Harry And His Cat 🇺🇦🇪🇺💙

@Mariebe10098426 @SusanPickin @BrexitCentral @BorisJohnson @Conservatives @michaelgove @Jacob_Rees_Mogg @sajidjavid @GavinWilliamson What is so bad that is not worth all this?

@shiftfury @cyber_nerd @YTJustGetATesla 🤣

@mpharrisonHarry @cyber_nerd @YTJustGetATesla You buy it, but doesn’t mean you’ll get it. It’s coming soon.

Remember folks. That Carwow video that’s upset everyone. Where they can’t tell the difference between Full Self Driving and EAP? This is what their car has:

@Stephen26514061 @FurkanGozukara @DanielleFong Have you heard of the Resistance?

@FurkanGozukara @DanielleFong French have a really good reputation for bravery.

OMG you won't see ON FOX News for sure: French NATO General Yakovleff: Joining Trump in the Strait of Hormuz is "like buying a ticket for the Titanic after hitting the iceberg"

@FierceLionPrv28 @EdKrassen Extremely crass

**Commentary** 🛡️ 🇺🇸 President Trump masterfully shut down the question about not warning Japan before Iran strikes by reminding them of Pearl Harbor—surprise matters in war and he’s protecting our troops by keeping plans secret. Ed Krassenstein mocking it just shows how out of touch the left is. Real strength wins. Agree? Drop your take. #MAGA

BREAKING: Japanese Reporter: "Why didn't you tell US allies about the war before attacking Iran?" Donald Trump: "Who knows better about surprises than Japan. Why didn't you tell me about Pearl Harbor?" wtf?

@CrimsonGrail @friendsofdoge @realDailyWire Jokes are supposed to be funny though

@friendsofdoge @realDailyWire It was a joke. Take that stick out of your ass.

This might actually be Trump's funniest moment 😂 Japanese Reporter: Why didn't you tell us before you struck Iran? Trump: "Why didn't you tell me about Pearl Harbor?" 💀🔥😂

@miasorety @YTJustGetATesla x.com/i/status/20347…

@YTJustGetATesla THEY ARE IN EUROPE FSD CANNOT BE USED....DUHHH

@cyber_nerd @YTJustGetATesla And yet it's offered for £3400...

Just look at the video first. They are in Europe, so no FSD is possible. Second, literally in the video, you see they use basic Autopilot on an open road and play along with the rainbow road to hide it... and then EAP on the highway... and they never ever say "it's not true FSD," so it's clickbait.

@wholemars Then when the self driving fucks up, and they're not in a state to take over, you'll blame them. Again

People love to blame the car when they were just drunk driving the car themselves Next time actually turn self-driving on… you will make it home safe

@jbroc18 @esjesjesj But that's *his* expensive hardware

@esjesjesj Just wait till he finds out that AI relies on expensive hardware too.

So he doesn’t know how science works at all

@DonBreneman @garyblack00 Video of him promising just that for 2020 x.com/i/status/20275…

@DonBreneman @garyblack00 The only reason "supervised" was tacked on after some period of time, was because of the name FULL Self Driving. The same with Autopilot. The names themselves give people unrealistic expectations of its capabilities. Which is why CA forced them to change the names

Intense debate continues online about the Fox News dashcam footage from an August 18, 2025 incident near Houston involving a mom with her infant in a $TSLA Cybertruck. The video shows the truck allegedly in Full Self-Driving (FSD) mode failing to follow a right-hand curve on the overpass, barreling straight ahead through traffic cones, and slamming into a concrete barrier instead of curving safely. Tesla has stated via Elon Musk that autopilot (or FSD?) was disengaged four seconds before impact. The victim is suing TSLA for $1 million. While we believe video logs will show that FSD (or autopilot) was in fact disengaged prior to the accident, the absence of an effective PR team at TSLA to put to rest media misstatements (here Fox News) is again hurting the company’s brand and reputation for safety, which will be critical as it tries to secure regulatory approvals to launch fully autonomous Cybercabs with no steering wheel or pedals nationally later this year.

