
@TheCanadianGTR So basically
Nomad
11K posts

@minds_do_wander
Just a nobody on the internet. Probably won't do much but share thoughts I echo, but you never know what a nobody might do or where they might go.

@TheCanadianGTR So basically

Polychromy is archaeologists finding traces of the underpainting layer and then pretending finely crafted sculptures were handed to pre-schoolers to paint by number. They even get frustrated by how much “red hair” they find- red is used in underpainting to build warmth for brown.



@jtalexander @DrewPavlou Ok, I get the point you’re trying to make, but Caesar’s war in Gaul actually was bad for Rome. It led to the final destruction of the Roman Republic and therefore the gradual fall of Rome as it slipped into ever more tyrannical and barbaric monarchy, and then came the Dark Ages

The average person should not have politics. They should never think about politics in their entire lives. The average person is as removed from political power as an earthworm is from Mars and the notion that they should nevertheless be 'politically active' is insane.

I controlled every aspect of this video. Each scene was prearranged by me before being animated. AI simply replaced the camera and crew that I can’t afford. Ask AI to “reimagine Take On Me” and you’ll get slop. Use AI to project from your own imagination and you’ll get this.


Animated?… I’m sorry but that’s dumb & something no one wanted. Just do live action set a decade or 2 later. Thats it there’s your show.


I'm not going to be as nice as this lady. If you don't have an editor, please don't publish. I don't care if you're paying that editor or not, but they need to be someone who *can* edit professionally. Technically, yes, you have a choice of whether or not to get outside help with your book, but I have yet to find the unicorn miracle that is good without any outside professional help. Opting to "not" is a great way to produce trash. However, a good edit is going to run $3-5k. The £880 quoted as an average here for an 80k manuscript is only around 13 hours of work at $60/hr (which is a good editor's rate). That's not really realistic. I expect the quoted average, then, is not really a dev or line editor's average, but is a blend including copy, which is a lot cheaper. I recommend, if you can't afford this, to work on your own editing skills (check out our videos--we discuss a lot of developmental editing topics in the context of actual books) and then *swap* work with other people. Basically, use your time as currency instead to get others to help you edit. But do not publish without outside editing advice.

Anyone else ever notice that the strongest advocates for "indies must get an editor" are the people who directly benefit from indies spending 10x their revenue on editing?

I hate the idea of “essential reading.” What is essential for one person will not be essential for another. It is my experience that I get more out of things I read out of interest compared to things I read out of obligation.




Whenever I try to post something more whimsical and thoughtful, not directly political, it just gets buried by the algorithm. Not sure how intentional this is. I suspect the algo is tuned to look for engagement, and if a post doesn't immediately pick up likes and comments it gets sidelined. Ragebait gets engagement, so that's what the algo promotes.
