nostosalgos

2.1K posts

nostosalgos banner
nostosalgos

nostosalgos

@nostoimeraki

Katılım Temmuz 2024
157 Takip Edilen57 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
nostosalgos
nostosalgos@nostoimeraki·
@pegobry_en The two kinds of right wing poasters.
nostosalgos tweet media
English
1
3
28
2.7K
nostosalgos
nostosalgos@nostoimeraki·
@Steve_Sailer Can't believe they didn't include The Count of Monte Cristo, Crime and Punishment, or Brideshead Revisited.
English
0
0
1
78
Steve Sailer
Steve Sailer@Steve_Sailer·
New on SteveSailer . Net -- What are the Top 100 Novels Ever? "The Guardian" publishes a decent (i.e., traditional rather than Woke) ranking of fiction. What do you think? Link in replies:
Steve Sailer tweet media
English
79
3
105
27.3K
nostosalgos
nostosalgos@nostoimeraki·
@DesmondShum @greg_ip Considering that China is in the process of dumping in most countries right now, wouldn't the response be to place high tariffs on China to protect their own industries?
English
0
0
0
245
Desmond Shum
Desmond Shum@DesmondShum·
China’s Debt Machine Has a Long Runway wsj.com/world/china/be… This is a very good summary by @greg_ip, on WSJ, of China’s attempt to dominate manufacturing through debt-fueled expansion — a point others have also been circling around for some time. My view is this: China’s debt-driven investment machine will run far longer than most people expect. Why? First, the Chinese state can absorb and redirect national wealth — including private wealth — through its control of banks, capital markets, credit allocation, and the entire financial system. Beijing can force-feed money into industries far longer than any market-based economist believes possible. Second, China does not operate as a market economy. This is not about profits. Beijing sees manufacturing dominance through an ideological and geopolitical lens. It wants control. Once China has crushed enough competitors through overcapacity, price wars, and exported involution, it will reap the harvest. Economically, it will dictate industry terms and eventually jack up prices — exactly the way this has played out domestically. Geopolitically, it will turn industrial choke points into weapons. We have seen this movie before. That is why market economies have no choice but to defend themselves now. Waiting for China’s “unsustainable” system to collapse is not a strategy. By the time it collapses, your manufacturing base may already be dead. Or China may already be in harvest season after your collapse — and by then we will have moved on to a very different script.
Michael Pettis@michaelxpettis

1/12 Very good article by Greg Ip. I think the most important point he makes is this one: "The Achilles’ heel of Chinese industrial policy is its cost and waste. China runs bigger budget deficits relative to economic output than the U.S." @greg_ip wsj.com/world/china/be…

English
4
36
126
16K
nostosalgos
nostosalgos@nostoimeraki·
@Rawmilkchad I'm Albertan, but not a secessionist, and roughly came to the same conclusion. There is no doubt in my mind that Ottawa would rather let Albertans starve to death than let them leave. We really underestimate the amount of hatred the east has for Alberta.
English
0
0
1
13
Raw Milk Chad (NEET ARC)
Raw Milk Chad (NEET ARC)@Rawmilkchad·
I'm in the minority of Albertan secessionists who think we should join the US. I honestly don't think we stand a chance of actually leaving Canada without a US-backed color revolution. Even if (by a miracle) we won the vote to leave fair and square, Canada would throw a temper tantrum. They hate us, but love the money we bring them. We're their golden goose. They would suggest the vote was rigged or that there was foreign interference. They would say that due to "muh native treaties" we couldn't leave. They would be willing to use military presence to bully us (under the guise of "protecting against right wing extremists" or some nonsense). They're already priming the population for the "foreign interference" narrative using CBC (the media arm of the Liberal Government) to blast this into the head of every "elbows up" boomer.
Raw Milk Chad (NEET ARC) tweet mediaRaw Milk Chad (NEET ARC) tweet media
Eric Daugherty@EricLDaugh

🚨 WOW! Alberta, Canada secessionists say they’ve SUBMITTED enough signatures to trigger a vote to leave Canada It must now be approved to come to a final vote THIS IS HUGE! These patriots deserve to be liberated from the leftists 🇺🇸🇨🇦 Alberta is the MOST conservative province. I wouldn’t mind them becoming the 51st or 52nd state after this 🔥

English
6
0
70
2.1K
nostosalgos
nostosalgos@nostoimeraki·
@FistedFoucault What are your thoughts on the Mosley/Irving theory that Britain and France deliberately escalated the war because of pressure from Jewish bankers who wanted revenge for the treatment of Jews in Germany?
English
1
0
5
394
Niccolo Soldo (Fisted By Foucault)
My estimate is that we are roughly 20 years away from a fairly significant cohort of historians asking the question: "Did the wrong side win WW2?*", with an asterisk representing The Holocaust
English
29
18
662
21.4K
nostosalgos
nostosalgos@nostoimeraki·
@ChMark161 Central Canadians will say this and then nod approvingly to the fifth bombardier/auto sector bail out.
English
0
0
1
8
nostosalgos
nostosalgos@nostoimeraki·
@Lady_Astor I remember how much people hated them in the 2000s. Never would have guessed they would stay married all this time. The Pratts' are on an unreal redemption arc.
English
0
0
2
78
nostosalgos
nostosalgos@nostoimeraki·
@Chickenhearts69 Hong Kongers are racist about everyone which is great. I was saddened to see how much Indians have taken over Thailand without push back from the thais.
English
0
0
2
23
CoconutGreek
CoconutGreek@Chickenhearts69·
Hongkong many blaqs, indgays and Hijabis What does mean?
English
4
0
27
2K
nostosalgos
nostosalgos@nostoimeraki·
@fleming_benn the early noughts hipsters are an interesting bunch because they either went full woke progressive or far right despite enjoying many of the same things.
English
0
0
0
14
nostosalgos
nostosalgos@nostoimeraki·
@UCCavalier This feels like a very elitist, eastern viewpoint levied at alberta. we have nothing to be proud of?
English
0
0
0
24
Upper Canadian Cavalier
Upper Canadian Cavalier@UCCavalier·
"The Alberta annexationist is not, most of the time, a bad man. He is a demoralized man... no civilizational inheritance to defend, no institutions to love, no history to be proud of, no religion to anchor him, and no model of manhood beyond consumption and complaint."
Upper Canadian Cavalier@UCCavalier

