Diodes without borders

I’ve stayed out of this, but watching @dbongino who I was once friends with attack patriots because his ego has become bigger than his brain is exhausting. When you have as large an audience as he does, and has a job as big as he did, this kind of irrational behavior is irresponsible and it’s clear he cares more about himself than the nation. Dan is indeed a liar. I tried to resolve this privately, but he has refused to have rational conversations about anything he sees as bruising his ego. (Keep reading) 🧵

@marklevinshow

If you count on the lazy and biased media to tell you what’s going on in Washington regarding @DHSgov funding, you are making a mistake. Here’s the reality. The Department of Homeland Security is not being funded and its employees are not being paid because Democrats refuse to vote for funding unless Republicans agree to hamstring @ICEgov and @CBP. The Democrats’ demands are not reforms – they’re handcuffs.  I’m willing to work on DHS reforms, but our country’s national security cannot be held hostage. I have no intention of giving in to hostage-taking and unreasonable demands that impede federal agents’ ability to do their jobs and, in some cases, put their lives at risk.

Dan, in your first call, which I think is the first and last occasion you and I ever spoke: (1) you seemed upset that I had received and had released FBI whistleblower information about the pipe bomb investigation. (2) I informed you that your staff had threatened to criminally investigate my staff as retribution against me (for pipe bomb or Epstein activity?) (3) you threatened to personally finance a defamation suit against reporters on behalf of a suspect. Perhaps it was also a veiled threat to sue me. You said “those depositions aren’t going to fun for the people involved” or something like that. In any case, Deputy FBI Director shouldn’t be financing civil lawsuits against reporters covering cases the FBI is working on. (4) you said you were going to call every agent in and get to the bottom of the whistleblower issue. (5) you offered me a briefing but I was going to be tied up until at least 6pm on the Epstein files transparency act, so I asked how late i could get the briefing and you said you were going to leave the office at 5pm. (6) I asked you a few questions on the call and your answers indicated to me that you were perhaps less informed than me on some of the issues, or you were going to be less than forthcoming. A few hours after the call, I received and released new FBI whistleblower information regarding the all-hands meeting (which matched what you told me in #4 above), related to concern that the meeting was called to “out” the whistelblowers. Your second (attempted) call was the evening I achieved 218 signatures on the Epstein discharge petition and I had been busy thwarting Mike Johnson’s last ditch effort to derail the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Not sure why your call log shows 1:36am. You called me in the evening, maybe 8ish? note - my staff also had the unfortunate pleasure of receiving numerous late night calls on Signal from FBI staff telling them there was absolutely nothing in the Epstein case and that I should back off.

Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did NOT match Tyler Robinson's rifle mol.im/a/15692625 via @DailyMail