NEVERMORE MEDIA

"In 1908, John D. Rockefeller wasn't just drowning in oil wealth—he was drowning in antitrust lawsuits, public outrage, and mountains of toxic byproducts from his refineries." "He paid his attention to medicine, not because cures weren't working, but because cures aren't profitable." "Now in 2025, we're watching infertility skyrocket, hormone disorders explode, and endocrine systems collapse under chemicals that we never voted on."

Now a guy who made plastic into gasoline was threatened and is in hiding. Where have we heard this before? The 20th century showed us there has been a glass ceiling on humanity’s progress and powerful interests who will apparently do anything to hold us all captive under it.

Nothing about this dystopia feels natural. We all sense it deep in our marrow. We all know something has gone terribly wrong. If you lived in an alternate reality without wars or poverty, where everyone had enough and governments did what’s in the interests of the people and the ecosystem, it would never occur to you that there was anything odd about this. It would feel completely normal. Things would be more or less how you’d expect them to be. You can’t say the same about the present status quo. The whole thing instinctively scans as weird and counterintuitive. The more you learn about the way the world works, the more insane it all looks to you. Have you ever had to explain war to a young child? It’s terrible. If you’re actually honest with them about what war is and why it is waged, it completely shatters their understanding of the world. They look at you like they’ve suddenly been transported into a strange alien universe where everything is backward. Their reaction is correct. That is the sane and normal way to look at war. All the freakish mental contortions we do to try and normalize it is what’s crazy. Everything about this dystopia is like this. If you could see it all with fresh eyes, you would scream in horror. The only reason anyone finds any of this tolerable is because we have become desensitized and accustomed to the madness. Seeing somebody sleeping on the sidewalk should feel like a punch in the stomach. Seeing children killed by bombs on your social media feed should stop your whole world. The fact that there are plutocrats profiting from war and militarism. The fact that billionaire corporations are integrating surveillance technology into every facet of our society. The fact that we’re destroying our biosphere and driving families into poverty to maximize shareholder value. The fact that oligarchy has turned democracy into a sham where our votes don’t make any real difference. The fact that there are people in the global south who are living like slaves so that those of us in the imperial core can have cheap bread and circuses to keep us docile and distracted. We all know deep down inside that these are intolerable abuses, but they’ve been so normalized and compartmentalized in our psychology that it all just fades into this kind of eerie dissonance in the background of our attention. The more conscious you become of what’s going on in the world, the more that dissonance moves into the foreground, and the less tolerable this dystopia becomes for you. As Terence McKenna said, “The cost of sanity in this society is a certain level of alienation.” And that’s a good thing. Injustice and abuse should not feel tolerable. We should allow our discomfort with this intolerable situation to drive us to action and resistance. And as uncomfortable as it can feel to stare into the unmasked face of the empire in all its beastly fury, this clarity also brings with it a degree of relief, because when it comes online you finally understand why nothing has ever felt right about this civilization you were born into. You understand that your intuitive discomfort and revulsion you felt as a child at the madness you were being indoctrinated into accepting was one hundred percent accurate, and that everyone who taught you to accept the unacceptable was wrong. Trust that childhood intuition. You’ve always had the truth inside you. Let it guide you as you read and inform yourself to help your mind catch up with what you already know in your heart. Let your heart inform your mind, let your mind inform your actions, and let your actions help awaken humanity to the truth we’ve been hiding from ourselves all these years.

The idea vaccines cause autism was invented by Andrew Wakefield in 1998 and was so thoroughly debunked he lost his license for gross malpractice And here we are 27 years later RFK Jr and his fans dredging up the same nonsense Such a tiresome waste of time

A new study is being touted as showing no relationship between fluoridated water and IQ. But here's what you should know. The study focuses on a population in Wisconsin that was born in 1940 -- which is five years before any communities in the U.S. began fluoridating their water. This is an important limitation because the key window of vulnerability for fluoride's cognitive effects is the early years of life (in utero and infancy) when the brain is undergoing rapid development and the blood brain barrier does not yet adequately protect the baby from toxic chemicals. Curiously, the authors *claim* they measured the effect of fluoridation "from birth." This is where it gets interesting. The authors admit they have no data on water fluoride levels from the 1940s. None. That's a pretty serious limitation by itself. But it gets worse. To get around this data gap, the authors relied on a 2020 publication that provides test results for about 2 wells per county in Wisconsin. To use this data, the authors needed to make several big assumptions. This is where it gets bad, real bad. The authors assumed that if ONE well in a county had "optimal" fluoride levels (0.7 mg/L) then EVERY CHILD in that county was exposed to fluoridated water. This assumption, which is critical to the study, has basically no connection to reality. Why? Because the level of fluoride in a single well tells you virtually nothing about the level of fluoride in other wells, let alone in *all* other wells, let alone in *public water supplies* (which are often derived from surface waters, not well water). Why does this matter? Because the study's use of a clearly erroneous measurement of early life exposure to fluoridated water made it virtually impossible for this study to detect an association between early-life fluoride exposure and IQ. It's like trying to determine if prenatal exposure to Tylenol is associated with autism by determining the Tylenol use of the child's neighbor rather than the child's mother.