noun426🍀

528 posts

noun426🍀

noun426🍀

@noun426

Forever apprentice. Always learning the ways of crypto. Always hungry for more.

Katılım Mayıs 2017
247 Takip Edilen78 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
noun426🍀
noun426🍀@noun426·
Time to practice hitting the “SELL” button folks. First sell signal emerged 2 weeks ago with @coinbase app hitting top spot in App Store
English
3
0
2
106
noun426🍀 retweetledi
Oracle Boar
Oracle Boar@bored2boar·
I stopped my Polymarket bots for a moment. Ghost fills are destroying edge so fast that every bot PnL goes negative before you even notice. V2 update changed nothing. The bug everyone was waiting to get fixed survived the biggest infrastructure overhaul Polymarket has ever shipped. Here is the full situation for anyone running automated strategies right now: The upgrade closed the incrementNonce path. That was the cheap cancellation method costing 0.1 dollars in gas that was draining market makers daily. Gone. Good. But my bots are still getting ghost filled constantly. Because the actual problem was never the nonce mechanic. The attack lives in the time gap between off-chain order matching and on-chain settlement. That gap is identical in V2. Attacker matches your order off-chain. Your system logs a clean fill. Your position opens. Before settlement reaches the chain, they cancel their side silently. Position disappears, capital is stuck, you have no trade. Losing sides settle instantly every time. Winning sides get pulled before they land every time. Run this against a high frequency bot for a few hours and the PnL curve inverts completely. That is exactly what is happening to me right now. However, Polymarket team assured us that this should be fixed soon. And I respect the transparency. But bot builders have been waiting for this fix through multiple update cycles now... Ghost fills are not a minor inconvenience. They are a systematic extraction of capital from anyone running serious strategies on this platform. Pausing until there is a real architecture level fix on the settlement timing. Not a workaround. Not a patch. An actual solution.
Oracle Boar tweet media
Oracle Boar@bored2boar

x.com/i/article/2048…

English
28
16
173
29.5K
noun426🍀 retweetledi
Yishi
Yishi@ohyishi·
KelpDAO 自己把门锁拆了,LayerZero 卖的就是这种可以自己选锁的门,Aave 以为邻居家的门肯定是锁好的,所以放心收了邻居的钥匙做抵押。 最好的结果是能跟黑客谈,给个 10–15% bounty,把大头要回来,皆大欢喜。 谈不拢的话 LayerZero 生态基金出大头,它最有钱、最有长期利益,赔了还能保住 OFT 生态。 KelpDAO 最穷,要么代币 + 未来收入补,或者干脆整个项目打包卖给 L0 或 BMNR。 Aave 的 Umbrella 和 stkAAVE 兜最后一层,但 WETH 储户绝对不能吃 haircut,不然的话 Morpho、Spark、Fluid、Euler 全部跟着重定价,LRT 赛道整体被拉黑,整个 DeFi 行业倒退三年。 相信 Aave 可以挺过去。
Aave@aave

Update on rsETH incident: According to our analysis, rsETH on Ethereum mainnet is fully backed. Out of an abundance of caution, rsETH remains frozen across Aave V3 and V4 and exposure to the incident is capped. WETH reserves also remain frozen across affected markets including Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, Mantle, and Linea. Aave is actively validating information and assessing potential resolutions.

中文
37
12
139
37.4K
noun426🍀 retweetledi
Wu Blockchain
Wu Blockchain@WuBlockchain·
OneKey Founder Yishi on Handling the KelpDAO Hack 1, Best case: negotiate with the hacker and offer a 10-15% bounty. 2, If talks fail, let the LayerZero ecosystem fund cover most of the loss. 3, KelpDAO is the weakest; compensate with tokens + future revenue, or sell the whole project to L0 or BMNR. 4, Aave’s Umbrella and stkAAVE serve as the final backstop, but WETH depositors must not take any haircut — otherwise it would trigger repricing across Morpho, Spark, Fluid, Euler, blacklist the LRT sector, and set DeFi back by years. 5, He believes Aave can survive this. x.com/ohyishi/status…
Wu Blockchain tweet media
English
19
19
189
53.5K
Vivo
Vivo@vivoplt·
Anybody else who has retired Claude and is using Codex instead?
English
184
6
707
62.1K
noun426🍀 retweetledi
Tyler
Tyler@rezoundous·
The $20 Codex Plus plan was working fine for me until few days ago. Now I'm rate limited by the absurdly low 5h limit. So am I supposed to pay an extra $80/mo to unlock that 5h limit which was previously there?
English
159
33
862
60.9K
noun426🍀 retweetledi
Shanu Mathew
Shanu Mathew@ShanuMathew93·
Hadn't hit a Codex rate limit on $20 unless I was running fast mode intensely and as soon as they drop a $100 price tier (the next up), I auto hit the rate limit twice the first day I start using it again sigh
English
25
8
374
26.4K
noun426🍀 retweetledi
Wes Winder
Wes Winder@weswinder·
openai messed up this was a badly timed change > 2x usage bonus ends > cut 5h usage limits for plus subs (weekly stays the same) of course people are gonna be pissed now you’d think they would learn from anthropics mistakes, but i guess not
OpenAI@OpenAI

The Codex promotion for existing Plus subscribers ends today and as a part of this, we’re rebalancing Codex usage in Plus to support more sessions throughout the week, rather than longer sessions in a single day. The Plus plan will continue to be the best offer at $20 for steady, day-to-day usage of Codex, and the new $100 Pro tier offers a more accessible upgrade path for heavier daily use.

