mogsblogs

NHS FILED 200 COMPLAINTS AGAINST A DOCTOR. EVERY SINGLE ONE WAS LIES. Dr Raj Mattu was a cardiologist at Walsgrave Hospital in Coventry. In 2001 he spotted something management had apparently missed: squeezing five patients into cardiac bays built for four was killing people. A 35-year-old died because staff could not physically reach him through the overcrowding. Dr Mattu told @BBC (@nhsuhcw). He filed reports. He raised alarms. The NHS response was textbook. They suspended him. Then they filed 200 complaints against him to the General Medical Council. Not a typo. Two hundred. Over eleven years. Every single one was rejected. A tribunal later heard that a senior manager had said : don't worry about a parking ticket, we want to get him off the road completely. The suspension followed within weeks of that conversation. Dr Mattu was sacked in 2010. He spent over a decade unable to practise cardiology while the trust spent an estimated £14 million of public money fighting to keep him out. His health deteriorated. He underwent major lung surgery. His colleagues described him as being hounded mercilessly. In 2016 an employment tribunal ruled he had been unfairly dismissed. He was awarded £2.5 million in compensation including tax contributions. The tribunal found the dismissal was inextricably linked to his 2001 whistleblowing. It confirmed he was blameless. The CEO who oversaw the whole campaign, David Loughton, was later awarded a CBE. The doctor who tried to save them got destroyed. The managers who destroyed him got decorated. Sources: @BBC @guardian @nhsuhcw

SHE SAVED MILLIONS IN TAX. HE SET THE TAX RULES. HMRC SAW NO PROBLEM. Rishi Sunak (@RishiSunak) was running the nation's finances. Raising taxes on working people. Telling the country there was no alternative. His wife, Akshata Murty, was quietly using non-domiciled status to avoid paying UK tax on her overseas earnings, including roughly £11.6 million a year in dividends from her father's company, Infosys. The estimated saving: around £2.1 million per year. Over several years, sources told @Independent that figure could have reached £20 million. Non-dom status is legal. But when the man setting tax policy for 67 million people has a wife saving millions under that same policy, most organisations would want that conflict documented and scrutinised. There is no evidence HMRC (@HMRCgovuk) treated it with any urgency. Then someone inside Whitehall decided the public had a right to know. A source passed details to @Independent in April 2022, right in the middle of Partygate. The story blew up. Sunak was forced to ask for a ministerial interests review. Murty announced she would voluntarily start paying UK tax on worldwide income. What happened to the whistleblower? A leak inquiry was launched. @Channel4 noted it could lead to criminal prosecution, because disclosing someone's personal tax information is illegal in the UK. The source was never publicly identified. No prosecution ever came. So the person who told the truth about a potential conflict of interest at the heart of the Treasury faced a criminal investigation. The conflict of interest itself got a press release and a polite apology. Source: @Independent, @guardian, @BBCNews, @thetimes

HE TOLD FOS IN 2016. NOW MILLIONS ARE WAITING FOR BILLIONS. A whistleblower walked into the Financial Ombudsman Service in 2016 with evidence of unlawful commission arrangements in car finance. Evidence. Not suspicion. Not a hunch. Evidence. FOS (@financialombuds) dismissed the complaint. That whistleblower is Paul Carlier (@Carlier_J87). A 30-year banking veteran who had already blown the whistle on Lloyds and UBS at personal cost. He brought FOS a complaint on behalf of his elderly mother-in-law after a car dealer showed him exactly how the scam worked, including the Black Horse system used to set interest rates based on dealer incentives rather than customer credit scores. FOS said no. @TheFCA, also warned by Carlier throughout 2016 and into 2017, did nothing publicly until 2024. Eight years later, on 11 February 2025, Dame Siobhain McDonagh (@Siobhain_Mc) raised Carlier's case at the Treasury Select Committee. She told FOS leadership directly: "In 2016 he submitted a claim to the Financial Ombudsman Service, in which he provided evidence proving the unlawful and widespread use of the incentivised commission arrangements that are at the heart of what is now the car finance scandal." Interim chief ombudsman James Dipple-Johnstone said he would need to look at the individual case and respond separately. The committee moved on within two minutes. Nobody asked the question that matters. If FOS had acted in 2016, how many of the 60,000 cases now sitting in their pending tray would not exist? How many consumers paid inflated interest rates for years that could have been stopped? There is more. In April 2025, a senior FOS employee told Carlier something that explains everything. Their words: "The FCA is our authority. So we don't go above the FCA. They quite literally set out the rules. What we can look into. What we can't look into. What is the right answer in this." FOS told Parliament in February 2025 that the FCA had never pressured or directed them on how to handle these cases. One word answer. "No." Then in the same breath confirmed they are currently blocked by an FCA-imposed pause from resolving 60,000 live cases. So FOS was never pressured historically. But it deferred entirely to FCA authority. And it is now frozen by FCA instruction. Make that make sense. Lloyds Banking Group, owners of Black Horse, have since written to Carlier confirming that his family members' finance agreements did involve a discretionary commission arrangement. The lender that told FOS in 2016 there was nothing wrong has now admitted there was. FOS has responded by declaring Carlier's cases closed and threatening action against him for pursuing them. This is the body set up by Parliament to provide independent consumer justice. It is May 2026. Nine years after Carlier first raised this. The car finance redress framework is still being built. The people who were harmed first are still waiting. Paul Carlier did everything right. He found the evidence. He reported it. He went to FOS. He went to the FCA. He went to Parliament through his MP. He is still being told his cases are closed. That is a system protecting itself. Source: Treasury Select Committee, HC 685, 11 February 2025 | @CommonsTreasury, Paul Carlier testimony and evidence: @Carlier_J87 Financial Ombudsman Service: @financialombuds @TransparencyTF @MLorrM @johnmcdonnellMP @Wftproof