Misha

439 posts

Misha banner
Misha

Misha

@misha_130

software business owner, currently working on https://t.co/eiX5tj9VyU

Princeton, NJ Katılım Ağustos 2016
63 Takip Edilen19 Takipçiler
Misha
Misha@misha_130·
@n0lim1ts_j0hn @IMAO_ About as realistic as odyssey himself, xena being a spin off from hercules and odyssey being a spin off achilles/agamemnon
English
0
0
0
27
Coach Bartzokas's defender
Coach Bartzokas's defender@n0lim1ts_j0hn·
@IMAO_ Ah yeah and Xena Warrior was so realistic and was named Odyssey... guys keep some of your marbles intact don't lose all of them
English
1
0
0
1.2K
Frank J. Fleming
Frank J. Fleming@IMAO_·
Interestingly, Xena Warrior Princess had a black Helen of Troy thirty years ago, but race wasn’t a big deal back in the 90s.
Frank J. Fleming tweet media
English
1.7K
1.3K
13.7K
700K
Misha
Misha@misha_130·
Fine lets be honest and actually compare translations Here is Fitzgerald, the most common one that is taught in schools: Now shrugging off his rags the wiliest fighter of the islands leapt and stood on the broad door sill, his own bow in his hand He poured out at his feet a rain of arrows from the quiver and spoke to the crowd: “So much for that. Your clean-cut game is over, Now watch me hit a target that no man has hit before, if I can make this shot. Help me, Apollo.” And here is the same excerpt from Wilson: Odysseus ripped off his rags. Now naked, he leapt upon the threshold with his bow and quiverfull of arrows, which he tipped out in a rush before his feet, and spoke. “Playtime is over. I will shoot again, towards another mark no man has hit. Apollo, may I manage it!” Which one did you like more?
English
1
0
0
10
Jeebbers
Jeebbers@Thtomb·
@misha_130 @AzzurraS4 So, you do realize that changing the words changes the meaning of a sentence, right? If you change the words in the line, the meaning of said line changes. If you change the majority of the words in a story, you change the story. This is not rocket science.
English
1
0
0
15
🍃☘️🍀卂乙乙ㄩ尺尺卂🍀☘️🍃
This is Emily Wilson, who translated the Odyssey for "modern audience", focusing mainly on the "girl power", deleting the epic novel classicisms. Nolan's Odyssey is based on this (of course) desecration of the myth. It was enough to read the classic version by Homer, nothing to interpret, everything is in there, characters description, places, costumes, dialogues...but they preferred to insult and despise Greek culture and people intelligence.
🍃☘️🍀卂乙乙ㄩ尺尺卂🍀☘️🍃 tweet media
English
152
122
836
28.3K
Misha
Misha@misha_130·
@Thtomb @AzzurraS4 I just said the lines match. Take any line # from her translation and match it to the Greek poem you'll find the same text with a selection of different words that you would be complaining about. From memory, one of the complaints was that Wilson decided to call maids as slaves
English
1
0
0
17
Jeebbers
Jeebbers@Thtomb·
@misha_130 @AzzurraS4 Okay. Let me go write a completely different story that fits within the 12,110 line count, and match the original poem line for line. It will be about dinosaurs and aliens. And I'll call it the Odyssey. It will be my translation of it. Fucking idiot.
English
1
0
0
18
Misha
Misha@misha_130·
@Thtomb @AzzurraS4 Just note how her translation maintains the original line count of 12,110 from the original poem matching them line for line...but it's a new story of course
English
1
0
0
16
Jeebbers
Jeebbers@Thtomb·
@AzzurraS4 Calling it a "translation" is a lie. She didn't translate it. She wrote a new story, and slapped the title of "The Odyssey" on it.
English
1
0
2
143
Misha
Misha@misha_130·
@AzzurraS4 Did you actually read this or the illiad translation? Your statement is ridiculous. Instead of thanking Emily for YEARS of hard work translating and getting the Homer works up to standard, you make up stories about a "woke version"
English
1
0
1
180
Misha
Misha@misha_130·
@HomerPavlos I am completely lost at all these characters that are listed that only appear for 2 scenes in the book. How are they important for the odyssey?
English
0
0
0
796
Homer Pavlos
Homer Pavlos@HomerPavlos·
The production of Christopher Nolan received permission for 15 days of filming in Greece with a budget of 16 million euros. The Greek state gave them 6 million as a subsidy from the money of Greek taxpayers, who were never informed about the cast of the film or the distortion of the most important work in our history. The issue here is not that they received money. We Greeks would gladly have given all 16 million for Nolan to shoot a faithful Odyssey. But it should have been a film that properly represents us Greeks, Hellenism and stays true to the values and writings of Homer. Not so we Greeks could pay for a Black Helen and Clytemnestra, a Batman-like Agamemnon, a trans Achilles or Elpenor (a woman playing a male role), a Black Athena, and a script based on the worst possible "translation" that exists. In short, Nolan disrespected all Greeks, while the Greek people are now officially in the crosshairs of racism and the falsification of their history and culture. Woke Hollywood must die.
Homer Pavlos tweet mediaHomer Pavlos tweet media
English
1.5K
8.8K
63.4K
2.1M
Misha
Misha@misha_130·
@mjovanovictech Its click bait, lets misunderstand a concept and mock it for engagement
English
0
0
1
172
Milan Jovanović
Milan Jovanović@mjovanovictech·
This is only true if you don't understand Clean Architecture (and software architecture) in general
English
15
2
120
33.2K
Misha
Misha@misha_130·
@javarevisited The lesson here is that 1 day consulting gig is much cheaper than actually hiring him. My advice is to hire him hourly since it only took him 45 minutes anyway
English
0
0
2
241
Javarevisited
Javarevisited@javarevisited·
