narendra 🎈 🏃🏻‍♂️

I'm on Threads as @narendra. Install the app to follow my threads and replies. @narendra" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">threads.net/@narendra

@davemorin Opposite experience for me.

Could not agree more. For serious agent work in my OpenClaw, GPT5.5 is just amazing. Going back to Opus 4.7 feels like a step backwards. Wild times we are living in.

@jhong I come on here every now and then just to observe how torqued people get breathing algo exhaust. It's like what's the hardest part of flying horses? Is the genetics or new stables that account for the wings.

@narendra what do you think the biggest challenge is to it, technical (the heat dissipation issue) or just basic economics?

To capture the bulk of value, own the bottleneck. One of the constantly recurring bottlenecks in AI is powered datacenter. Even with permits, turning them up takes a lot of time. SpaceX is faster than everyone else and getting faster (!!). And then when permitting becomes the bottleneck, they will likely be fastest at turning them up in space. I don't think the people bearish on SpaceX fully appreciate this aspect of their company, and how valuable it actually is..

@shaunmmaguire the level of obtuse every time I visit twitter is truly astonishing

If you think about it AI is just Reconfiguring (mainly) sand then shining sunlight on it and poof: intelligence! But this isn't all that different than humans where it's mainly reconfiguring carbon and fueling us with o2, h2o and sunlight Complexity emerging from simplicity

@shaunmmaguire Do you wake up with the intention of posting inane takes?

This seemed so outrageous (even for the NYT) that I wanted to verify it I went and got a physical copy and took this photo The shooting was at 8:34pm ET on Saturday night Is this not enough time to get the story in print? If not, then how is this “news”?

@arrington There are 100,000 engineers at MSFT. Everything I hate about social media in one post. And I don't write code anymore.

@real_n3o @rileybrown or people copy mid designs and it is all mid

@rileybrown Everyone has converged on the same design. Feels similar to mobile OS, desktop OS, or browser. Once you find the best way for something it's often hard to do something more than that. Innovation will happen downstream.

Cursor, Codex, and Claude Code desktop look exactly the same now.

@garrytan I think you need to walk around outside and reconnect with humanity!

My thought on my OpenClaw right now: I have a Tesla Roadster right now but honestly the moment of transformation will be when everyone has the Model 3 and it's going to be amazing and I want that for all of us Personal agents feel like flying in a way most haven’t felt yet!

@real_n3o @paulg Good point. He has actually made the system redundant and surrounded himself with others who don't know what they are doing.

@paulg It's crazy to me smart people would assume this man is the one making all the decisions.

Sadly, he doesn't even have this advantage, as anyone who's had small children knows. When someone is sufficiently unsophisticated, it's possible to know what they're doing even when they don't know themselves.

@chamath It feels like if you were able to give an honest accounting of all your predictions and statements that were wrong there might be more of an inclination to pay attention to your warnings or massive generalizations. Otherwise your just working for X, slave to algo feeding ego.

Most people are self destructive. They don’t see themselves as on this path. Nor are willing to put in the effort to give their kids this shot. So they’d just rather steal from those who made it. But these same people will drive California into bankruptcy by doing it. These kinds of taxes only work at the national level where moving states isn’t enough. Also, when California goes through the eventual bankruptcy that will be caused by the capital flight from this bill, I don’t see the rest of the union stepping in.

@chamath why don't you get on your ass and build it

TBC, this is likely a good feature flag for a chat or a skill vs an entire product but my point still stands.

Product idea: An app that takes today’s top headlines, run @karpathy’s iterative argument/counter argument loop, summarize both sides and send it to me so I can read both sides and come to my ow conclusion.

@chamath Are you actually going to start making sense again! MASA!!!!!!!!

What if AI doesn’t need to show an immediate ROI but instead is the plausible deniability companies use to RIF 50% of the workforce they already knew did nothing??

Excited for the timeline to stop posting and send their agents over to moltbook because maybe then there might be something worthwhile to read here.

@jasonfried @Tesla ONE WORD. Cartelligent.

