Michael McNally

41K posts

Michael McNally

Michael McNally

@notoserfdom

Politically homeless. Editor. Open to job offers.

United Kingdom Katılım Şubat 2011
1.1K Takip Edilen1.5K Takipçiler
Michael McNally
Michael McNally@notoserfdom·
@IsraelMFA Good luck with this, but it would be more effective to instruct the Mossad to hack into their IT systems, subscription platform, etc. Knocking these scum offline for a day or two would send a strong message.
English
85
0
36
13K
Israel Foreign Ministry
Following the publication by Nicholas Kristof in The New York Times of one of the most hideous and distorted lies ever published against the State of Israel in the modern press, which also received the backing of the newspaper, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar have instructed the initiation of a defamation lawsuit against The New York Times.
English
2.4K
2.2K
13.5K
2.1M
Michael McNally retweetledi
Kosher Chutzpah
Kosher Chutzpah@KosherChutzpah·
🚨 ISRAELI SUSPECTED RAPIST BREAKS HIS SILENCE ON PIERS MORGAN UNCENSORED "It was 100% consensual. He was practically begging for it. And he enjoyed every second of it. Said I was better than a goat!"
English
281
794
4.5K
315.6K
Michael McNally retweetledi
ShipofTheseus
ShipofTheseus@JewishSpaceLazr·
Forcing Jews to argue the anatomical likelihood of a dog penis penetrating a human anus is the most humiliating “watch them turn out their pockets” moment in the history of antisemitism. Nick Kristof will rot in hell.
English
627
690
6.3K
252.5K
Michael McNally
Michael McNally@notoserfdom·
I wonder if whoever ends up as Labour leader will be tempted to call an early election, gambling that Reform isn't ready to fight one, and that the right-of-centre vote will be split between Reform and the Tories. Because as Labour moves further left things will get much worse (and if Streeting somehow ends up as leader and PM he'll be lucky to survive for a year). Either way, I cannot wait for the day when all of the below are consigned to the dustbin of history.
Allison Pearson@AllisonPearson

Angela Rayner’s Ashton-under-Lynne constituency was Labour for 47 years. On May 7th, Reform took 18 of the 19 seats up for grabs. Ange will lose her seat in 2029. Ed Miliband will lose Doncaster. Wes Streeting will DEFINITELY lose his seat. Andy Burnham hasn’t got a seat.