A developer with 20 years of experience applied for a Senior Role. He had built systems that handled millions of users. He was rejected before the first round. The reason: "We're looking for someone with more 'growth potential.'" He knew what that meant: "We think you’re too old and too expensive." Six months later, the company’s legacy system crashed during a migration.↓ The junior team was panicked. They reached out to the "overqualified" dev for a 1-day consulting gig. He fixed the issue in 45 minutes. It was a bug he had seen and solved back in 2008. Experience isn't just a higher salary; it's an insurance policy against mistakes you haven't made yet. Ageism in tech doesn't just hurt the elderly; it hurts the stability of the software.
English
6
2
25
6.3K
Misha
Misha@misha_130·
@unclebobmartin @esrtweet The scary part is that languages have special magical problems that are only revealed to you when you become a senior in the language
English
0
0
0
303
Uncle Bob Martin
Uncle Bob Martin@unclebobmartin·
I’m designing an online course in software engineering with agents. In days past I would have used a popular language like Java or C# or JavaScript for that course. For this course I chose Go, not because it is popular but because it is fast. My students will see little of it; and they will not be forced to watch agents struggle with VM startup delays or browsers.
English
13
9
165
9.9K
Eric S. Raymond
Eric S. Raymond@esrtweet·
Choice of language for software projects has become a very different game now that we have robot friends to do most of our code generation and translation for us. I have people wondering why I just shipped a project in Rust when I don't like the language and don't hand-code in it myself. I did this because I am adjusted to current reality, and now I'm going to talk about that. The age of hand-coding is mostly over. It no longer matters as much whether the computer language I use is comfortable to my hand, only whether the robot friend I'm using can generate it at high quality. It also matters whether I can read the language, because I am going to want to run my eyeball over it to review the code. Rust meets that bar - I find it kind of spiky but basically readable. Rust is a good deployment language for me to choose when (a) I want solid memory-safety guarantees, and (b) the code is already mature and I don't expect to need to do exploratory programming or serious feature development on it in the future. In particular, this makes Rust a good place for me to land my old C projects. Which is why in the last couple of months I have migrated two of them to Rust. C to Rust translation by robots is cheap and easy now; I will probably continue to do this. Each time I get a bug report on one of these projects in the future, boing! Rusticated. You may believe that Rustacea is stuffed with Communists and sexual deviants. You might even be right. I don't have to care whether that's true anymore, because I have a robot friend who is in all relevant ways smarter than they are. The wider lesson here is that the developer and user community around a language doesn't matter as much as it used to in whether you should get involved with it. Because in the future, we're going to be relying on human community brains less and artificial intelligences more. And that future is now. Not everything C gets moved to Rust, though. I lifted cvs-fast-export to Golang instead, because I think it's fairly likely that I'm going to have to do significant development work on it is in the future, so the payoff from a language I'm more comfortable reading and modifying by hand goes up. I'm certainly never going to start a project in C again. What would be the point, other than masochism? I spent 40 years writing C and I'm very good at it, but I will cheerfully leave it and it's buffer overruns and its heap corruption and its undefined behaviors and its portability problems behind. It helps that my robot friends are good at writing C code that doesn't have those problems, but...why even go there? Why expose yourself to those risks if the robot misses something? These days I do my exploratory programming in Python or Golang. My robot friends are extremely good at generating code in both those languages. I think they're slightly higher leverage on Golang, possibly due to that language having a smaller surface? Python used to be my favorite language. I soured on it for a while after the 2-to-3 transition was massively botched, and the GIL meant concurrency in it was a disaster area, and managing library dependencies became an even bigger disaster area. I'm a little happier with Python now that I can declare strict typing and uv has reduced dependency pain somewhat. But I think if I think I'm going to have to write anything much larger than a glue script in Python, I just shrug and reach for Golang instead. I'm very comfortable in Golang. Over time, I'll probably migrate my older Python projects to Golang because that's cheap and easy now and the performance win can be quite significant. I don't know what other languages I'm going to be using in the future. I do know that choosing a development language is a much less grave commitment than it used to be, because if it turns out to be not well suited for the job I'm doing, I can simply have my robot friend translated to a better one.
English
68
58
657
45.8K
Misha
Misha@misha_130·
@ChShersh I was honestly upset when all the people I knew who didn't have a passion for anything went into CS or SWE just because it looked easy. I was passionate about this since I was 13, and they just wanted a cushy job
English
0
0
4
425
Dmitrii Kovanikov
Dmitrii Kovanikov@ChShersh·
At some point, a narrative that SWE is a cushy high-paying job became popular. It’s a creative work. You chill remotely 4 hours a day and get your buck. Many people went into CS because of that. But suddenly post-Covid market correction and AI happened. And we don’t have as many SWE jobs as we have people. So this is how we ended up with 2000 applications per job.
Alex 🔔 | updatify.io@_avdept

