Mary Mary

@AntiWokeMemes Cardiac arrest prevention

What should these 2 politicians RUN for?

@AntiLeftMemes Say bye bye to international flights, bc if customs goes, you won’t be able to 😂

Democrat Cory Booker is DEMANDING the Trump administration to pull ICE agents out of Democrat Cities at the request of the Democrat Party. What do you want to tell Cory Booker?

Iran signed a ceasefire last night and broke it before most Americans finished breakfast. But that’s not the story. The story is what Trump did while everyone was staring at the missiles. The sequence: Iran signs ceasefire. Iran releases fake version claiming total victory. CNN runs fake version as real news. Trump calls it fraud. Iran launches missiles at Israel, Kuwait, UAE, and Bahrain. Ceasefire lasts fewer hours than a domestic flight. Everyone is asking the wrong question. The question isn’t “why did Iran break the ceasefire.” The answer to that is obvious. Iran has a political wing that wants to negotiate and a military wing that wants to die fighting. The IRGC operates 32 independent regional commands. The politicians signed the paper. The generals launched the missiles. Iran is a country negotiating with itself at gunpoint. Trump already knows this. This morning he posted that Iran has gone through “a very productive regime change.” He’s not angry about the broken ceasefire. He’s looking past the IRGC and talking directly to the political faction that’s still alive and desperate. Then, minutes later, he posted a 50 percent tariff on any country supplying weapons to Iran. He didn’t name China. He didn’t have to. Five Iranian ships left a Chinese port carrying sodium perchlorate, the chemical you need to make the solid rocket fuel inside every missile that just hit Kuwait. China trades $500 billion a year with the US. Russia trades under $500 million. The tariff isn’t about Russia. So: one hand offers Iran reconstruction money and sanctions relief. The other hand prices China out of the Iranian weapons pipeline. Two posts, two targets, one table. Meanwhile there’s a conservative commentator somewhere reading the CNN version of Iranian propaganda and telling you Trump surrendered. My brother in Christ, he just set the opening bid for a meeting with Xi Jinping. Are you paying attention?

True

@MAGANEWS_X ABSOLUTELY

Question for MAGA from a liberal woman. "Hi, I'm just wondering if you guys who voted for Trump — did you vote for the Department of Education to be dismantled? Because that's what he's doing right now. MAGA?

@PeriklesGREAT Dumb and Dumber

What would you call this Presidential Team?

Don’t mistake this ceasefire as a loss for Iran. Their strategy has always been delay, delay, delay. In their view, they are winning. Our next steps are critical— we can’t let up the pressure on their missiles or proxies and we need to remove every bit of the enriched uranium.

@atensnut Great Value Hillary. But that’s what you look like when you sell your soul for power. She’s awful and she’s been flying under radar with her “I’m a mom” routine…she’s a literal CIA plant and hoping she gets to redistrict to keep people from tossing her on her ass.

They were forewarned about this moron. I cannot believe they elected her.

@RoKhanna @TuckerCarlson @mtgreenee He didn’t back down. No matter how this went y’all were frothing to try and frame this as impeachable.

Trump backed down. No credit to Congress, which barely made a whimper. Credit to the American people—progressive activists & anti-war conservative voices like @TuckerCarlson, @mtgreenee, and many more. We need an anti-Epstein class, anti-war, pro-working class coalition.

@SenWarren It must be miserable ALWAYS getting things wrong.

We don’t know what will happen tonight: if Trump will back down or commit war crimes. But I do know that Congress has the power to stop this. Republican Leader John Thune must call the Senate back into session immediately. And Congress needs to vote to stop Trump’s war NOW.

@RoKhanna Please show where it says literally anywhere other than your socialist-funded playbook that words equate to war crimes….🙄

We need to invoke the 25th Amendment and remove Trump. Threatening war crimes is a blatant violation of our constitution and the Geneva Conventions.

@JessicaTarlov Yeah you can do that when you have millions of money funded into networks from people with a globalist agenda that are paid to rev people up and idiot media people like yourself who push the bullshit narrative you do. As a former Democrat I’m ashamed of what this party is now.

Republicans can mock the No Kings protests all the want, but the reality is it just grew from 6 million to 8 million people in a few months. 3,300 rallies in all 50 states, many in suburbs and small towns. Meanwhile, Republicans in Congress see the writing on the wall. A record 36 are retiring early. Donald Trump is sitting around 40% approval at best, closer to the low 30s by some measures. When a president is under 50%, their party historically loses an average of 34 seats in Congress. Democrats only need a handful of seats. The energy is real and it is growing.

