Xack4r

@CodeWithAmann Go is my lover

Which backend stack has the strongest future?

@stylesshDev built diffkit - a beautiful, design-first GitHub dashboard that makes PRs and code reviews actually enjoyable. Loved it so much I ported it to a native Electron app. Huge respect for the project and the quality of the codebase. Deserves way more stars than it has.

@devXritesh OK 200, {"error": "...."}

As a developer, User opens profile page… but profile doesn’t exist. What status code will you return? 200? 404? What’s the correct choice?

@PremChauraisya Go, C#, python

In which programming language you can code without AI?

@Samaytwt Grok, it generates perfect, what other labs "safety filters" don't allow

Be honest As a developer which one is the most underrated ai model here?

@aiedge_ I... I... I am.. I am sure you... You ...you know......

Anthropic CEO (Dario Amodei): "Coding is going away first, then all of software engineering." What do you think about this?

Developers, where do you host your application?

@ArtificialAnlys i keep use opus btw

GPT-5.5 takes OpenAI back to the clear number one in AI. OpenAI’s new model tops the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by 3 points, breaking a three-way tie with Anthropic and Google OpenAI gave us pre-release access to test all five reasoning effort levels: xhigh, high, medium, low and non-reasoning. ➤ OpenAI topping five headline evaluations: GPT-5.5 (xhigh) leads Terminal-Bench Hard, GDPval-AA and our newly hosted APEX-Agents-AA. The model trails only other OpenAI models in CritPt and AA-LCR, and comes second to Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview on three additional evaluations. The largest gains are on AA-Omniscience (+14 pts), our knowledge and hallucination benchmark, and τ²-Bench Telecom (+7 pts), a customer service agent benchmark. ➤ 20% more expensive to run our Intelligence Index: Per-token pricing has doubled from GPT-5.4 to $5/$30 per 1M input/output tokens. However, a ~40% token use reduction largely absorbs the hike - resulting in a net ~+20% cost to run our Intelligence Index. ➤ Effort a clear ladder for balancing intelligence and cost: GPT-5.5 (medium) scores the same as Claude Opus 4.7 (max) on our Intelligence Index at one quarter of the cost (~$1,200 vs $4,800) - although Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores the same at a cost of ~$900. GPT-5.5 (low) approximates Claude Opus 4.7 (Non-reasoning, high) on our Intelligence Index at half the cost to run (~$500 vs ~$1 ,000). ➤ Number one in GDPval-AA with an Elo of 1785: GPT-5.5 (xhigh) leads Claude Opus 4.7 (max) by ~30 pts and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by ~470 pts. GDPval-AA is Artificial Analysis’ benchmark that leverages OpenAI’s GDPval dataset to evaluate models on real-world economically valuable tasks. ➤ Top AA-Omniscience accuracy, but trailing the frontier on hallucination: Our private AA-Omniscience benchmark rewards factual knowledge across diverse topics, but punishes hallucination. GPT-5.5 (xhigh) has the highest accuracy at 57% - meaning the model can recall facts in the Omniscience corpus more effectively than any other model. However, it has a hallucination rate of 86% - vs Opus 4.7 (max) at 36%, and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview at 50%. This makes it more likely to answer a question when it does not ‘know’ the answer. The 14 pt gain in AA-Omniscience from GPT-5.4 (xhigh) was largely driven by knowledge, with a modest improvement in hallucination. Congratulations to the team at @OpenAI and @sama on the launch

@theo Still sucks in ui?

$5 per mil in, $30 per mil out. GPT-5.5 is smart. I've been using it for a bit. It's also weird, hard to wrangle, and too expensive IMO. Double the price of GPT-5.4. 20% more expensive than Opus 4.7.

@theo Exactly when I went to the gym...

My new cryptography puzzle is now live. Will pay $1,000 to the first person who DMs me the plaintext decryption of the first line. 2nd line is a hint. If you send me slop, AI hallucinations, or a decryption of the 2nd line, you are disqualified. x.com/theo/status/20…

@bridgemindai @matthewmillerai idk, for me Opus 4.7 sucks in Frontend part. Not yet tested for backend, but keep using 4.5/4.6

Claude Opus 4.7 is so good I just bought two Max subscriptions. After vibe coding for over 12 hours yesterday I can confirm this is the best model in the world. It burns tokens fast. But the coding output is unmatched. Two $200/month Max plans so I never hit a rate limit again.

@KohRudolph31382 Typical beginning of porn

@charlieholtz When windows beta?

Introducing our new, simplified sidebar! You can now see GitHub status at a glance (merged, failing CI, conflicts) Hover any workspace to see metadata and get easy access to next actions without leaving your chat:

@peaklabs_dev Time to vibecode the own one

And the circle is complete. MinIO is now archived. 1️⃣ MinIO deprecated the UI. 2️⃣ They stopped providing images and pre-built binaries, going source code only. 3️⃣ The documentation “disappeared”, available only to enterprise users. 4️⃣ MinIO started to only receive security updates and bug fixes - no new features. 5️⃣ MinIO gets archived and the CE version is no longer maintained.

@burakeregar I had also used Lovable in this way.

🏴‍☠️this is how your vibecoded app gets hacked... let's hack a website together i'll show you why "trusting client" fallacy can cost you 1000s of dollars thread to learn how to avoid this:

@karthikponna19 Fiber

as developer, which one do you prefer for backend ?

She's 18 but anyone that wants to see her naked should be on the registry.

It's the slap for me😂🤣

@catshouldnt Cat is ready to pair