David Macias

806 posts

David Macias

David Macias

@mr_davidmacias

Silicon Valley Tech Pioneer, All-in for instigating cultural change & domesticating socially just, eco-living innovations for humankind. https://t.co/yqoXs6MFWP

Seattle, WA Katılım Şubat 2008
2.2K Takip Edilen1.5K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
David Macias
David Macias@mr_davidmacias·
A MUST listen. @karaswisher knows Silicon Valley like few others. Listen and learn from her perspective. I got to Silicon Valley in the 80’s. Compared to the David Packards and those who built Silicon Valley, today’s #BigTech leaders absolutely need some regulatory guard rails.
World Affairs@world_affairs

For years, big tech operated with no rules. Will new regulations force change? On this week’s On Shifting Ground, @RaySuarezNews speaks with @karaswisher about the great con behind #BigTech innovation: bit.ly/3v6Huyq

English
1
19
36
23.4K
Felix Prehn 🐶
Felix Prehn 🐶@felixprehn·
Just created a complete workbook on Goldman Sachs' AI investment framework for software stocks. Includes their 26 winning stocks, 41 losing stocks and what makes each AI-proof or vulnerable. For 24 hours, it's yours for FREE. Like + comment "WORKBOOK" and I'll DM it to you
English
1.4K
92
1.5K
128.1K
David Macias retweetledi
Gary Marcus
Gary Marcus@GaryMarcus·
We URGENTLY need a federal law forbidding AI from impersonating humans The night before I testified in the US Senate in May, 2023, the late philosopher Daniel Dennett sent me a manuscript that he called “counterfeit people”. It was published a few days later in The Atlantic. It started like this “MONEY HAS EXISTED for several thousand years, and from the outset counterfeiting was recognized to be a very serious crime, one that in many cases calls for capital punishment because it undermines the trust on which society depends. Today, for the first time in history, thanks to artificial intelligence, it is possible for anybody to make counterfeit people who can pass for real in many of the new digital environments we have created. These counterfeit people are the most dangerous artifacts in human history, capable of destroying not just economies but human freedom itself. Before it's too late (it may well be too late already) we must outlaw both the creation of counterfeit people and the "passing along" of counterfeit people. The penalties for either offense should be extremely severe, given that civilization itself is at risk.” He was right then. Three years later even more so. The need for the kind of law he was calling for – one forbidding “the creation of and ‘passing along’ of counterfeit people” is now urgent. Two items sent to me this morning make that absolutely clear, a deep fake video you have probably seen of Tom Cruise fighting Brad Pitt, and a tool to hook up OpenClaw to voice synthesis. Scammers will be among the first to adopt these tools. And indeed they already have; a friend who was filming me for a documentary yesterday told me of a Canadian friend of his who was scammed out of hundreds of thousands of dollars by a deepfaked video of Mark Carney. Because the tools for counterfeiting have gotten so good 2026 will almost certainly see more deepfaked scams like this than the rest of history combined. Tell your representatives today, not tomorrow, that we must pass federal laws forbidding machine output from being presented as humans, and that we must develop the means to enforce those laws. No use of the first person by chatbots, and no more deepfakes of living people’s voices and images without their express consent, aside from carveouts for obvious parody and so on. All of this has gone too far, too fast. And we must not let corporate lobbyists thwart efforts to address all this. Generative AI systems may still struggle to reason, but they were built for mimicry, and their mimicry has gotten to the point where we must do something now. I will end by quoting from Dennett’s deeply prescient Atlantic essay (and I am sorry that it is paywalled):
Gary Marcus tweet media
English
63
412
1.2K
69.8K
David Macias retweetledi
Rachel Nichols
Rachel Nichols@Rachel__Nichols·
I’m rooting for the girl. Or, more accurately, I’m rooting for the powerhouse woman who owns the Seahawks, who has taken an active role in building a winner, improving a culture, fended off many male owners of NFL teams who’ve been pressuring her to sell, and donated hundreds of millions to charity when other billionaires have been using their money to buy politicians. We are so lucky to have Jody Allen in the NFL - check out this great @JerryBrewer piece for more: nytimes.com/athletic/70200…
Rachel Nichols tweet mediaRachel Nichols tweet mediaRachel Nichols tweet mediaRachel Nichols tweet media
English
53
223
2K
119K
David Macias
David Macias@mr_davidmacias·
Finally. A framework that optimizes the domestication of AI. It harmonizes all the relevant issues. Taiwan nails it. Please read.
Luiza Jarovsky, PhD@LuizaJarovsky

🚨 BREAKING: Taiwan enacted its basic law on AI, which includes, among other innovative provisions, detailed AI governance principles and LABOR RIGHTS for humans who lose their jobs due to AI. Other countries should take note: According to the law's third article, the research and application of AI in Taiwan should adhere to the following principles (read them carefully): 1. Sustainability: It should consider mental health, social equity, and environmental sustainability, reducing potential health risks or digital disparities, and enabling the public to adapt to the changes brought about by AI. 2. Human Autonomy: It should support human autonomy, respect fundamental human rights and cultural values ​​such as the right to personality, allow for human oversight, and implement a people-centered approach that respects the rule of law, human rights, and democratic values. 3. Privacy Protection and Data Governance: It should respect the privacy and autonomy of personal data, adopt the principle of data minimization, and avoid the risk of data leakage. 4. Security: Cybersecurity measures should be established throughout the research and application of AI to prevent security threats and attacks, ensuring the robustness and security of the system. 5. Transparency and Explainability: AI outputs should be appropriately disclosed or labeled to facilitate risk assessment and understanding of their impact on relevant rights, thereby enhancing the trustworthiness of AI. 6. Fairness: AI research and application should avoid risks such as system bias and discrimination, and should not result in discrimination against specific groups. 7. Accountability: Traceability should be maintained, and different roles in AI research and application should bear corresponding responsibilities, including internal governance responsibilities and external social responsibilities. For those familiar with the EU AI Act, the way the principles above are framed is more direct and comprehensive than the European framework. As I wrote a few times before, the EU missed an opportunity to be more explicit and broad when protecting fundamental rights in the context of AI development and deployment (which could help set a stronger regulatory precedent). Another interesting provision is Article 12, focused on labor rights. It says that, in response to the development of AI, the government must address skill gaps and ensure workers' occupational safety, health, and labor rights, including providing employment assistance to those unemployed due to AI, based on their work abilities. To my knowledge, this is the first AI law that expressly foresees labor rights for those who lose their jobs due to AI. Well done, Taiwan! - 👉 To learn more about recent AI governance developments, join my newsletter's 90,000+ subscribers (below). 👉 To upskill and advance your career, join the 28th cohort of my AI Governance training in March (link below).

