Pratik Dalwadi

2.4K posts

Pratik Dalwadi

Pratik Dalwadi

@moderndas

Krishna: Yogasthah Kuru Karmani (First establish in Yoga and then Act)

Vancouver, British Columbia Katılım Eylül 2017
150 Takip Edilen198 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Pratik Dalwadi
Pratik Dalwadi@moderndas·
I don’t want to write code. I want to understand the code.
English
0
0
4
555
Toby Eggleston
Toby Eggleston@tobyeggleston·
@willchen500 I don't think the models even need to enter the market themselves. They just raise the cost of token usage and squeeze margin - L/H have no moat.
English
2
0
5
2.2K
WillC
WillC@willchen500·
Harvey and Legora are essentially sales organisations that resell tokens. They have hired legions of ex big law juniors and mid levels as sales people (“GTM”) along with some ex partners to wine and dine their former colleagues. They slap on a UI that makes them look different from ChatGPT but the product differentiation and vertical specific features are far and few in between. You could just as well use both for any white collar job. Their web apps are basically 1. A chatbot interface 2. A projects function where you can upload your files 3. A tabular review function where you can bulk review documents in a table 4. Workflows which are just custom prompts you write for the chatbot or tabular review. I was able to build everything plus some additional functionality they do not have like version control in mikeoss.com in two weeks. I call this the “token reseller theory”. They are like car dealers or real estate agents but for tokens. The model providers get them to do the selling to crack open the reticent legal market. What happens to H/L now that the model providers want the market for themselves? Does not bode well for them.
Bohan@loubohan

Heard that Harvey is slicing their wrapper even thinner by outsourcing their product to Anthropic Managed Agents as they realize there is no data/posttrain moat on top of the models Harvey/Legora will become a brand + sales team distribution channel for Anthropic until they get bought or give up

