narendra 🎈 🏃🏻‍♂️

11.9K posts

narendra 🎈 🏃🏻‍♂️ banner
narendra 🎈 🏃🏻‍♂️

narendra 🎈 🏃🏻‍♂️

@narendra

Stochastic parrot. Since 1995. Inventor - online photo sharing, the retweet. App/Video/Tech for @wser. MVLL Juniors Manager. @30boxes + building something new.

CA/WY Katılım Temmuz 2006
1.4K Takip Edilen20.4K Takipçiler
narendra 🎈 🏃🏻‍♂️
Great to have a new non-rage baiting algo. But man does it suck that all these networks are beholden to tuning that has so much emotional influence. Hi everyone.
English
1
0
4
156
narendra 🎈 🏃🏻‍♂️
@bgurley I completely disagree with this argument. If a batter gets in the box with no plan then he/she is agreeing to be on the pitcher's plan. Agency is good, collaboration is hard, but neither automatically means manic thrashing.
English
0
0
0
18
Sue
Sue@suekhim·
American kids can’t read or do math anymore. 90% of parents think their kid is at grade level. Only 28% are. And now, kids are addicted to AI for cheating. That’s why we built Koji to coach you to think, instead of doing the thinking for you.
Sue tweet media
English
11
16
319
48.7K
Sue
Sue@suekhim·
AI is making kids dumber. It should be making them geniuses. Introducing Koji, the first AI tutor that gets kids to actually think. 👇
English
2.2K
1.2K
12.2K
4.9M
Matthew Knauer
Matthew Knauer@matthewk36711·
Peyton Bonds is as polarizing a prospect as they come, a massive swing for upside by San Francisco (round 3, pick 90). The raw tools are tantalizing, having smoked a ball at 120.7 mph this season with a 90th-percentile exit velocity of 107.4 mph. That level of raw power typically elicits swing-and-miss concerns, but not with Bonds, as he made contact on 91% of swings in-zone vs. fastballs and 86% against spin. Now for the concerns. Barry's nephew chased at 39% of pitches outside the strike zone, with a meager 67% in-zone swing rate. His zone-minus-chase rate is the lowest among all drafted college hitters in the first five rounds. With two strikes, his chase rate soared to 65%. Bonds has also struggled significantly to get his best contact in the air. Against right-handed pitching, his average launch angle was just 2.4°, albeit with more consistent lift and slugging vs. LHP. Just 21% of Bonds' fly balls were hard-hit (above 95 mph), with an average exit velocity of 83.6 mph. The swing is clearly very flat, and Bonds has to leave his typical plane to elevate balls in the air. It likely helps him maintain strong bat-to-ball skills, but doesn't allow him to reach the slugging metrics a hitter with his level of raw power should. SF will have to find the happy medium, while also working to significantly improve the swing decisions.
English
6
6
153
82.6K
Mark Cuban
Mark Cuban@mcuban·
Is Microsoft ditching patents ? Same issue. You may think your IP is protected. It's not. Every model is training on every patent app, and simultaneously being prompted to find workarounds or ways to compete with that patent I think the value of a patent has dropped and the value of a trade secret has increased
Vaibhav Sisinty@VaibhavSisinty

Satya Nadella just warned every company using AI: you are paying twice. Once with money. Again with something far more valuable. He published an article introducing something called the Reverse Information Paradox. And it changes how you think about every AI tool your company uses. Nobel laureate Kenneth Arrow described the original paradox: a seller risks giving away knowledge just to sell it. Nadella says AI flips this completely. In the AI age, the buyer gives away knowledge just to use what they bought. Every time your team uses Claude or GPT at work, every prompt reveals what you are building. Every correction teaches the model what good looks like inside your company. Every eval shows what you value. Every trace exposes your workflow. The model provider learns more about you with every interaction. You learn almost nothing about what they are learning in return. Your corrections are distilled institutional know-how. The kind a competitor could never buy. And it leaks trace by trace, correction by correction, without you noticing. His line: "You can offload a task. You can offload a job. But you can never offload your learning." If the model provider disappears tomorrow, do you still own the intelligence your team built on top of it? Your evals. Your memory. Your traces. Your workflows. Or did all of that compound inside someone else's infrastructure? In the cloud era, companies accumulated data. In the AI era, they accumulate learning. Right now, most of that learning is compounding inside the model provider. Not inside the company paying for it. The CEO pushing AI harder than anyone just told you to protect your knowledge from the very tools he is selling you. That should tell you everything.

