Random Kansas City Person

855 posts

Random Kansas City Person banner
Random Kansas City Person

Random Kansas City Person

@mulchisnice

Katılım Şubat 2024
79 Takip Edilen10 Takipçiler
Chris Blattman
Chris Blattman@cblatts·
We had the opposite experience: 1. My wife kept her last name. 2. When we had her firstborn daughter, my wife suggested she take her last name. I thought that was fine. 3. When we had my son, he took my last name because why not? 4. No idea what these administrative challenges are, but we never encountered them. 5. My only worry was that maybe it would be harder to take kids across international borders by myself, so my daughter has my last name as a middle name and my son has my wife's last name as a middle name. Because who cares about middle names? 6. Literally no one at a school, airport, or wherever has ever made this an issue, let alone even ask the question why the kids have different last names. And at least a dozen countries. It has literally never come up.
Lyman Stone 石來民 🦬🦬🦬@lymanstoneky

I think what this position misses is: 1) Kids are gonna have a surname 2) Having the whole household share a surname really is useful for a whole lot of purposes and parents who don't share surnames with their kids often face administrative challenges 3) Making up a new surname for the whole household breaks ties with *both* sides of the family and also most people see it as kinda cringe 4) So it's either his or hers or hyphens 5) Hyphens are fine, many countries do that, but they do make it literally impossible to write your full surname on many documents for many name combos, so you're back at having a name that creates recurrent administrative problems 6) So the lowest-friction solution really is his or hers 7) There's no fundamental reason it has to be his, but either way somebody is gonna give. You can argue it should be the man, but the only argument for that is matriarchy, which is no more compelling than patriarchy. 8) On the other hand the argument for "this is just the convention, don't sweat it too much" is fairly strong

English
41
14
816
202.8K
Shelfy
Shelfy@RealShelfy·
Absolutely electric lmao CB Buckner noticeably annoyed when he tapped the 2nd time only to be wrong again and listen to 40,000 people cheer for his incompetence 😂
English
814
2.8K
43.1K
7.4M
Kansas City
Kansas City@KansasCity·
Let’s build a better US-71! Join us for Community Summit #4 to discuss the draft recommendations for US-71. 📆 4/7 ⏰ 5:30-7:30 📍5540 Wayne Avenue More: reconnecteastside.com
Kansas City tweet media
English
19
6
30
6.2K
The Athletic | Football
The Athletic | Football@TheAthleticFC·
What do Gary Neville, Pep Guardiola and Ben White have in common? They were all unimpressed by Rayan Cherki’s showboating in Manchester City’s Carabao Cup win over Arsenal. You can understand why Arsenal wouldn't have taken kindly to Cherki's keepie-uppies — particularly White, who duly left one on the Frenchman in the moments that followed. But for the neutrals, it was just a bit of fun... right? 📝 @NickMiller79 bit.ly/4uKHo9F?utm_so…
The Athletic | Football tweet media
English
101
57
769
101.2K
Brayden Cook
Brayden Cook@The_Catechumen·
Saying, “I believe in one, holy, Catholic, and apostolic Church,” but redefining every word doesn’t mean you actually affirm the creed. Catholics can profess the marks specifically as they were intended to be defined - and as they were explained by the fathers/those contemporaneous to promulgation of the creed. You can’t. It’s the same thing creedal baptists do when they redefine “one baptism for the forgiveness of sins” to mean “one baptism that doesn’t forgive your sins but only symbolizes the forgiveness you’ve already received.” It’s the same problem. You aren’t really AFFIRMING the creed, because you shift the meaning away from what those words were intended to convey by the fathers. You’re misappropriating it.
Nathan Zekveld@RevZekveld

I believe "one, holy, catholic and apostolic church". That does not say I believe “the One Roman Catholic Church”.

English
18
19
314
11.2K
The Athletic | Football
The Athletic | Football@TheAthleticFC·
Galatasaray’s Noa Lang has undergone surgery in Liverpool on his right thumb after cutting it in a collision with the advertising hoardings at Anfield. Liverpool FC plan to investigate what exactly happened during the incident which caused the injury and wish Lang a full and speedy recovery. More from @JessMCHopkins nd @adjones_journo ⬇️ bit.ly/4sZNilT
The Athletic | Football tweet media
English
56
84
1.2K
170.7K
The Athletic | Football
The Athletic | Football@TheAthleticFC·
In the third of our series on World Cup venues, @HenryBushnell tells you everything you need to know about Kansas City Stadium — an old-school sporting gem in Middle America. It will never host a Super Bowl. It has no translucent roof, no 11,000-square foot video board, pool or rooftop farm. But for decades, and especially recently, it has been a fortress for the Kansas City Chiefs. It also holds the record for the loudest outdoor sports crowd (142.2 decibels) in recorded history, from a September 2014 NFL game. What will it look like for the World Cup? 🔗 nytimes.com/athletic/71256…
The Athletic | Football tweet media
English
9
3
69
29.9K
Mark Goldbridge
Mark Goldbridge@markgoldbridge·
Probably the worst ref of the season this. Total shit all game for both teams
English
88
253
9.4K
545.2K
Tony
Tony@Oghener0·
Antoine Semenyo: €72.00m Tijjani Reijnders: €54.90m Rayan Aït-Nouri: €36.80m Rayan Cherki: €36.50m James Trafford: €31.20m Gianluigi Donnarumma: €30.00m Marc Guéhi: €23.00m Sverre Nypan: €15.00m Marcus Bettinelli: €2.40m That's all our summer and January transfers combined, total Cost = €301.80M. Wirtz + Isak alone = €281.30M 😂
Tony@Oghener0

