Mim

1K posts

Mim

Mim

@mtlittle1

Southerner living in Merseyside. AFC supporter (LFC second team!) I care about basic human rights. Screw the tories.

Liverpool Katılım Eylül 2015
420 Takip Edilen81 Takipçiler
Mim
Mim@mtlittle1·
@I_amMukhtar It still scares the shiz out of me that this dimwit was a Magistrate for 20 YEARS!! Man alive.
English
0
1
4
71
Mukhtar
Mukhtar@I_amMukhtar·
Reform MP Sarah Pochin has been caught out and has now deleted a video from her social media showing her helping Ethel McGill, once dubbed “Britain’s biggest benefits cheat”. Ethel faked dementia and mobility problems, hid her father’s death for 12 years, and claimed around £750,000 in benefits. She was receiving her father’s pension and other benefits after failing to report his death. She also falsely claimed disability allowance for more than a decade. She even asked Liverpool Housing Trust for a bigger property, claiming her family needed to live together to provide round-the-clock care for her father, who was already dead. She also got someone to pretend to be her late father and told social workers not to speak to him because he could become aggressive. She was jailed for six years in 2019.
Mukhtar tweet media
English
78
1.4K
4.2K
248.3K
Mim
Mim@mtlittle1·
@zarahussain999 @takeiteqsy Ohh I don't know why you've posted this old video now?! I agree with a lot of your content and support your cause a lot of the time - but dragging up an old video is a bit odd. Gooners at the time rejected these idiots. Please I beg, it's been a long 22 years mate.
English
0
0
0
11
Mim retweetledi
Bimboh Adekoya
Bimboh Adekoya@Bimboh5·
I have been waiting for the Afrobeat version of 🎶North London Forever 🎶 @officialLoudd nailed it🙌🏿 I could not help smiling seeing our star striker @mc_lively_ making a special appearance never mind that he cannot sing with that voice 🤣😂 @Arsenal this is rocking 🔥 #AFC
English
13
369
1.5K
77.6K
Mim
Mim@mtlittle1·
@SangitaMyska Thank you for raising attention to this! I'm so pleased you're back x
English
0
0
2
12
Sangita Myska
Sangita Myska@SangitaMyska·
The plot thickens: APCO, spying on journalists, Josh Simons, & Labour Together ..
The Fraud@StarmertheFraud