English
0
1
1
50
Michael McNally
Michael McNally@notoserfdom·
@Aizenberg55 @nytimes @NickKristof Only in the age of Israel Derangement Syndrome, which is perhaps even more deranging that Trump Derangement Syndrome, could we be having to run this by dog experts and consult medical journals.
English
1
1
28
613
Aizenberg
Aizenberg@Aizenberg55·
Two dog experts confirm it is impossible to train a dog to become aroused and anally penetrate a human on command. Medical journals only describe human initiated bestiality. The @nytimes @NickKristof did not fact check the story. This is how low anti-Israel discourse has fallen.
Aizenberg tweet media
English
364
1.1K
4.2K
169.4K
Michael McNally
Michael McNally@notoserfdom·
The scale of the damage Labour will inflict on the country in the next three years as they try to cling to power, and the left battles it out with the far-left, is unimaginable. They will take still more money from workers and businesses to shore up their 'shirkers wall' of benefits claimants and pay off their trade union paymasters. And if they can't buy off enough voters, or win enough back by fear mongering about the 'far-right', or lure voters from the Greens by competing with them on class warfare and antisemitism, they will look for new ways to rig the next election in their favour, such as giving the vote to EU citizens. They will resort to all manner of dirty tricks, and seek to divide the country in ways we can't even imagine. Our only hope for mitigating the damage is that things get so bad so quickly that Labour has to risk an early election, gambling that Reform won't be ready. And when we do finally throw them out, Reform, likely in coalition with the Tories (who, yes, are equally culpable for this mess), will face an almost impossible task of trying to rebuild the country in the face of an insurgency by obstructionist civil servants, relentlessly striking doctors, nurses, teachers and train drivers, and violent leftist mobs. God help us.
English
0
0
2
34
Allison Pearson
Allison Pearson@AllisonPearson·
Labour are incapable of making necessary reforms - cutting welfare bill, copying a functioning healthcare system, dropping net zero and drilling in the North Sea to slash energy bills reversing costs to employers - because their left wing won’t wear it. The British government is a prisoner of far-left ideology.
English
33
226
1.1K
12.4K
Michael McNally retweetledi
Scott Jennings
Scott Jennings@ScottJenningsKY·
This New York Times "article" about Israel is such a journalistic atrocity that I actually feel stupid reading it out loud. If everyone at the NYT who is responsible for this is not fired, then the publication will lose whatever shred of credibility it has left.
English
2.2K
6K
26.4K
849.9K
Michael McNally retweetledi
AG
AG@AGHamilton29·
For those keeping track, Kristoff's piece: - Was published to pre-empt a detailed report about sexual violence by Hamas, full of actual evidence. - One of his main quoted Israeli sources says Kristoff misrepresented his take. - The article omits context about the background of its sources. - Several of his cited victims have a clear record of significantly changing their story. Kristoff omits any explanation for these changes. - The main source of the most significant abuse claim is a terrorist-tied org that has pushed constant insane conspiracies. A group that denies extensive evidence of widespread sexual violence by Hamas and had an interest in pre-empting the report mentioned in the first point. - The article promotes a central claim from that group about dogs being trained to rape people, which is biologically unlikely and has almost no supporting evidence. Kristoff has since misled followers about the medical evidence to support the possibility. Another primary linked source for the claim is an online grifter known for making stuff up, sexually harassing women, and sending inappropriate photos to minors, while having no firsthand knowledge to support the claim. The NYT fired several people for publishing a Tom Cotton op-ed with a very mainstream view about preventing mob violence, but Kistoff knows there will be zero consequences for any of the above because the NYT consistently adopts the view that journalistic standards don't apply when publishing anti-Israel content.
English
113
975
4.7K
162.9K
Michael McNally retweetledi
Buck Sexton
Buck Sexton@BuckSexton·
Israel doesn't train dogs to rape Palestinian inmates. That's a vicious, stupid lie pushed by a slimy little propagandist. But this newest blood libel is meant to distract you from the latest released evidence- including video recordings that *no credible person says are fake* of Palestinians doing the most sadistic, grotesque things imaginable on Oct 7- raping corpses while they are mutilating and murdering them, lighting genitals on fire, shooting out the eyes and genitals of helpless victims, forcing husbands to watch as their wives and children are raped and murdered- And Palestinians did this on the *orders of their elected government* with months of planning to do exactly what they did. It wasn't spontaneous. The monstrous cruelty, the sexual degradation was the point. They knew Oct 7 wasn't going to win a war, or gain any territory. It was just an orgy of Jew hate and violence. The Palestinians were mass murdering, child rapist terrorists who did all this and were gleeful about it. They made phone calls boasting to their family members. Did anyone in the Hamas government express remorse or regret about any of this? Or anywhere in Gaza? Of course not. They ordered it. They delighted in the extreme pain and cruelty of the Oct 7 operation against Jews. So now some Americans, including ones who claim to be conservative, are taking the side of Hamas and claiming this was a genocide? What do these people really think Israel was supposed to do in response to Oct 7? Fight an imaginary "gentle" war? No response at all? Give up? Childish thinking. Absurd moral preening. War is hell, but Hamas brought that hell upon Gaza.
English
1.2K
4.1K
17.5K
557.9K
Michael McNally retweetledi
Zac Goldsmith
Zac Goldsmith@ZacGoldsmith·
“What kind of a depraved monster slices off a woman’s breast while she is being gang raped, and throws it into the dust to be used as a plaything? What kind of a twisted pervert turns rape into necrophilia by shooting a woman in the head while he is still defiling her? What kind of ‘freedom fighters’ go into battle with a set of handy Arabic-to-Hebrew phrases, including ‘take off your pants’, ‘lie down’, and ‘spread your legs’? What self-respecting human being presses nails, scalpels, a hammer, an axe, screwdrivers and other household tools into a woman’s genitals? How hard do you have to rape someone, and with what, to shatter their pelvis? Who shoots a young girl in the face and then films her mutilated corpse on her brother’s mobile phone? The answer is: Hamas terrorists. This is the stark reality of what they did to men, women and children on October 7, 2023. And the world must never forget.” @WestminsterWAG
English
3.7K
17.3K
51.2K
1.8M
Michael McNally
Michael McNally@notoserfdom·
The mistake a lot of people on the right make is calling Starmer unpatriotic, which enables his defenders to feign outrage: "How dare you suggest that!" The point is that, as globalists and Marxists, Starmer, Hermer and co regard the very concept of patriotism as nonsense. They view the UK as a province of the 'international community', and ideally of the EU, which it's their job to administer in the interests of global elites. So Starmer isn't unpatriotic, although he absolutely behaves as if he were — and of course he'll put on an England shirt and pretend to enjoy a pint when the occasion demands it. He just feels no responsibility to put the interests of Britain and the British people ahead if the interests of other nations, or trans-national organisations.
English
1
0
8
145
Allison Pearson
Allison Pearson@AllisonPearson·
The British people sense Starmer is not for the British. He’s a globalist human rights lawyer who would happily put our enemies before us. See below 👇
Ben Judah@b_judah