I went coding when programmers were making sometimes even less than at mcdonalds my first payroll was $100/mo and it considered a good wage back then it was never about money for me, it was about challenges and its sad to see people claiming opposite

English
36
23
661
84.4K
Uncle Bob Martin
Uncle Bob Martin@unclebobmartin·
The proposed wealth taxes in California and Oregon are ballot initiatives. A simple majority of the population of those states can vote to change their constitution to tax wealthy individuals’ net worth. In California it is a one time 5% tax on net worth over $1 billion. In Oregon, it is an annual 2% tax on net worth over 30 million. These taxes are insane. Those people will leave their states in droves. These stupid progressive policies are utterly ruinous.
English
33
6
256
20.4K
Misha
Misha@misha_130·
@EOEboh The first time it ran the dns server didn't have it cached so it had to go all the way to authorative dns to get the ip address
English
0
0
2
1.6K
Captain-EO 👨🏾‍💻
You run the same query twice. First run: 1200ms Second run: 8ms You didn't change anything. What happened?
English
30
4
249
49K
Misha
Misha@misha_130·
@kristijan_kralj The fact that they have bad architects has nothing to do with .net. Most of my codebases are mediator pattern with cqrs, simple segregated, replaceable
English
2
0
2
749
Kristijan Kralj
Kristijan Kralj@kristijan_kralj·
The hidden cost of "enterprise" .NET architecture: Debugging hell. I've spent 13+ years in .NET codebases, and I keep seeing the same pattern: Teams add layers upon layers, to solve the problems they don't have. IUserService calls IUserRepository. IUserRepository wraps IUserDataAccess. IUserDataAccess calls IUserQueryBuilder. IUserQueryBuilder finally hits the database. I've seen a lot of classes having one-line methods whose sole purpose was to call the next layer and that's it. But to change one validation rule, you step through 5 layers. To fix a bug, you open 7 files. The justification is always the same: "What if we need to swap out Entity Framework?" "What if we switch databases?" "What if we need multiple implementations?" What if this, what if that. The reality: Those "what ifs" don't come to life in 99% of cases. I haven't worked on a project where we had to swap the ORM. But I've seen dozens of developers waste hours navigating through abstraction mazes. This happens with both new and experienced developers. New developers asking on Slack all the time: "Where to put this new piece of code?" But senior developers are too busy to answer that message. Why? Because they are debugging through the code that has more layers than a wedding cake. The end result? You spend more time navigating than building. Good abstractions hide complexity. Bad abstractions ARE the complexity. And most enterprise .NET apps? Way too much of the second kind.
English
120
45
607
112.7K
Misha
Misha@misha_130·
@unclebobmartin Through shipping production code non-technical teams inevitably become technical
English
2
0
0
207
Uncle Bob Martin
Uncle Bob Martin@unclebobmartin·
In this letter, the CEO of Coinbase talks about non-technical teams shipping production code. Honestly, I don’t think he knows what he’s talking about. Using AI agents makes it possible for teams who are not deeply technical in the syntax of a language to ship production code. But that team had better be very deeply technical in managing the structure and quality of the code that is produced. What the agents give us is the ability to disengage from deep syntax. But they do not give us the ability to disengage from modular design and architecture. You still need to be deeply technical in those topics in order to produce good production quality code.
Brian Armstrong@brian_armstrong