Joint Statement: Paul Holden and Andrew Feinstein Regarding Labour Together, APCO and the Labour Party On Wednesday last week we received documents from Labour Together following Subject Access Requests that we submitted to Labour Together in February 2026. The documents provided by Labour Together are deeply disturbing. They show that Labour Together and APCO targeted us, our colleagues, our associates and Paul’s family with utterly false and highly defamatory allegations, and that this was done with the knowledge of the highest levels of the Labour Party. Indeed, we are now of the view that the operation to investigate us, our families and associates was effectively a joint operation run by the Labour Party, Labour Together and APCO. This highly invasive campaign was launched because of Paul’s factually accurate reporting. This reporting raised serious questions about whether Labour Together and Morgan McSweeney deliberately failed to report £730,000 in donations to the Electoral Commission in violation of the law. It is now plain that Sir Keir Starmer benefited from the work funded by these donations and that they facilitated his rise to power. We are calling for a full inquiry into Labour Together. We also call on Sir Keir Starmer to clarify his role in this scandal. Considering the documents that have been disclosed to date, we find it nearly inconceivable that Sir Keir Starmer did not know about this despicable project that included Labour Together reporting us to the National Cyber Security Center (NCSC), a part of GCHQ, based on utterly false and highly defamatory allegations. These highly defamatory allegations were then shared with at least one major newspaper outlet. The newly released documents reveal six important facts. First, they show that Morgan McSweeney and Paul Ovenden were aware of the APCO and Labour Together investigation into us from at least January 2024. McSweeney was the Labour Party’s head of campaigns and subsequently Sir Keir Starmer’s Chief of Staff in Number 10. Paul Ovenden was the Director of Labour Party communications and subsequently Head of Strategy in Number 10. The emails show Simons arranging a meeting between himself, Ovenden, McSweeney and Tom Harper, a senior APCO employee, to discuss the investigation into us. A third Labour employee was copied into the email, but, because of redactions, we do not know who this is. We ask the Labour Party to confirm who else was copied into this correspondence. The excellent @PeterKGeoghegan and Democracy for Sale have confirmed with a Labour Party source that the intended meeting did take place. Second, they show that APCO’s Tom Harper actively coached Josh Simons and Labour Together on how to submit a ‘crime complaint’ about us to the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC), a part of GCHQ. Harper provided text for Simons to submit to the NCSC. The decision to complain about us to the NCSC was made only days after Simons had emailed McSweeney, Ovenden and Harper about APCO’s upcoming report into us, asking for a meeting to discuss its contents. Third, Josh Simons has repeatedly claimed in public that he appointed APCO to investigate a ‘hack’ of Labour Together materials. But the new documents show that Labour Together and Simons did not conduct any meaningful cybersecurity review to establish whether materials had been hacked from Labour Together, or where else they may have been sourced from. Labour Together did, however, appoint a cybersecurity expert to review a potential hack in late 2025. This review, a summary of which has now been disclosed to us, shows that there was no ‘hack’ of Labour Together. This is obviously true, as we have repeatedly explained that the investigation into Labour Together was based on documents legally leaked from the Labour Party by whistleblowers concerned about misconduct by the Party’s most senior officials, open-source materials, and Freedom of Information requests. Fourth, they show that Josh Simons and Labour Together told the NCSC that they were reporting us because they were concerned that Paul’s reporting ‘may be a co-ordinated effort to discredit Labour Together in order to undermine Mr McSweeney and by extension, Mr. Starmer in the run-up to next year’s general election.’ It is our view that this joint Labour Together, Labour Party and APCO operation was launched because Paul’s factually accurate reporting would have shed light on the highly problematic and unlawful aspects of Sir Keir Starmer’s rise to power. Fifth, they show that APCO had sent a ‘case summary’ to Josh Simons of Labour Together on the 20th of November 2020, on the basis of which APCO were contracted by Labour Together two days later. The ‘case summary’, setting out a proposed scope of work, clearly identified us as journalists. From the very beginning, therefore, APCO and Labour Together knew that they were looking to investigate journalists – the very journalists who were reporting accurately on Labour Together, Morgan McSweeney and undeclared donations. Sixth, they show that Simons wrote to an unknown person at the Labour Party in November 2023 asking for ‘intel’ on us. This shows that Simons’ immediate response to announcement of Paul’s book was to seek the assistance of the Labour Party. At the time, we were both Labour Party members. The reply to Simons’ request has been redacted in our documents. We call on the Labour Party to release all documents to us relevant to this scandal, and to confirm whether Josh Simons, Labour Together or APCO were provided with any of our private, personal information.

