Tomás Mamede

1.2K posts

Tomás Mamede banner
Tomás Mamede

Tomás Mamede

@mrtomasmamede

Co-Found and Secretary @ IPB | iOS Engineer | I am trying to do the best I can 💪 | #Bitcoin will upgrade the world

Porto, Portugal Katılım Ekim 2013
320 Takip Edilen312 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Tomás Mamede
Tomás Mamede@mrtomasmamede·
This is one of those days in my life that I never expected to happen... I just won an Apple Scholarship! 🎉🎈🍾🎊 I am on cloud number nine! #WWDC2020 #SwiftStudentChallenge
Tomás Mamede tweet media
English
19
13
381
0
Tomás Mamede
Tomás Mamede@mrtomasmamede·
@lopp I think this is not a good direction. Bitcoin has survived multiple drawdowns and it has always recovered in large part due to the strong philosophical principles. Censorship resistant money is what bitcoin is all about. Let the bitcoins be claimed by anyone that can do it.
English
1
0
0
120
Jameson Lopp
Jameson Lopp@lopp·
Thoughts on BIP-361: * I know folks don't like it. I don't like it myself. I wrote it because I like the alternative even less. * It isn't a spec, nor is it proposed for activation. It's a rough idea for a contingency plan that needs more R&D. * I hope it never needs to be considered for adoption. * Ultimately, my thesis is that in the face of existential threat, individual economic incentives outweigh philosophical principles.
English
238
61
628
110.3K
Giovanni's BTC_POWER_LAW
Giovanni's BTC_POWER_LAW@Giovann35084111·
I have a conundrum. I was working on setting all the requirements for the printed version and the book is 450 pages and there are several colored graphs. The printing costs alone are around 27 dollars and Amazon has a markup relative to that and would not allow me to sell it at cost or close to it. As for now the printed version is 60 dollars that is insane. I would have to see what I can do to reduce the price maybe creating a simpler version of the graphs. But I have a physical copy in my hands and it is beautiful for sure. It is almost like a college textbook more than the typical Bitcoin book. But let me see if I can work on a black and white version of the book with simplified graphs. Maybe both can be available so people can choose which one they want.
Giovanni's BTC_POWER_LAW tweet media
RG@radov24533

@Giovann35084111 @Giovann35084111 will you be releasing physical copy?

English
36
3
93
9.4K
Tomás Mamede
Tomás Mamede@mrtomasmamede·
@Breedlove22 Does the data reveal if anything changes when you read an ebook with the audiobook in the background?
English
0
0
2
37
Robert ₿reedlove
Robert ₿reedlove@Breedlove22·
Can confirm anecdotally that reading physical books affords me much greater reading comprehension and retention.
Anish Moonka@anishmoonka

Went down the rabbit hole on this. Your brain treats a physical book like a landscape. It builds a spatial map of the text, the same way it maps trails, rooms, and city blocks. When you scroll on a phone, that map breaks apart. Seven large-scale research reviews and direct brain scans confirm what you already feel. A 2023 study in PLOS ONE attached brain-activity sensors to children’s heads while they read the same text on paper and on screen. Paper reading produced fast brain waves, the pattern linked to focused attention. Screen reading shifted the brain into slow waves, the pattern linked to mind wandering and daydreaming. Same kids. Same words. Measurably different brain states. A separate 2022 study from Showa University in Japan scanned the front of the brain, the area that manages focus and comprehension, during phone versus paper reading. Smartphones sent that region into overdrive, meaning the brain was straining just to keep up with basic processing. Paper reading produced a moderate load that triggered natural deep breathing, which helped regulate brain function and sustain focus. The phone suppressed that breathing pattern entirely. Since 2017, researchers have published seven major reviews combining hundreds of individual studies. Six of seven reached the same conclusion: people understand less on screens. A 2018 review of 54 studies and 170,000+ participants, literally titled “Don’t throw away your printed books,” found paper outperformed screens across the board for non-fiction. A 2024 follow-up with 49 more studies confirmed it. The gap has grown steadily every year since 2001. Being a “digital native” doesn’t help. The best explanation is how your brain tracks where you are. Your short-term memory can only juggle about 7 things at once. A physical book gives you constant location cues: the weight shifting from right hand to left, where a paragraph sits on the page, how thick the remaining pages feel. Your brain hands off the “where am I in this text?” job to those physical signals, leaving more room for actually understanding what you’re reading. On a phone, every screen looks identical. Your brain has to track position and process meaning at the same time, and something gives. A Norwegian eye-tracking study analyzing 25,000+ individual eye movements found screen readers processed text more shallowly. The students had no idea they were reading differently. In 2019, nearly 200 reading scientists from 30+ countries signed an open letter warning that screen reading was degrading deep comprehension. Since then, Scandinavian countries, among the most digitized school systems on Earth, have started putting physical books back in classrooms.

