SusieStitches

16K posts

SusieStitches

SusieStitches

@moodring724

Pismo Beach, CA Katılım Haziran 2011
265 Takip Edilen139 Takipçiler
SusieStitches
SusieStitches@moodring724·
Oh damn😳
BoozeyBeauty@BoozeyBeauty

Things are not looking good for Greg Connor who is the hand-picked successor to District Attorney Michael Morrissey. Connor, who has been Morrissey’s right-hand man for 15 of the 16 years he’s been in office, did not show up to the first candidate debate of this election season at BC Law. 😬 His team’s explanation? He had “other campaign obligations” that day. But there was nothing posted on his campaign social media showing any event or obligation that would justify skipping a major debate. Instead, what we saw after the fact tells a different story. 🤔 The very next day, Connor posted that he had been door knocking in Quincy. The day after that, he appeared at an event where a union publicly showed support for him. So let’s be 100% real about what this looks like. Connor chose door knocking in Quincy (which is essentially Morrissey’s home base) over sitting on a stage and debating the other candidates. Candidates which includes Adam Deitch, who headed the Federal probe of the John O’Keefe murder. That doesn’t read like strategy and instead reads like avoidance... which this playbook itself should feel familiar. Lean on Quincy. Highlight union backing. Stay in controlled environments. 🗣It’s the same exact blueprint Morrissey used for years.🗣 Connor isn’t just aligned with Morrissey. He’s running the same campaign. And for voters who care about accountability and transparency, especially in cases like John O’Keefe and Sandra Birchmore, that’s something worth thinking about before September. There also has been no correction of his original statement where he denied any input of the Karen Read prosecution. It was recently uncovered (via a public records request) that Connor is included in over 7,400 emails after the first trial.

English
0
0
0
7
BadAssNewz
BadAssNewz@BadAssNewzz·
what your ass better do is get to court tomorrow or the chasing will be after you with a warrant Posted for criticism, commentary, and fair use under 17 U.S.C. § 107
English
13
4
30
1.1K
SusieStitches
SusieStitches@moodring724·
@TeamYouTube Allegedly w/Brittney J is…well, see for yourself.
KT@KT87985373

4-27--#AWBJ Midnight Chit Chat Video: youtube.com/watch?v=4CoDUE… Targeting viewers, derogatory generalizations, and straight-up cyberbullying. This isn’t "chit chat" - it’s a TOS violation marathon. This one especially: ~1:16:54 - 1:22:34: Claims people "have taken everything from me," "ruined everything," and are "getting more people to attack me" — specifically surprised at "Shaina." ~Broader defensive rants framing YouTube creators as attackers obsessed with her content/guests. This is part of a pattern of drama-focused streams where she calls out/demeans other creators instead of creating positive content. Report for Harassment & Cyberbullying (prolonged insults, shaming, malicious framing of individuals). Creators deserve protection from targeted attacks on the platform. #YouTube #Harassment #ReportDrama Timestamps of the latest toxicity from Allegedly w/ Britney J: 📍 1:01:23 - Verbal abuse 📍 1:16:44 - Hate speech/Dehumanization 📍 1:19:51 - Vile comparisons Do better, @YouTube @YouTubeCreators Potential Terms of Service ViolationsHarassment and Hostile Language toward Viewers/Critics: Time: 40:32 — Referring to a viewer as a "weirdo". Time: 40:48 — Referring to critics as "weird mo mofos". Time: 41:17 — Calling critics "weirdos" and using profanity. Time: 43:54 — Using aggressive language and profanity, telling a critic to "snap the [ __ ] out of it" and stating "all of y'all, it's weird". Time: 44:47 — Referring to a specific critic, Candy Wick, as an "idiot". Time: 1:01:23 — Telling a viewer to "grow the [ __ ] up, junkie". Time: 1:03:47 — Referring to a viewer as a "loser".Time: 1:06:54 — Referring to someone as a "block [ __ ]". Time: 1:10:06 — Expressing extreme anger ("I'm infuriated. I'm [ __ ]") and calling others "demonic".Derogatory Generalizations: Time: 55:31 / 56:17 — Repeatedly using the term "ghetto" to describe people's behavior. Time: 56:30 — Generalizing and labeling attendees of an event as a "bunch of alcoholics". Time: 1:13:01 — Making broad derogatory statements about women, stating they are "children" with the "mindset of like a middle school little girl" and are not even "high school mentally". Time: 1:16:44 — Labeling a group of people as "demonic entities" and "evil". Time: 1:19:51 — Comparing people to "pigs," describing them as the "most selfish, greedy, nasty, vile animal". Cyberbullying / Targeted Aggression: Time: 1:01:30 - 1:02:26 — Accusing a viewer of being "obsessed" and stating they are seen "all over the place" talking about the creator. Time: 1:05:35 — Describing someone as "butt hurt" and mockingly discussing their loss of income. Time: 1:07:46 — Directly telling critics they are "losing your income" and "court cases are popping up" as a form of "karma". Time: 1:18:25 — Accusing others of "unalivening one of her patients" while discussing a conflict involving a woman with cancer.