English
14
369
713
29K
Mim retweetledi
The Fraud
The Fraud@StarmertheFraud·
Joint Statement: Paul Holden and Andrew Feinstein Regarding Labour Together, APCO and the Labour Party On Wednesday last week we received documents from Labour Together following Subject Access Requests that we submitted to Labour Together in February 2026. The documents provided by Labour Together are deeply disturbing. They show that Labour Together and APCO targeted us, our colleagues, our associates and Paul’s family with utterly false and highly defamatory allegations, and that this was done with the knowledge of the highest levels of the Labour Party. Indeed, we are now of the view that the operation to investigate us, our families and associates was effectively a joint operation run by the Labour Party, Labour Together and APCO. This highly invasive campaign was launched because of Paul’s factually accurate reporting. This reporting raised serious questions about whether Labour Together and Morgan McSweeney deliberately failed to report £730,000 in donations to the Electoral Commission in violation of the law. It is now plain that Sir Keir Starmer benefited from the work funded by these donations and that they facilitated his rise to power. We are calling for a full inquiry into Labour Together. We also call on Sir Keir Starmer to clarify his role in this scandal. Considering the documents that have been disclosed to date, we find it nearly inconceivable that Sir Keir Starmer did not know about this despicable project that included Labour Together reporting us to the National Cyber Security Center (NCSC), a part of GCHQ, based on utterly false and highly defamatory allegations. These highly defamatory allegations were then shared with at least one major newspaper outlet. The newly released documents reveal six important facts. First, they show that Morgan McSweeney and Paul Ovenden were aware of the APCO and Labour Together investigation into us from at least January 2024. McSweeney was the Labour Party’s head of campaigns and subsequently Sir Keir Starmer’s Chief of Staff in Number 10. Paul Ovenden was the Director of Labour Party communications and subsequently Head of Strategy in Number 10. The emails show Simons arranging a meeting between himself, Ovenden, McSweeney and Tom Harper, a senior APCO employee, to discuss the investigation into us. A third Labour employee was copied into the email, but, because of redactions, we do not know who this is. We ask the Labour Party to confirm who else was copied into this correspondence. The excellent @PeterKGeoghegan and Democracy for Sale have confirmed with a Labour Party source that the intended meeting did take place. Second, they show that APCO’s Tom Harper actively coached Josh Simons and Labour Together on how to submit a ‘crime complaint’ about us to the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC), a part of GCHQ. Harper provided text for Simons to submit to the NCSC. The decision to complain about us to the NCSC was made only days after Simons had emailed McSweeney, Ovenden and Harper about APCO’s upcoming report into us, asking for a meeting to discuss its contents. Third, Josh Simons has repeatedly claimed in public that he appointed APCO to investigate a ‘hack’ of Labour Together materials. But the new documents show that Labour Together and Simons did not conduct any meaningful cybersecurity review to establish whether materials had been hacked from Labour Together, or where else they may have been sourced from. Labour Together did, however, appoint a cybersecurity expert to review a potential hack in late 2025. This review, a summary of which has now been disclosed to us, shows that there was no ‘hack’ of Labour Together. This is obviously true, as we have repeatedly explained that the investigation into Labour Together was based on documents legally leaked from the Labour Party by whistleblowers concerned about misconduct by the Party’s most senior officials, open-source materials, and Freedom of Information requests. Fourth, they show that Josh Simons and Labour Together told the NCSC that they were reporting us because they were concerned that Paul’s reporting ‘may be a co-ordinated effort to discredit Labour Together in order to undermine Mr McSweeney and by extension, Mr. Starmer in the run-up to next year’s general election.’ It is our view that this joint Labour Together, Labour Party and APCO operation was launched because Paul’s factually accurate reporting would have shed light on the highly problematic and unlawful aspects of Sir Keir Starmer’s rise to power. Fifth, they show that APCO had sent a ‘case summary’ to Josh Simons of Labour Together on the 20th of November 2020, on the basis of which APCO were contracted by Labour Together two days later. The ‘case summary’, setting out a proposed scope of work, clearly identified us as journalists. From the very beginning, therefore, APCO and Labour Together knew that they were looking to investigate journalists – the very journalists who were reporting accurately on Labour Together, Morgan McSweeney and undeclared donations. Sixth, they show that Simons wrote to an unknown person at the Labour Party in November 2023 asking for ‘intel’ on us. This shows that Simons’ immediate response to announcement of Paul’s book was to seek the assistance of the Labour Party. At the time, we were both Labour Party members. The reply to Simons’ request has been redacted in our documents. We call on the Labour Party to release all documents to us relevant to this scandal, and to confirm whether Josh Simons, Labour Together or APCO were provided with any of our private, personal information.
