GodIsAble

BECAUSE YOU GUYS HAVE NO STANDARDS FOR A MAN THAT HAS MONEY, AND FAME. YOUR STANDARDS APPLY ONLY TO BROKE MEN. But when you meet a man who u need more than he needs you and benefit from more than he benfits from you, you can metaphiorcally eat poop if that is what it takes to be around him. Sad part is you guys don't even understand that you are mostly in business and not in love and date opportunistically. I repeat a man of means has a lot of options and you are replaceable and there are not many rich men. Not every man can fly you around the world.i HOPE YOU HAVE THE BRAIN TO UNPACK WHAT I MEAN. Not just Latto, even around me I have seen women tolerate rivals in the same relationship and they are cool when the guy has Mulla. Now think of this, this is a rich lady who also makes the wave and she is accepting this situation. She will not tolerate a broke dude to make this happen. You commit sins in relationships when you are broke

@TheShadeRoom Y’all let men get away with too much. Never will you see babydads hanging & having dinner together. You can be respectable and love a man’s kids without being sister wives. Y’all normalize the weirdest shit. Just be cordial, raise the kids, and communicate when needed. WEIRD.

“Big mama, five kids.”💁🏾‍♀️ Latto linked up with Keyanna Joseph, the mother of 21 Savage‘s children. ✍🏾:#TSRStaffJR

No kid know who they are under 8yrs old heather you are a dog, human, goat and monkey! This is why every parents has a say under the decision making of their kids and they have to do so primarily under 15yrs old. In a generation where we are exposed to the internet and confused it is easy to brainwash kids . So it is incumbent of any parent to make sure they guide their kids to make the right judgement and counsel them and protect them

Maryland Governor Wes Moore says he would let his son go through gender mutilation as a minor if he wanted to. DAVID: “Would you advise him to wait until he’s 18?”   MOORE: “I’m not going to advise him on something that he feels…”

Another retard Souza posting a clip without context and lie to his audience who are too lazy to think and objectively process things. You think you are targeting Tucker but he is just getting bigger and let me educate and expose your stupidity just like I did to Mehdi post “I want to comment on Mehdi Hasan's dishonest post where he says Tucker denied calling Trump the anti-Christ. Here is my rebuttal: You say a lot of things every day, and you may not remember everything. Later in the interview, Tucker apologized if he said that, but he added context when pressed, clarifying that he does not think for certain that Trump is the anti-Christ!!! By apology, I mean that he was conceding to the journalist when she pressed him on whether he actually said it... and then he gave context! Mehdi ignored all of that and even ignored that it was a question in his monologue, not a direct statement Tucker made. Now, in his monologue about Trump’s weird behavior, he did not say for certain Trump is the anti-Christ. He asked a question based on his actions: could this be the anti-Christ? Which does not in any way directly suggest Trump is!!! I did not study English at a high level, but it is a disgrace when I see high-level media personalities like Mehdi show complete manipulation and incompetence in their understanding of that monologue. The interviewer put a question forward to suggest Tucker said Trump is the anti-Christ, and he said no, he didn’t say that. And he is right. The lady twisted his words to land him where she wanted, he denied it, and going by that monologue, he is right. He only asked a question about whether Trump could be the anti-Christ based on his crazy behavior!!!! This is a classic case of trying to find fault for all the wrong reasons!!! And some idiots here, I believe, don’t understand English well enough to understand that the monologue was a question and not an admission by Tucker. He was right to answer the way he did based on how the question was asked. Furthermore, he added context that he doesn't actually believe it. I can’t believe we are here lecturing people on English and calling out the manipulative behavior of Mehdi!! The interviewer put it to him like and I quote “ recently you said Trump is the anti-Christ?” And this is different as Tucker asked a question in his monologue. The interview Lee was putting words in Tucker’s mouth and twist his question!!”

The giveaway here is not Tucker’s denial he called Trump the Anti-Christ. It’s his response when he’s confronted with a video showing he did. At that point, a normal and decent person would say, “You got me,” or “Well, I guess I did.” Not Tucker!