This is an email I sent earlier today to all employees at Coinbase: Team, Today I’ve made the difficult decision to reduce the size of Coinbase by ~14%. I want to walk you through why we're doing this now, what it means for those affected, and how this positions us for the future. Why now Two forces are converging at the same time. We need to be front footed to respond to both. First, the market. Coinbase is well-capitalized, has diversified revenue streams, and is well-positioned to weather any storm. Crypto is also on the verge of the next wave of adoption, with stablecoins, prediction markets, tokenization, and more taking off. However, our business is still volatile from quarter to quarter. While we've managed through that cyclicality many times before and come out stronger on the other side, we’re currently in a down market and need to adjust our cost structure now so that we emerge from this period leaner, faster, and more efficient for our next phase of growth. Second, AI is changing how we work. Over the past year, I’ve watched engineers use AI to ship in days what used to take a team weeks. Non-technical teams are now shipping production code and many of our workflows are being automated. The pace of what's possible with a small, focused team has changed dramatically, and it's accelerating every day. All of this has led us to an inflection point, not just for Coinbase, but for every company. The biggest risk now is not taking action. We are adjusting early and deliberately to rebuild Coinbase to be lean, fast, and AI-native. We need to return to the speed and focus of our startup founding, with AI at our core. What this means To get there, we are not just reducing headcount and cutting costs, we’re fundamentally changing how we operate: rebuilding Coinbase as an intelligence, with humans around the edge aligning it. What does this mean in practice? - Fewer layers, faster decisions: We are flattening our org structure to 5 layers max below CEO/COO. Layers slow things down and create coordination tax. The future is small, high context teams that can move quickly. Leaders will own much more, with as many as 15+ direct reports. Fewer layers also means a leaner cost structure that is built to perform through all market cycles. - No pure managers: Every leader at Coinbase must also be a strong and active individual contributor. Managers should be like player-coaches, getting their hands dirty alongside their teams. - AI-native pods: We’ll be concentrating around AI-native talent who can manage fleets of agents to drive outsized impact. We’ll also be experimenting with reduced pod sizes, including “one person teams” with engineers, designers, and product managers all in one role. In short: AI is bringing a profound shift in how companies operate, and we’re reshaping Coinbase to lead in this new era. This is a new way of working, and we need to leverage AI across every facet of our jobs. To those who are affected I know there are real people behind these decisions — talented colleagues who have poured themselves into this company and our mission. To those of you who will be leaving: thank you. You’ve helped build Coinbase into what it is today, and I am sincerely grateful for everything you've done. All impacted team members will receive an email to their personal account in the next hour with more information, and an invitation to meet with an HRBP and a senior leader in your organization. Coinbase system access has been removed today. I know this feels sudden and harsh, but it is the only responsible choice given our duty to protect customer information. To those affected, we will be providing a comprehensive package to support you through this transition. US employees will receive a minimum of 16 weeks base pay (plus 2 weeks per year worked), their next equity vest, and 6 months of COBRA. Employees on a work visa will get extra transition support. Those outside of the US will receive similar support, based on local factors and subject to any consultation requirements. Coinbase prides itself on talent density. Our employees are among the most talented people in the world, and I have no doubt that your skills and experience will be highly sought after as you pursue your next chapters. How we move forward To the team that is staying, I know this is a difficult day. We’re saying goodbye to colleagues and friends you've been in the trenches with. But here’s what I want you to know as we move forward together: Over the past 13 years, we have weathered four crypto winters, gone public, and built the most trusted platform in our industry. We’ve made it this far by making hard decisions and by always staying focused on our mission. This time will be no different – nothing has changed about the long term outlook of our company or industry. And most importantly, our mission has never been more important for the world. Increasing economic freedom requires a new financial system, and we’re building it. The Coinbase that emerges from this will be more capable than ever to achieve our mission. Brian

