Nathan Anderson

"christian nation is gooder than transing kids" is "utter garbage" in the mind of Nathan Anderson.

I fully believe that if Dabney were around today, he would repent of some of the racial views expressed in his writings. When contemporary racists say things like, “You’d excommunicate Dabney if he were around today,” they are not saying anything useful. I usually counter, “If Dabney were around today, he’d repent.” Why assume that Dabney would not be willing or capable of receiving greater light from God’s Word on the issue of race? This is true of many great saints in history whose views were immature and have been improved upon. There are many early church theologians who would have gladly reworked and improved their Trinitarian formulations if given access to the insights of later generations. I have no doubt many medieval theologians would have welcomed the Reformational doctrine of justification by faith, if given the biblical arguments for it. And, yes, I think many 19th century Southern theologians (some of the first theologians in history to have to deal with the issue of race in such an experiential way!) would gladly receive further light from the Scriptures on the issue. There is no reason to assume their views are frozen in time or that they’d be unwilling to reconsider. I’d like to think that I’d be open to reassessing my views if strong biblical arguments can be made against something I currently believe. Why not grant Dabney the benefit of the doubt as well? ~Rich Lusk

Take the IQ test before becoming a pastor, goy 🤡

🧵 Some people ask me why I have such an appreciation for foreign cultures, languages and food but at the same time I am very conservative when it comes to immigration. It's precisely because I believe blending of cultures based on an economic zone/propositional ideas actually harms the cultures and traditions of the recipient nation and the sending nations they are intending to protect. Nations and cultures are tied to their history and their land. I spent a summer in college working in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Argentina has a rich culture which is a combination of Spanish, Italian, and British influences and even have a dialect of Spanish (rioplatense) that is unique and actually fun to speak. I can go into a YMCA and get delicious food that would cost me $40 a plate in an American restaurant. If a huge group of Americans just decided to descend on Argentina and buy up all their real estate, never learn Spanish, and pressure the government to cater to their needs, it would ruin the uniqueness that is Argentina. Argentina is for Argentines, and if I visit, I consider myself a guest in their home. It is the same with the United States. American culture, up until about 100 years ago, was mainly a collection of Northern European Protestants that developed a specific culture that we now associate with main street USA, state fairs, community churches, etc. We want to preserve that. It is also true for individual state cultures. North Carolina for example, has a distinct Appalachian/coastal Southern blend that is being threatened by Northerners buying up generational lands in droves to flee leftist enclaves in the Northeast. Asheville used to be an Appalachian town and it has lost its culture and is now an enclave of wealthy liberals and hipsters. Locals are getting priced out both economically and culturally. I am a localist and a traditionalist. I want all cultures to be preserved in their proper contexts. French for the French, Mexico for the Mexicans, and America for Americans. Propositional nations always descend into chaos over time and lose their distinctiveness, not add to it.

Eric constantly bucks up against faithful Reformed brothers White & Wilson but promotes KJVO Anderson as sound? 🤣🤡 Talk about over-correction. Anderson is a hard supersessionist, which stems from papist & Jesuit heresy circa the counter-reformation. Ogden should change their ministry name to New Christendumb Press for promoting this fool. But I guess wolf packs do run together.