022 - 16th - 2:32:37 Boston - 2023 - 18th - 2:27:18 Chicago - 2023 - 17th - 2:27:35 Trials - 2024 - 11th - 2:28:04 Boston - 2024 - 16th - 2:28:27 New York - 2024 - 11th - 2:29:32 Boston - 2025 - 17th - 2:26:19
RUN@Outside_Run

Take an exclusive look inside the legend's final Boston Marathon as a pro. bit.ly/3GokkZH

English
72
55
1.3K
57.5K
Ron Filipkowski
Ron Filipkowski@RonFilipkowski·
OK, let’s see the best signs that you saw today.
Ron Filipkowski tweet media
English
1.6K
12.5K
223K
8.5M
Michelle Berryman
Michelle Berryman@micberryman·
OH @ DCA: I didn’t bring my cowboy hat because it wouldn’t fit.
English
0
0
0
27
Michelle Berryman retweetledi
An0maly
An0maly@LegendaryEnergy·
Dr. Suess over a rap beat is fire. This guy crushed this performance 🔥
English
661
6.5K
40.3K
2.3M
Michelle Berryman
Michelle Berryman@micberryman·
Just a friendly reminder: It’s Bobby Dodd Stadium at HISTORIC GRANT FIELD, sponsored by Hyundai. That is the only way Hyundai should ever be referenced with regards to the stadium. #gatech
English
0
0
1
113
Michelle Berryman retweetledi
GOLF.com
GOLF.com@GOLF_com·
Stacy Lewis shared a wild Nelly Korda stat. 😳
English
7
59
901
216K
Michelle Berryman retweetledi
LPGA
LPGA@LPGA·
"You've worked so hard and been a class act the whole time." 👏 Celebrities and legends of the game congratulate Lydia Ko on her qualification for the LPGA Hall of Fame! ⭐️
English
4
54
421
20K
Michelle Berryman retweetledi
LPGA
LPGA@LPGA·
A message from our #Paris2024 gold medalist! 💌
English
48
107
2K
50.2K