Mateusz Morusiewicz

132 posts

Mateusz Morusiewicz banner
Mateusz Morusiewicz

Mateusz Morusiewicz

@mmrosum

Katılım Ekim 2015
223 Takip Edilen528 Takipçiler
Mateusz Morusiewicz retweetledi
There.Is.Now.Alternative⚡🤖
TEE.salon is coming to Bangkok TODAY: 15:00 - 23:00 UTC+7, 11.10.2024 Agenda: TEE.salon (yes, that's a link!) From the most WTF use cases to whiteboarding Trustless TEEs. Let's co-build the TEE stack, t/acc Ethereum and the Silicon in the future architecture of compute. Registration required for building access: lu.ma/teesalonbangkok
Bangkok, Thailand 🇹🇭 English
20
49
142
56.6K
Mateusz Morusiewicz retweetledi
Max Resnick
Max Resnick@MaxResnick·
There are four reasons you might want MEV burn only one of them makes any sense. 1) Smooth MEV rewards 2) Make Eth Deflationary 🦇🔊 3) Achieve a mechanism design goal that cannot be achieved without the burn (e.g. OCA proof 1559 heuristic). 4) Taxes 1) Smoothing MEV rewards seems like a fine idea but neither the APS proposal nor the previous proposal (use the highest bid 2 seconds before the auction ends as a floor) actually achieves this. The original proposal has been shown empirically to still induce long tails in MEV behavior. The APS design is simply transferring the risk to the ticket holder. Even if you want ordinary validators not to have uncertainty in their rewards they can just buy insurance and it should be equivalent to this. 2) If you burn validator rewards then you have to mint more ETH to achieve the same level of stake so any deflationary effects wash out. 3) As far as I am aware there is no stated mechanism design goal for the burn other than patching a censorship problem that 1559 broke. The best option would be to simply repeal and replace 1559 rather than further complicating the system to patch an already broken transaction fee mechanism. 4) Taxes are the only sensible reason to advocate for the burn in my opinion. value accrued due to asset appreciation can be taxed as capital gains whereas is many jurisdictions the validator rewards are taxed as income. ethresear.ch/t/in-a-post-me…
English
4
3
33
6.6K
Mateusz Morusiewicz retweetledi
sxysun ⚡️🤖
sxysun ⚡️🤖@sxysun1·
🎭🕺🪭💃New performance art just dropped for y'all Swifties and econ nerds by @stephensonhmatt @lstephanian and moi: an auction to mitigate the negative externalities of ticketing bots and resale markets read on for a tldr, and find more at suift.tickets!
Lauren Stephanian@lstephanian

In honor of our favorite celebrity’s birthday, @stephensonmatt, @sxysun1 and I are releasing SUIFT, the Simple Unified Inception for Ticketing auction, a concept for a working suApp. You can view the landing page here:

English
1
4
17
4.4K
Mateusz Morusiewicz retweetledi
Andrew Miller
Andrew Miller@socrates1024·
Hiring up to one Ph.D student next year for Decentralized Systems Lab to explore one of two focus areas: 1) decentralized governance and bridging to political science 2) privacy smart contract programming models using ideal functionalities soc1024.ece.illinois.edu
English
5
30
106
19.4K
Mateusz Morusiewicz retweetledi
@bertcmiller
@bertcmiller@bertcmiller·
The first SUAVE apps were borne in the last week. Many, many more are to come. Get in touch if you are interested in building on or helping to test SUAVE's alpha.
Dogan@doganeth_en

1/ Introducing SUClave: A New AMM Design That Utilizes Intents (SUAVE) and Uniswap V4 to Address the LVR - LP Profitability Problem. Let's delve into the mechanism details and explore how we aim to solve it 🧵 github.com/getclave/sucla…