English
85
71
1.7K
531.1K
Pratik Dalwadi
Pratik Dalwadi@moderndas·
@prakdadlani bhai why buyers ask you "how much you make" i don't understand and why do you feel obligated to answer this?
English
0
0
0
7
Prakash Dadlani
Prakash Dadlani@prakdadlani·
Indians don't respect Indians. A guy importing products from China came to us: China product: - USD8.50 = ₹1,100 Landed - 20,000 pcs MOQ - Advance payment - 75 days lead time Our SAME Desi product: - ₹950 ex factory - MOQ 5,000 pcs - Pay when goods ready - 2 weeks delivery When we offered our Bharat product, he laughed and said we are crazy. Mocked us by saying: - “How much you earn?” - “Give full breakdown” - “Give 60 days credit” - “What’s in it for me?” When he buys from China? No questions. Full respect. Happy advance payment. Deal done with a smile. With outsiders: we act like professionals. With our own: we act like vultures. Even when we get a much better deal. Suck every rupee. Question everything. Kill the deal. Then cry: “India me quality nahi hai.” Problem system ka nahi hai. Problem soch ka hai.
English
197
622
4K
121.5K
∩
@zachpogrob·
INNOVATE ONE THING MAKE THE REST INSTANTLY FAMILIAR INNOVATE ONE THING MAKE THE REST INSTANTLY FAMILIAR INNOVATE ONE THING MAKE THE REST INSTANTLY FAMILIAR
English
4
0
114
3.4K
Pratik Dalwadi
Pratik Dalwadi@moderndas·
@landforce my man.. it never measures your joyfulness levels then whats the point
English
0
0
0
41
Klaas
Klaas@forgebitz·
ai is going to unlock smaller teams building super apps more niche made super apps is going to be amazing i want to be able to choose from 20 amazing platforms and pick the one perfect for me i don't care about generic slop
English
46
1
87
3.6K
Pratik Dalwadi
Pratik Dalwadi@moderndas·
@Loyalsachfan10 thats actually a good sign sachin not talking about him, sachin does not want the kid to get caught up in his head too much about his skills. sachin is waiting for this kid to mature in his talent.
English
0
0
1
513
Akul (𝑨𝑻10)
Akul (𝑨𝑻10)@Loyalsachfan10·
I sense a rift between Sachin Tendulkar and Vaibhav Suryavanshi. Whenever Vaibhav plays well, Sachin does not tweet about him however, when Shreyas takes a catch, Jurel executes a stumping or Tilak scores a century Sachin tweets immediately. Source: 2024 Mumbai Indians captaincy change Gang from that Fan club
Akul (𝑨𝑻10) tweet media
English
52
19
536
139.6K
Parmita Mishra
Parmita Mishra@parmita·
Will Google solve disease in 10 years? Not without data. We can commoditize drug design, and STILL not solve most diseases. You need @precigenetic.
English
22
38
500
82.3K
Pratik Dalwadi
Pratik Dalwadi@moderndas·
@paraschopra what to do if you are burning thru claude api credits ? my claw was dormant for few days and it burned 5$ for just getting on/off several times of the day.
English
0
0
0
14
Paras Chopra
Paras Chopra@paraschopra·
I don’t get the OpenClaw hype Connecting Claude with Telegram / WhatsApp is trivially easy, you can literally ask it to help you do this and it’ll guide you. Same story with recurring jobs. I just did this - now Claude send me local bangalore news summary at 12pm IST daily on Telegram. Took me 15 mins to build. If the argument is that Claw lets nontech users do this, imagine the security implications when users let an LLM take over their system while having no idea what’s happening under the hood. Making custom scripts and workflows with Claude lets you at least know what you’re configuring on your system.
English
242
36
1.1K
172.7K
Pratik Dalwadi
Pratik Dalwadi@moderndas·
@metapreston really? when threads came out i predicted that this has no chance but don't underestimate the female demography of instagram, they might make it work.
English
0
0
1
409
Preston
Preston@metapreston·
Threads is doing to Twitter what Instagram did to Snapchat. I never thought this would be possible
Preston tweet media
English
139
20
464
161.2K
Pratik Dalwadi
Pratik Dalwadi@moderndas·
@forgebitz isn't it expensive to use cursor? i thought they would mark up the cost of claude models when used inside cursor, no? but otherwise i find it the most easy to use
English
0
0
2
45
Klaas
Klaas@forgebitz·
i always stick with cursor/opencode claude code is great but i don't care that much about a single model, they just nerf it within a few weeks same goes with codex the moat of the models is almost zero; it's all in the application layer
English
57
1
218
11K
Pratik Dalwadi
Pratik Dalwadi@moderndas·
@parmita notice how we're happy only in certain moments. this is because what we wanted was happening in that moment or what was happening is what we wanted. either way - it was because there was a total acceptance of the moment. not because of any person, milestone or a specific outcome.
English
0
0
0
11
Parmita Mishra
Parmita Mishra@parmita·
I want to learn how to be happy. I already know how to have lots of energy and laugh a lot. But that’s not my aim I want to learn how to be happy specifically.
English
40
0
71
4.1K
Pratik Dalwadi
Pratik Dalwadi@moderndas·
@asmartbear the former is what i always strive to get better at.. sometimes not acting on anything for weeks. the latter is very easy, you feel like you are progressing but you realize much later that you just ended up right where you began.
English
1
0
1
3
Pratik Dalwadi
Pratik Dalwadi@moderndas·
@asmartbear i admit that keeping the mind clear & unbiased while coming up with a strategy (what product to build + which market to go after) is mentally very difficult as opposed to just keep building things purely on a whim, or based on random insight or even solving my own problem. 1/2
English
1
0
1
25
Jason Cohen
Jason Cohen@asmartbear·
If you had a strategy and it didn’t work, that’s a shame, but it’s the game we play. If you never had a strategy, and just made random things, and it didn’t work… what did you expect? That’s why “throw on the wall as see what sticks” is nonsense.
English
9
1
29
1.9K
Pratik Dalwadi
Pratik Dalwadi@moderndas·
@p_millerd we tried selling services to create audiobooks out of existing content to some professionals 3 years ago - by manually cloning either their voice or using voice actor. It did not take off for some reason.
English
1
0
0
27
Paul Millerd
Paul Millerd@p_millerd·
holy moly - elevenlabs voice clones are excellent i am so bullish on audiobooks now
English
7
0
34
2.8K
Pratik Dalwadi
Pratik Dalwadi@moderndas·
@Saboo_Shubham_ that was my main concern, heygen costs me 1.50 or 2$ for 7 minutes which is still cheaper than this but in our product we are not able to confidently say that it will get to profitability soon.
English
0
0
1
20
Shubham Saboo
Shubham Saboo@Saboo_Shubham_·
The cost is insane here. $0.50 per minute. That’s $30 an hour. An outsourced human call center worker costs about $0.017 a minute (roughly $1.02/hour). You’re paying a 30x premium to talk to an AI Agent. Everything seems good till it isn't.
Shubham Saboo@Saboo_Shubham_

This is getting way too real! I can now get on a video call with my OpenClaw Agents to chat with them face to face. All i need to do is to send them a Google meet invite.

