Michael Cable

Do you remember when you joined X? I do! #MyXAnniversary but I’ve moved to Bluesky

Funny cuz Elon was the kid on the cover of Evil Empire

@karlwoolley @DevRelCallum Looks not a patch on the old place inside - steak and eggs still tasty!

@DevRelCallum Tad’s! @michael_cable lives on a breakfast of steak and eggs from here - tadssf.com

This

@LozzaFox I 100% support your freedom. Hope this helps: letmegooglethat.com/?q=toilet+clea…

Just so we are clear. I would rather scrub toilets for the rest of my days and retain my dignity. Than shill for cash and opportunity, only to compromise absolutely everything which really matters in life. I’ve made many millions over the years and I gave them up to fight a battle I didn’t want to fight. So if you think that some half baked pile on is going to stop me. Think again. I am truly free.

Filmmaking advice from John Waters today:

@elonmusk @MarioNawfal Have you heard of the trolley problem? So you could have flicked a switch and saved children’s lives.

There was an emergency request from government authorities to activate Starlink all the way to Sevastopol. The obvious intent being to sink most of the Russian fleet at anchor. If I had agreed to their request, then SpaceX would be explicitly complicit in a major act of war and conflict escalation.

ELON PREVENTS NUCLEAR WAR? Elon Musk covertly instructed his engineers to deactivate Starlink's satellite communications network during a MAJOR Ukrainian offensive. This action was taken to intentionally thwart a surprise attack by Ukraine against the Russian naval fleet. The Ukrainian submarine drones, armed with explosives, mysteriously lost connectivity as they advanced towards the Russian warships. Now we know that Musk intentionally deactivated Starlink. Ukrainian officials pleaded for the reactivation of the satellites, however Musk was concerned the attack could trigger a nuclear response from Russia. This fear was not baseless, as Musk had open discussions with high-ranking Russian officials not long before the attack. I’ve posted heavily about the dangerous rhetoric from Russia relating to a possible Nuclear attack on Ukraine, with Crimea being considered a Red Line. No matter which side of the war you’re on, we all want to avoid a nuclear conflict, and @elonmusk’s actions may have prevented just that. Do you think Elon did the right thing?

A British writer penned the best description of Donald Trump I’ve ever read: “Why do some British people not like Donald Trump?” A few things spring to mind. Trump lacks certain qualities which the British traditionally esteem. For instance, he has no class, no charm, no coolness, no credibility, no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no subtlety, no sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no honour and no grace – all qualities, funnily enough, with which his predecessor Mr. Obama was generously blessed. So for us, the stark contrast does rather throw Trump’s limitations into embarrassingly sharp relief. Plus, we like a laugh. And while Trump may be laughable, he has never once said anything wry, witty or even faintly amusing – not once, ever. I don’t say that rhetorically, I mean it quite literally: not once, not ever. And that fact is particularly disturbing to the British sensibility – for us, to lack humour is almost inhuman. But with Trump, it’s a fact. He doesn’t even seem to understand what a joke is – his idea of a joke is a crass comment, an illiterate insult, a casual act of cruelty. Trump is a troll. And like all trolls, he is never funny and he never laughs; he only crows or jeers. And scarily, he doesn’t just talk in crude, witless insults – he actually thinks in them. His mind is a simple bot-like algorithm of petty prejudices and knee-jerk nastiness. There is never any under-layer of irony, complexity, nuance or depth. It’s all surface. Some Americans might see this as refreshingly upfront. Well, we don’t. We see it as having no inner world, no soul. And in Britain we traditionally side with David, not Goliath. All our heroes are plucky underdogs: Robin Hood, Dick Whittington, Oliver Twist. Trump is neither plucky, nor an underdog. He is the exact opposite of that. He’s not even a spoiled rich-boy, or a greedy fat-cat. He’s more a fat white slug. A Jabba the Hutt of privilege. And worse, he is that most unforgivable of all things to the British: a bully. That is, except when he is among bullies; then he suddenly transforms into a snivelling sidekick instead. There are unspoken rules to this stuff – the Queensberry rules of basic decency – and he breaks them all. He punches downwards – which a gentleman should, would, could never do – and every blow he aims is below the belt. He particularly likes to kick the vulnerable or voiceless – and he kicks them when they are down. So the fact that a significant minority – perhaps a third – of Americans look at what he does, listen to what he says, and then think ‘Yeah, he seems like my kind of guy’ is a matter of some confusion and no little distress to British people, given that: • Americans are supposed to be nicer than us, and mostly are. • You don’t need a particularly keen eye for detail to spot a few flaws in the man. This last point is what especially confuses and dismays British people, and many other people too; his faults seem pretty bloody hard to miss. After all, it’s impossible to read a single tweet, or hear him speak a sentence or two, without staring deep into the abyss. He turns being artless into an art form; he is a Picasso of pettiness; a Shakespeare of shit. His faults are fractal: even his flaws have flaws, and so on ad infinitum. God knows there have always been stupid people in the world, and plenty of nasty people too. But rarely has stupidity been so nasty, or nastiness so stupid. He makes Nixon look trustworthy and George W look smart. In fact, if Frankenstein decided to make a monster assembled entirely from human flaws – he would make a Trump. And a remorseful Doctor Frankenstein would clutch out big clumpfuls of hair and scream in anguish: ‘My God… what… have… I… created?' If being a twat was a TV show, Trump would be the boxed set.” -Nate White

@SoVeryBritish Milk

@delaneykingrox I’d push to £8.50 if it came with tea

@kornula @stuartf100 @EmardonLareous @kelly_cadigan

@kornula @stuartf100 @EmardonLareous @kelly_cadigan

@kornula @stuartf100 @EmardonLareous @kelly_cadigan So it was the wrong word. So what do you want me to apologise for?

@kornula @stuartf100 @EmardonLareous @kelly_cadigan Are you embarrassed by your sex? It’s the wrong word. If you are embarrassed I’m very sad for you.

@kornula @stuartf100 @EmardonLareous @kelly_cadigan Ok, by the way you meant synonym not euphemism. But you expect me to take your definition of gender as a fact?

@TerfCityUSA @stuartf100 @EmardonLareous @kelly_cadigan Poor response btw.

@TerfCityUSA @stuartf100 @EmardonLareous @kelly_cadigan Sadly I don’t.

@kornula @stuartf100 @EmardonLareous @kelly_cadigan If you think that ok. I support sex to not be a euphemism for sexuality or gender. It’s just more accepting of the fact people need to live their life on their terms - not those of others.

@kornula @EmardonLareous @stuartf100 @kelly_cadigan You are entitled to your opinion as much as I am of mine.