English
55
1.2K
1.8K
225.2K
Mim
Mim@mtlittle1·
@EylonALevy hahahahahaha you mug!!
Nederlands
0
0
0
5
Eylon Levy
Eylon Levy@EylonALevy·
Israel is now 8th after the jury vote. Now the public speaks. I think we’ve got this🇮🇱
English
27
6
155
9.9K
Mim
Mim@mtlittle1·
@faizashaheen We know it's not corporate interests though don't we? The Lobby controls the entire operation and even if the next leader is less spineless and disingenuous, they still need to be approved by them. That cycle won't break anytime soon, depressingly.
English
0
0
0
12
Faiza Shaheen
Faiza Shaheen@faizashaheen·
Yes, Starmer is awful but with potentially 5 PMs in 5 years, and two party politics fracturing, we’ve got to ask why we’ve become such a politically unstable country. Inequality and an economy that only really works for the 1% with a political system that selects only people who will uphold this system won’t end with Starmer. Unless a new PM has the guts to take on corporate interests we’ll be stuck in the same vicious spiral.
English
133
557
2.8K
101.9K
Mim
Mim@mtlittle1·
@narindertweets Obviously none of this is a surprise. Always when the far right start attacking each other like the morality police when they are all scum. Would be interesting for @SoniaPoulton to look at this. @SangitaMyska as well now she is free to speak!!
English
0
0
0
13
Narinder Kaur
Narinder Kaur@narindertweets·
Extraordinary allegations from @benhabib6 !! Ben Habib alleges that Nigel Farage & Boris Johnson were paid £1m each by Christopher Harborne to essentially rig the election in favour of Johnson. He also claims the undeclared £5m "gift" Farage received in 2024 from Harborne was payment for Farage to take over as party leader of Reform UK and stand in Clacton.
English
541
3.9K
7.5K
1.2M
Mim
Mim@mtlittle1·
@GuzKhanOfficial Depressing. The Israel Lobby controls the government and not enough people will say it. Whomever gets selected will be approved by them. It's more of the same - and when they are "too left wing" then they get kicked. Rinse and repeat. Get Israel out!!
English
0
0
0
12
Guz Khan 🥶
Guz Khan 🥶@GuzKhanOfficial·
There is no amount of money in this lifetime that will ever take us away from the truth. FREE PALESTINE 🤲🏽
English
113
539
4.7K
56.1K
Mim
Mim@mtlittle1·
@donmcgowan The real issue is the Israel Lobby though isn't it? They will approve the candidate and then through the media, they will inevitably destroy them when they are not Pro-Israel enough. Rinse and repeat.
English
0
0
0
8
Don McGowan
Don McGowan@donmcgowan·
If this does play out and Starmer is somehow ousted, do these Labour figures think that the media will miraculously back off and allow them to govern? Because if they do, I’d like to invite them all to the grand opening of my new bridge emporium.
English
125
480
2.5K
25K
Mim
Mim@mtlittle1·
@JamesEFoster In the end, this surely comes down to whom the Israel Lobby will approve to replace Starmer. They are in control and obviously the media isn't allowed to say that! Please I beg, not Streeting!!
English
0
0
0
55
James Foster
James Foster@JamesEFoster·
He hasn’t even got @RachelReevesMP coming out in support of him. And when he goes, so does she.
English
3
38
194
4.9K
Mim
Mim@mtlittle1·
@paulcrump464942 @MothinAli Crazy that you would post that when your address is on Companies House! Should we sent the Greens over to the Rambles to see if you would like to be Islamophobic and Transphobic to their faces? No, thought not. Pipe down you weapon.
English
0
1
13
125
fffffff
fffffff@paulcrump464942·
@MothinAli Bet your loving this. Looking at a cock in a frock. Allah wouldn't like that 🤣🤣🤣🤣
fffffff tweet media
English
5
0
4
1.8K
Mothin Ali
Mothin Ali@MothinAli·
Labour Together not responding at all well to the loss of Lambeth to the Greens.
English
158
288
2.5K
69.7K
Mim
Mim@mtlittle1·
@kennardmatt Absolutely agree! However, it's a travesty that Israel still won the UK local elections by-proxy. There is nothing to separate Starmer from Farage - and the Israel Lobby have succeeded in pushing people towards a Muslim hating party.
English
0
0
0
12
Matt Kennard
Matt Kennard@kennardmatt·
Zack Polanski became Green Party leader in September 2025 He’s vaporised the 126 year old Labour Party in just 8 months Incredible A major service to all British people - and the world
English
754
1.4K
7.2K
105K
Mim
Mim@mtlittle1·
@bbcelection @SkyNews missing so many election results coming in because of your pointless interviews. We've given you viewership for hours so please at least give that back.
English
0
0
0
4
Mim
Mim@mtlittle1·
@RichardC97070 It's a pity that you're an Islamophobic Reform voter, you have potential to not be a complete and utter twat deep down 👍🏽
English
1
0
0
10
Richard Craven
Richard Craven@RichardC97070·
Loud berk in the quiet carriage. Shouting into his phone for the last 15 minutes.
English
77
8
290
58.1K
Mim
Mim@mtlittle1·
@RichardC97070 Disdain rather, apologies - knew as soon as I pressed reply!
English
1
0
1
266
Mim
Mim@mtlittle1·
@RichardC97070 Oh you're welcome - your delicious distain at the end was made for these opportunities to share Train Guy. In this case, look at me, I'm doing a Snowdon challenge and everyone must know!!
English
1
0
1
282
Richard Craven
Richard Craven@RichardC97070·
@Chequebookjerry It wasn't on speaker, but he was still talking loudly in the quiet carriage and is therefore a wanker.
English
1
0
13
1.3K