nataleste.eth 💋

@Clark10x this is me 😆 going to interact w this tweet bc i’m so sick of larping tweets all over my tl

I've spent about 3 weeks and over $2,000 in Claude tokens setting up multiple agents to trade on Polymarket It was paper trading for a week and averaged about $80 per day It's been live for 2 days & completely broken All of these other people gotta lying on the timeline 😂😂

@degennQuant @HyperliquidX can i get a code? :D

Introducing the first $SGD (Singapore Dollar) offramp on @HyperliquidX Receive it in your Singapore bank account or any other $SGD account within 5 minutes. Liquid banking.

@wataminoodles mines filled with AI and ‘how i turned xx to xx’ and it’s annoying bc i want more humans and real posts on my feed

Whole CT posting about pokemon cards is crazy. No one is posting anything about new products or projects anymore. Creators went from giving alpha to posting whatever is happening in their life now. Lifestyle content era.

so i’m pretty sure the team had the ability to launch at a higher FDV if they wanted to, and this was intentional to weed out users who were going to be dump. i agree with a lot of your points but also felt that the typical ‘marketing playbook’ launching at ‘healthy’ fdv isn’t exactly working anymore to put it superficially, u launch high, ure giving free money away and following the dying play book and having people dump the token. u launch low, only way is up by concentrating revenue towards $dime the impact of the product’s success is amplified. that is to say of course that it’s contingent on whether they are able to get real users - but otherwise because they launched at shit Fdv, they still have lots of dry powder left to incentivise users on the app how many users did we think were really going to sit around after a ‘healthy fdv?’ it’s in no way hopium but it does seem that strategically this ‘tge’ isn’t the ‘tge’ and they have shifted the honey pot finish line slightly further so that we don’t forget about the product that they are building, rather than a short term publicity success of ‘hey we launched at xxx FDV’ that’s gg wane off that being said can agree that comms shld be handled better

Honest thoughts on Paradex TGE It's a long post, but it's worth reading to the end So let's begin... the $DIME launch was fucking terrible. Probably one of the worst launches we’ve seen in a long time And I say this as someone who has supported @paradex for over a year. I traded there, provided liquidity and defended the project countless times So yeah, this one hurts The execution and communication surrounding the launch were honestly a disaster. When you have a highly engaged community like the one at Paradex, where many have dedicated time and money to contribute to the growth of the project, the minimum you can do is handle the TGE properly At the end of the day, we ended up with the main token at 10m MC and 40m FDV Even the worst memecoins have a higher value That’s a valuation I wouldn’t have expected even in the absolute worst-case scenario, especially considering the platform’s metrics and the team behind it. These are the same people who built @tradeparadigm, not some random anonymous team launching a shitcoin Which is why this whole situation feels so frustrating And of course now all the haters are celebrating. Every other perp dexs community (and not only) is having a great time dunking on Paradex, saying they were right all along, mocking the launch, mocking the token, mocking @fiddybps1 and the whole team But here’s the thing people don’t realize: A weak TGE for Paradex doesn’t just hurt Paradex. It hurts the entire perp dexs ecosystem; as well as all other competitors without a real advantage Because the message the market just received is very clear: - There are too many perp dexs rn - Most of them don’t have real PMF - The hype around this sector has cooled down massively If Paradex had launched strong (even something like 300m FDV) it would have shown that there’s still real demand for this narrative; Instead we got the opposite A weak launch, a collapsing token price, zero interest and a market that now thinks the whole sector might be overvalued You can already see the impact everywhere $LIT has just reached a new ATL, bets on Polymarket have fallen and overall sentiment has worsened Only $HYPE is holding steady, mainly due to the team's ability to generate strong and continuous buying pressure, currently turning the token deflationary But even here there are some doubts: when will there be clarification on the large allocation still dedicated to the community? After all, we all know that many people use HL only in the hope that there is a secret points campaign, which I believe makes the metrics still quite boosted, even though there is still a strong organic component We have also seen how HyperEVM is disappointing, with copy-paste projects offering little or no innovation and ridiculous airdrops So yeah… the situation is not great But now, back to the main topic: What will happen to Paradex? Can it still make it, or is it doomed to fail? I think yeah, but honestly... now it all depends on the team And before someone says I’m blindly defending the project because I have their badge, let me be clear: I’ve criticized several decisions from the team over the past months (those who are on dc know that), and I still stand by those criticisms First, there were too many avoidable technical issues, the most obvious one being the chain rollback. The real issue here isn’t even the centralization aspect (let’s be honest, no perp dexs today is truly decentralized anyway) but incidents like that inevitably create unnecessary FUD and erode trust in the team, especially in a market that is already skeptical Then there’s the S2 extension, which in hindsight probably should have been avoided. It would have made much more sense to move forward with the TGE last year, particularly considering that several of the features and improvements that were supposed to justify the extension were never actually delivered during that period As a consequence, early S2 users were effectively diluted, since the XP:DIME ratio ended up dropping significantly. Many of the people who supported the platform early ended up receiving less relative value than they expected, which understandably created frustration Communication with the community is another area where things could have been handled much better. I genuinely don’t understand why so many teams underestimate this, because communication is fundamental for any project. Your community needs to understand what you’re building, where the project is going, and why certain decisions are being made. Without that transparency, confidence starts to fade very quickly, and especially in crypto, a project without a community simply doesn’t survive The WL campaign is another example where the execution didn’t really achieve the intended results. It was supposed to expand the platform’s reach and bring in new users, but in practice the impact was far more limited than expected There’s also the whole NFT side of the ecosystem (MoneyBadgers, ShizoPunks, Dave Fighter) which was initially presented as something that would play a meaningful role within the platform. In reality, they never received the level of value or integration that many holders expected, which inevitably generated criticism over time. Maybe that changes in the future, but for now it’s hard to argue that the NFT strategy delivered what people were hoping for And finally, there’s the marketing side, where the team clearly should have done MUCH better Now personally I’m not a huge fan of the typical crypto marketing playbook anyway. Throwing money at influencers rarely solves anything; half of them are low-quality (or even just bot) and the other half will shill anything for a paycheck Then, I don't know about you, but when I see a product being heavily advertised, I try to avoid it at all costs, so in reality you get the opposite effect of what you hoped for In fact, I respect the HL approach much more: spend zero on marketing and focus all your resources on building the best possible product Because at the end of the day, even though marketing can help, the product itself is still the strongest form of marketing you can have. If a platform genuinely offers something better than the competition, users/traders will talk about it naturally, word spreads, liquidity follows, and the ecosystem grows organically And these are just some of the criticisms that come to mind... but so what can the team do to get back on track? Precisely on the last point mentioned. I believe Paradex can make it because, objectively, the product is (still) great Despite declining metrics and liquidity, the core product is still strong. Execution costs are competitive, the infrastructure is solid, and the team understands the the markets at a deeper level than most projects in this space (despite some mistakes, this is undeniably true) The real problem atm, however, is not the exchange, but the token Because you can have a great platform, but if your token is worthless, it's very difficult to attract users and liquidity, especially in a highly competitive environment such as perp dexs Rn $DIME simply has no utility, and indeed, as we have seen, buying pressure is pratically zero If you take a step back and look at it objectively, there is no valid reason to buy or hold it today, unless you believe it's undervalued and have confidence in the team that will ultimately implement the promised utilities About that, if we check out the "DIME Genesis" post from the Foundation, they've outlined a few ways they plan to create value for the token: buybacks funded by platform revenue (today they've created DAF: DIME Assistance Fund, where they'll do periodic buybacks), staking mechanisms that unlock ecosystem features, and an interesting unlocking structure tied to platform growth and performance (which leads the team to push even harder to improve the product and bring greater value to its token) That said, it's impossible to ignore that Paradex is now at a critical juncture. The next few weeks will be decisive for the future of the platform. As someone who has supported the project from a long time, I want and hope more than ever to see the team succeed But that's is all I can say at this point: Let's see what the team's next moves will be and whether they will prove that the market was wrong to value $DIME at such a low price