Another idiot who is born in an English speaking country but who doesn’t understand English and would allow his feelings to rob him of the gift to sit and think and process and get context before making a post. Let me educate him like I did to Mehdi and I will post it here “I want to comment on Mehdi Hasan's dishonest post where he says Tucker denied calling Trump the anti-Christ. Here is my rebuttal: You say a lot of things every day, and you may not remember everything. Later in the interview, Tucker apologized if he said that, but he added context when pressed, clarifying that he does not think for certain that Trump is the anti-Christ!!! By apology, I mean that he was conceding to the journalist when she pressed him on whether he actually said it... and then he gave context! Mehdi ignored all of that and even ignored that it was a question in his monologue, not a direct statement Tucker made. Now, in his monologue about Trump’s weird behavior, he did not say for certain Trump is the anti-Christ. He asked a question based on his actions: could this be the anti-Christ? Which does not in any way directly suggest Trump is!!! I did not study English at a high level, but it is a disgrace when I see high-level media personalities like Mehdi show complete manipulation and incompetence in their understanding of that monologue. The interviewer put a question forward to suggest Tucker said Trump is the anti-Christ, and he said no, he didn’t say that. And he is right. The lady twisted his words to land him where she wanted, he denied it, and going by that monologue, he is right. He only asked a question about whether Trump could be the anti-Christ based on his crazy behavior!!!! This is a classic case of trying to find fault for all the wrong reasons!!! And some idiots here, I believe, don’t understand English well enough to understand that the monologue was a question and not an admission by Tucker. He was right to answer the way he did based on how the question was asked. Furthermore, he added context that he doesn't actually believe it. I can’t believe we are here lecturing people on English and calling out the manipulative behavior of Mehdi!! The interviewer put it to him like and I quote “ recently you said Trump is the anti-Christ?” And this is different as Tucker asked a question in his monologue. The interview Lee was putting words in Tucker’s mouth and twist his question!!

Fuck @TuckerCarlson he sold his soul & he’s continually exposing himself . He was also to much of a coward to sit down & debate with me whilst I was in america

This is why I hate the media and only check here once in a while!! They don’t care what the context and truth is!! I may disagree with Tucker or anybody but I have a duty to be fair and that is how I approach things. I can even be the devil’s advocate if they are right. The world is so full of lazy thinkers and most run with that without even pausing to think first, process and analyze the statement first!!

I said this same thing in reply to Mehdi post!! “I want to comment on Mehdi Hasan's dishonest post where he says Tucker denied calling Trump the anti-Christ. Here is my rebuttal: You say a lot of things every day, and you may not remember everything. Later in the interview, Tucker apologized if he said that, but he added context when pressed, clarifying that he does not think for certain that Trump is the anti-Christ!!! By apology, I mean that he was conceding to the journalist when she pressed him on whether he actually said it... and then he gave context! Mehdi ignored all of that and even ignored that it was a question in his monologue, not a direct statement Tucker made. Now, in his monologue about Trump’s weird behavior, he did not say for certain Trump is the anti-Christ. He asked a question based on his actions: could this be the anti-Christ? Which does not in any way directly suggest Trump is!!! I did not study English at a high level, but it is a disgrace when I see high-level media personalities like Mehdi show complete manipulation and incompetence in their understanding of that monologue. The interviewer put a question forward to suggest Tucker said Trump is the anti-Christ, and he said no, he didn’t say that. And he is right. The lady twisted his words to land him where she wanted, he denied it, and going by that monologue, he is right. He only asked a question about whether Trump could be the anti-Christ based on his crazy behavior!!!! This is a classic case of trying to find fault for all the wrong reasons!!! And some idiots here, I believe, don’t understand English well enough to understand that the monologue was a question and not an admission by Tucker. He was right to answer the way he did based on how the question was asked. Furthermore, he added context that he doesn't actually believe it. I can’t believe we are here lecturing people on English and calling out the manipulative behavior of Mehdi!! The interviewer put it to him like and I quote “ recently you said Trump is the anti-Christ?” And this is different as Tucker asked a question in his monologue. The interview was putting words in Tucker’s mouth and twist his question!!”

