Mike Roselli

1.3K posts

Mike Roselli banner
Mike Roselli

Mike Roselli

@michaelroselli

Chicago-based attorney. Co-Founder/COO at Sports Betting Exchange (SBX). Former @PlayUp_US. Creator/host @doggyjuice podcast.

Chicago, IL Katılım Temmuz 2011
954 Takip Edilen597 Takipçiler
Mike Roselli
Mike Roselli@michaelroselli·
@a_kane47 @jesswelman Both can be true and in my view you are both correct. To Alex’s point, it’s important context for an average reader (especially in today’s headline-driven world) to be aware of the shortcomings of state regulatory regimes and how those regimes negatively impact the consumer.
English
0
0
2
47
Alex Kane
Alex Kane@a_kane47·
Right, and the thing that makes it newsworthy ie plays well with the average reader, is that the audience says: “of course it’s sports betting”. But the real story is, if Kalshi was categorized as “sports betting”, it would be subject to a set of state regulations, costs, and burdens that would effectively end its existence. And whereas people might dislike Kalshi, I think many of those people would prefer that there a regulatory model that allows a true, low cost, open and transparent exchange mechanism. And that such a mechanism is not possible under state regulation.
English
1
0
9
537
Alex Kane
Alex Kane@a_kane47·
I like a lot of Dan’s reporting, but this angle is tired. It’s super easy to dunk on Kalshi/others when they refuse to call the activity sports betting. A new and refreshing angle would explore why categorizing Kalshi’s activity as “sports gambling” presents a trap door of ill-fitting state regulation that would completely erase the concept of an open, transparent, federal exchange model.
Dan Bernstein@dan_bernstein_

EXCLUSIVE: Kalshi classified itself as a sports gambling product in a trademark filing for the term "prediction market." That's despite the company's public stance being that it has nothing to do with gambling.

English
7
1
30
14.6K
Mike Roselli
Mike Roselli@michaelroselli·
“AVOID PRIVATE CREDIT AVOID PRIVATE EQUITY Because it's starting...” @BennMaldonado I immediately thought of you when I saw this. You were on top of this before anyone. Well done.
George Noble@gnoble79

Remember this scene in The Big Short? Jamie Shipley and Charlie Geller have bet everything against the housing market. They've been bleeding for months, wondering if they're wrong. Then they flip on CNN and see it: New Century Financial - the second-largest subprime lender in America - has filed for bankruptcy. "It's starting." That was April 2, 2007. New Century wasn't the crisis. It was 1% of the problem. But it was the first domino. 4 months later, BNP Paribas froze 3 funds citing "complete evaporation of liquidity." 18 months after that, Lehman was dead. I'd encourage you to watch that scene today. Because we JUST got our New Century moment in private credit: Blue Owl Capital - $307 billion in assets under management - just permanently halted investor redemptions at its retail private credit fund, OBDC II. Investors will NEVER AGAIN redeem shares from this fund. On January 25th, I wrote that private credit was showing cracks at the exact moment Wall Street wanted to open it up to your 401(k). 3 weeks later, here we are. The timeline follows a pattern anyone who's been around markets long enough recognizes: Through the first 9 months of 2025, OBDC II investors withdrew $150 million - up 20% year over year. Meanwhile, Blue Owl execs publicly assured investors there was "no meaningful pressure" on their asset base. But there was. And they're now facing a federal class-action lawsuit for saying otherwise. In November, they attempted a merger that would have forced OBDC II investors into a publicly traded fund trading at a 20% discount to NAV. Effectively confiscating a fifth of their capital. Blue Owl's own CFO conceded investors "could take a potential haircut." The stock dropped 11% in 8 days. They killed the deal. Now they've abandoned the pretense entirely. PERMANENT halt. Fire-selling $1.4 billion in loans across three funds. Investors get roughly 30% of NAV back through quarterly distributions - on Blue Owl's schedule, not theirs. One delightful detail: Blue Owl's co-CEOs have pledged $1.9 billion of their OWN company shares as collateral for personal loans - proceeds used, in part, to acquire the Tampa Bay Lightning. The stock is down 33% this year. That collateral has literally shed $260 million since January. Founders leveraging company stock for hockey teams while retail investors queue up for their own money. Wall Street's version of noblesse oblige. But here's what matters: This isn't about Blue Owl. Blue Owl is a symptom. The disease is a $3.4 TRILLION private credit industry built on opacity, conflicts of interest, and the polite fiction that illiquid assets can offer liquid redemptions. Morningstar DBRS reports the trailing default rate has risen to 4%, up from 2.8% a year ago. Downgrades outpacing upgrades. Outlook negative. UBS warns defaults could reach 13% if AI disrupts the software companies making up 17% of BDC loan portfolios. Payment-in-kind loans (where borrowers can't pay cash interest and simply pile it onto the debt) have surged past 11% of BDC income. When your borrowers are paying you with IOUs, the word "income" deserves quotation marks. And the government's response? Open YOUR 401(k) to private credit. Trump's executive order directed regulators to do exactly that. They want to "democratize" an asset class whose flagship retail product just permanently locked investors out. The KKRs. The Blackstones. The Apollos. Everyone loaded up on private credit is exposed. When the tide goes out, you find out who's swimming naked. In April 2007, New Century went bankrupt. Most of the financial world shrugged. 17 months later, Lehman made the point impossible to ignore. And Blue Owl permanently halted redemptions TODAY. AVOID PRIVATE CREDIT AVOID PRIVATE EQUITY Because it's starting...

