nickf0ng

15.6K posts

nickf0ng banner
nickf0ng

nickf0ng

@nickfong

nostalgia as anesthetic

Katılım Mart 2007
1.9K Takip Edilen130 Takipçiler
nickf0ng
nickf0ng@nickfong·
@_aur0x @TomVergz SWHA is a liability in pushing hard mode at sub 30% deficit. Her burst takes too long to fire
English
0
0
0
24
aur0x
aur0x@_aur0x·
@TomVergz Still wild Pryd didn’t give SWHA triple S for story.
English
2
0
3
2.5K
Vergz
Vergz@TomVergz·
Neon, our first triple quadruple Nikke #NIKKE
Vergz tweet media
English
30
73
2.2K
41.1K
nickf0ng retweetledi
Yasir Ai
Yasir Ai@AiwithYasir·
🚨BREAKING: Two researchers from UPenn and Boston University just published a paper that should be uncomfortable reading for every CEO automating their workforce right now. The argument is straightforward. Every company replacing workers with AI is also eliminating its own future customers. Laid off workers stop spending. Enough of them stop spending and nobody can afford to buy anything. The companies that fired everyone end up selling into an economy with no purchasing power left. Every executive can see this. The math is not complicated. But here is why nobody stops. If you do not automate, your competitor does. They cut costs, lower prices, take your market share, and you collapse anyway. So every company automates knowing it is collectively destructive because the alternative is dying alone while everyone else survives. The researchers proved this is a Prisoner's Dilemma playing out in real time. The numbers are already moving. Block cut nearly half its 10,000 employees this year. Jack Dorsey said AI made those roles unnecessary and that within the next year the majority of companies will reach the same conclusion. Salesforce replaced 4,000 customer support agents with AI. Goldman Sachs deployed a coding tool that lets one engineer do the work of five. Over 100,000 tech workers were laid off in 2025 and AI was cited as the primary driver in more than half those cases. 80% of US workers hold jobs with tasks susceptible to AI automation. The researchers tested every proposed solution. Universal basic income does not change a single company's incentive to automate. Capital income taxes adjust profit levels but not the per-task decision to replace a human. Collective bargaining cannot hold because automating is always the dominant strategy. They also identified what they call a Red Queen effect. Better AI does not solve the problem, it accelerates it. Every company chases faster automation to gain market share over rivals but at the end everyone has automated equally, the gains cancel out, and the only thing left is more destroyed demand. The one thing the math says could work is a Pigouvian automation tax. A per-task charge that forces companies to account for the demand they destroy each time they replace a worker. The conclusion is that this is not a transfer of wealth from workers to owners. Both sides lose. Workers lose income. Companies lose customers. It is a deadweight loss with no market mechanism to stop it on its own. (Link in the comment)
Yasir Ai tweet media
English
638
4.3K
12.4K
3.3M
nickf0ng retweetledi
𐌁𐌉Ᏽ 𐌕𐌉𐌌𐌉
I hate when people at work ask you what books you are reading for professional development. I am reading books to counteract the effects of being professionally developed. I am reading books that bring me back to being human.
English
152
6.9K
57.8K
722.4K
nickf0ng
nickf0ng@nickfong·
@gekkeikan_NIKKE How does your Mihara do so much damage? Mine has similar ele to Rapi but generally Rapi does more damage in Indivilia
English
1
0
1
31
月桂冠
月桂冠@gekkeikan_NIKKE·
インディビリア交戦時間更新2分48秒 早なったねぇ😚
月桂冠 tweet media月桂冠 tweet media
日本語
1
0
46
1.7K
nickf0ng retweetledi
DAIMATSU(NIKKEアリーナ)
DAIMATSU(NIKKEアリーナ)@DAIMATSU120·
@nickfong and it's naturally more effective than other cubes against non-advantageous enemies. On the other hand, it's a bit questionable up to level 4. You'd be better off using a damage reduction cube or other cubes.
English
1
0
0
90
DAIMATSU(NIKKEアリーナ)
DAIMATSU(NIKKEアリーナ)@DAIMATSU120·
うぉー! ベスティ強化🥳🥳🥳 ベスティ強化🥳🥳🥳 遂に防御無視キューブレベル7です。 皆さん、レベル7にすると防御力無視ダメージが14.14%まで上がりますよ☺️☺️ ユニオンメンバーの皆さんに感謝🙏🙏
DAIMATSU(NIKKEアリーナ) tweet mediaDAIMATSU(NIKKEアリーナ) tweet mediaDAIMATSU(NIKKEアリーナ) tweet media
日本語
5
0
30
2.1K
nickf0ng retweetledi
Evan
Evan@EvanWritesOnX·
I am surprised how my tweet below entered the political spheres of Australians. It means that many Australians actually care about their country. But if you want to do something about it, the first thing to understand is that the answer is not the other party. The two parties run the visible layer. The operators underneath is the same regardless of who is in office. Same mining multinationals. Same four banks. Same supermarket duopoly. Same media owners. Same property speculation engine. Same gas exporters paying almost no resource rent. The faces rotate. The arrangement does not. So voting harder for Labor when the Liberals disappoint you, or harder for the Liberals when Labor disappoints you, is not resistance. It is the trap. It is the pressure-release valve doing exactly what it was built to do. The way to move the operators in Australia, is how you move any operator in any country. Stop voting tribally. Strengthen the cross bench. Vote for community independents and minor parties willing to put structural questions on the table that the majors have agreed never to discuss. A senate full of crossbenchers extracting concessions is worth more than another majority for either side. Learn who owns what. Find out who owns your bank, your supermarket, your toll road, your energy retailer, your superannuation, your media. Most Australians have no idea how much of the country routes back to a small handful of foreign asset managers and resource multinationals. Once you see it, the arguments between the parties stop looking like a contest and start looking like theatre. Build parallel structures. Move your money to a credit union or mutual bank. Buy from local cooperatives where you can. Read independent media. Put solar and battery on your own roof so you stop buying back your own gas at a markup from the people who exported it. Demand specific reforms, not vague good intentions. Ask every candidate, federal and state, whether they will support a real Petroleum Resource Rent Tax. Whether they will support a Norway-style sovereign wealth fund built on actual resource royalties. Whether they will support ending negative gearing and the capital gains discount. Whether they will support breaking up the media monopolies. Whether they will support foreign investment screening with teeth. Whether they will support rebuilding domestic refining capacity and downstream processing of the minerals that's shipped out raw. Vote on the answers. Politicians respond to specificity. They absorb and neutralise vagueness. Tell the truth in your daily conversations. The deepest defense of the system is the conditioning that tells Australians their own sovereignty over their own resources, their own currency, their own land and their own future is the unrealistic option. Norway did it. South Korea did it. Singapore did it. Australia chose, repeatedly, through both parties, not to. That is a choice. Choices can be made differently. Saying so out loud, in private and in public, in conversations with family and friends and colleagues, slowly breaks the spell. Australia is managed. That is the bad news and that is also the good news. Anything that can be managed can be unmanaged. But not by waiting for the next election to deliver a saviour from inside the same recruiting pipeline that produced the current arrangement. The change starts when enough citizens stop voting for the marketing departments and start asking who actually owns the building.
Evan@EvanWritesOnX