English
105
83
755
321.4K
David Choi
David Choi@DavidChoiMusic·
@ericschmidt @grok summarize this article for me in plain English and explain the best, the worst, and what we should do about it as Americans.
English
2
0
0
1.2K
Eric Schmidt
Eric Schmidt@ericschmidt·
Selina and myself on the China US race - we need to understand the critical importance of the arrival of reasoning by computer and make sure we get the right products to benefit everyone, not just a few nytimes.com/2026/07/11/opi…
English
11
26
133
39.5K
Tim Ferriss
Tim Ferriss@tferriss·
There is a process that I have used, and still use, to reignite life... Create two timelines—6 months and 12 months—and list up to five things you dream of having (including, but not limited to, material wants: house, car, clothing, etc.), being (be a great cook, be fluent in Chinese, etc.), and doing (visiting Thailand, tracing your roots overseas, racing ostriches, etc.) in that order. If you have difficulty identifying what you want in some categories, as most will, consider what you hate or fear in each and write down the opposite. Do not limit yourself, and do not concern yourself with how these things will be accomplished. For now, it’s unimportant. This is an exercise in reversing repression. Be sure not to judge or fool yourself. If you really want a Ferrari, don’t put down solving world hunger out of guilt. For some, the dream will be fame, for others fortune or prestige. All people have their vices and insecurities. If something will improve your feeling of self-worth, put it down. Drawing a blank? In that case, consider these questions: 1) What would you do, day to day, if you had $100 million in the bank? 2) What would make you most excited to wake up in the morning to another day? Don’t rush—think about it for a few minutes. If still blocked, fill in the five “doing” spots with the following: — one place to visit — one thing to do before you die (a memory of a lifetime) — one thing to do daily — one thing to do weekly — one thing you’ve always wanted to learn What does “being” entail doing? Convert each “being” into a “doing” to make it actionable. Identify an action that would characterize this state of being or a task that would mean you had achieved it. People find it easier to brainstorm “being” first, but this column is just a temporary holding spot for “doing” actions. Here are a few examples: 1) Great cook —> make Christmas dinner without help 2) Fluent in Chinese —> have a five-minute conversation with a Chinese co-worker Determine three steps for each of the dreams in just the 6-month timeline and take the first step now. Define three steps for each dream that will get you closer to its actualization. Set actions—simple, well-defined actions—for now, tomorrow (complete before 11 A.M.) and the day after (again completed before 11 A.M.). Once you have three steps for each of the four goals, complete the three actions in the “now” column. Do it now. Each should be simple enough to do in five minutes or less. If not, rachet it down. If it’s the middle of the night and you can’t call someone, do something else now, such as send an e-mail, and set the call for first thing tomorrow. If the next stage is some form of research, get in touch with someone who knows the answer instead of spending too much time in books or online, which can turn into paralysis by analysis. The best first step, the one I recommend, is finding someone who’s done it and ask for advice on how to do the same.
English
97
953
10.5K
1.4M
Ryan Carson
Ryan Carson@ryancarson·
Been using SWE 1.7 a lot in @DevinAI and it’s getting hard to tell the difference between it and Opus 4.8 or gpt 5.5. It’s also free right now, so that’s nice. Definitely reaching for Fable or gpt 5.6 on harder stuff but a huge chunk of engineering can be done now for drastically lower prices. Pretty sure in 6-12 months the majority of engineering is going to be done in non-frontier lab harnesses (Cursor, Devin, Amp, Factory) with models they’ve trained or fine-tuned. Also with the downward token price pressure being applied by both Meta and xAI … all very good for all of us.
English
25
13
202
23.9K
Brian Armstrong
Brian Armstrong@brian_armstrong·
Sad state of affairs when most mainstream media journalists can’t be trusted to tell the truth at this point. As a founder, you have to hunt to find the good ones and spend more of your time going direct or with new media, bypassing them entirely. Many traditional media companies got disrupted by tech, and therefore came to hate tech. So they have a conflict of interest in all tech reporting, even if they don’t disclose it. Others are mainly political propaganda organizations at this point (Marxist etc) and try to label it journalism to prey on ignorant people. Actual journalism is important and even heroic at times (war zones etc), it just isn’t practiced very often by traditional media companies any more, which is a shame and why we need new media companies.
dar@radbackwards