GUYS I JUST CLOCKED A CRAZY FACT 😭

HT
119
376
7.3K
1.1M
Random Kansas City Person
Random Kansas City Person@mulchisnice·
@philipaklein National Review is so pathetic these days. Constantly carrying water for this administration. Even Charles Cooke doesn't care about the Constitution anymore
English
0
0
0
12
Philip Klein
Philip Klein@philipaklein·
If you look past the tweets and listen to what Marco Rubio has been saying consistently it's that destroying Navy/drones/missiles is necessary to prevent them from creating a shield that would make them immune to any future military action against its nuclear program. One can agree or disagree with this justification, but mentioning the need to eliminate these capabilities is not a separate issue from the nuclear question, as far as Rubio has communicated it.
Yashar Ali 🐘@yashar

All of a sudden, the Islamic Republic of Iran nuclear issue has disappeared. And to be clear, no other tweet from the State Department regarding this speech mentions the nuclear issue.

English
27
95
593
50.3K
Alexi Lalas
Alexi Lalas@AlexiLalas·
Official 2026 FIFA World Cup poster.
Alexi Lalas tweet media
English
64
28
319
21K
Kieran Maguire
Kieran Maguire@KieranMaguire·
Is there really a 'Big Six' in the Premier League, or is it a modern myth? Calculated the wages of all clubs for all years and adjusted for football inflation (current purchasing power). The top 114 adjusted wages paid since 1992/93 only involve five clubs, Chelsea, Manchester United, Manchester City, Arsenal and Liverpool. Spurs do not appear until 119th.
Kieran Maguire tweet mediaKieran Maguire tweet mediaKieran Maguire tweet mediaKieran Maguire tweet media
English
110
96
970
288K
Random Kansas City Person
Random Kansas City Person@mulchisnice·
@FeserEdward His hypocrisy on this is astounding. He was saying the exact opposite with Venezuela. Hopefully he's changed his mind.
English
0
0
1
275
Matt Walsh
Matt Walsh@MattWalshBlog·
I can't take the gaslighting, guys. I really can't. Conservatives are now running around saying "Iran has been waging war on us for 47 years." Okay then why didn't any of you call for an attack on Iran at any point until now? Why didn't you make a case for Trump "ending the war, not starting it" until precisely the moment when Trump did it? You and I both know that you are latching onto a talking point you never used until 45 seconds ago. You and I both know that almost every conservative influencer in the business was opposed to war with Iran until just now. And now you're trying to use justifications that stretch back decades. It doesn't make any sense. If you changed your mind, fine. Say so. Explain why. You're allowed to change your mind. I've changed my mind about things. But don't try to rewrite history. Be honest about it. There's too much at stake to play these games.
English
11.2K
7.6K
72.6K
6.8M
Men in Blazers
Men in Blazers@MenInBlazers·
How does Thomas Muller see football in North America? 🤔 "Football here still has no big significance in the life of the general population. It’s not spoken about in the office on a Monday morning," he told @kicker (translation via @RaeComm). "But the football bubble is not in fact so small. In the stadia there’s euphoric atmosphere. The people are interested in the game."
Men in Blazers tweet mediaMen in Blazers tweet media
English
21
24
273
50.5K
Matt Walsh
Matt Walsh@MattWalshBlog·
You wouldn't know it based on what you see on this site, but there is actually a lane for people who are skeptical of military intervention and regime change wars but also aren't weeping for the Iranian regime and actively rooting for America to fail. Not only does the lane exist in real life but it's where like 90 percent of real people live.
English
1.5K
1.4K
18.7K
1.4M
Matt Walsh
Matt Walsh@MattWalshBlog·
What exactly is the end game? "The Iranian people rise up and take control of their government"? Okay what does that mean exactly? Which people? How are they taking control? What happens after they do take control? Are we sure the new people, whoever they are, will be better than the old people? How are we going to make sure of that? How are we going to make sure of it while also not putting boots on the ground? This has not been explained. It needs to be.
English
4.6K
1.8K
21.3K
1.6M