Australia was not established as a nation-building project. It was established as an extraction platform. The British did not colonize Australia to build a civilization. They colonized it to extract l; first convict labor, then wool, then gold, then minerals, then gas. The political architecture was built around that extraction logic from day one, and it has never been restructured away from it. You assume the state exists to serve the population, and therefore bad outcomes must mean the state is being run poorly. Australia is not a sovereign state that happens to have a mining sector. It is a private sector extraction platform that happens to have citizens. Every Australian who “owns” a home is servicing a debt instrument that enriches the FIC. The minerals get dug up by foreign-owned multinationals. The profits get distributed to global shareholders. The taxation office is structured; by design, through decades of lobbying, to ensure the extraction proceeds leave the country with minimal sovereign capture. The politicians are doing exactly what the structure requires of them: absorbing public anger, rotating every few years to reset the pressure valve. Australia is not mismanaged. Australia is managed perfectly, just not for Australians.

English
111
795
2.2K
108.1K
nickf0ng retweetledi
Sunil Godhania
Sunil Godhania@SunGod87·
Love turn based combat.
Sunil Godhania tweet mediaSunil Godhania tweet mediaSunil Godhania tweet mediaSunil Godhania tweet media
English
73
6.4K
32.1K
970.7K
nickf0ng retweetledi
staxxx🦅
staxxx🦅@papiwontmiss·
I got a dog named Koozie and my neighbor Darell is obsessed with him. He sends me texts when he is drunk😭😭
staxxx🦅 tweet media
English
221
11.6K
225.4K
3.1M
alz
alz@alz_zyd_·
Iykyk
alz tweet media
Suomi
6
1
13
2.5K
nickf0ng
nickf0ng@nickfong·
@learning_yohei Canberra is the capital of Australia. The dynamic of the largest cities in Australia vs Canberra is like if there was only Kyoto and Osaka and they decided to create a Tokyo in-between both cities 😅 (this is just my opinion)
English
0
0
0
157
Yohei from Japan🇯🇵
Yohei from Japan🇯🇵@learning_yohei·
世界の文化に興味を持つ日本人です🇯🇵😄 オーストラリア人に質問があります🇦🇺🙋‍♀️ オーストラリアの首都ってシドニーですよね?🤔 多くの日本人はシドニーって言ってます🇯🇵🤝🇦🇺
Yohei from Japan🇯🇵 tweet media
日本語
769
20
814
78K
nickf0ng retweetledi
Andy Ryan
Andy Ryan@ItsAndyRyan·
Publisher: So you've given us a book about a big friendly giant, one about an enormous crocodile, and another where a granny grows as big as a house. What's new? Roald Dahl: There's this peach... Publisher: Is it - Roald Dahl: It's fucking huge
English
43
2.8K
45.2K
855.5K
nickf0ng retweetledi
こけし
こけし@kokesi_nojob·
✨✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨ ✨✨✨シャイニングチンポ✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨
@astralbaes

nature is so beautiful ✨

日本語
979
34.7K
320K
15.3M
nickf0ng
nickf0ng@nickfong·
@AusNurseYamata Sorry to hear this happened! Australia is expensive even though we earn a wage here. Hope this doesn’t affect your friendship.
English
1
0
5
11.6K
ヤマタ/メルボルンおじさん
日本からメルボルンに遊びに来た友達をおしゃカフェに案内した 楽しくランチした後の会計で友達が一切財布を出さずに「オーストラリアって給料めちゃくちゃ高いんやろ?永住権もあるし完全に勝ち組やん!ここは奢りなw」って え、、?
日本語
79
24
2K
951.2K
nickf0ng retweetledi
k r i s t i a n
k r i s t i a n@esteifri·
Un tipo grabó miles de conciertos, los digitalizó y los subió a archive.org para que cualquiera pueda escucharlos. Para esto se inventó internet, para compartir y no para hacer videos abriendo paquetes de Temu, pelotudxs de mierda. archive.org/details/aadamj…
Block Club Chicago@BlockClubCHI

From early Nirvana to Phish, a Chicago fan’s secret recordings of 10,000 shows are now online. blockclubchi.co/4t6zW7R

Español
125
8.5K
42.5K
1.4M