English
133
38
660
81.6K
Pratik Dalwadi retweetledi
Parmita Mishra
Parmita Mishra@parmita·
a single gram of soil contains more microorganisms than there are humans on earth. we have catalogued less than 1% of them. and we think we’re ready to model biology with AI trained on 200 cell lines. r u fr
English
9
13
103
2.2K
Pratik Dalwadi
Pratik Dalwadi@moderndas·
@dvassallo @svpino do you think now with AI assisted book keeping and other CPA tasks automated, they would want to spend more time with customers answering their questions? In pharmacy they always sold us tools by promising to automate repetitive tasks so we could spend more time with the patients
English
1
0
0
47
Daniel Vassallo
Daniel Vassallo@dvassallo·
"I'm too rich for the CPA I can afford, and too poor for the CPA I need" Very well put. I would certainly benefit if I had a part-time accountant on payroll, but it doesn't make sense economically and too much hassle to find one and retain too. So we're left with CPAs who handle tax returns for hundreds of clients and you're just a number on their conveyor belt.
English
3
1
14
1.9K
Santiago
Santiago@svpino·
The first time I used a CPA, he was extremely efficient and extremely wrong. It was a large company. They took care of everything for me. I felt amazing. Years later, I understood what a crappy job they did: They did almost nothing to help me save money. As my taxes became more complex, I started trusting CPA and tax preparer experts less and less. I quickly realized that they provide very good service for the 95% of people out there, but as soon as your situation becomes more complex, their services are less valuable. Right now, I'm too rich for the CPA I can afford, and too poor for the CPA I need. This year, I filled out my taxes using a combination of Claude (for the most part) and ChatGPT. For reference, I have a solid understanding of tax law, and I've always been involved in my taxes. I'm also not uneducated. I used TurboTax's consulting service to ask complex questions beyond my knowledge and to fact-check Claude's suggestions. Most of the time, the human experts were clueless and didn't know that something we did was even possible or lawful. Most experts had to ask me "to return my call later" so they had time to read more about the topic. Claude was right every single time. This was eye-opening for me. By the way, I also found a mistake in my 2024 return. Claude found out that I wasn't reporting a backdoor Roth IRA contribution correctly. I had to file an amended return for 2024, and the IRS owes me $2,562. To all the people saying this is just bro science and that you should trust your CPA, I say: Have fun with it. Instead: • Claude did 99.9% of the work with my help • I used human experts to validate some of that work • I paid the TurboTax Audit Defense service to have them represent me in the event of an audit I know this might be fringe today, but more and more people will start moving this way. CPAs will have to compete now to win our business back.
Daniel Vassallo@dvassallo