English
8
6
74
21.3K
Tomás Mamede
Tomás Mamede@mrtomasmamede·
@Giovann35084111 Congratulations! Really excited for this. I’m going to wait for the hardcover version!
English
1
0
2
46
Giovanni's BTC_POWER_LAW
Giovanni's BTC_POWER_LAW@Giovann35084111·
The Physics of Bitcoin book is now available for pre-order on Amazon (only Kindle version for now).
Giovanni's BTC_POWER_LAW tweet media
English
11
12
99
6.3K
Tomás Mamede
Tomás Mamede@mrtomasmamede·
Pantheism is all about contemplation but it teaches little about bargaining with reality and how to effectively engage with it. This is, in my opinion, where Christianity thrives. It’s all about action and how to deal with others and reality. “I Am who I Am” - I am the spirit of being and becoming - reality itself. To communicate and engage with the Hebrew God is to communicate with reality itself.
English
0
1
2
165
miguel milhao
miguel milhao@miguel_milhao·
a Microstrategy nao era uma infinite money make machine? desceu 80% já !🤣🤣🤣
Português
46
4
183
31.1K
Tomás Mamede
Tomás Mamede@mrtomasmamede·
As usual, you are wrong. You don't spend energy to create new bitcoins. You spend energy in order to prove that you did real work. And that allows you to be able to change the immutable Bitcoin transaction ledger known as the "blockchain". In this process the miner that wins the new block is attributed new bitcoins. Because miners are paid in bitcoins, the Bitcoin currency has to be money, otherwise there would be nothing paying for the security of the network.
English
0
0
0
26
Peter Schiff
Peter Schiff@PeterSchiff·
@saylor @elonmusk Yes, but Bitcoin isn't based on energy, you just waste energy to create it. When you use energy to mine gold, your turn energy into an extremely useful metal. With Bitcoin, you turn valuable energy into nothing.
English
46
0
84
8.5K
Αntonio Nogueira Leite
Αntonio Nogueira Leite@al_antdp·
Há muitos portugueses capangas desta gente. Têm um nome
Αntonio Nogueira Leite tweet media
Português
99
32
391
12.6K
Tomás Mamede
Tomás Mamede@mrtomasmamede·
@al_antdp @grok Frequently identified não quer dizer que o seja… Ou seja, há burocratas não eleitos que o acusam de ser, mas se é verdade, isso já é outra história.
Português
0
0
3
71
Giovanni's BTC_POWER_LAW
Giovanni's BTC_POWER_LAW@Giovann35084111·
I know it is not intuitive to people who are not used to reasoning as professional physicists, but I explain that a finite cap of 21 M is equivalent to a cap of zero in a ledger. Monetary transactions are the transfer of economic tokens representing value from one individual or entity to another. This can be achieved by removing the token from one individual to another. If you allow for negative transactions, then it is the same as having a total zero cap or any value at all. The fundamental thing is to have this cap fixed. Of course, in a more realistic system, you settle on a positive finite cap, but the concept is the same. The main point is that the precise value doesn't matter; what matters is the invariance of this quantity. giovannisantostasi.medium.com/bitcoin-value-…
English
8
5
56
8.9K
BTC Prague
BTC Prague@BTCPrague·
Tag the speaker you want to see at BTC Prague 2026 ⬇️
English
180
10
136
27.2K
Tomás Mamede
Tomás Mamede@mrtomasmamede·
@Giovann35084111 I am arriving at Lugano in about one hour. I haven’t registered for the event but I would love to come. Where can I meet you?
English
1
0
1
36
Giovanni's BTC_POWER_LAW
Giovanni's BTC_POWER_LAW@Giovann35084111·
The power law is getting the attention and recognition it deserves. First Bitcoin Balkan, now Bitcoin Capital Summit, people are intrigued and in general positive. I'm very glad for this trip to Europe.
