
Mo Patel
1.8K posts

Mo Patel
@mopatel
Leadership: AI | Security | Distributed System. Experiencing the human condition on Jiu Jitsu mats.




new post on harness engineering for AI self-improvement: lilianweng.github.io/posts/2026-07-… It is hard to forecast how much the future of RSI will rely on harnesses. Likely harness engineering will evolve in the direction of self-improvement and enable auto-research, and, in turn, smarter models keeps harnesses simple. Even when many harness improvement get eventually internalized into core model, the need to specify goals and context will not disappear.

Since Quick launched in July 2025, we’ve collectively built more than 50,000 sites. Over 50% of employees have at least one Quick site. When you remove the barriers to build & share, it’s incredible what happens. More examples of how we’re using Quick : shopify.engineering/quick

i'm strongly against model companies focusing too much on harness, but i would love to hear if anyone has a strong argument for it my reason against it: if openai didn't build GPT 5.5, no one else can. this is their core competence if openai didn't build codex cli and app, we have opencode and t3code. building harness is NOT their core competence this is not saying products like claude code, codex aren't good - i genuinely think these are top tier products built by really talented people my point is - the world might be a better place if model companies focus more on their core capability and give us better, faster, safer and cheaper models, rather than competing with the ecosystem in the application layer what do you think?












I am at #TFdevsummit let's connect if you are in the Google Mountain View location





Deepseek-R1 model has been aligned with the CCP narrative (on the Deepseek site it refuses this after emitting some CoT output) but here on Hyperbolic it "toes the line"