I just filed my taxes with OpenClaw. Here's how it went. I sold my 90% stake in a business last year for $1.8M cash (installment sale: half in 2025, half in 2026). I also had a single-member LLC, brokerage income from dividends and stocks, HSA distributions, ACA marketplace insurance, 3 real estate properties, prior estimated tax payments, foreign income tax credits, and three kids. Not a simple return. I usually pay a CPA. Last year it cost me $8,000 for personal and business returns, and every question took weeks to get answered (so I didn't ask much). This year I decided to see how far I could get with OpenClaw instead. Here's what actually happened: Phase 1: Research (Monday) I had a pile of documents: the purchase agreement, all LLC operating agreement amendments, old K-1s, prior tax returns going back to 2012, bank statements, balance sheets. I fed everything to OpenClaw and said "read everything in chronological order and figure out my 2025 tax situation." It reconstructed the full entity history: my LLC started in 2019, converted to an S-corp in 2020, became a multi-member LLC (partnership) in 2023, then I sold a small share to an acquirer in 2024, and eventually sold my remaining 90% last year. Having all the prior returns was huge. OpenClaw traced my cost basis through every transition: original capital contributions, income allocations, distributions, entity conversions. It cross-referenced numbers across years, verified how my previous CPA had handled things, and flagged details I never fully understood, like why my ending capital account was negative and what my recourse liabilities represented. It even caught an error. My previous accountant flipped the month with the day for when I sold a small share of my business (5/4 instead of 4/5) which meant I got attributed some income for one month that should have gone to another partner. Didn’t change tax due much, but OpenClaw FTW! By the end of the day, it had prepared a comprehensive summary.md document with all the numbers, forms needed, and open questions. Phase 2: Actually filing (Tuesday) OpenClaw researched TurboTax's current plans and saved me $500 by unburying the $129 TurboTax DIY plan I actually needed. Intuit was trying to sell me a $639 package via a recommendation quiz that said there's no other option for my situation. There was! This was a 4+ hour session where I went screen by screen through TurboTax with OpenClaw guiding every field: - Brokerage 1099: Imported automatically. OpenClaw verified the numbers matched my records. - Schedule C (my solo LLC): I had no bookkeeping done for this, so OpenClaw analyzed all bank transactions and prepared the P&L. I only had to recategorize one transaction because it was a reimbursement for something I had paid for personally. - K-1 partnership income: No actual K-1 yet (the acquirer hasn't filed the entity return), so we estimated my share of the partnership based on bank statements and revenue data. - The installment sale: This was the hardest part. TurboTax kept double counting the gain, reporting it through both the K-1 disposition AND Form 6252. We had to zero out the K-1 sale fields and let the installment sale section handle all the gain reporting. Took several attempts to get right. - Itemized deductions: Mortgage interest, property taxes, local sales taxes, and so on. Uneventful, and OpenClaw correctly predicted the SALT cap limits I'd run into it. TurboTax confirmed those calculations. - Annualized income method: Since the $900K installment came in Q2, using the annualized method on Form 2210 saved ~$3,700 in underpayment penalties. This was quite tedious, and I'm not sure an accountant would have done this for me. I've been told "just pay the penalty" before. - HSA: ~$12K distribution, all qualified medical expenses, $0 taxable. - ACA Premium Tax Credit: 1095-A entered month by month for 11 months of marketplace coverage. I quit the ACA plan in November, in favor of CrowdHealth. No deductions from them unfortunately. At the end, OpenClaw reviewed the final 137 page tax return draft return line by line. Total federal due: $125K, excluding the ~$40K in estimated taxes already paid throughout 2025. — Have you said thank you once, Donald?! What worked well: 1. Document analysis. I threw PDFs and CSVs at it: purchase agreements, K-1s, old returns going back years, bank statements, and it extracted exactly what was needed. Being able to say "look at my 2022 return and tell me what basis my CPA used" and get an answer in seconds was invaluable. Way faster than explaining things to a human. 2. Answering questions in real time. Instead of emailing a CPA and waiting days, I asked "what are recourse vs nonrecourse liabilities?" and got a clear answer in 5 seconds while staring at the TurboTax field. This back-and-forth is what made the whole thing work. Every question I had, answered immediately. 3. Catching optimizations. The annualized income method, investment interest expense from brokerage margin, etc. Small things that add up. 4. Cross-referencing prior years. Having OpenClaw dig through my old returns to verify how things were previously handled gave me real confidence. I could see that the numbers were consistent with what my CPA had done before. What didn't work well: 1. Driving TurboTax directly. I had OpenClaw try to fill in the forms via browser automation. Too slow! TurboTax's multi-step wizards with radio buttons and dynamic forms don't lend themselves well to AI control yet. We switched to me clicking while it dictated what to enter. I'm optimistic this will be improved soon. 2. TurboTax's installment sale handling. This was genuinely tricky. The double counting issue required a creative workaround. A CPA familiar with TurboTax would know the right workflow. OpenClaw had to experiment. 3. No K-1 yet. We estimated the partnership income. When the real K-1 arrives, I'll probably need to amend. This is the same problem I'd have with a CPA though. But if the K-1 preparer was using OpenClaw, maybe I would already have it! What to watch out for: - You need to know your own situation. I'm not completely ignorant about tax prep. I had a reasonable expectation of what the numbers should look like, roughly how much I owed, what the major items were, and so on. I wasn't relying on blind faith. The ability to ask questions and verify things quickly is what built confidence. - Complex form interactions are tricky. The TurboTax installment sale / K-1 double-counting issue could have resulted in extra taxable income if we didn't catch it. Having a sense of what the final number should be matters. - You still need to understand your own finances. The bottom line: Total cost: $129 (TurboTax Premium) vs $8,000 I paid my CPA last year. Also $23.90 in OpenAI GPT 5.4 tokens, including drafting of this post :) Time spent: ~6 hours total across research, prep, and filing. Still faster than dealing with a CPA, and I got much better answers. The biggest difference wasn't the money. It was the speed of answers. Every question I had during filing got answered in seconds. That real-time loop of "what does this field mean?" → clear explanation → enter the number → move on is something no CPA engagement can match. Next year, I'll know the drill. And OpenClaw has memory. That one should be much simpler. Long live the claw! 🦞

English
34
6
123
44.9K