@YammerTime01 A bit of both?

Evil or stupid is the central question regarding Musk and every one of his supporters.

NATO is a defensive coalition & is triggered when a NATO Ally is attacked. NOT when an 80 year old deranged Madman starts an offensive war with NO PLAN, says he's won 5 times, & then begs for help like a dog.

@DonBreneman @garyblack00 Elon has regularly said you could watch videos, play games or snooze while it drives. The mixed messages from fans also push this belief. Until there's an accident and they're back to the driver is responsible

There you go again, Gary. As a supervisor, it's the drivers job to anticipate a problem, same as if you were driving. I can tell instantly if the car isn't doing what I expect and take over instantly. It definitely appears that the brake was likely not used, I'll bet what we saw was nothing but regen. I'm sure you know better, but no way did she do anything until it was panic time. That is not supervising at all. The only other possibility in my opinion is that she possibly bumped the brake or somehow disengaged without realizing, so she didn't take needed actions. Your constant negative attitude is rather disgusting.

@Arkasiraee @therocketbloke @JohnLeePettim13 There is a choice of 2-3 h2 cars, and a handful of places to fuel them in the whole of the UK

@Arkasiraee @therocketbloke @JohnLeePettim13 Hydrogen for transport has a massive chicken and egg problem of supply and demand. BEVs are already well on the way to replacing ICE, and has a charging infrastructure in place and growing, and getting better. H2 production, storage and distribution is still highly problematic

Hydrogen is the stupidest, most ridiculous, and most impossible energy alternative. It takes 5 to 10 times more energy than it returns. This has been known since 2004, yet hydrogen refuses to die. It is far from renewable because it contains no energy at all—energy must be forced into it like a battery—and you lose even more when converting it back to electricity. It has the worst energy return of any alternative: far more energy goes in than you ever get back. Consider the process: you first split hydrogen from natural gas or use far more energy to electrolyze it from water, then compress or liquefy it, build extremely expensive and short-lived steel containers and pipelines (since hydrogen embrittles them), and finally deliver it to virtually non-existent hydrogen vehicles. Fuel cell technology remains far from commercial. It is also highly explosive. Hydrogen requires 12 times less energy to ignite than gasoline vapor, so the smallest spark or heat source can turn it into a bomb.

@Arkasiraee @JohnLeePettim13 Aberdeen has abandoned them. So has Liverpool.

@Arkasiraee @JohnLeePettim13 The world is littered with failed H2 transport projects. H2 buses fail because the fuelling infrastructure maintenence costs are too high. They invariably get replaced with BEV buses

@Arkasiraee @JohnLeePettim13 The energy to create the hydrogen needs to be counted. From power station to miles on road it loses at least 80%, compared to a battery losing maybe 10%.

Let's be real, Hydrogen is not the stupidest, most ridiculous or impossible energy alternative that's outdated 2004 thinking! It works like an advanced battery, you put clean renewable energy in to make it from water, and yes you lose some when using it (30-45% comes back today, much better than old claims). But that makes it renewable and perfect for storing power long-term. Hydrogen vehicles are real and commercial Toyota Mirai cars, Hyundai models, and tons of trucks and buses are already driving today around the world. New special materials have fixed the old pipeline and tank problems. On the explosive part, it does ignite easily, but it rises and spreads super fast so leaks usually just disappear harmlessly safer than gasoline in many cases. Hydrogen is absolutely the future because batteries are awesome for small cars but can't handle heavy trucks, ships, planes or storing energy for months at a time. That's where hydrogen shines, and with thousands of projects and billions pouring in worldwide, it's scaling up fast in 2026. It refuses to die for a good reason, it is any-day better that batteries to store energy for large energy storage requirements.

@MajorGrubert @JohnLeePettim13 OPs point was mainly about energy efficiency

@mpharrisonHarry @JohnLeePettim13 The metric here is energy density rather than energy efficiency.

@esjesjesj 👎