I gave WIRED the exclusive on our hands launch, and they wrote a really weird article about how we are sexualizing robotics… wired.com/story/the-1x-n… I felt pretty betrayed because that’s not what they told me they were writing about not is that what I’ve ever been about… actually I stand for quite the opposite… But I’ve come to find a lot of dishonesty and malice in the journalism community so I wasn’t surprised. This is what I sent the author… I’m only sharing this because I hope it encourages journalists to resist the click bait trap and tell truly awesome stories because I for one don’t believe journalism is dead— I think it’s just starting and just needs to evolve past the weird corner of the internet where data driven optimization turns everything into smooth brained shocking brain rot bullshit. The technological revolution we are going through should inspire a journalism renaissance. Not let it fall into further decay. There is so much brilliance at play in the world and the stories should be told! My note: “[author name redacted], it was nice talking to you, but I wanted to let you know that I didn’t enjoy your article at all. I understand the need to be inflammatory because that seems to be the only thing that gets clicks these days but that doesnt mean you shouldn’t recognize when something special is in front of you. I trusted our PR team in saying we should offer you the exclusive on what is one of the most important technological developments in the history of Mankind and I deeply regret it. Good luck with the rest of your writing career. -Dar Sleeper”

English
166
132
1.8K
387.9K
mark pincus
mark pincus@markpinc·
I love it when someone picks up that this ‘persona’ is just the real me. Unfiltered. Not trying to fit a brand or message. Its never worked well with the press. They want a clear narrative. Sometimes i sound tone deaf but lets be honest. we all do unedited. Thank God for X and long form pods!
Okles Dokles@oklesdokles

If you’re an avid reader or podcast listener guy, you end up having this sort of weird one directional relationship with people you don’t know. But you kinda know them, or at least you know a version of them, the public version. And of course you don’t really know if that’s authentic or performative, but you make your assessment and that usually determines how likely you are to stay on their frequency. My take is that @markpinc is one of the real real ones. It’s a bit hard to describe but if you consume a lot of content online, you get pretty attuned to these kinds of things. It’s rare, rarer than it should be, but it’s also unmistakable.

English
5
3
69
16.2K
Aravind Srinivas
Aravind Srinivas@AravSrinivas·
Imagine a fable 5 quality model that’s 3-4x less expensive in less than 6 months. And an Opus 4.8 grade model that can run on a local device in less than 12 months. Greater than 50% chance that these events will happen. Worth keeping in mind when you make predictions about the future.
English
272
372
6.3K
801.5K
Wilder World
Wilder World@WilderWorld·
Next release: a full buff system for gear, weapons and attachments. With persistent degradation, where equipment visibly wears over time. Condition changes performance. Scars tell stories.
Wilder World tweet media
English
7
17
104
7.3K
narendra 🎈 🏃🏻‍♂️
@girdley Back of the Y has been awful since day 1. I had an early 3 for a few years and then couldn’t deal with how uncomfortable it was and got a Subaru.
English
0
0
0
77
Michael Girdley
Michael Girdley@girdley·
We test-drove a Model Y FSD. It was the same as the last time -- the ride was so rough my kid got carsick. We noticed they had the tires inflated to 47 psi. It was the Premium AWD. Is this normal? (FWIW, passengers preferred the new Telluride and Outback comfort by a mile.)
English
259
8
139
139.4K
narendra 🎈 🏃🏻‍♂️
@BontaHill Honest question. Do you think you phrase posts like this because of the cultural impact of gambling and prediction markets? Entirely possible he gets hurt or has another slump etc.
English
0
0
0
333
Bonta Hill
Bonta Hill@BontaHill·
Devers is going to mess around, hit 30-35 home runs, and drive in 90+ runs despite a historically bad April. Kind of insane.
English
28
5
308
28.1K
narendra 🎈 🏃🏻‍♂️
@ryancarson You're looking for logic in all the wrong places. This is stage 2 product design consensus management -- the sub brand. Keep an eye out for "an OpenAI innovation" appended.
English
0
0
1
34
Ryan Carson
Ryan Carson@ryancarson·
Why on earth did OpenAI just destroy the massive amount of trust and goodwill that they built up with devs by deleting the Codex brand? I could potentially make sense of it it because they're trying to skate where the puck is headed: "all information work is going to be done from one home base". They obviously need that home base to be ChatGPT and it's a *logical* thing to do. The Codex team should have stood up and fought hard against this and said that dev goodwill is something that they can't negotiate on. The dropdown "ChatGPT Codex" vs "ChatGPT Work" says it all. So if we're writing code, we're not working?
English
113
5
265
44.4K