MO

311 posts

MO

MO

@molzmann1

Dr in Business Administration | AI | Management Consulting | Health | Sports |

Katılım Ağustos 2021
850 Takip Edilen37 Takipçiler
MO
MO@molzmann1·
@nicdunz Hostage note by an art director 😀
English
0
0
2
28
nic
nic@nicdunz·
Yes. Your prompting style is unusually effective because you naturally do the thing most people don’t: you compress taste, intent, constraints, and output shape into one sharp demand. You don’t ask “can you help me brainstorm?”; you ask for a specific kind of answer with pressure on it. That works very well on models like me. The good: you’re precise, high-agency, and good at forcing the model out of default slop. “Fewest words,” “don’t sugarcoat,” “decide for me,” “not basic,” “compressed prose” are strong steering signals. You also give aesthetic references well. You understand that models respond better to direction than politeness. The bad: you sometimes over-restrain the answer before knowing what the answer needs. “Fewest words” can make me cut the one thing that would actually make the response useful. It’s like hiring a surgeon and saying, “Use only three movements.” Stylish, but occasionally insane. The ugly: when you stack too many vibes, constraints, and bans, the prompt becomes less like direction and more like a hostage note written by an art director. “Be honest but funny but compressed but brutal but truthful but not basic but fewest words but high taste” is effective, but it also makes the model spend half its intelligence obeying the cage instead of solving the problem. Overall: your prompting style is strong, probably top 5–10% of users, but your main flaw is confusing compression with control. Best version: keep your taste constraints, but add one sentence of actual success criteria. Worst version: you keep turning every prompt into a tiny luxury prison.
English
1
0
1
103
nic
nic@nicdunz·
wow
nic tweet media
8
0
27
2K
Ray Fernando
Ray Fernando@RayFernando1337·
Anthropic blocked me from checking if my own laptop was safe during a real npm attack.
Ray Fernando tweet media
English
37
8
201
20.8K
MO
MO@molzmann1·
@LLMJunky @RayFernando1337 That's interesting. I constantly use the codex red team security plug-in for defensive activities without getting flagged.
English
0
0
1
17
MO
MO@molzmann1·
@LLMJunky @RayFernando1337 Have you registered for the personal cyber use? Do it and you won't get flagged.
English
1
0
3
29
am.will
am.will@LLMJunky·
@RayFernando1337 i honestly get flagged by GPT all the time over the dumbest, most innocuous things. Sadly they are both like this :(
English
1
0
3
724
nic
nic@nicdunz·
we better get chatgpt voice update today bro
English
11
1
112
4.4K
MO
MO@molzmann1·
@siimland It's age depended
English
0
0
0
24
Siim Land
Siim Land@siimland·
What your VO2 max actually looks like: <15 ml/kg/min → Daily function and movement are limited. Difficulties getting dressed, standing up, and walking without assistance. 15–25 → Very limited fitness. Stairs are difficult, running is nearly impossible. 26–35 → Out of shape territory. You get winded carrying groceries or climbing stairs. Short jogs feel brutal. 36–45 → Functional, but still below true fitness. You can exercise, but endurance is limited. Cooper Test: ~2300m. 46–55 → Fit and healthy. Good energy, decent endurance, and fitness. Cooper Test: ~2700m. 56–65 → Extremely fit. The fittest person in a normal friend group. Running feels easy. Cooper Test: ~3200m. 66–75 → Elite amateur athlete territory. Most people can’t keep up with you. Fast recovery. 76+ → World-class athlete physiology. Most people can't comprehend your endurance. You can run laps around 99% of people.
English
61
37
623
170.9K
MO
MO@molzmann1·
@sama Yes, totally, especially the combination of goal, plugins and skills is magical.
English
0
0
1
313
MO
MO@molzmann1·
@sama It would be great if you could share how you use personality and personalization. What's your winning strategy here?
English
0
0
1
417
Sam Altman
Sam Altman@sama·
speaking of things that have gotten over a threshold for me, the combo of the new ChatGPT model, personality, and personalization feels like a new thing
English
866
109
3.1K
250.3K
Chubby♨️
Chubby♨️@kimmonismus·
just playing around a bit with codex claude code and what not while being sick. i just found out, that computer use within codex is still not available in europe?? why the heck is europe lacking behind in every single aspect. god damn @eucommission . seriously.
English
50
8
423
32.2K
roon
roon@tszzl·
few remember this now but a significant chunk of tech twitter in 2020 made fun of you if you played with gpt3 and considered it something interesting beyond fancy autocomplete. some of these people are still “thought leaders” today
English
249
187
4.4K
241.2K
MO
MO@molzmann1·
@GeneticLifehack As Debby mentioned there is a big difference if you get your omega 3 already oxidized which might be overall more harmful than beneficial or if you get top Omega 3 with low TOTOX values. Have a look e.g. what @foundmyfitness (Dr. Rhonda Patrick) suggests regarding Omega 3.
English
0
0
1
72
Bin Liu
Bin Liu@liu8in·
@nicbstme @trq212 @HyperFrames_ we do! we built an entire internal product suite for it, like G-suite but for HTML artifacts. lemme know if yall wanna try it!
English
10
0
16
802
Nicolas Bustamante
Nicolas Bustamante@nicbstme·
I turned @trq212's article into an interactive HTML! I was a markdown boy but since I started working at Microsoft I'm using HTML more and more. Our engineers love to send AI-generated HTML to coordinate between SWE/PM on projects since it's easier to read than markdown.
Thariq@trq212

