Nikh

44 posts

Nikh banner
Nikh

Nikh

@niknotlikeus

Earth Katılım Aralık 2010
254 Takip Edilen13 Takipçiler
outlier
outlier@Shushmitaaa·
we made it to OpenAI. I am sooo happyyyyyyyyyy yayyyyyy😭🧿
outlier tweet media
English
44
1
272
31.2K
Nikh
Nikh@niknotlikeus·
@DaveShapi Dave, you aren't keeping up with the most interesting stuff. Codex 5.4 is much better than Opus on coding. Claude is better at proper conversations.
English
0
0
0
29
David Shapiro (L/0)
David Shapiro (L/0)@DaveShapi·
So this is interesting. Not only did I delete my OpenAI account, I've blocked some of the top OpenAI accounts on here and so I rarely get news directly about OpenAI. And I don't feel like I'm missing out on anything. Shows that OpenAI is increasingly becoming irrelevant. Certainly, not like it used to be. If you wanted to be "in the know" about AI, you had to follow OpenAI very closely. But now they aren't even doing the most interesting stuff.
English
67
13
280
37.6K
N Chandrababu Naidu
N Chandrababu Naidu@ncbn·
Municipal Administration Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh signs an MoU with Puch AI. This partnership aims to deploy AI solutions designed to enhance the productivity of urban SHG women operating in the retail sector. @siddharthb_ and @puch_ai
N Chandrababu Naidu tweet media
English
34
241
1.8K
242K
INVEST UP
INVEST UP@_InvestUP·
As per standard protocols laid by State Government, the MoU signed with Puch AI on 23 Mar 2026 was reviewed. Necessary details as per SOP were sought from the investor, but they failed to provide them timely. Due diligence showed lack of net worth and credible financial linkages for the project's scale. On directions of the State Government, the MoU is cancelled effective today. No rights or obligations remain. The MoU has been cancelled in the interest of transparency and highest level of probity in governance, which are in the core of Government of Uttar Pradesh. #UttarPradesh #InvestUP #Governance #Transparency #EaseOfDoingBusiness #PolicyDriven #Accountability #GoodGovernance #InvestorConfidence #MakeInIndia @UPGovt
English
407
397
2.6K
706.7K
Nikh
Nikh@niknotlikeus·
@puch_ai @rohini_sgh @thewire_in @puch_ai I think your real revenue won't even be 50 lakhs given no one spends anything on a WhatsApp wrapper. Send the actual figures, the concerns are real. Why should public money be given to a company that can't prove real technical innovation? You are a wrapper.
English
0
0
0
11
Puch AI
Puch AI@puch_ai·
@rohini_sgh Expect better research standards from @thewire_in. x.com/i/status/20362…
Puch AI@puch_ai

Nice political attempt. However, the video is completely baseless and built on outdated or fake information taken from random comments and unreliable sources. The revenue shown in your video belongs to a different company, Pucho.ai, not us. The valuation figures are outdated, and all other claims, including that we are merely a wrapper on top of Gemma, are false. These are not facts, just uninformed opinions from people like you. Hope you get to experience better AI soon.

English
3
4
23
3.5K
Nikh
Nikh@niknotlikeus·
@scaling01 This is very fair. Beating this would constitute proper improvements. It won't effect the models real world usage, this test would be more useful to forecast AGI/ASI. Why are you so upset about it?
English
0
0
4
616
Lisan al Gaib
Lisan al Gaib@scaling01·
> be me > build "AGI" benchmark > actually version 3 already > we don't talk about 1 and 2 > (they saturated in a year) > invent new scoring method > if human scores above AI, use squared efficiency > example: human took 10 steps to solve level > AI took 100 steps to solve a level > then AI's score is (10/100) > correction, add square penalty to be extra cheeky > (10/100)^2 > AI scores plummet > smug_face.jpg > observe that AI is scoring higher than human on some levels > "damn" > "CLAMP THE SCORES!!!" > new metric now takes minimum of 1 and AI's score > AI literally NOT ALLOWED to score higher than human > meanwhile human get squared rewards > doubly_smug_face.jpg > AI thinks at 200 tokens/s > human thinks at 5 tokens/s > cries about it > "UNFAIR ADVANTAGE" > add restriction that models can't use more than 5X the steps that a human used > DeepThink, Pro and xhigh models exist that think longer to score better > excluded them > DECLARE AI HIT A WALL
Lisan al Gaib@scaling01

The Scoring of ARC-AGI-3 doesn't tell you how many levels the models completed but how efficiently they completed compared to humans actually squared efficiency, whatever that means meaning if a human took 10 steps to solve it and the model 100 steps then the model gets a score of 1% ((10/100)^2) so ARC-AGI-1/2 and ARC-AGI-3 scores are not comparable