English
0
0
0
54
Sam Bhagwat
Sam Bhagwat@calcsam·
icymi we wrote a new agents book: patterns for building ai agents it has everything you need to take your agents from prototype to production, like agent design patterns, the basics of security, etc reply to this tweet with BOOK and we'll dm you so you can get a copy
Sam Bhagwat tweet media
English
5.3K
752
8K
1.1M
David Macias
David Macias@mr_davidmacias·
@SteveCase Thanks for your work in the 1990s to get America online. I think we all miss Web 1.0 in many ways.
English
0
1
3
291
David Macias retweetledi
NASA
NASA@NASA·
We are saddened by the passing of Jim Lovell, commander of Apollo 13 and a four-time spaceflight veteran. Lovell's life and work inspired millions. His courage under pressure helped forge our path to the Moon and beyond—a journey that continues today. go.nasa.gov/41tbrpq
NASA tweet media
English
3.1K
17.1K
91.7K
12.5M
David Macias
David Macias@mr_davidmacias·
Completely 💯 disagree. The 1980s were the best decade to be alive, possibly the 1990s. To your measures I add, affordability of college and home buying. If you are Chinese, I agree with your suggestions, but as an American or European, definitely the 1980-90s. Please share your thoughts. Other than stage 3+ cancer survivability, what other measures am I missing?
English
1
0
1
213
Dr Danish
Dr Danish@operationdanish·
The algorithm doesn’t want you to know this, but this is the greatest time to be alive in history. People will keep saying doom and gloom is around the corner, but if you take a step back, we are living in the most optimistic time in history. No world wars. No pandemics. No global existential events. Our perspective is warped. Humanity has been through much worse… we just weren’t talking about it constantly.
English
50
19
237
32.5K
David Macias
David Macias@mr_davidmacias·
@linamkhan 💯 it’s multidimensional Value, beyond just lining the shareholder price of BigTech. Instead it serves the broader ecosystem, like in the golden days of Silicon Valley. Today’s BigTech monopoly squelches innovation, consumer options and rights, etc. #BreakupBigTech.
English
0
0
0
237
David Macias retweetledi
Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
A partner at a prominent law firm told me “AI is now doing work that used to be done by 1st to 3rd year associates. AI can generate a motion in an hour that might take an associate a week. And the work is better. Someone should tell the folks applying to law school right now.”
English
1.8K
2.5K
24.8K
7.1M
MapleStax Trades
MapleStax Trades@MapleStax·
I’ve made over $100,000 in just 3 months using my custom CBC strategy. Now I turned it into a FREE TradingView indicator that tells you exactly when to buy and sell—no guesswork. I’ve been testing it for months, and it’s been printing. 📈 Like + Comment “Trade” - I’ll DM it to you. (Must be following to DM) $SPY $SPX
MapleStax Trades tweet media
English
1.8K
110
1.7K
190.8K
David Macias
David Macias@mr_davidmacias·
You will manage it well. Because in the stories you will focus on the hero’s bringing success on a day to day basis to their local communities and families. It’s imperative that we light the path for the children. This ofcourse doesn’t mean we don’t continue to fight the current Anthropocenic madness.🙏
English
0
0
2
120
Ben See
Ben See@ClimateBen·
From September, I'll be teaching Dystopian Fiction to 15-18 year olds. This will be a core part of the syllabus for years as we move to 1.75-2°C. Can you imagine? How will I manage it?
English
51
54
440
11.8K
David Macias
David Macias@mr_davidmacias·
Great news. @dekai123 your book is clearly a MUST READ. (amzn.to/3T4ctUc) We are at a crucial time in history as our lives get essentially fused with AI. Your expertise and perspective is much needed as we all seek guidance on finding the wisest path forward. Appreciate you. 🙏
English
0
1
1
65
David Macias retweetledi
Alex Vacca
Alex Vacca@itsalexvacca·
CIA can't operate without it. Pentagon can't function without it. And Wall Street can't trade without it. Yet most people have no idea about what Palantir does. How the Government let a $300 Billion surveillance company track you everywhere 🧵
Alex Vacca tweet media
English
143
1.2K
8.4K
1.7M
David Macias
David Macias@mr_davidmacias·
To the detriment of us all. I worked at HP labs in the 1980s as a similar rethinking of R&D budget was unfolding. Think Bell Labs, IBM, Xerox, etc. It’s ALWAYS a question of the economics of innovation. From the government perspective it’s grounded in social benefit, health, national defense, etc. From the corporate perspective it’s how closely aligned those economics are to a product line’s profits. Universities have and will always be the optimal entities for research funding and personnel etc. This is an area where DOGE is harming all of us, not just our Universities, which are the best in the world.
English
0
0
3
110
Dr Danish
Dr Danish@operationdanish·
Prediction: Research will unbundle from Universities.
English
14
0
63
6.1K