Starmer's authority is now crumbling. But even those most committed to a new Prime Minister should pause for thought about what it means for Britain in the world. For all his many, many domestic missteps, Keir Starmer has genuinely led on Ukraine, make tough calls with Trump and rebuilt relations with Europe by working intensely with President Macron and Chancellor Merz. Labour in government was shocked at how quickly it was swamped by foreign affairs from Gaza and Ukraine, to Trump and Iran. This isn't going to change. However Starmer's challengers have no foreign policy experience, no geopolitical worldviews, no foreign affairs teams and no experience in explaining our place in the world and its tumult to the public. But if they succeed that will be half their job. What's the plan for a geopolitical pivot to Europe? What's the strategy to deal with Trump and our fragmenting Western alliance as China's Axis of Authoritarians deepens? What's next for Britain's extensive diplomatic and security role when it comes to Ukraine? Who will be maintaining key connections to the White House? Changes at the top are often necessary. But they are delicate and not cost free internationally. In diplomacy so much is bound up in personal connections and trust built up over time. Building since 2016, these musical chairs at the top have now become so intense, with Prime Ministers lasting roughly two years and Foreign Secretaries now annuals, our allies and partners are frustrated. I've heard from European and Gulf leaderships first hand it is hardly worth investing diplomatically in a counterpart who's suddenly gone and thus hardly worth investing in Britain.

English
69
457
2.3K
40K
Michael McNally
Michael McNally@notoserfdom·
Caption this – I'll go first… Kemi: "Are you still here?"
Michael McNally tweet media
English
0
0
0
25
Michael McNally retweetledi
Hugh Hewitt
Hugh Hewitt@hughhewitt·
“No, dogs aren't being trained to systematically rape prisoners, you nattering halfwits. And no, Hamas propaganda operatives are not reliable sources on the question of Israeli crimes.” @havivrettiggur has a long post on the Kristof column —including some blunt and surprising profanity which tells me that Haviv has reached a new level of anger with the anti-Semites as well as his own government’s inability to respond to the systematic infusion of vile propaganda into platforms that once stood for standards. I would be alarmed if I were a Jew. I’ve read enough about the Dreyfus trial and aftermath to recognize turning points and the Kristof column is the same level of insanity as the charges against Dreyfus raised to the same level of credibility as his trial, if only for a nanosecond. @Continettj noted today that anti-Semitism has replaced climate alarmism as the spinal cord of the Left. Matt’s right. Haviv is on my program Thursday. I had that entire interview charted before the Kristof column and I am going to stick to that original outline. Because falling for the trap of rebutting the absurdist lies is for fools. It can’t be rebutted because it’s myth —a story intended to be believed. My shock that Nick Kristof caught the disease is great. He’s been a guest often over the years. His books such as “A Path Appears” have been good, even inspiring. But he’s been captured. In Ohio in the ‘60s, I lived on a street lined with beautiful elm trees. Then, in the blink of an eye, they were all gone. Dutch elm disease came and took them all with remarkable speed. That’s what is happening in American journalism on all matters Israel and I fear Jewish to all sorts of reporters and analysts. But there is no Zola today who can stand up and if not stop at least begin to turn the tide as very few people read beyond this post or that article. It’s a very dire situation when the New York Times would publish that trash. It’s an alarm.
Haviv Rettig Gur@havivrettiggur