The Liberal government is going to pass some version of online censorship legislation within the next eighteen months, and the conservative movement is going to lose the fight against it. This will be a strange defeat, because the movement has actually been winning this fight for nearly a decade. Ottawa has drafted the legislation and retreated from it, drafted and retreated, each time seeing the political coalition required to pass it dissolve before the vote. That repeated retreat has been the one sustained conservative victory of the Trudeau and Carney years. It is about to end. And the people ending it are not the Liberals. They are a loose network of Albertan YouTubers who believe they are fighting the regime and have not yet realized they have become its best argument. The annexation content produced by this movement is, from the regulator's perspective, almost perfect. Canadian citizens, broadcasting to Canadian audiences, arguing that Canadian sovereignty should be dissolved and portions of the country handed to a foreign power. Every view is a data point. Every subscriber is a constituency. Every comment section is a confirmation that the content is spreading. If the Liberal government had to invent a justification for online harms legislation from scratch, it could not have produced better material than what these men are producing voluntarily, daily, at their own expense. The conservative movement, which has spent a decade defending free speech in the abstract, is now being asked to defend this. And it cannot. Not because the free speech principle is wrong, but because the principle cannot carry the weight of the material it is being asked to defend. Worse, the movement has spent five years demanding that the Canadian state take foreign interference seriously. Khalistani organizing in Surrey, Chinese influence operations in Vancouver, Iranian regime activity in Toronto. The movement was right to demand this. The state was wrong to ignore it. But having committed to the foreign interference frame when the foreign power was India or China, the movement cannot coherently reject the frame when the foreign power is the United States. Either foreign subversion is a legitimate target of state action or it is not. The separatists have forced the question. And the Liberals, who have been waiting a decade for the right question to be forced, are going to give an answer the conservative movement has no reply to. This is a story about demoralization, about Harper's wasted decade, about the fairy tale the Laurentian managerial class has told the provinces it rules, about Aristotle's natural slaves, and about why a serious Canadian nationalism has to accept the principle of a policed public square while rejecting the people currently proposing to police it. I wrote the full essay here. If you want to know how the most sustained conservative victory of the last decade is about to turn into its most consequential defeat, it will be worth your time. (Link in comments)

English
4
3
42
1K
nostosalgos
nostosalgos@nostoimeraki·
@IbnKulthum It feels like at this point, a lot of Canadians want to be conned.
English
0
0
2
123
nostosalgos
nostosalgos@nostoimeraki·
@philippilk I'm Canadian, created my account in Canada, but I live in Shenzhen now.
English
0
0
0
31
Mr. S.T.A.R.
Mr. S.T.A.R.@favelaoverlord·
@RameshBotha Dem virtue signalling ala Pelosi’s Taiwan trip is far more destructive than Trump’s weird trade posturing imo
English
1
0
13
369
Mr. S.T.A.R.
Mr. S.T.A.R.@favelaoverlord·
Iran wars effects on China - I’ve deliberately left out things that affect both America and China: Positive -long term massive uptick in global demand for fossil fuel-independent infrastructure, china is global no.2 for nuclear export, global no.1 for renewables, global no.1 for EVs, global no. 1 for electrical infra -Alienation of Gulf/Euro/Asian allies from American alliance networks due to incitement of hydrocarbon shortages -Allies questioning relationship with the US due to American military capability issues -War has forced repositioning of American military assets based in Korea and affiliate locales (driving further alienation of Asian allies affected) -War has depleted American missile and interceptor stockpiles -War offers opportunity to collect intel on American military capabilities -An Iranian SoH victory would shake credibility of American system -Iran war offers testing ground for BRI capabilities and throughputs Negative -War may cause Trump to lose in ‘28 (imo Trump is a better president for China relations than a dem) -War has… uh… challenged global norms around shipping sovereignty, a risk for export oriented nations like china -oil price spikes hit China and Chinese trade partners quite hard -an Iranian SoH victory would likely mean sanctions rollback and the loss of an exclusive oil import partner -Iranian defeat would likely mean regime collapse and loss of a partner nation -the opening of Russian oil to the global market raises Chinese prices
Eris332@eris332

@favelaoverlord So is china winning or losing exactly?

English
4
3
76
6.5K
nostosalgos
nostosalgos@nostoimeraki·
@IvanoftheYukon @martianwyrdlord We can start with the Dominion of the People’s Republic of Canada (DPRC). And then we will add more letters every year like the 2slgbtq thing.
English
0
0
1
12
John Carter
John Carter@martianwyrdlord·
Alberta separation bros, you must do this. It would be the funniest thing.
Applied Epistemologist@ChMark161

@martianwyrdlord They just need to separate, call themselves "real Canada", adopt the Red Ensign as their flag, and offer the other (bankrupt) provinces terms for joining. Then everyone will be happy except the Laurentians. And the terms could include their banishment.

English
17
16
329
7.8K