English
130
269
2.7K
281.1K
Misha
Misha@misha_130·
@BurbunPitt Well many people think that the illiad and odyssey was written by different people because the characters are so different
English
0
0
0
2.8K
Tyler Burbun
Tyler Burbun@BurbunPitt·
Christopher Nolan should hire a better casting director #TheOdyssey The Odyssey Troy
Tyler Burbun tweet media
English
627
454
8.9K
2.4M
Misha
Misha@misha_130·
@SeverusChud Who cares? Helen appears in the odyssey as a side note how she is back with menelaus. Literally 2 minutes of screen time
English
0
0
0
9
Severus
Severus@SeverusChud·
I'm sorry, but Nolan casting Lupita Nyong’o as Helen of Troy has completely killed all immersion in this epic for me. Homer’s Odyssey was never some diverse melting pot. Helen was a fair skinned, golden-haired Spartan queen, daughter of Zeus, the ultimate beauty in an epic built by European blood and gods. Yet i'm meant to believe her face was the one who launched a 1,000 ships? It's very sad to see Nolan go down this route. Ancient Greece wasn’t full of Sub Saharans, yet they’re flooding Ithaca with dei and tokenism. This destroys what could’ve been a incredible Epic. Tragic.
Severus tweet media
The Odyssey Movie@odysseymovie

Defy the Gods. Watch the New Trailer for Christopher Nolan's The Odyssey and experience the film in theaters 7 17 26.

English
3.1K
3.6K
43K
5.2M
Maria Kukharets
Maria Kukharets@KukharetsMaria·
ok designers, genuine question how are you dealing with client who goes "...why does it take so long if AI does it in minutes" ? like yes it generated something fast. and then I spent 2 hrs fixing what it got wrong, validating flows, checking edge cases…
English
2
0
8
161
Misha
Misha@misha_130·
@staysaasy Well you should go forward with this fiction and write a Sci fi book
English
0
0
0
158
staysaasy
staysaasy@staysaasy·
So my buddy has changed his entire life with his OpenClaw. He used to be perpetually busy and distracted. Always late. Super flakey. And frankly miserable. He. Has. Changed. Overnight. I hang out with him 3x more because his claw makes scheduling with him so easy. His wife says he has an extra 8 hours a week of time with his family because the claw has automated so much of his life. He went from the most scattered person I know to the most reliable. Tech is beautiful man. Of course this is complete fiction. I know 0 people who have had any durable life changes from the world’s most hyped personal assistant. Maybe 2027 will be the year these dreams come true.
English
112
46
2.2K
137.1K
Misha
Misha@misha_130·
@UpdatingOnRome What's the relation to Rome though? Aeneas or something?
English
2
0
1
9.1K