A lot of subscribers have asked what I made of the Nick Kristof oped. So much has already been said. What more is there to say? My first thought was everyone else's. Horrifying. Testimonies of pain and torture. We know that the Israeli Prisons Service is notoriously incompetent. There have been cases of Hamas prisoners abusing each other, and even famous cases of them abusing female Israeli guards. We know, too, that all prison systems struggle with the problem: New York prisons face 2,000 claims against them. So abuse of prisoners isn't merely possible, it's guaranteed. October 7 and the ensuing war sent thousands of detainees into the prisons. And in the early months, drafted into the system undertrained reservist guards. Guards who had seen Hamas's videos gleefully documenting their crimes. I expected, therefore, a hard-hitting story of real abuse, something Israeli leaders must take notice of. And then I came across the first obvious lie. And then the second. And then an odd claim -- maybe possible, but how exactly? -- and then another just like it. And a famed Hamas propagandist laundered as a reliable source. And then another. Why, if there is no doubt that abuse occurred -- and there is no doubt -- was there so much obvious propaganda in Kristof's oped? I won't pretend the lies weren't a relief. They were. It's agony to read about Israeli criminality, and the lies let me cast doubt on the whole narrative. There's an obvious propaganda campaign at work here. But as claim followed claim, it became hard not to wonder: Despite the propaganda, what part is nevertheless true? How bad has it gotten? So here's what we know, or at least what I think I know. This is a campaign that seeks our destruction. Kristof quotes people who celebrated October 7 and want Israel destroyed, and will lie to achieve that goal. We know how the lies in this story made their way into it, where they came from and what purpose they serve. Even so, I'm not willing to conclude there's no truth at all in there, just because there are lies. Dogs did not rape anyone. The people who invented that particular inanity claimed it without evidence, knowing that no one, certainly not self-appointed moral arbiters like Nick Kristof, would ever bother checking the provenance of the claim. Because they never, ever do. Because why would they? So the claim spreads through the millions-strong activist network without investigation, exciting and mobilizing -- not because anyone understands how it might be possible but for the sheer thrill of it. And it's cited by Kristof as a reliable report. A recent report by a Norwegian NGO, also referenced, claimed "systemic sexual violence" in the West Bank by citing just 16 cases across three years in a geographic region containing as many as three million Palestinians and over half a million Israelis. And some of the examples scarcely cleared the bar for harassment. But the NGO in question knew for a fact that no journalist would look too deeply into any of it. And indeed, no journalist did. Because they never, ever do. Because why would they? Friends, a paper trail is being created. Just like they created a paper trail on mass starvation in Gaza -- mass starvation first claimed in early 2024, and then claimed again and again by NGOs, the UN, everybody. Some were nuanced warnings of a "possibility," some declared it had arrived. The headlines from both were largely the same. And then, in thundering silence, the mass starvation claim just faded away, never having materialized -- while billions of ordinary people around the world who don't follow too closely remain convinced that countless Gazans died of starvation. So they moved on. A Lancet letter claiming hundreds of thousands of deaths spread like wildfire, mostly because (a) nobody actually read or understood what it claimed and (b) nobody cared enough to check if it was remotely plausible. Then, just in case anyone forgot Lancet, came the claim by UN rapporteurs of the deaths of hundreds of thousands of children -- 380,000 infants under five allegedly died, more than the entire population of infants in Gaza. Stupid, right? But it was repeated again and again by activists and protestors. No one checks, no costs are exacted for the never-ending barrage of fakery. Because why would they? A wild religious frenzy has taken hold. Hatred of Israel is now definitional to the left, and to parts of the right. Greta Thunberg has forgotten all about climate change. An enemy of humanity has been identified just in time to unleash all the pent-up religious rage that this troubled secular age won't allow against anyone else. And by complete and utter coincidence, that enemy you're suddenly allowed to hate is vaguely associated with the Jews. Yes, alas, it really is that simple. But also, dear friends -- bear with me -- it isn't. All the above is true. They're fucking liars and bigots. They marched in their millions, again and again and again, for weeks and months and years -- marches completely unprecedented in their size, regularity and duration in all the history of the West, in all the history of war, larger by orders of magnitude than all other marches for all other conflicts and wars and suffering combined, even those caused by their own governments. And no serious person pretends that anything similar could ever have coalesced or will ever coalesce again unless Israel is involved. "But we fund you," shouts the American activist to explain this mind-numbing selectivity. Then why did one-third of the city of Amsterdam march? Or millions of Spaniards, Brazilians and Indonesians? It was unprecedented and it was everywhere. And Kristof has joined the new religion. Not by being concerned about abuse, but by not caring one whit whether he's trafficking in truths or lies. Only the Jews will ask to distinguish between the two. He just needs to throw it all on the page, and his membership in the glorious crusade is assured. Alas, the Jews are correct about the nature of this moment. Some things are so big and fundamental, so assumed and widespread, that they become hard to see. Fish don't notice the water. Activists who can only ever march against Jews are convinced they are merely righteous people