Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Cruce Saunders
4.8K posts
Cruce Saunders
@mrcruce
Founder of ARAMAI, The Kinetic Council Humans first, AI integrated, Coherence over chaos Schema-as-a-service for trustworthy AI
Global Katılım Mart 2007
821 Takip Edilen2K Takipçiler
The deeper I go into ontology, the more respect I have for the Greeks
English
Intelligence doesn't live where data is stored — it emerges from the structured meaning encoded in data relationships between systems. The implicit and explicit schemas organizations have spent decades building are its foundation.
English
"Persistence is not about me remembering. It is about the world remembering me."
English
Connected Data London — Nov 20-21
Use code SPKNCDL2515 for 15% off
connected-data.london
@Connected_Data
Git repo goes public week after
Reply “SCHEMA” if you want the repo link early
See you in London or in the code
English
If you’re a data architect who’s tired of 80% of your budget going to semantic duct tape…
If you’re an ontology engineer whose models never leave the lab…
If you’re a content strategist whose content model is treated like a suggestion…
You'll want to hear this.
English
I’ve been off-grid for months building something that ends the schema mess once and for all.
Why do AI agents still hallucinate fields that don’t exist?
Because schemas are prisoners.
Time to break them out.
English
Cruce Saunders retweetledi
Sometimes I don't even know how we get so lucky... Coming up on 12/13, we've got @storyneedle and @mrcruce joining us to talk about structured content in content design. Pinch me! More info and RSVP at meetup.com/content-strate…
English
Figma is not a design tool.
It is a drawing tool.
That these get conflated demonstrates the shallowness of so much design practice.
Oakland, CA 🇺🇸 English
@juansequeda Architecture of the invisible *feels* abstract.
When we architect a house, or an engineer an electrical or plumbing system, the schematics have obvious real world implications to everyone.
Schema architecture is no less critical for data & content, but yet get lost in TLDR.
English
- We have to talk to… humans! And humans are complicated.
- As technologist, we want technology, automation and avoid manual tasks like talking to humans.
- modeling is as much of an art as it is a science.
What are other reasons?
English
Data Modeling is hard!! It’s actually a lost art.
Much of Computer Science research in the 90s focused on this (hello expert systems!!) but it got lost due to the rise of Big Data and NoSQL.
It’s hard because:
English
it's like becoming a member of a club with secret handshakes: certain frustrations, certain excitements, certain ways of looking at and talking about obscure problems all cause amused (or jaded) nods of recognition from other members, even if you didn't know they were in the club
English
Props to the resilient content change leaders carrying forward ambitious programs in the face of legacy content debt & old thinking.
As a friend told me yesterday, "We’re clinging to a structured content raft in a sea of strings."
and yet still progress continues! Keep rowing.
English
@arh Rest in peace, Doug. A professional with a huge heart and genuine passion. He leaves with the admiration of an industry.
English
RIP Doug Gorman, Simply XML. Known to many in the #techcomm profession; he is missed. legacy.com/us/obituaries/…
English
Dizzying to consider how much chunky inaccessible content & data exists in a healthcare system where data facets and portability have such importance to humans.
Faxes, print & mail forms, arduous manual intakes, PDFs, and patient information overload still rule in 2022.
English
@storyneedle Perhaps because a large number of medical providers and payers still only transact information via fax or mail?
As the volume of medical incidents increases, the need to figure out how to work with faxes to file claims and get medical records also rises.
English
Yes! Patterns are incredibly valuable IP. So much embedded thinking baked into reusable components used by teams to build the future.
Invest in patterns and rally the organization around them.
#cx #ux #designsystems #contentengineering
Michael Andrews@storyneedle
Content models and design systems are both repositories for collective UX knowledge in the enterprise. Concrete, discrete decisions are considered and evaluated in detail, decided, then added to the stock of knowledge that teams can reuse.
English
@storyneedle Wow this is really interesting @storyneedle , it looks like medieval scholars were the first to maintain explicit personal knowledge graphs!
Ref:
Lines of Thought: Branching Diagrams and the Medieval Mind amazon.com/dp/022674308X/…
English
@content_is_all Twilight Zone!
It’s true though – there are plenty of folks managing tagging systems, controlled vocabularies, and hierarchical lists that don’t necessarily relate what they’re doing to taxonomy.
English
😂 Can we please be over this in 2022?
Taxonomy needs to be taught from third grade forward. It’s just a step or two from sorting shapes. The enterprise can figure this out!
#education #contentstrategy #contentdesign
courtney@courtneyreyers
"Do we have a taxonomy?" "What's that?" Here we go again 🚀
English
@AlanMorrison Especially today, navigating reality requires more & more abstraction.
I'd submit that curriculum designers should get intentional about introducing taxonomic concepts much earlier.
Some intentionally introduce abstraction from kindergarten:
scholastic.com/parents/family…
English
@mrcruce Well, conceptualization and classification requires abstraction. It's teenagers rather than third graders who finally get to the stage of being able to reason abstractly. And some are better than others at it.
Enterprises value the concrete over the abstract. HR in particular.
English