@paradex is now …. dime

my AI says everything on X is AI

Today, you really cannot focus on climbing the corporate ladder, relying on a monthly salary, or even building a traditional cash-flow business. These are all dangerous. You need to be invested, deeply invested, in the assets that have the most to gain from a rapidly changing world and environment. It is unlikely that you will be able to outpace the current winners when it comes to AI, robotics. Simultaneously, we are navigating a massive restructuring of the geopolitical order. The era of easy globalization is ending. Central banks are trapped in a cycle where they must devalue currency to service debt. In this environment, holding cash or relying on fixed income is a guaranteed way to lose purchasing power. The financial currents are moving too fast. If you are not invested you are immediately behind. The only true hedge against this dual tsunami of AI deflation and monetary inflation is ownership. We are moving into an era where the divide will not be between the "rich and poor," but between those who own the infrastructure of the future and those who are just users of it. The vast majority of future wealth will accrue to the assets that benefit from these shifts: Do not labor to compete with the machine, own the machine. Put every last dollar in the machine. Or be left behind.

The logo finally makes sense now

@PioGerard @MoneyBadgersX yes pucker her lips

@natalestee @MoneyBadgersX nat vibe?

gdime i got an artsy chick @MoneyBadgersX

@ellisliu9 @MoneyBadgersX she slaying w her lipstick

@natalestee @MoneyBadgersX shes so cute

@LordYapper its true!!! chatgpt has been a saver

@natalestee every guide hides bugs chatgpt sniffs em out

d1- d3 of clawdbot journey: there are so many tweets out there talking about how easy it is to set up, make money etc. no one talks about the friction - here's an open reflection. 1) setting up - plenty of amazing guides out there, but so many errors. used chatgpt to guide me

still this is all very cool tech 😀 and im still new to all of this! very excited to continue updating my journey and if you are on it too, id like to follow your journey

5) The reality is that its going to take time before your bot makes money - it has to learn and you have to spend a lot of time teaching it. here's what my bot said after i shared several automated trading success tweets with it.

It’s almost time, have you cracked the code?