enraged by war, without ever pausing to wonder why the only war that ever enraged them or ever made its way to their phones was one particular war, and not larger and deadlier wars also conducted with Western weapons and money. And so the Jew is made fearful once more. Throughout Christendom and Islam, he is being returned to his proper place in the social hierarchies of old, complete with anxious conversos and ideological purity tests. And yet, still, despite it all, their lies aren't the end of the story. Their lies are a separate story. A campaign of lies that constitutes a return to the mean for the Jewish condition in the West. A campaign meant to justify brutality against us, not to end war or suffering. And despite all of it, dear Jews, there really is abuse. It's nowhere near as much as the psychotic claims of these fantasists. Not by orders of magnitude. If it was, they wouldn't need to lie so much. But it's there nonetheless. Many dozens of cases at least, probably in the low hundreds by now, most of them without any sexual aspect, but still wanton violence. Exact numbers are hard to come by, but the army gave a few estimates to the courts a couple of times over the past three years. There have been many indictments filed against soldiers, serious ones. I know something about a handful of those cases. I know that the problem is real. It's there, it's real, and it doesn't seem to be stopping. And if it isn't stopped with an iron will and uncompromising hand, it will continue to fester and grow. And it must be said: neither Ben Gvir nor Netanyahu are interested in fixing it. Nobody at the top cares about the rights of prisoners. Let me be clear: For the first time in my life, I support a death penalty. No one who crossed over the border to massacre and kidnap on October 7 should be left alive; they came to kidnap children precisely because they sought the release of mass murderers kept alive in our prisons. Hamas, as always, in its totalizing brutality, forces the choice: If their murderers live, our children may die. I choose our children. And those who came for our children cannot be deterred, reformed or deradicalized. They murder their own to clear a path to murdering ours. And so I believe they must die. We must try, convict and destroy them. And even I, radicalized in this narrow, specific way, say we cannot collapse into torture or abuse. That's not justice. It isn't even vengeance. It is participation in Hamas's way of war. Nor do our leaders seem to care about the simple breakdown of discipline that these abuses represent, the kind of breakdown we saw again and again with the incidents of looting in Gaza and in the early cases of prisoner abuse that came to light. No, dogs aren't being trained to systematically rape prisoners, you nattering halfwits. And no, Hamas propaganda operatives are not reliable sources on the question of Israeli crimes. The vast, vast majority of soldiers are honorable men who walked into fire so our families may live. The whole world may turn on them; I will stand with them, grateful for their sacrifice. And Kristof, a willing purveyor of propaganda happily feigning that he can't see the water and thrilling to a moral crusade engineered by would-be genocidaires he pretends not to understand -- is no messenger of moral reckoning. But friends, so fucking what. Let the narcissistic guttersnipes strut their moral emotions before the world, let the UN publish endless reports that don't hold up to basic scrutiny, let the NGOs dream their rabid, sick dreams that no journalist ever fact-checks -- yes, they're lying. But so fucking what. We still, for ourselves -- because fuck them -- must see that it isn't all fake. The problem is real. It's far smaller than they claim, but real nonetheless. And when discipline and morality break down, it can only get worse. We either crack down now or we watch it fester and grow. And our own Ben Gvirs are stubbornly refusing to fix what is actually broken, the real thing in the real world. And so we are caught in a strange sort of vise, the same vise we find ourselves in with the genocide lie: A vast propaganda machine that seeks to destroy us -- countless activists too high on their own self-regard to see the irony of raging against a "genocide" while calling for the erasure of a people -- all while our own incompetent, venal, self-absorbed political class insist in their mindless chatter on confirming every claim of our enemies for sheer, bald egomania. I'm sick of it all. I know you're all sick of it too. And that, in a nutshell, is what I think about this. Just because they're lying, just because a vast perfidious campaign has overwhelmed global elites in a bid to clear the way for our removal, just because they're still, after two millennia, building their visions of redemption on The Evil Jew -- doesn't mean there isn't also, separately, a problem on the ground. So what do we do now? Simple. We see it, we acknowledge it's happening, we bring our rage to our inept leaders until they bend to our will and act to stop the breakdown... And we soldier on. We soldier on because the enemy really is coming to murder us. Because Hamas must still go if Gaza is ever to rise to a new day. Because Hezbollah will yet destroy Lebanon on the altar of destroying us. Because the ayatollahs built their whole damn religion on the extermination of our children. We fix the broken things within us as if the pogromists and their simpering Kristofs don't exist. We owe no answers to the propagandists who seek to clear a path to our deaths. But we do owe answers to ourselves. Let the screaming mob rage and churn like so much sea-foam. Despite that raging mob, despite the enemy who still seeks our destruction, and yes, despite feckless incompetents like Ben Gvir, our minister of prisons, who claim to lead us -- we remain the strongest, freest Jews who ever lived, more capable and committed than our self-destructive enemies ever imagined. And the task is still before us, yet to be completed, the sacred duty given to our generation to ensure our children don't have to face the genocidaires who now surround us. We do not waver, we do not stumble. We soldier on. Because fuck them all.