English
0
0
1
911
Mike Roselli retweetledi
Prediction News
Prediction News@PredictionNews_·
Quick CFTC / PM timeline 2023: The CFTC blocks election contracts 2024: Kalshi sues the CFTC and wins, legalizing election contracts 2025: The CFTC drops its appeal and takes a more hands-off approach to PM’s 2026: The CFTC is backing PM’s in court
English
1
2
13
1.2K
Mike Roselli
Mike Roselli@michaelroselli·
@a_kane47 @sporttrade_app Result: The taxpaying citizens of Louisiana and Connecticut continue to be deprived of access to fair prices
English
1
0
2
131
Alex Kane
Alex Kane@a_kane47·
Louisiana and Connecticut both mentioned here. As many know, @sporttrade_app is a sports prediction market that’s attempted to get state by state licenses. Here’s the reality of LA and CT: Even after paying for “market access” to a casino in LA, the LA regulatory body determined it didn’t want to contemplate or allow our exchange model in their state. Result: Blocked. CT also employs a “skin” system where only 3 “licensees” are actually allowed to hold a license, and each can partner with only one online operator. Once again: Blocked
RLinnehanSR@RLinnehanSR

Louisiana is the latest to warn its licensed sports betting operators to not get involved in prediction markets. @iGamingBusiness was the first to report. sportsbettingdime.com/news/betting/l…

English
3
1
11
4.1K
Mike Roselli retweetledi
Alfonso Straffon 🇨🇷🇺🇸🇲🇽
So every week Wall Street analysts will eagerly await for New York to release their weekly report for sports betting, as the hold percentages serve as an early look for how operators performed, which in turn helps them update their views/forecast for the quarter. Problem is waiting around 4 days for a release seems to be a waste of time. And also, it's just one market being used as a proxy for performance across all states. Given the above limitations, I decided to use my data sources to build a more robust and timely estimate, available as early as Monday, as to how books did in the prior week, with updates to the current month and quarter too. The model was backtested against the performance of key operators (using state reports that id), and found it to be moderately-to-strongly correlated. In the charts below you can see the most recent forecast suggests November and the 4Q25 have improved relative to prior periods. Anyway, all this to say if you are interested in this work, reach me at astraffon@igaminganalyst.com or just DM me here to discuss.
Alfonso Straffon 🇨🇷🇺🇸🇲🇽 tweet mediaAlfonso Straffon 🇨🇷🇺🇸🇲🇽 tweet mediaAlfonso Straffon 🇨🇷🇺🇸🇲🇽 tweet mediaAlfonso Straffon 🇨🇷🇺🇸🇲🇽 tweet media
English
5
10
128
82.7K
Isaac
Isaac@roundrobin42·
Had a great time on @foxandfriends talking about underage gambling and predatory sportsbook marketing
English
14
6
145
39.5K
Mike Roselli retweetledi
Jason Trost
Jason Trost@jasontrost·
Take any sportsbook. Let users set their own odds. Add politics, economics, tech. Allow trading positions. Stop banning winners. Add API access. Remove the slot machines. Boom — you’ve invented prediction markets.
English
6
3
31
15.9K
Mike Roselli retweetledi
Dan Bernstein
Dan Bernstein@dan_bernstein_·
BIG NEWS: The CFTC has, I believe for the first time in many months, acknowledged sports prediction market contracts in a new staff advisory note. And it acknowledges that in some states, operators may have to go offline.
English
6
11
92
36.8K
Mike Roselli retweetledi
Chicago Cubs
Chicago Cubs@Cubs·
October is why. (Narrated by Anthony Rizzo)
English
264
6K
22.2K
1.8M
Alex Kane
Alex Kane@a_kane47·
100%. But IMO, this is ok. The single-dealer sportsbook model will always be regulated by states. Such a model is not permissible federally. The market-based model will be regulated federally. Such a model is not permissible in states. There’s two forms of betting = two regulatory models.
Bill Speros@billsperos

@DustinGouker Gouker: High taxes, regulatory and legislative burden prevent both lower-margin sports trading markets (@sporttrade_app @a_kane47 ) and sharp books like @CircaSports and @primesportsbook from entering the Commonwealth's market

English
5
3
6
10.7K
Mike Roselli retweetledi
SigmaSquirrel
SigmaSquirrel@SquirrelSigma·
Meanwhile, in Chicago, we're actively working to destroy the regulated market. This tax would make the per-bet charge $.75 - $1.00 on every bet in the city where 21% of IL residents live.
Ryan Butler@ButlerBets

The Sports Betting Alliance, a gaming consumer advocacy group, has (not surprisingly) come out against a recent proposal to add a $0.50 surcharge to every legal online sports bet in Chicago; Illinois this year became the first state to implement a per-bet charge

English
2
1
11
3.6K
Mike Roselli retweetledi
Pat McAfee
Pat McAfee@PatMcAfeeShow·
.@SportsbkConsig was an absolute legend His vibes were always immaculate and he will be greatly missed Rest in peace, brother #PMSLive
English
45
133
864
256.3K
Mike Roselli
Mike Roselli@michaelroselli·
This weekend we lost the most universally beloved man in the entire industry. Going to miss our chats, Consig. Stories for days and a friend to all. RIP to a true legend @SportsbkConsig
Mike Roselli tweet media
English
1
0
19
967