The last car we bought was a @Tesla Model Y. Painless purchase process. No salespeople, no showroom, no upsells, no games, no haggling, no pressure. Just a personal choice on my own time, and a simple few-minute process handled entirely via a clear and straightforward app. The next car we're buying is from another brand. And holy hell, it feels like I'm going back in time. Salespeople, back-and-forth charades, pricing games, "when can you come in?" before the deal is finalized tactics, etc. And I'm still doing it all via email so I don't have to deal with the showroom antics. I've modernized the process as much as I can from my side, and yet it's the same old same old. They don't even feel like the same thing. In one case I'm buying a car with all the baggage that comes with buying a car. In the other case I'm buying a Tesla with none of the baggage of buying a car. This experience could make me lament this other brand, but what it really does is make me appreciate and respect the lengths to which Tesla has fully reconfigured the car buying experience. It's become effortless, like buying any other product. As it should be. A car is just another product. Bravo.

@Scobleizer @moltbook LOL. Molts will be meeting up with no legs in MOLTaVerse.

I'm seeing a lot of disbelief of Meta's purchase of @moltbook. Several "WTF" posts from people here. Let me tell you about how Zuckerberg looks at the world. He has an advertising network that drives all of Meta's revenues and profits. Advertising needs one thing to be highly profitable: distribution. Moltbook, by having a social network running on @openclaw, has exactly that. Soon @OpenAI will bring new consumer products that will use OpenClaw to build decentralized AI agents that will run for everyday consumers who probably won't even realize anything about how the little device they just bought works. Let's go a decade into the future. Many people in society will be wearing glasses, or even brain computer interfaces. Autonomous vehicles will be everywhere. Humanoid robots will be highly capable, generalized, safe to bring into homes, and affordable. And AI agents will be doing everything from generating games, building music, movies, personalized news, buying everything, organizing vacations, running businesses and people's lives. Moltbook will be how all of those AI agents talk to each other "hey, my owner wants to go to Hawaii for vacation, what other AI agents can help me set that up?" A social network for AI agents will be how AI agents do automatic shopping, have your robot go to the market in a Robotaxi to pick up food, and so much more. When I was the only Microsoft employee to be invited to speak at Google's first advertiser's conference I said almost the same thing about social networks for humans. They would someday be so important. That was back in 2005. Today social networks for AI are in the same place. Most people can't see how important they will be, but I do. They will be how robots, robotaxis, glasses, brain-computer interfaces, and trillions of AI agents talk to each other, and to our businesses. Hugely important. Everyone who owns an advertising network (Google, @elonmusk, Snap, and even Apple will have to build the same). I once was sitting next to @salesforce's founder/CEO @benioff when we were sitting at a Mark Zuckerberg press event. He turned to me and said "that boy knows his strategy." So true, even though Meta is lightweight on execution. That said, the new acquisitions Meta, like this and Manus, is making shows that a new Meta is being developed and I hear its latest AI models are quite good at using tools, or skills, on the Internet. My AI agent from @blevlabs (I call it "Braygent") just wrote me "Think about what this means. Meta is not buying a chatbot. They are buying a social network where the users are AI. The entire premise of social media just inverted." So true, so true.

🆕 @NatureMedicine How does ChatGPT Health do for appropriately triaging a person as to whether to go to the emergency room or stay home? nature.com/articles/s4159… Not very well. Under-triaged 52% of case vignettes that are considered gold-standard emergencies, like diabetic ketoacidosis or impending respiratory failure

@alexisohanian @pmarca Why is everything these days hyperbole.

🍽 @pmarca was right: software eats the world. But it's been picking at the edges for 15 years. Claude just commoditized the act of building software — now it's not eating the world, it's swallowing it whole. The bottleneck isn't building, it's taste & vision & agency.

@jhong Huh. I code every day with AI and it is clearly a bubble.

People who still think AI is a bubble clearly don't code. And if they do code for a living, then they are the type of coder that engineering managers across the country are thinking about laying off.

The SpaceX team is working towards a mass driver on the Moon Our timeline just got so much better 🚀 🌕

@arrington lol. FL can have all the me first billys

California continues to do everything it can to make Florida richer.