🇺🇸 Tucker didn't have the best time in the NYT interview. Q: On a recent show, you said this about Trump, "Here's a leader who's mocking the gods of his ancestors, mocking the God of gods and exalting himself above them. Could this be the Antichrist?" Tucker Carlson: I actually did not say, "Could this be the Antichrist?" The reporter plays a clip of Tucker saying, "Could this be the Antichrist?" Tucker: I don't know where that comes from, but I know those words never left my lips because I'm not sure I fully understand what the Antichrist is. Maybe he doesn't like Trump at all, but has pretty much his style 😂

I posted this reply to Mehdi and I will say it here again “I want to comment on Mehdi Hasan's dishonest post where he says Tucker denied calling Trump the anti-Christ. Here is my rebuttal: You say a lot of things every day, and you may not remember everything. Later in the interview, Tucker apologized if he said that, but he added context when pressed, clarifying that he does not think for certain that Trump is the anti-Christ!!! By apology, I mean that he was conceding to the journalist when she pressed him on whether he actually said it... and then he gave context! Mehdi ignored all of that and even ignored that it was a question in his monologue, not a direct statement Tucker made. Now, in his monologue about Trump’s weird behavior, he did not say for certain Trump is the anti-Christ. He asked a question based on his actions: could this be the anti-Christ? Which does not in any way directly suggest Trump is!!! I did not study English at a high level, but it is a disgrace when I see high-level media personalities like Mehdi show complete manipulation and incompetence in their understanding of that monologue. The interviewer put a question forward to suggest Tucker said Trump is the anti-Christ, and he said no, he didn’t say that. And he is right. The lady twisted his words to land him where she wanted, he denied it, and going by that monologue, he is right. He only asked a question about whether Trump could be the anti-Christ based on his crazy behavior!!!! This is a classic case of trying to find fault for all the wrong reasons!!! And some idiots here, I believe, don’t understand English well enough to understand that the monologue was a question and not an admission by Tucker. He was right to answer the way he did based on how the question was asked. Furthermore, he added context that he doesn't actually believe it. I can’t believe we are here lecturing people on English and calling out the manipulative behavior of Mehdi!! The interviewer put it to him like and I quote “ recently you said Trump is the anti-Christ?” And this is different as Tucker asked a question in his monologue. The interview Lee was putting words in Tucker’s mouth and twist his question!!”

What the ever living fuck is going on with these people lying in the most insane way possible

Another lie here and complete misrepresentation taken out of context and I will say here what I said to mehdi “I want to comment on Mehdi Hasan's dishonest post where he says Tucker denied calling Trump the anti-Christ. Here is my rebuttal: You say a lot of things every day, and you may not remember everything. Later in the interview, Tucker apologized if he said that, but he added context when pressed, clarifying that he does not think for certain that Trump is the anti-Christ!!! By apology, I mean that he was conceding to the journalist when she pressed him on whether he actually said it... and then he gave context! Mehdi ignored all of that and even ignored that it was a question in his monologue, not a direct statement Tucker made. Now, in his monologue about Trump’s weird behavior, he did not say for certain Trump is the anti-Christ. He asked a question based on his actions: could this be the anti-Christ? Which does not in any way directly suggest Trump is!!! I did not study English at a high level, but it is a disgrace when I see high-level media personalities like Mehdi show complete manipulation and incompetence in their understanding of that monologue. The interviewer put a question forward to suggest Tucker said Trump is the anti-Christ, and he said no, he didn’t say that. And he is right. The lady twisted his words to land him where she wanted, he denied it, and going by that monologue, he is right. He only asked a question about whether Trump could be the anti-Christ based on his crazy behavior!!!! This is a classic case of trying to find fault for all the wrong reasons!!! And some idiots here, I believe, don’t understand English well enough to understand that the monologue was a question and not an admission by Tucker. He was right to answer the way he did based on how the question was asked. Furthermore, he added context that he doesn't actually believe it. I can’t believe we are here lecturing people on English and calling out the manipulative behavior of Mehdi!! The interviewer put it to him like and I quote “ recently you said Trump is the anti-Christ?” And this is different as Tucker asked a question in his monologue. The interview Lee was putting words in Tucker’s mouth and twist his question!!”