English
19
44
537
110.4K
Antifa_Ultras
Antifa_Ultras@ultras_antifaa·
A zionist encounters a surprise while trying to kick a Palestinian flag.
English
911
3.6K
36.4K
1.3M
Nikh
Nikh@niknotlikeus·
@Wealth_Counter @indiain24hr This is why you use anonymous accounts and telegram. How stupid can they be to have their names.
English
1
0
0
169
WealthCounter
WealthCounter@Wealth_Counter·
@indiain24hr This is exactly why women speaking up matters. The chat was real, the threat was real, and now there is a record. Authorities have no excuse to ignore this.
English
1
10
330
32.3K
indiainlast24hr
indiainlast24hr@indiain24hr·
🚨 Disturbing incident in Chhattisgarh! Influencer Nivedita Mandavi exposes group of boys planning kidnapping & gangrape of a girl. "How low can humans fall?" she asks. Social media pretence vs dark reality
indiainlast24hr tweet mediaindiainlast24hr tweet mediaindiainlast24hr tweet mediaindiainlast24hr tweet media
English
114
1.4K
5.6K
438.2K
Nikh
Nikh@niknotlikeus·
@cryps1s @DaveShapi @cryps1s You were actually right. It is a skill issue. Double down on it. Taking backs and caring for such a customer is beneath you. He has nothing worthwhile to comment.
English
0
0
2
800
David Shapiro (L/0)
David Shapiro (L/0)@DaveShapi·
He deleted this tweet but I kept receipts. Shitty behavior from the C-Suite at OpenAI. They are really hurting from the QuitGPT movement and I'm seriously about to delete my account.
David Shapiro (L/0) tweet mediaDavid Shapiro (L/0) tweet media
English
111
112
1.3K
130.5K
Nikh
Nikh@niknotlikeus·
@MEGUjuke Sue me after you've done suing all the labs that won't give a fuck. Good luck winning, it'll only get more mainstream with time.
English
7
0
28
13.9K
Nikh
Nikh@niknotlikeus·
@0x45o Rationalists
English
0
0
1
14
0x45
0x45@0x45o·
we need a slur for people who think AI will take our jobs
English
384
35
1K
101.7K
Nikh
Nikh@niknotlikeus·
@cursor_ai Literally what's the use of such a costly model? Why would anyone go for it and not Codex/Claude?
English
0
0
0
43
Cursor
Cursor@cursor_ai·
Composer 1.5 is now available. We’ve found it to strike a strong balance between intelligence and speed.
Cursor tweet media
English
154
184
1.9K
661.4K
Nikh
Nikh@niknotlikeus·
@elonmusk "Caw Caw" you're being a crow dude.
English
0
0
0
36
Nikh
Nikh@niknotlikeus·
@livgorton @ericho_goodfire @livgorton you seem manipulating asf. Good luck to the org dealing with you, you're less focused on proper AI safety and seem more focused on your social media reach.
English
0
0
1
514
Liv
Liv@livgorton·
I really didn't want to have to comment further on this. I wasn’t expecting – and did not want – my tweet to get this level of attention, and really just wanted to have this be over. However, this characterisation feels unfair, and so I feel obliged to say something. To start, I am very glad you’ve lifted the non-disparagements. I think not having non-disparagements should be a normative expectation in AI safety. I also do need to take some responsibility: I should have read my employment contract closely. If I had, I would not have signed it. I was really excited to work at an AI safety organisation, and honestly, it never occurred to me that non-disparagements would still be used after the previous scandals. Still, I’m responsible for signing a contract with terms I should have objected to. I’m glad you’re welcoming feedback now when there’s public attention. However, I feel misrepresented by the implicit message that this is the first time you’re getting this feedback. I raised this issue extensively internally. Further, I was asked to sign a new confidential non-disparagement agreement, which would have prevented me from raising this publicly. If this had happened, it seems to me that Goodfire would not have had the public feedback which led to this being changed. I also feel misrepresented by your comments on whistleblowing exceptions. While the non-disparagement did have some exceptions, they were the minimum legally required exceptions for it to be enforceable, and would not have extended to safety whistleblowing (which was also not corrected when I raised it). I don't want to get into an argument about this on twitter but it's very important to me to not feel misrepresented. All of this is honestly very stressful for me, and I’m hoping I can take a break from twitter following this.
English
15
26
640
74.5K
Eric Ho
Eric Ho@ericho_goodfire·
We met as a team today and have decided to remove non-disparagement clauses from all employment agreements past and present effective immediately. For context, we had a non disparagement (which is standard for vc-backed startups) that had carve-outs for whistleblowers, so there was nothing that prevented employees from commenting on anything unlawful. It was boilerplate from our law firm when incorporating. Goodfire is an early stage startup and the majority of our energy goes towards our mission of understanding AI systems, but we're always looking for ways to improve. We appreciate the feedback we’ve gotten and will always do our best to do the right thing.
English
10
7
321
126.4K
Nikh
Nikh@niknotlikeus·
@chatgpt21 @litteralyme0 OpenAI should push through the hate and stand tall. AntiAI needs to know the world ahead.
English
0
0
0
25
Chris
Chris@chatgpt21·
@litteralyme0 Imagine wishing on the downfall of a company beginning to crack the frontier of mathematics
English
85
3
354
46.2K
Tanveer Gill
Tanveer Gill@GillTanveer89·
The GOAT of AI code planning.
English
5
9
281
325.7K