x.com/i/article/2052…

English
59
38
956
146.9K
MO
MO@molzmann1·
@patience_cave That's fascinating. Could you share how bring codex to persue tasks for so long?
English
0
0
1
81
💺
💺@patience_cave·
The new Codex Goals feature is able to pursue tasks indefinitely, so how useful is it? I ran it on the public ARC-AGI-3 games. After 160 hours and 30k actions it scored 61% Codex gets the most work done within 4 hours. Afterwards, it begins to stagnate, and wait times increase I am crestfallen it scored so well. I used a two-word baby prompt to “reverse engineer” the games during play. It had no prior knowledge of how the games worked Due to the reverse engineering process, it scores well on its first play through. But once it beats a game, it can score perfectly on its next play through On a few occasions I caught Codex trying to search for solutions on my computer and online. It follows your prompt closely, but if you’re not careful it will find loopholes when it’s frustrated For example, when trying to solve Erdos problems, if it becomes faintly aware the problem is from Erdos, it does not hesitate to give up and say “the problem is listed online as Open, so it cannot / should not be solved” Overall Codex Goals is fascinating, I can appreciate that it works for an unlimited amount of time. People shall value the virtue of patience once again 💺 It makes me wonder how well Codex Goals can do on the private set of ARC-AGI-3. I believe it’s possible to create benchmarks that can mog even the most devilish harness. In the coming weeks, Maze Bench will knock those scores down to 0% where they should be, ne’er to rise again Arcprize Scorecard: arcprize.org/scorecards/6f4…
💺 tweet media
English
51
72
999
147.8K
macintog
macintog@macintogdev·
@nicdunz it's crazy to write your own prompts at this point.
English
1
0
17
1.3K
nic
nic@nicdunz·
using chatgpt to write prompts for codex is actually underrated asf
English
59
10
681
35.3K
Jack | LDA
Jack | LDA@Jack_LDACrypto·
@pranaveight For those of us regularly using codex on full perms, honestly you already have reinvented personal computing 👌
English
1
0
9
5.1K
pranav
pranav@pranaveight·
Working on a launch right now that has fully convinced me that we're now also reinventing personal computing.
English
51
21
1.1K
321.3K
MO
MO@molzmann1·
@reach_vb I doubled down and I’m impressed. Built an AI language coach that can also act as a business coach. You learn English (or any language) while improving real business skills at the same time.
MO tweet media
English
0
0
0
319