English
14
97
448
54.4K
Ben Riley-Smith
Ben Riley-Smith@benrileysmith·
Theresa May - 3 years Boris Johnson - 3 years, 2 months Liz Truss - 7 weeks Rishi Sunak - 1 year, 9 months Keir Starmer currently 1 year, 10 months If he goes today, it’s averaging a PM every two years. Are we the new Italy?
English
550
1.1K
11.9K
1.5M
Michael McNally retweetledi
Josh Howie
Josh Howie@joshxhowie·
The New York Times, winner of a record 145 Pulitzers, has staked its near two century reputation on a dog physically being able to put its doggie dick, into a human bottom. That is how much it hates Jews.
English
258
548
5.1K
160.5K
Mark Littlewood
Mark Littlewood@MarkJLittlewood·
Britain has become ungovernable. The Blairite constitutional reforms cemented our status as a quangocracy with a politicised judicial system overseeing it. The next PM will discover this in short order just as the last few have.
English
73
238
1.2K
42K
Michael McNally retweetledi
Andrew Fox
Andrew Fox@Mr_Andrew_Fox·
If you want to know why all the deeply silly “dog rape” stories were published this week, it’s because the paid pro-Palestinian influencer squad were ordered to get ahead of this, genuine horror story.
Andrew Fox tweet media
English
601
5K
14.5K
333.9K