English
0
0
1
11
SusieStitches retweetledi
JoeyBagaD🍩nuts
JoeyBagaD🍩nuts@DonutsBaga·
💥All the US Attorney has to do is charge the cops who investigated John O’Keefe’s death with the blatant and easily provable acts PERJURY they committed, and watch how fast they start talking. 💥Once their pensions & freedom are on the line, all bets are off.
JoeyBagaD🍩nuts tweet media
English
23
71
494
5.8K
SusieStitches retweetledi
Unfiltered Thoughts (Justice For John O’Keefe)
The McAlberts are so sad that John O’Keefe died. Chris Albert was his “friend” who woke up on January 29 and immediately had to invite John to his pizza party before he was even out of bed at 8:53am. Yet….. for some strange reason, he has broken red plastic (presumably from a taillight) hanging up on the wall inside D&E. If your friend really suffered life threatening injuries from being hit by a car, would you memorialize his death by saving / acquiring items that resemble the murder weapon? Or is this more of a “trophy” piece for the McAlberts? Did Chris Albert display broken taillight pieces in his shop prior to John’s death? I have serious questions… Is Chris Albert on the deposition list? #KarenReadCase @DamonE73270 @Nickyhaircuts
Unfiltered Thoughts (Justice For John O’Keefe) tweet media
English
37
32
285
28.8K
SusieStitches
SusieStitches@moodring724·
@X You are a joke for allowing this complete village idiot to continue doing what he’s doing.
BadAssNewz@BadAssNewzz

so @Support is a complete joke and waste of time....guess they support doxing and don't give a shit if someone does it

English
1
0
0
15
SusieStitches
SusieStitches@moodring724·
KT@KT87985373

4-24--#AWBJ "Grimey AF" Brittney you have been told many times why people cover you: 1. You've weaponized our Court system several times because of hurt fee-fee's and you wanted to shut critics down because you are incapable of ignoring any type of critisism because thats how you grift. You took Lies to the courts also! 2. You LIE about everything and push false narratives to incite your audience against others wether it be victims families or creator you always have a target. 3. People started covering you because of your coverage on Sebastian Rogers case and the way you targeted the Proudfoots for over a year pushing false narratives, and defaming them. 4. You've spent the past year falsely accusing a whole group of people that you've labeled "The Dark Side" or "Haters" of calling pretty much every agency you could think up with zero evidence in fact you knew who called the first time and you still accused us. You Target-Escalate the Conflict-Deflect-Play Victim-Grift Over and Over Again! Last night’s stream in a nutshell: Deflect → Accuse → Victim → Repeat Claims other creators are using her “for money and views” and that she’s done nothing to them. AND THATS A LIE!! ➡️ Step 1: Deflection Paints herself as the target, removes context of ongoing conflict. Now flips it — accusing those same creators of chasing “clout, subs, and views.” ➡️ Step 2: Accusation Projects the exact behavior she’s actively engaging in. Frames everything as people “hating her” and trying to control who others like. ➡️ Step 3: Victim Narrative Reinforces “us vs them” to her audience. Zoom out and look at the pattern: Targets multiple creators in one stream Labels them as clout-chasing / obsessed Claims innocence Then pivots to being attacked Same script. Different names. Meanwhile… The entire stream is: centered around other creators driven by drama sustained by audience engagement Even the chat shows confusion about the direction of the stream and tech issues throughout. This isn’t about “being talked about.” It’s about a repeatable system: ➡️ keep conflict going ➡️ keep audience engaged ➡️ keep narrative controlled And this is why documenting matters. Because when you line the clips up side by side, it stops looking like isolated drama… …and starts looking like a pattern. Harassment and Bullying 1:16:21: The speaker describes others as "gross" and "full of hate". 1:16:48: References to other women as "old carrots" and "white trash". 1:17:37: Relaying a comment telling someone to "go off yourself and die". 1:17:48: Referring to someone as a "stupid manipulative piece of [ __ ]" and using the phrase "See you next Tuesday". 1:17:57: Calling others "pathetic" and saying "you don't even matter". 1:26:54: Referring to individuals as "[ __ ] losers". 1:28:18: Direct acknowledgment of "adult bullying" and describing it as "nauseating" @YouTube @TeamYouTube #TOSViolations #Cyberbullying #SebastianRogers