I want to comment on Mehdi Hasan's dishonest post where he says Tucker denied calling Trump the anti-Christ. Here is my rebuttal: You say a lot of things every day, and you may not remember everything. Later in the interview, Tucker apologized if he said that, but he added context when pressed, clarifying that he does not think for certain that Trump is the anti-Christ!!! By apology, I mean that he was conceding to the journalist when she pressed him on whether he actually said it... and then he gave context! Mehdi ignored all of that and even ignored that it was a question in his monologue, not a direct statement Tucker made. Now, in his monologue about Trump’s weird behavior, he did not say for certain Trump is the anti-Christ. He asked a question based on his actions: could this be the anti-Christ? Which does not in any way directly suggest Trump is!!! I did not study English at a high level, but it is a disgrace when I see high-level media personalities like Mehdi show complete manipulation and incompetence in their understanding of that monologue. The interviewer put a question forward to suggest Tucker said Trump is the anti-Christ, and he said no, he didn’t say that. And he is right. The lady twisted his words to land him where she wanted, he denied it, and going by that monologue, he is right. He only asked a question about whether Trump could be the anti-Christ based on his crazy behavior!!!! This is a classic case of trying to find fault for all the wrong reasons!!! And some idiots here, I believe, don’t understand English well enough to understand that the monologue was a question and not an admission by Tucker. He was right to answer the way he did based on how the question was asked. Furthermore, he added context that he doesn't actually believe it. I can’t believe we are here lecturing people on English and calling out the manipulative behavior of Mehdi!! The interviewer put it to him like and I quote “ recently you said Trump is the anti-Christ?” And this is different as Tucker asked a question in his monologue. The interview Lee was putting words in Tucker’s mouth and twist his question!!

Mehdi, can we just please put the partisan games away for one second and realize we need members of both sides to fight this fight? I’m genuinely asking politely and sincerely. He’s constantly under fire for exposing the truth about our relationship with Israel. You don’t have to sleep with him. You don’t have to love him or even like him. But please don’t join forces with Zionists to bury him on this issue. He’s right on Israel. We should encourage that.

Hey @cenkuygur and other fellow antiwar leftists, I get the desire to ally with antiwar rightists in this moment, but this is one of the many (many!) reasons I still have issues with Carlson: he lies so easily and casually and demonstrably. It’s a trust issue with him.

I want to comment on Mehdi Hasan's dishonest post where he says Tucker denied calling Trump the anti-Christ. Here is my rebuttal: You say a lot of things every day, and you may not remember everything. Later in the interview, Tucker apologized if he said that, but he added context when pressed, clarifying that he does not think for certain that Trump is the anti-Christ!!! By apology, I mean that he was conceding to the journalist when she pressed him on whether he actually said it... and then he gave context! Mehdi ignored all of that and even ignored that it was a question in his monologue, not a direct statement Tucker made. Now, in his monologue about Trump’s weird behavior, he did not say for certain Trump is the anti-Christ. He asked a question based on his actions: could this be the anti-Christ? Which does not in any way directly suggest Trump is!!! I did not study English at a high level, but it is a disgrace when I see high-level media personalities like Mehdi show complete manipulation and incompetence in their understanding of that monologue. The interviewer put a question forward to suggest Tucker said Trump is the anti-Christ, and he said no, he didn’t say that. And he is right. The lady twisted his words to land him where she wanted, he denied it, and going by that monologue, he is right. He only asked a question about whether Trump could be the anti-Christ based on his crazy behavior!!!! This is a classic case of trying to find fault for all the wrong reasons!!! And some idiots here, I believe, don’t understand English well enough to understand that the monologue was a question and not an admission by Tucker. He was right to answer the way he did based on how the question was asked. Furthermore, he added context that he doesn't actually believe it. I can’t believe we are here lecturing people on English and calling out the manipulative behavior of Mehdi!! The interviewer put it to him like and I quote “ recently you said Trump is the anti-Christ?” And this is different as Tucker asked a question in his monologue. The interview Lee was putting words in Tucker’s mouth and twist his question!!

