n² 🌞

@ChileHeloPilot Elliot Page as Michelle Obama 😭😭😭

@SorehaNick Then stop playing bud or find some people to play with. I’ve literally had no issues with it, if you love infantry so much either play the small maps or just stick to cod, it’s okay if battlefield isn’t for you, don’t need to get all whiny about it

Played Season 4 yesterday - medkit still bugged - audio still bugged - black screen is still here - TTK still buns - map is a map - teammates still clueless - snipers still have no flinch - gunplay still buns - movement is virtually the same (some tech got removed, new parachute distance is interesting) - performance is WORST - Battlefield 6: still mid We all already gave suggestions to how to make the game better, whether they listen, time will tell.

@NomadicM26 @JasonLaboyPhoto @LumpyTheCook Going to get it either way, why not get a couple extra items for it if I can?

“We’ve lost 97% of our players in four months! How are we supposed to get them back?!” “Well… there is ONE plan… it’s a long shot- but hell, it might just be crazy enough to work.”

Man I miss prime James Karinchak, that mf was crazy 😭😭

@LosTalksPats @Patriots To say people who don’t agree with LGBTQ propaganda are not educated is inaccurate and offensive.

Don’t care. Best country in the world

Also pointless because samurai would get their shit kicked in

@971BFS 🔥🔥🔥

#HeyGuys, are these 🔥 or 🔥🔥🔥?

@TheTrojanBlade I kid I kid, happy for yah’ll, Lemon went crazy this year

6!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Be great, QB1.

Sit down buddy

@FoolyCOD @CallofDuty @Treyarch I’m happy for yah’ll but I fear it’s too little too late, broken trust, everyone knows the only reason why they did it, imo not enough to drive sales back up and save their asses against bf6. To me cod has just become another movement shooter that I guess I’m just too old for lol

Astronomical W for the community. Well done @CallofDuty @Treyarch Horrible day for the “sToP RaGE bAiTiNg” crowd. You guys do NOT deserve this. Either way, I’m glad everyone will benefit from the persistent critical feedback👍

I knew Brayan Rocchio’s walk off home run looked awfully familiar yesterday. Here’s Rocchio’s home run and Francisco Lindor’s home run at the same time. Rocchio with nearly an identical swing and result. @rocchio05 x #GuardsBall

Whether Shrek unjustly broke up a valid sacramental marriage between Fiona and Lord Farquaad? Objection 1: It would seem that Shrek did unjustly break up a valid Catholic marriage. For the Our Lord says, “What God has joined together, let no man separate” (Matt. 19:6). But Fiona was given in marriage to Lord Farquaad, and Shrek impeded their union. Therefore, Shrek acted against divine law. Objection 2: Further, matrimony is a sacrament of the Church, signifying the union of Christ and the Church. To interrupt such a union is to commit a grave offense. But Shrek, by interfering with Fiona’s wedding, did precisely this. Therefore, his actions are to be condemned. Objection 3: Moreover, Lord Farquaad, though morally dubious, was a lawful ruler and had entered a legitimate courtship. Shrek, being an ogre and dwelling apart from civil society, had no jurisdiction in the matter. Therefore, he acted outside his proper order. SED CONTRA, It is written (Genesis 2:24), “A man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife.” But a forced marriage does not reflect this mutual joining of wills. Lord Farquaad sought Fiona not out of love but for power. Thus, no true matrimonial consent existed. I answer that, a valid sacramental marriage requires free and mutual consent between the parties, directed toward the good of the spouses and the procreation and education of offspring. Lord Farquaad, motivated by vainglory and dominion, did not intend these goods, but rather sought Fiona for her royal status. Moreover, Fiona’s consent was impeded by external coercion and the concealment of her true self. Shrek, in recognizing Fiona’s dignity and loving her in her true nature, acted in accord with natural and divine law, which places authentic love and free consent above the mere externalities of ceremony. His intervention, though disorderly in manner, upheld the higher order of truth and love. Therefore, Fiona’s marriage to Farquaad was not sacramentally valid, lacking true consent and proper disposition. Shrek, in liberating her, did not dissolve a valid marriage, but prevented the appearance of one. In this, his ogrely zeal was, by grace, rightly ordered. Reply to Objection 1: The bond which God joins is made through true consent. But here, consent was lacking due to deceit and force. Therefore, the bond was not of God. Reply to Objection 2: The sacrament is not valid where the proper matter and form are deficient. A political union devoid of charity is not a sacrament, but a parody thereof. Reply to Objection 3: Though Shrek lacked civil status, natural law is prior to civil law. Love, being of God, justifies even an ogre when he defends the truth.

No scandals. No attitude issues. No violence except for that one time when it was awesome. Just wholesome taters and web gems.

Priorities unchanged. Another major secured. The wins keep coming on and off the course for Scottie Scheffler

"i asked chatgpt" "i asked grok" well i asked Ryan Day and he said I'd like to know where Lou Holtz is right now