QAM
0
0
2
19
Notorious Jules
Notorious Jules@Blind_Faith1423·
@X What are you going to do about this? This is the 5th person he has done this to since June.
momma bear@ElleMow27

Per @Grok, “Yes, this post qualifies as harassment (specifically, doxxing in a retaliatory context).” All the times he has done this to people in the last three months is adding up quickly. Pretty disturbing behavior when you rally your followers to gather info and report in retaliation.

English
3
3
7
298
SusieStitches retweetledi
AIM
AIM@turnright101·
Since the 2:27 am Jen McCabe search triggered the antis, I will repost this subject as long as I desire until everyone start asking critical questions. In that, Jen McCabe conducted the 2:27am search using Safari, not Google. Both are search engines. Dear Jen McCabe and the antis: ✍️Google is a search engine just like Safari and Yahoo are search engines. ✍️Cellebrite that the antis are bragging about is just a mere analyzing tool used for extractions. Cellebrite also has the capacity to search the B/W Database for deleted searches. ✅Jen carried out a search typing “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27 am using Safari search engine. ✅The commonwealth contracted Ian Wiffen who claimed he analyzed Jen McCabe’s phone extractions. 💁🏼The point is if the evidence shows in the extractions report is being denied by Jen McCabe, why is she not suing Safari that the extractions was collated from? 💁🏼Why is she not suing the company Ian Wiffen work for? 💁🏼Why is she not suing the commonwealth that relies on Cellebrite that provides the attached report which CLEARLY shows the Cellebrite BW / database showing that “hos long to die in cold” search occurred at 2:27am but B/W database exposed it as “deleted”? 💁🏼 Why didn’t Jen McCabe request her search history from Safari to counter Cellebrite extractions attached which CLEARLY state she searched “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27am and the search was “deleted”? Guys, Safari, Google or Yahoo can provide you with your search histories including what is deleted dating back years but within a timeframe. 🤟Read the attached and watch Ian Whiffen stating that he cannot testify with certainty how the “hos long to die in cold” was “deleted”. 💁🏼The question you need to ASK JEN MCCABE is how did Cellebrite extracted “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27am on the 29th from her phone Back Wall BW / Database? 💁🏼If Jen McCabe NEVER search “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27am on the 29th as shown attached, it won’t reflect on her phone BW, database. ✅In fact, there is a recent missing person case that the FBI used the same BW to extract information from the ring camera that was said to have been override. ✅This is similar to what happened with Jen McCabe’s search and Cellebrite BW extracted the search from her phone Database even though it was deleted. Stop allowing corrupt officials and their colluded oligarchs pull a wool over your eyes. These same colluded party lied through their teeth during the criminal trials one and two in the matter between the Commonwealth vs Karen Read. Yet, they are suing the same Karen they attempted to frame for defamation? #karenread #justiceforofficerjohnokeefe #fkr
AIM tweet media
English
28
13
123
12K