Mehdi, I genuinely don't understand why you think in this binary way. That in order to be allies with someone on an issue, you have to vouch for that person in their entirety and every policy position they have. No, you just have to be an ally on that issue. Martin Luther King, Jr. became allies with Lyndon Johnson, who was often viciously racist behind the scenes and got countless people killed in Vietnam. Should King have canceled Johnson instead of working with him to pass the Civil Rights Act? If you're house is on fire and someone comes with a hose, you don't ask him about what his policy is on the carried interest loophole, you thank him for the help. If you hadn't noticed, Israel lit our house on fire.

I want to comment on Mehdi Hasan's dishonest post where he says Tucker denied calling Trump the anti-Christ. Here is my rebuttal: You say a lot of things every day, and you may not remember everything. Later in the interview, Tucker apologized if he said that, but he added context when pressed, clarifying that he does not think for certain that Trump is the anti-Christ!!! By apology, I mean that he was conceding to the journalist when she pressed him on whether he actually said it... and then he gave context! Mehdi ignored all of that and even ignored that it was a question in his monologue, not a direct statement Tucker made. Now, in his monologue about Trump’s weird behavior, he did not say for certain Trump is the anti-Christ. He asked a question based on his actions: could this be the anti-Christ? Which does not in any way directly suggest Trump is!!! I did not study English at a high level, but it is a disgrace when I see high-level media personalities like Mehdi show complete manipulation and incompetence in their understanding of that monologue. The interviewer put a question forward to suggest Tucker said Trump is the anti-Christ, and he said no, he didn’t say that. And he is right. The lady twisted his words to land him where she wanted, he denied it, and going by that monologue, he is right. He only asked a question about whether Trump could be the anti-Christ based on his crazy behavior!!!! This is a classic case of trying to find fault for all the wrong reasons!!! And some idiots here, I believe, don’t understand English well enough to understand that the monologue was a question and not an admission by Tucker. He was right to answer the way he did based on how the question was asked. Furthermore, he added context that he doesn't actually believe it. I can’t believe we are here lecturing people on English and calling out the manipulative behavior of Mehdi!! The interviewer put it to him like and I quote “ recently you said Trump is the anti-Christ?” And this is different as Tucker asked a question in his monologue. The interview Lee was putting words in Tucker’s mouth and twist his question!!

I am doing fairly well for myself and grateful. Now there is something I don’t understand about men even as a man. Why is it that men especially successful black men mostly have this damaged mindset to chase women that are known “pass arounds in the industry” ? What really makes those women attractive to men especially men who have a lot of options? What really made those ladies attractive to them? Just like the Kim and others!!! Is their p*ssy special or is it that they don’t shit like other innocent girls or what!!! We are so damaged as a generation and it is sad. What is really special about such run arounds? I thought when you have money and everything you should have some self respect and esteem and are in a position to really make good choices! But these guys are just fascinated with the idea of rolling with the industry who*es!!!! I think I need to do a research on this!!! Even as a man who is not at the level of those guys in term of financial success, if you put Megan and a fine and innocent village lady with no name

Megan Thee Stallion went live and started being NASTY with her NEW man just one day after breaking up with Klay Thompson over cheating rumors 😬👀 "Y'all meet my new man I'm done with athletes they all cheat" "And Klay still gotta send me $300k a month I secured the bag"

WOW - Charlie Was Right‼️🔥 #usa #america #israel #palestine #iran #polit... youtube.com/shorts/6fjpu93… via @YouTube @TuckerCarlson @RealCandaceO @ComicDaveSmith @RealAlexJones @NickJFuentes @MegynKellyShow

@sostalksmoney @TuckerCarlson Adam you are the dumbest success stories i have seen. You must be dumb to believe the propaganda polls you see to sell a narrative.