Giovanni's BTC_POWER_LAW tweet media
English
4
1
80
3.7K
Jameson Lopp
Jameson Lopp@lopp·
Discourse is being disrupted by bots. Be skeptical when engaging with accounts you haven't seen before.
Jameson Lopp tweet mediaJameson Lopp tweet media
English
72
56
345
97.4K
Tomás Mamede retweetledi
J.K. Rowling
J.K. Rowling@jk_rowling·
If you believe free speech is for you but not your political opponents, you're illiberal. If no contrary evidence could change your beliefs, you're a fundamentalist. If you believe the state should punish those with contrary views, you're a totalitarian. If you believe political opponents should be punished with violence or death, you're a terrorist.
English
14K
126.6K
581.9K
23.4M
Tomás Mamede
Tomás Mamede@mrtomasmamede·
@PiusSprenger A high tide lifts all boats. But some boats are made of steal while others are made out of wood.
English
0
0
5
265
Pius the Banker
Pius the Banker@PiusSprenger·
$ETH outperformed $BTC over the last 5 years. 
Is it time for Bitcoin Maxis to panic — or admit there’s a second best?
Pius the Banker tweet media
English
34
3
55
6.8K
Tomás Mamede
Tomás Mamede@mrtomasmamede·
The is an outright attack. Today, if spammers what to add spam to a block they go to the mining pools and ask them directly to include their transaction in their next block. This is a win, win situation on both sides: spammers get their crap on the blockchain and pools make money - it is all that matters to them. They don't necessarily care about bitcoin, but they'll do anything to make extra profit. While this is a problem in and of itself, the problem is rather contained to some pools that, one could argue, are not very ethical. What core is doing is opening the pandora box for spammers and reduce their cost of adding crap to the blockchain. Removing the limit allows anyone to submit crappy transactions, at no cost, from their mum's basement just for fun. As the saying goes - build it and they will come. How does this affect Bitcoin and the network? Spammers will always pay whatever to see their crap on the blockchain. And miners will always prioritize transactions that pay more fees. If we go down this road we might face two problems that might impact the health of the network: 1. The mempools become full of spammy transactions that due to the higher fees they are willing to pay will take precedent over monetary transactions. What this leads to is that monetary transaction will take longer to settle on the main chain or in a more extreme scenario might even be discarded from the mempool. 2. Transaction fees might increase so much for the average monetary transaction that it can become prohibitive for some to transact. These two issues combined have a big impact on the ability for the average Bitcoin user to transact and diminishes censorship resistance. It is almost as if the network is censoring itself and nothing stops a coordinated attack from malicious actors to render the Bitcoin network unusable if nodes and miners are willing to relay spam transactions. Another issue is the position that core is adopting of attempting to dictate what is and isn't stored and relayed by your node. Nodes need to be sovereign and remain sovereign otherwise we impact decentralization in a big way.
English
0
0
3
57
Mechanic #BIP-110
Mechanic #BIP-110@GrassFedBitcoin·
I've been very naive about the motivations behind blowing out datacarriersize. This isn't just a disagreement. This really is an all-out attack and the goal is to undermine the network at its deepest level. Don't become an involuntary participant in this.
English
24
73
448
19.8K