@Narchist23

280 posts

@Narchist23

@Narchist23

@narchist233

Katılım Mayıs 2026
59 Takip Edilen3 Takipçiler
Mrs B Awesome
Mrs B Awesome@BlueNip·
Why do SA banks offer sharia law banking? When muslims are only about 1 to 2% of the entire population?🤔
English
139
63
570
435.7K
@Narchist23
@Narchist23@narchist233·
@dannydanon Every disgusting thing you jews did to gaza i wish for your daughter
English
0
0
0
2
Danny Danon 🇮🇱 דני דנון
כל הכבוד לבתי האהובה! ליום הגיוס לא הצלחתי להגיע, אבל לטקס סיום ההכשרה בתפקיד המשמעותי היה חשוב לי במיוחד להגיע ולציין יחד איתך ועם שאר מסיימי הקורס את הרגע המרגש הזה. גאה בך מכל הלב על ההתמדה, הנחישות, העבודה הקשה, ועל סיום ההכשרה בהצטיינות. ❤️
Danny Danon 🇮🇱 דני דנון tweet media
עברית
593
196
2K
101.1K
AOE21
AOE21@Aoe21Aoe52·
@nxt888 The Palestinians did not want partition They rejected it They wanted it all - all the land from the River to the Saa That is the reason for all the blood letting for the past 78 years.
English
33
1
2
25.3K
Sony Thăng
Sony Thăng@nxt888·
"Palestinian suffering is historically brought upon by themselves." This sentence is the most revealing thing you have written in this entire exchange. Not because it is uniquely callous. It is a commonly held position. But because it exposes, with unusual clarity, the foundational move that your entire argument has been making from the beginning. It assigns agency and therefore responsibility entirely to the Palestinians, and strips agency and therefore responsibility entirely from the Zionist movement, the British colonial government, the United States, and the international community. The Palestinian population did not bring upon themselves the Balfour Declaration, which was issued without their consent. They did not bring upon themselves the British Mandate policy of facilitating Jewish immigration against their expressed political objections. They did not bring upon themselves the UN partition plan, which was voted on by a body in which they had no representation. They did not bring upon themselves Plan Dalet, which was adopted by the Haganah two months before Arab armies entered. They did not bring upon themselves the expulsions at Lydda, at Haifa, at Jaffa, documented by Israeli historians, including Benny Morris, who names the commanders and describes the orders. What they did was resist. And you have classified resistance to dispossession as the cause of the dispossession. That is not history. That is the logic every colonial power has used about every colonized population that refused to accept its own elimination quietly.
§@EarthOddysey

On what moral basis were Palestinians "obligated" to accept partition? They weren’t obligated to like it. They were not obligated to see it as fair. They were entitled to reject it politically. But rejection is not the same as a right to launch or support a war to prevent any Jewish state from existing. By 1947 there were two peoples on the land with competing national claims. Jews were not a random foreign lobby with no connection to the place; they were a people with ancient ties, continuous presence, mass displacement, and a real need for sovereignty after centuries of persecution. Partition was morally imperfect because reality was morally impossible: two peoples claimed the same land, and neither was going to disappear. The moral basis was not that Palestinians owed Jews a debt. It was that Jews also had a right to self-determination, and partition was the proposed compromise between two conflicting claims. The tragedy is that compromise was rejected in favour of war by the Arabs. Palestinian suffering which is historically brought upon by themselves is real but it does not erase Jewish legitimacy and it does not turn rejection of any Jewish sovereignty into moral innocence.

English
40
666
1.6K
29.2K
Rabbi Poupko
Rabbi Poupko@RabbiPoupko·
This was taken today in Gaza City. Paid for by naive donors and western tax dollars, at the expense of starving children in Sudan.
Rabbi Poupko tweet media
English
140
22
118
268.5K
@Narchist23
@Narchist23@narchist233·
@Ayesha_Bagus Theres already kommando camps north of Pretoria where kids are indoctrinated
English
0
0
0
1
solé
solé@layxsnv·
who took ur concert virginity??? i'm intrigued
English
2.9K
147
7.8K
853.1K
Hurwi1
Hurwi1@ghurwi1·
@BlueNip Because they are faaaaaar more than that
English
0
0
0
11
@Narchist23
@Narchist23@narchist233·
@johnnyceworm @BlueNip What special rates you dumbfuck 😂😂 i pay the standard fee for deposits or withdrawals on my account.
English
0
0
0
1
Bigd
Bigd@johnnyceworm·
@BlueNip best is special rates too, I'm so sick and tired of this.
English
0
0
0
12
@Narchist23
@Narchist23@narchist233·
@KrissCollins3 @BlueNip @BurgerKing The company that brought the burger king Franchise to south Africa is or was Muslim owned you dumbass. They also brought Starbucks to SA and there are no Halal Starbucks in SA
English
0
0
0
1
Kriss
Kriss@KrissCollins3·
@BlueNip Why do @BurgerKing sell their franchises to people who won't serve bacon?
English
0
0
0
46
Gloria
Gloria@Gloriaisindebt·
@BlueNip They follow a false prophet who slept with a 9 year old girl. Sick religion
English
0
0
0
10
@Narchist23
@Narchist23@narchist233·
@HerbertsGhost @ShuaybG @BlueNip So kfc serves Bacon ?😂😂 hey dumbass just a fyi: the vegetables and fruit you eat and the water you drink is considered halal too by default
English
0
0
0
1
@Narchist23
@Narchist23@narchist233·
@HerbertsGhost @_thebard1 @BlueNip I cant speak for McDonald's or KFC. But the company that brought the Burger King and Dunkin doughnut franchises to South Africa is/ was Muslim owned. They brought Starbucks to SA too and there are very little Halal Starbucks in SA
English
0
0
0
1