GOODNIGHT SWEET PRINCE @TuckerCarlson 📉📉📉

@marklevinshow This guy looks like a ghost. Fucking retard

We’re living in a media environment where anyone can say anything—and too many people are abusing it. I take on the explosion of podcasts and so-called 'influencers" and expose how some are using these platforms to mislead, divide, and attack the very principles they claim to defend. I break down the difference between serious voices and opportunists, and why figures like Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon, Megyn Kelly, and Candace Owens are at the center of a broader problem in today’s media landscape. This isn’t just about personalities—it’s about credibility, influence, and the future of conservative discourse. New media was supposed to challenge the establishment—but without standards, it can also create chaos, misinformation, and manipulation. If you’re not paying attention, you’re being influenced by it. This is about media, truth, and who you can actually trust. Watch the entire episode: Rumble: rumble.com/v786owk-ep022-… YouTube: youtu.be/KeQ06s7Uxd0

I voted for Trump, but I’ve started seeing a pattern that deeply concerns me. It began with the way he treats people who actually risked everything to get him elected — people like Elon Musk, who poured millions into the campaign, put his companies and employees in the crosshairs, and literally had his cars and factories attacked. Yet the moment someone disagrees with him, Trump turns on them and starts the name-calling. I’ve watched the same thing with brilliant, accomplished people he once praised: the second they push back, they suddenly become “idiots” and “low-IQ.” Former friends, allies, anyone who steps out of line gets the same treatment. That pattern woke me up. Trump may be richer than Candace Owens, Megyn Kelly, Tucker Carlson, or Dave Smith, but he is nowhere near more talented than they are. They built empires from nothing. He inherited a head start. The comparison doesn’t hold. It takes a special kind of denial to still take him seriously when he attacks his own core base the moment they exercise independent thought. If the only acceptable relationship is total agreement with zero criticism, then you’re not supporting a leader — you’re a mental slave. Free thinkers are not “disloyal”; they’re the ones who actually built this movement. The people he’s smearing are not what he calls them. He made the Epstein files a campaign issue no one forced him to touch. Now that the public is simply reminding him of his own promise, he lashes out as if he expected a free pass. Same with “no new wars.” He campaigned on peace, and the moment people hold him to it, he starts attacking everyone who notices. Worse, he’s putting the entire GOP in a terrible position. This behavior is going to crush us in the midterms and make the next presidential cycle even harder. He doesn’t seem to care about the future of the party — and why would he? He’s not running again. From a purely strategic standpoint, he is destroying the coalition that got him elected. Look at who he’s going after: Tucker, Candace, Megyn, Alex Jones, Dave Smith, and many others. These are voices with tens of millions of loyal followers who don’t need Trump’s validation. They built their own audiences and their own brands. The party needs them for messaging and turnout. Trump can call them whatever he wants, but he’s not hurting them — he’s hurting us. He speaks glowingly about Mark Levin, who has a fraction of their reach, while torching people who actually move the needle with voters. That’s not leadership. That’s ego. Trump should expect disagreement. It’s natural. But treating every critic — especially those inside his own coalition — like an enemy is not only childish, it’s strategically suicidal. He’s cocky, egocentric, and increasingly reckless. And the more he doubles down, the more he proves the very point he refuses to see. MAGA was never supposed to be a cult of personality. It was supposed to be about ideas bigger than any one man. The moment we forget that, we lose everything we fought for. Trump want to turn the GOP like the cult thinking DEMS and the GOP has a history of independent thinkers. He is fucking around and he will begin to find out in the midterms. The polls he sees on CNN are deceiving but he will find out soon. I voted for him but his behavior has been crazy , ungrateful and unpresidential. He is the only president I have seen who pick fights daily with people and use this bully tactics always when you disagree with him.

Trump is attacking them now because they all oppose the Iran war, and have all been increasingly critical of the Israeli govt. As have Joe Rogan, Theo Von, me and many others who have good relations with Trump. He should stop lashing out, and listen to his friends.