English
79
37
949
89K
noun426🍀 retweetledi
Michal Takac
Michal Takac@michaltakac·
Lol’d at the 2x price increase of @Zai_org GLM Coding Plan. Many people won’t be renewing, but if you’re OpenClaw / Hermes user, you still might use it. I’m disappointed, but will keep @TheDimensionLab agents on GLM plan until we have in-house hardware to run 5.1 model on.
Michal Takac tweet media
English
3
4
14
2.6K
noun426🍀 retweetledi
Mark Kretschmann
Mark Kretschmann@mark_k·
OpenAI nerfed Codex and now you hit the limit after one hour of coding. Obviously they want you to sell the new $100 Pro plan instead. Not cool, @OpenAI 😠
English
176
84
1.4K
70.8K
noun426🍀 retweetledi
Tyler
Tyler@rezoundous·
Dear OpenAI, I am hitting the 5h session limit within 10 minutes on my Codex Plus plan. You have made it completely unusable overnight. Please fix it. Thanks.
English
287
151
2.6K
208.8K
noun426🍀 retweetledi
max.jpg
max.jpg@Metagravity0·
My codex $20 plan finally hit limit for the first time.. What did you guys dooooo
English
73
18
682
35.5K
noun426🍀 retweetledi
Tyler
Tyler@rezoundous·
Is it just me, or has Codex usage limits been nerfed?
English
218
26
812
54.5K
noun426🍀 retweetledi
Aryan
Aryan@justbyte_·
Unpopular opinion: $20 in Codex feels unlimited where $20 in Claude vanishes in 30 mins.
English
179
37
859
42.4K
noun426🍀 retweetledi
Emilz
Emilz@emilheap·
State of Codex vibe coders today: Codex Pro Users - Happy, peaceful and productive - 2x Usage Limits extended - 5x and 20x are effectively 10x and 40x Codex Plus Users - Absolutely decimated, Max pain - 1x Usage Limit (party's over) - 5 Hour Usage Limit divided by 2 (effectively by 4)
English
8
1
39
5.4K
noun426🍀
noun426🍀@noun426·
@sama Can you please build telegram support into codex?
English
0
0
0
20
Sam Altman
Sam Altman@sama·
It is very nice to see Codex getting so much love. We are launching a $100 ChatGPT Pro tier by very popular demand.
English
1.6K
424
11.7K
1.1M
noun426🍀 retweetledi
Luke Heeney
Luke Heeney@heeney_luke·
did codex just change their 5 hour limits? I am suddenly burning through it in an hour after never coming close before. Gah, usage limits are why I use it over Claude!
English
113
16
854
95.8K
noun426🍀 retweetledi
CryptoMalaysia
CryptoMalaysia@CryptoMYsia·
Just got this email from Binance 🇲🇾 !!! Malaysians with MY KYC will no longer be able to use P2P through the PGK currency 🚨 Restrictions begin: 10/4/2026 Deadline to complete ongoing trades: 20/4/2026 Full restriction: 30/4/2026
CryptoMalaysia tweet media
English
35
33
179
47.5K
noun426🍀 retweetledi
BridgeMind
BridgeMind@bridgemindai·
68% of our community is still experiencing rate limiting with Claude Code today. This isn't one person complaining. This is two thirds of active vibe coders being throttled on plans they're paying for. Anthropic slashed Claude Opus 4.6 rate limits with no announcement. No transparency. No apology. And they're still doing it. 88 votes in 9 minutes. The community is fed up. If you're paying $20, $100, or $200/month and can't use Claude Code for more than an hour, you're not getting what you paid for. Cancel. Switch to Codex with GPT 5.4. Come back when Anthropic respects its customers.
BridgeMind tweet media
English
77
27
536
17.2K
noun426🍀 retweetledi
Pankaj Kumar
Pankaj Kumar@pankajkumar_dev·
Claude Quota Reduced: Opus Feels Worse and Pro Plan is Unusable - I noticed a clear drop in Claude’s quality, especially with Opus 4.6. more hallucinations, worse decisions, and poor instruction following. - Tasks that used to work smoothly now need multiple retries, even for simple changes. - The quota issue is worse even small prompts are consuming a noticeable percentage of limits. - Claude Pro is where things break a single maxed Sonnet session took 8% of my weekly limit. - In just 2 days, I hit 56% usage with only 5-6 sessions (2 hours each). - This is with normal usage like concepts, strategy, and documentation. - Paying $20/month now feels like getting fewer messages than the free plan. - The Pro limit feels almost unusable. - Later it was said peak hours burn quota faster, but this wasn't communicated clearly. - Overall, it feels like Claude got worse and more expensive at the same time.
Pankaj Kumar tweet media
English
180
122
1.8K
136.6K