
mingdengzhang
64 posts

mingdengzhang
@mingdengzhang
If you don't know the standard of living of ordinary people in developed countries, then you know nothing about China.



脳を直接対象とした世界初のゲノム編集治療を目指し、神経細胞内の変異遺伝子を書き換える人体実験を6才の女子にする中国。 中国が最強の医療大国になるとおいらが考える理由は、善悪は別にして人体実験しまくれるから。

Marco Rubio lo clava sin piedad: «Irán es un país dirigido por clérigos radicales. Tienen todo: petróleo, gas, una ubicación estratégica y una población joven. Podrían ser el país más rico de Oriente Medio, fácilmente. Pero en vez de invertir en su gente, en carreteras, hospitales, educación o tecnología, regalan su fortuna al terror. La dan a Hezbolá, Hamás, los hutíes y milicias chiíes por todo Oriente Medio. Financian drones, misiles, un programa nuclear y terrorismo en todo el planeta. Su prioridad no es el progreso, sino la destrucción. Si hubieran gastado ese dinero en su pueblo y su economía, hoy Irán sería el Dubái de Asia Occidental. En cambio, eligieron ser la capital mundial del odio. Eso no es mala suerte. Es una decisión.»


One source of China's power is its incredible household savings. While real wages increased by 209% from 2015 to 2025, spending increased at the same rate and so too did savings. Meanwhile, China has managed to double spending and savings.


This is why i am admire bhandari. He might act extra pessimistic all the time but he is an very astute observer.










“There is a clear and politically popular answer to disinvestment pressures from Beijing: new investments in developed economies.” Read Logan Wright on how the United States and its allies can erode China’s strategic position: foreignaffairs.com/china/chinas-m…


Australia hit with a 12.5% US tariff... I say good! Finally Australia has gotten a taste of the medicine we helped inflict on China with the fraudulent Xinjiang forced labour narrative, especially with the help of ASPI - a pro-US cell in Canberra. As an admitted lawyer, I had been saying for years that any forced labour narrative must be built on actual international law. But no... what did ASPI and the Australian Government do instead? Substitute the international law definition of forced labour with a heuristic checklist that can cast anything from Xinjiang workers washing their hair to Xinjiang workers quoting Xi Jinping as evidence of forced labour. And then what about evidentiary thresholds? All of a sudden hearsay evidence - not accepted in a court of law - became reliable evidence of forced labour, and little satellite pictures of Xinjiang rooftops became evidence of forced labour occuring under those rooftops - as if they were see-through. And as for the UN's report - it's like I've said before... the people working on it should be ashamed of themselves. Incredibly flawed methodologies, including pretending 40 interviewees was a reliable sample size to make the extraordinary claim that there is up to a million forced Xinjiang labourers. It was a clown show to any serious legal professional. But what happened to people like me who said you must stick to legal definitions and rules of evidence to make such consequential claims? Mainstream media did hit pieces and the inevitable online bullying. But now lookie here... all of the Australian Government's made-up stories about Xinjiang forced labour are biting us in the a***. Because Trump is right... if the Australian Government really believed in the Xinjiang forced labour story, they should be doing a lot more to prevent Xinjiang goods entering Australia. But we need EVs and solar panels, right? So I say to the Australian government: you live by the sword, you die by the sword. Learn to live with the consequences of your made-up stories. In the meantime, I get to hold my head up high, because my days of professional vindication are coming. Here's my interview with CGTN - me being on the record that the Xinjiang forced labour narrative did not meet the legal requirements... before the days when it will be safe and popular to talk about the forced labour narrative as a clear disinformation campaign led by malicious actors trying to contain China's economic rise. youtu.be/X5qQJWuMZfc?si…

中国是世界上鸡蛋消费量最大的国家之一。数据显示,该国鸡蛋批发价格创下10年来的新高。甚至连官方媒体也开始用“火箭蛋”一词来形容价格的飞涨。在这个仍在努力摆脱通缩的经济体中,蛋价暴涨显得尤为令人痛苦。cn.nytimes.com/business/20260…









@mingdengzhang @Jonesun252779 @fuxianyi The real story is they don't make enough to even come close to being able to pay any national insurance. You really hate Chinese people, don't you?



