Marianne Nørtoft Overbye

A very sad announcement. I have just been convicted a second time for 'hate speech' and it is only due to a technicality that I could not immediately be sent to jail —to the judge's frustration. In an ironic turn of events it's actually thanks to my previous prison sentence (for memes in a private group chat) that I am now still free —in a physical sense, at least. Call me naive but I didn't think they would take it this far, given that this precedent criminalises many of the arguments used by even the most moderate politicians critical of mass migration. In February 2024 I gave a lecture at Catholic University Leuven wherein I linked mass migration to crime and a deterioration of our quality of life. Every single point I made was 100% the truth and based on scientific evidence. Cynically, even the judge that convicted me admits as much by writing in his verdict: “Even if all of the statements made by Van Langenhove are based on scientific evidence and statistics, it makes no difference to the criminal intent. Van Langenhove is not charged with spreading false information. He is charged with presenting facts in a way that incites hatred against persons on the grounds of one or more of the protected criteria in the Anti-Racism Law.” That's a lot of words just to say he wants to send me to prison for speaking the truth. Even the regime media write: "It did not matter to the court that Van Langenhove was quoting scientific sources. The judge argued that Van Langenhove's main message was that a big part of the societal problems like insecurity, housing shortages and lowering educational standards are due to mass migration." You may think the regime media are being sympathetic to me in the first sentence, but in reality they are warning people: even if you speak the truth, if you go against our narrative, we will crush you in every way possible. Both the public prosecutor and the judge did not present a single real argument as to how or against whom I would have incited hatred. So even if I would accept their crazy, dystopic law, I still did not break it. The only argument they present is that I created a "hostile atmosphere of us versus them” in regards to migrants. But even this silly argument (which is not even a punishable offence) is not true. To me, the deadly disease is self-hatred and one of its worst symptoms is replacement migration. My enemy is thus NOT the migrants themselves but those orchestrating the mass migration. Sadly, in Belgium, evidence is not needed and ‘vibes’ are enough to put someone in jail. Given the fact that I have another court case coming up in September and that I have a dozen active criminal investigations for hate speech, time is running out for me. I have already paid more than €420,000 in legal fees and there is no ending in sight. I have been in an intense battle of attrition for eight years and must now regroup to make sure I can still win. If you want to help me, you can do so via the links below. If you can help in other ways, please contact me via DM. If you live in a country that still has free speech, never let them touch it, however noble they make the motives sound, because this is where it leads to.

Reuters stories on Henry Nowak: 0 Reuters stories on George Floyd: 1,087 Do you see what’s happening?

COVID changed my worldview permanently. Nearly six years after COVID began, not one world leader has seriously examined what the vaccines did to the people they harmed. Not one investigation. Not one parliamentary inquiry with genuine teeth. Not one head of state who has stood at a podium and said, we owe the injured an honest accounting and we are going to provide it. The silence is universal. And it is coordinated in a way that individual negligence cannot explain. This is the observation that matters most to me, more than any document, more than any leaked communication, more than any specific piece of evidence. Because the behaviour of every major government simultaneously tells you something that the individual pieces cannot tell you alone. Genuine public health emergencies produce genuine review. What worked. What did not. Who was harmed and how. That is what accountable institutions do. What we have instead is a wall. And on the other side of that wall, the vaccine injured, still without diagnostic codes, still without compensation, still without the basic acknowledgment that what happened to them was real. While Long COVID is promoted heavily by the same governments and the same media that will not ask a single honest question about the injections. The parallel presentations. The overlapping symptoms. The convenient framing that points everywhere except at the product. The universal silence of world leaders on vaccine injury is not the behaviour of people who have nothing to hide. It is the behaviour of people who have collectively decided that the cost of honesty exceeds the cost of continued silence. That decision is itself the answer.

🇺🇸🔥 IT’S OFFICIAL: RFK JR. SHATTERS GLOBAL ORDER – U.S. completes WHO withdrawal with final message: “WE WILL NEVER BE RULED BY THEM AGAIN” [VIDEO] 🇺🇸🔥 HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced the full U.S. withdrawal from the World Health Organization. In a historic speech, he exposed the WHO’s failures during COVID and declared that American health policy will no longer answer to unelected foreign officials. This move reclaims national sovereignty, ends U.S. funding, and reshapes global health leadership. 🇺🇸🔥 RFK Jr. Just Took Down the WHO – “We Will Never Be Ruled by Them Again” FOLLOW ME, THE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING

Hvornår er man rigtig dansk? I Liberal Alliance er vi ikke optaget af, om folk spiser svinekød, eller hvad de laver den 24. dcember. Det er en privatsag. For man kan godt være muslim og samtidig være en god medborger i Danmark. Men vi har også nogle alvorlige problemer med, at mange muslimer her til lands ikke respekterer vores værdier. Derfor er det ikke tilstrækkeligt, at vi ved tildelingen af statsborgerskab kun kigger på, om folk er i beskæftigelse, og om de ikke begår kriminalitet. De skal også have det rigtige sindelag. Og ja, det ér bundliberalt at sikre sig, at de mennesker, der gerne vil belønnes med et statsborgerskab og blive en del af vores liberale demokrati, rent faktisk køber ind på det liberale demokratis præmisser. Præcis ligesom vores grundlovsfædre sikrede det for 175 år siden, da man valgte at lade statsborgerskab være en politisk, og ikke administrativ, beslutning.