I voted for Trump, but I’ve started seeing a pattern that deeply concerns me. It began with the way he treats people who actually risked everything to get him elected — people like Elon Musk, who poured millions into the campaign, put his companies and employees in the crosshairs, and literally had his cars and factories attacked. Yet the moment someone disagrees with him, Trump turns on them and starts the name-calling. I’ve watched the same thing with brilliant, accomplished people he once praised: the second they push back, they suddenly become “idiots” and “low-IQ.” Former friends, allies, anyone who steps out of line gets the same treatment. That pattern woke me up. Trump may be richer than Candace Owens, Megyn Kelly, Tucker Carlson, or Dave Smith, but he is nowhere near more talented than they are. They built empires from nothing. He inherited a head start. The comparison doesn’t hold. It takes a special kind of denial to still take him seriously when he attacks his own core base the moment they exercise independent thought. If the only acceptable relationship is total agreement with zero criticism, then you’re not supporting a leader — you’re a mental slave. Free thinkers are not “disloyal”; they’re the ones who actually built this movement. The people he’s smearing are not what he calls them. He made the Epstein files a campaign issue no one forced him to touch. Now that the public is simply reminding him of his own promise, he lashes out as if he expected a free pass. Same with “no new wars.” He campaigned on peace, and the moment people hold him to it, he starts attacking everyone who notices. Worse, he’s putting the entire GOP in a terrible position. This behavior is going to crush us in the midterms and make the next presidential cycle even harder. He doesn’t seem to care about the future of the party — and why would he? He’s not running again. From a purely strategic standpoint, he is destroying the coalition that got him elected. Look at who he’s going after: Tucker, Candace, Megyn, Alex Jones, Dave Smith, and many others. These are voices with tens of millions of loyal followers who don’t need Trump’s validation. They built their own audiences and their own brands. The party needs them for messaging and turnout. Trump can call them whatever he wants, but he’s not hurting them — he’s hurting us. He speaks glowingly about Mark Levin, who has a fraction of their reach, while torching people who actually move the needle with voters. That’s not leadership. That’s ego. Trump should expect disagreement. It’s natural. But treating every critic — especially those inside his own coalition — like an enemy is not only childish, it’s strategically suicidal. He’s cocky, egocentric, and increasingly reckless. And the more he doubles down, the more he proves the very point he refuses to see. MAGA was never supposed to be a cult of personality. It was supposed to be about ideas bigger than any one man. The moment we forget that, we lose everything we fought for.

CNN plays a montage of Trump praising Megyn Kelly, Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and Alex Jones

This guy is new in the game but he understands a timeless lesson that he is using to get along with the president. You may not agree with him but get along with him. His the the number one man in the USA and of what benefit will it be to deliver for New York to engage in a fight with the man he may need for many things. He is not dumb like other crack heads. If I were him if you liek call Trump any ugly name in the book, I will also be his closest friend and not pick fights with him and I believe I will get many things done for him my constituents. Beside Trump is a New York guy partly and has business there he will want to help that guy and that guy may have good advisers that may have told him hey “this game is too big and you are not bigger than the program. Don’t be dumb and play the dumb games those crack heads play. Work with the president!!! Could you imagine he is has secured the release of one person and even talking for three! He knows he is not bigger than the authority of president and by talking to the president directly he can get many things done for his people without all this crack head show!!! He knows what he is doing

Just got off the phone with President Trump. In our meeting earlier, I shared my concerns about Columbia student Elmina Aghayeva, who was detained by ICE this morning. He has just informed me that she will be released imminently.

I am in my 30’s and as educated as I am I never paid attention to understand the Jews mentality about Jesus. Only last year did I reliaze that the jews don't rate Jesus or see him as anything other than a their or whatever and in fact I heard Shapiro say crazy things about him. Now this is my logic, if I am supposed to root for Israel and this same nation talk down on Jesus, am I supposed to uphold my support for them? This is my struggle. And I lean 70% right now to NO! My second struggle also is why is it that the jews are trying so hard to silent, call an it-semite and demonize anyone who disagree with Israel? And they do so heavily. They are using tehei media and wealth power to try so hard to demonize and silent those who disagree with them. Lastly, I am also troubled to accept that they are the special and chosen ones. How can a certain set of people just be that over others?

“If you want to find out what j*ws think of Jesus go read the talmud”

Sadly he is not interested for re-election and I always say that if they are not careful he is going to fuck up things and may take time for us to recovery and gain power again. And the danger is that he doesn't have that urgency becusee he is on his way out which is why the ones that are ambitions should speak now and let him understand the risk of what is happening for the party.

Andy Frisella warns President Donald Trump: "You've lost touch with your base. Your kids will be blackballed from America, your legacy will be ruined, and the Trump name will be a joke."