Iran was trying to use the North Korean model to get a nuke: create sufficient conventional deterrence so you won’t be challenged in acquiring one (it’s called the Seoul Hostage Problem). This has been explained over and over since day one. Everyone claiming shifting goalposts or no imminent threat has been lying. The reason North Korea was allowed to get nukes is because Seoul (and its 10 million inhabitants) is within artillery and rocket range of North Korea. During the 1994 nuclear crisis, the Clinton administration seriously considered airstrikes on North Korea’s Yongbyon reactor but backed off precisely because of the artillery threat to Seoul. Iran was trying to accomplish the same by stockpiling missiles and drones which would have had the same deterrent effect. The proof is what Iran has been doing in the past month: attacking all its neighbors in order to pressure the US to stop attacking it Beyond this, they were building medium-range ballistic missiles that could reach Paris and London, meaning all of Europe could be held hostage as they built a nuclear bomb. The reason Iran has not built a nuclear weapon until now is not because it couldn’t, but because it knew it would be attacked and denied this capability. So by allowing them to continue developing this conventional deterrence, you would be allowing Iran to get a nuclear weapon. And unlike North Korea, Iran is led by an eschatological death cult Reagan saw nuclear mutually assured destruction (MAD) as both morally bankrupt (because of the innocent-body-count problem) and dangerously fragile because it assumed flawless rationality between adversaries…this means it only takes one irrational actor to destroy the world. Working backwards from the conclusion that Iran’s Islamist regime must never have a nuclear weapon, it was necessary for the US to attack Iran to deny it the conventional capacity to hold the entire eastern hemisphere hostage. Every European leader knows this and behind the scenes praises the US for this action. But they are cowards, held hostage by their own internal Muslim populations, and so adopt these ridiculous public positions. This was never about Israel. And if your argument is that Iran should be allowed to get a nuclear weapon then you are a fool and a traitor to western civilization…you’re a useful idiot

@TrumpsHurricane Dumb bitch.

Describe Elizabeth Warren in TWO words or less

@ksorbs Can you imagine how great America could be if all the taxpayer money we’ve had stolen from us actually went to what it was supposedly collected for? Imagine the infrastructure, security and HEALTHCARE improvements that could be created.

We now have a list of the NO KINGS financiers: - Arabella: $79M - Warren Buffet: $16M - Ford: $51M - Rockefeller: $26M - Soros: $72M - Tides: $45M $294,487,641 MILLION

𝗣𝗘𝗘𝗥-𝗥𝗘𝗩𝗜𝗘𝗪𝗘𝗗 𝗦𝗧𝗨𝗗𝗬 𝗜𝗡 𝗡𝗔𝗧𝗨𝗥𝗘: 𝗔𝗡𝗧𝗔𝗥𝗖𝗧𝗜𝗖 𝗜𝗖𝗘 𝗖𝗢𝗥𝗘𝗦 𝗦𝗛𝗢𝗪 𝗖𝗢𝟮 𝗟𝗘𝗩𝗘𝗟𝗦 𝗕𝗥𝗢𝗔𝗗𝗟𝗬 𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗕𝗟𝗘 𝗙𝗢𝗥 𝗧𝗛𝗥𝗘𝗘 𝗠𝗜𝗟𝗟𝗜𝗢𝗡 𝗬𝗘𝗔𝗥𝗦 A study just published in 𝘕𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦 — one of the most prestigious peer-reviewed science journals on earth — is causing significant discomfort for Net Zero advocates. The findings come from ancient "blue" ice cores drilled in the Allan Hills region of Antarctica, which provide a climate record stretching back approximately three million years. The research found that CO2 and methane levels have been broadly stable over the past three million years — while global temperatures experienced significant shifts during that same period, including major ice ages and warming cycles. In other words, the data shows temperature swings happening independently of CO2 levels — which is not what the standard climate narrative predicts. Study lead author Julia Marks-Peterson acknowledged the findings were unexpected: "We definitely were a bit surprised." She added cautiously that the findings "may suggest that even small changes in greenhouse gas levels could trigger major shifts in climate." That last sentence is worth reading carefully. The study found CO2 was stable while temperatures changed significantly — and the researcher's response was to suggest that maybe tiny CO2 changes still caused big temperature swings. The data pointed one direction; the interpretation strained to point another. 𝘕𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦's own commentary noted that the ice cores hint that "changes in the ocean might have played a larger part than greenhouse gases in key climate shifts of the past three million years." To be clear about what this study does and does not say. It does not prove that CO2 has no effect on climate. It does show that over a three-million-year record, CO2 levels remained broadly stable while temperatures varied dramatically — suggesting other factors, including ocean circulation changes, drove major climate shifts. That is a significant finding that complicates the simplified narrative that CO2 is the primary control knob of global temperature. The Net Zero agenda has cost Western economies trillions of dollars, driven up energy prices for working families, and pushed industrial production to countries with far lower environmental standards. When peer-reviewed research published in 𝘕𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦 itself raises serious questions about the foundational assumptions underlying that agenda — the response should be inquiry, not dismissal. 𝗦𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘀𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗹𝗲𝗱. 𝗜𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗲𝗱. 𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗻𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗺𝘂𝗹𝘁𝗶𝗽𝗹𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴. dailysceptic.org/2026/03/25/sho…

@MichaelARothman That very well may have been. Contributed to by Melissa Brett

@MaryBowdenMD @CharlesGrooms I don’t want a Muslim doctor. Ever. Untrustworthy, their very religion compels them to do us harm.

@TrumpsHurricane Leave?

Liberal woman says she’s TIRED of living in America and being “oppressed” by President Trump.. What is your advice to her ??

@AdamKinzinger There are an awful lot of people who claim to be Christian but are complicit with killing babies. So throwing religion around it is kind of useless at this point. Y’all have tried tearing it down, don’t try to hold Christians on a pedestal now.

So now Democrats are more of an enemy than Russia or China. The evil that permeates trumps soul grows and grows. Every Christian leader that does not speak up is complicit.