English
1
8
68
17.3K
Mateusz Morusiewicz retweetledi
Puja Ohlhaver
Puja Ohlhaver@pujaohlhaver·
The fate of AI (and the world) should not hinge on one man and his quarrels with his board over a company that he positionined to enjoy regulatory capture of the most powerful government in the world, and is now eyeing vertical integration across the AI hardware stack. Sam Altman is turning every local game into a SV web2 global game (AI, identity, hardware) which only an oligopoly can win at best, or one wins at worst. Web3 seeks to decentralize power into plurality of many games across a network of cooperation, pushing power down, not centralizing it at the top. Technological growth and acceleration is not at odds with decentralization, but depends on it for resilience, security, robustness, risk minimization, and alignment. Plurality > Singularity Decentralization > Centralization Many > One
English
2
7
61
8.2K
Mateusz Morusiewicz retweetledi
Mateusz Morusiewicz retweetledi
sxysun ⚡️🤖
sxysun ⚡️🤖@sxysun1·
many in the industry right now seem to mistake shortsightedness for down-to-earth product exploration "in the arena" The bear has turned ppl into defeatists and many simply give up trying. It saddens me to see those around not only embrace the ponzis, but (even) celebrate it
English
1
1
17
2K
Andrew Miller
Andrew Miller@socrates1024·
wtf is this rats & cheese captcha??? took me 3 tries to get it right, if you fail even 1 out of the 10 trials you have to start again from the beginning
English
12
3
37
4.9K
Péter Szilágyi
Péter Szilágyi@peter_szilagyi·
I should start charging 0.15% on every transaction that goes through Geth... 🤔
Hayden Adams 🦄@haydenzadams

I work in crypto because of the immense positive impact I believe it can have on the world, removing gatekeepers and increasing access to value and ownership. I’m proud of the ways @Uniswap Labs has contributed to that effort and want to make sure we’re creating sustainable systems to power this work. From day one, we’ve worked to be both a transparent and sustainable business. As a next step, starting tomorrow we will charge a 0.15% swap fee – the first in Labs’ history – on certain tokens in our web app and wallet. The list of tokens and fee level will be kept updated in our help center linked below. This is separate from the Uniswap Protocol fee switch, which is voted on by UNI token governance. I built the protocol to be a permissionless and decentralized public good. Users have countless choices of ways to use it, through aggregators, other UIs, or by interacting directly with the smart contracts. Imo our interface remains the best – a huge amount of love (and money) goes into making that the case :) This interface fee is one of the lowest in the industry, and it will allow us to continue to research, develop, build, ship, improve, and expand crypto and DeFi. This year alone (so far!) we released an iOS wallet, Android wallet, UniswapX, major improvements to our web app, Permit2, Uniswap v4 draft codebase, and more! We’re in this for the long haul 🦄 support.uniswap.org/hc/en-us/artic…

English
25
18
537
124.7K
Mateusz Morusiewicz retweetledi
dmarz ⚡️🤖
dmarz ⚡️🤖@DistributedMarz·
SUAPP idea: roll up post scheduler. Each roll up submits their preference for when batches are uploaded and then stream batches to scheduler whenever ready. The scheduler will find optimal posting schedule for all preferences and post to base layer on each roll ups behalf.
English
1
1
15
2.7K
Mateusz Morusiewicz retweetledi
dmarz ⚡️🤖
dmarz ⚡️🤖@DistributedMarz·
where is browser p2p tech at these days?
English
0
1
5
640
Mateusz Morusiewicz retweetledi
Gwart
Gwart@GwartyGwart·
The reason Vitalik is so obsessed with living forever is because that’s roughly how long it’s going to take to *really* get proposer-builder separation right
English
13
17
352
32.6K
Mateusz Morusiewicz retweetledi
Gwart
Gwart@GwartyGwart·
“Ya I just think it’s of critical importance that we… hang on one second” *piles $50k into a coin called BALD that launched 15 minutes ago* “what was I saying, oh right, ya we absolutely need to decentralize these sequencers, it’s really holding us back.”
English
1
10
255
28.2K